You are right...he has to be at least in the conversation. He just produces. A late bloomer that has obviously worked his rear off to get to this level. Hard not to root for.Is it time to start thinking of Thielen as the best WR in the league?
That route he ran on that 24 yard diving catch was insane good.
It's just crazy how he makes DBs get off balance like he did at the top of that route on the 24 yard catch.You are right...he has to be at least in the conversation. He just produces. A late bloomer that has obviously worked his rear off to get to this level. Hard not to root for.
M V P
Pin it.
![]()
As a Thielen owner I would reject any trade. In the league I have him we have a 100+ rec bonus, PPR. He’s the WR1 - why would I trade him for a big name with that kind of production?Tempted to offer a big name WR to see if the owner will bite on a trade
never know. Sometimes, people think the train has to come to the station and sell high earlier than they should. inverse reason people won't sell a big name when they should.As a Thielen owner I would reject any trade. In the league I have him we have a 100+ rec bonus, PPR. He’s the WR1 - why would I trade him for a big name with that kind of production?
![]()
It’s 6 straight 100+ games. Clearly he’s become Cousins #1 target.never know. Sometimes, people think the train has to come to the station and sell high earlier than they should. inverse reason people won't sell a big name when they should.
I know. I was gonna offer OBJ and a throw in RB2, cause he has no depth at RB. Again, it's a big name, who has been under-performing, but has a great track record of finishing in top 5. If he declines, no harm.It’s 6 straight 100+ games. Clearly he’s become Cousins #1 target.
I guess it doesn’t hurt to try, but it’d better be “name receiver + something” or I don’t see what the point is.
99.999% chance of rejection.I know. I was gonna offer OBJ and a throw in RB2, cause he has no depth at RB. Again, it's a big name, who has been under-performing, but has a great track record of finishing in top 5. If he declines, no harm.
I’m assume this is a redraft league and not Dynasty correct?I know. I was gonna offer OBJ and a throw in RB2, cause he has no depth at RB. Again, it's a big name, who has been under-performing, but has a great track record of finishing in top 5. If he declines, no harm.
so you are saying there is a chance?Hot Sauce Guy said:99.999% chance of rejection.
On pace for a 150-1880-10 season........
398 points in PPR......
his pace goes up almost every gameMilkman said:He is the Minnesota #1. He has been for 20+ games.
On pace for 154-1898-11
409 points in PPR
I thought he'd have a big year but he didn't fall to me at the right place in any of my drafts. He's going to be a 1st round pick next year if he holds up.Man, I didn't see this coming. I thought last year was the one magic year that people would be chasing for the next five, always to be crushed. Wrong.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
Before sending the offer he inquired by email, where I told him he would have to knock my socks off. His socks must come off easy.Offered Ryan Grant + 2019 1st
He's the best receiver in the league. It's a great story too! What a journey he took.Rec: 9/110, 1 ReTD (34)
At least I don't feel so alone in under rating Adam Thielen as this list of folks who know some things about football seem to still be doing so.
And Thielen has outscored Julio in FF over at least the last 23 games......At least I don't feel so alone in under rating Adam Thielen as this list of folks who know some things about football seem to still be doing so.
What makes a WR the best is a bit different for every person you might ask as well.
An interesting angle by Clay who seems to think that slot routes are not as important as outside routes. I am not sure I agree with that but I seem to recall reading something from pff making that argument. I am undecided about that, would need to think about it some more.
As I have mentioned before yards per target can be a way to compare receivers who are getting similar volume of targets and a independent way to measure which players are more efficient. All of the players mentioned in the article are great receivers and deserving of being considered the best. Yards per target is a way to try to measure their relative effectiveness.
Adam Thielen has been outstanding in this metric since he became a starter. WR average something like 8.4 yards per target and good seasons for these players will almost always be below 9 yards per target. 8.8 for example is above average and for a WR getting a lot of targets will usually be higher than their career average yards per target, or a 3 year average of yards per target, which if they are good will be maybe 8.6 or something.
Adam Thielen is averaging 9.2 yards per target this season. He averaged 9 ypt last season (on 142 targets) and averaged 10.5 yards per target in 2016 (didnt start 6 games).
The 3 year average for Adam Thielen right now is 9.4 yards per target.
Using the 3 year average eliminates the problem of small sample size which can be misleading with metrics like this.
Using the same 3 year average for the other WR argued as better than Thielen:
Julio Jones 10.2 yards per target
Antonio Brown 8.5 yards per target
AJ Green 8.5 yards per target
Mike Evans 8 yards per target
Odell Beckham 7.9 yards per target
DeAndre Hopkins 7.7 yards per target
So Julio Jones has been better than Thielen by this metric. Thats it.
Adam Thielen caught seven passes for 103 yards and a touchdown in the Vikings' Week 8 loss to the Saints.
Thielen went over 100 yards again this week. He also set an NFL record for the most catches in the first eight games of a season. Thielen's touchdown didn’t come until late in the fourth quarter on a goal-line pass from Kirk Cousins. It was another dominant effort from Thielen, but the story of the game was a costly red-zone fumble he lost that flipped the momentum for the Saints. Thielen has been playing at an MVP level this season and will remain a locked-in WR1 for Week 9 against Lions.
Oct 28 - 11:32 PM
Maybe, but I hope Diggs plays. Thielen may be tripled covered if Diggs is out.Thielen goingbto get 14+ targets if Diggs is out.
Why would Diggs be out?Thielen goingbto get 14+ targets if Diggs is out.
DNP today. Supposed rib injury. Of course, it's Wednesday so probably just a maintenance day.Why would Diggs be out?
I read some kind of core injury. He's probably playing and even though Thielen would surely get even more targets not sure the efficiency would be there.Why would Diggs be out?
Ah - yeah, missed practice with “undisclosed” - saw someone tweet that it was a maintenance day. I haven’t seen any updates indicating he was in jeopardy of missing the week though. CVS doesn’t even have a Red Cross on him.I read some kind of core injury. He's probably playing and even tjough Thielen would sure get even more targets not sure the efficiency would be there.