FarFromHome
Footballguy
Not a bad idea if you can get at wr3 or low end wr2 prices. I'd assume few Wilson owners are gonna sell low though.Going to spend my day making offers for Wilson.
Not a bad idea if you can get at wr3 or low end wr2 prices. I'd assume few Wilson owners are gonna sell low though.Going to spend my day making offers for Wilson.
I think the point @JohnnyU made is the key here. It doesn't matter what we think of Adams at this point of his career, it's what Rodgers thinks. Until proven otherwise i'm going to bet that he is going to treat him like he was the 2020 version. I still think Wilson has tons of value in fantasy for the reasons I stated above, but I'd be very surprised if Adams doesn't lead the team in targets the rest of the season provided he is healthy.some of you may be confusing D. Adams with his 2020 version. Obviously this hurts Wilson a little, but if it leads to more first downs, more plays, and more scoring, it could end up being neutral.
I’m not saying he’s the same WR he was four years ago but I’ll say just from what I watched of him this season he is still elite in all the facets he was back then. Factor in the familiarity he already has with Rodgers and this could be a great situation for his owners.some of you may be confusing D. Adams with his 2020 version. Obviously this hurts Wilson a little, but if it leads to more first downs, more plays, and more scoring, it could end up being neutral.
he may very well. there were 34 targets last night. my point is that this is obviously an overall boost to the offense. Let's say next week there are 40 targets. Could easily seeI think the point @JohnnyU made is the key here. It doesn't matter what we think of Adams at this point of his career, it's what Rodgers thinks. Until proven otherwise i'm going to bet that he is going to treat him like he was the 2020 version. I still think Wilson has tons of value in fantasy for the reasons I stated above, but I'd be very surprised if Adams doesn't lead the team in targets the rest of the season provided he is healthy.some of you may be confusing D. Adams with his 2020 version. Obviously this hurts Wilson a little, but if it leads to more first downs, more plays, and more scoring, it could end up being neutral.
As a Wilson owner it makes zero sense to do that coming off of his two best games of the season, both 100yd and a TD. That's when his owners might have been trying to sell high. Nothing to do but hold right now.Not a bad idea if you can get at wr3 or low end wr2 prices. I'd assume few Wilson owners are gonna sell low though.Going to spend my day making offers for Wilson.
More like how people who got Nico at a dip after they made a similar trade for Diggs felt......and some people put burn marks on their arm with a cigarette for similar reasons.Going to spend my day making offers for Wilson.
In the end what we do is math. You outlined 40 passing attempts. I can't imagine the Jets going into each game thinking Rodgers needs 40 passing attempts. They have had losing game scripts most weeks and he has hit 40 attempts in only 2 of 6 games.he may very well. there were 34 targets last night. my point is that this is obviously an overall boost to the offense. Let's say next week there are 40 targets. Could easily seeI think the point @JohnnyU made is the key here. It doesn't matter what we think of Adams at this point of his career, it's what Rodgers thinks. Until proven otherwise i'm going to bet that he is going to treat him like he was the 2020 version. I still think Wilson has tons of value in fantasy for the reasons I stated above, but I'd be very surprised if Adams doesn't lead the team in targets the rest of the season provided he is healthy.some of you may be confusing D. Adams with his 2020 version. Obviously this hurts Wilson a little, but if it leads to more first downs, more plays, and more scoring, it could end up being neutral.
Adams - 10
Wilson - 8
Lazard - 6
Hall - 5
Conklin - 5
Others - 6
seems plausible
I suppose. I believe most of those targets will go to your top 3 listed, possibly more.he may very well. there were 34 targets last night. my point is that this is obviously an overall boost to the offense. Let's say next week there are 40 targets. Could easily seeI think the point @JohnnyU made is the key here. It doesn't matter what we think of Adams at this point of his career, it's what Rodgers thinks. Until proven otherwise i'm going to bet that he is going to treat him like he was the 2020 version. I still think Wilson has tons of value in fantasy for the reasons I stated above, but I'd be very surprised if Adams doesn't lead the team in targets the rest of the season provided he is healthy.some of you may be confusing D. Adams with his 2020 version. Obviously this hurts Wilson a little, but if it leads to more first downs, more plays, and more scoring, it could end up being neutral.
Adams - 10
Wilson - 8
Lazard - 6
Hall - 5
Conklin - 5
Others - 6
seems plausible
i'm assuming the offensive production improvesIn the end what we do is math. You outlined 40 passing attempts. I can't imagine the Jets going into each game thinking Rodgers needs 40 passing attempts. They have had losing game scripts most weeks and he has hit 40 attempts in only 2 of 6 games.he may very well. there were 34 targets last night. my point is that this is obviously an overall boost to the offense. Let's say next week there are 40 targets. Could easily seeI think the point @JohnnyU made is the key here. It doesn't matter what we think of Adams at this point of his career, it's what Rodgers thinks. Until proven otherwise i'm going to bet that he is going to treat him like he was the 2020 version. I still think Wilson has tons of value in fantasy for the reasons I stated above, but I'd be very surprised if Adams doesn't lead the team in targets the rest of the season provided he is healthy.some of you may be confusing D. Adams with his 2020 version. Obviously this hurts Wilson a little, but if it leads to more first downs, more plays, and more scoring, it could end up being neutral.
Adams - 10
Wilson - 8
Lazard - 6
Hall - 5
Conklin - 5
Others - 6
seems plausible
That's my hope as a Wilson owner and a Jets fan, that Adams opens up the offense, extends drives and gives Wilson and Hall better opportunities to make plays. I'm not doom and gloom for Wilson by any means, I just think it is realistic to expect Adams to get a lot of targets and Wilson's very high target share to decrease a bit.he may very well. there were 34 targets last night. my point is that this is obviously an overall boost to the offense. Let's say next week there are 40 targets. Could easily seeI think the point @JohnnyU made is the key here. It doesn't matter what we think of Adams at this point of his career, it's what Rodgers thinks. Until proven otherwise i'm going to bet that he is going to treat him like he was the 2020 version. I still think Wilson has tons of value in fantasy for the reasons I stated above, but I'd be very surprised if Adams doesn't lead the team in targets the rest of the season provided he is healthy.some of you may be confusing D. Adams with his 2020 version. Obviously this hurts Wilson a little, but if it leads to more first downs, more plays, and more scoring, it could end up being neutral.
Adams - 10
Wilson - 8
Lazard - 6
Hall - 5
Conklin - 5
Others - 6
seems plausible
Someone mentioned it earlier and I agree. Only person that benefits with this trade is Rodgers. I can see a path where he is a top 10 fantasy QB rest of season. Everyone else takes a hit. I can see Mike Williams fighting to stay active each week. Kinda surprised he wasn't involved in deal. He just looks like a Raider.
Maybe the pace improves when he has Adams and Wilson?Someone mentioned it earlier and I agree. Only person that benefits with this trade is Rodgers. I can see a path where he is a top 10 fantasy QB rest of season. Everyone else takes a hit. I can see Mike Williams fighting to stay active each week. Kinda surprised he wasn't involved in deal. He just looks like a Raider.
Jets are running a very low number of plays cause Rodgers wastes a lot of play clock. I do not see top 10 with that approach
It seems like some people are forgetting about the 2022 version of Davante. Hell the 2023 version of Davante was pretty amazing too considering he had Aidan O'Connell, Jimmy Garrappolo and Brian freaking Hoyer throwing to him, on a team that went through a mid season coaching change.some of you may be confusing D. Adams with his 2020 version. Obviously this hurts Wilson a little, but if it leads to more first downs, more plays, and more scoring, it could end up being neutral.
I'd say the guy taking the hit is Lazard who is currently 24th in the league among WR's for targets. Granted some injuries to other WR's and bye weeks but he's still 67th in the entire NFL for all positions in team target share.Biggest hit in value is Breece Hall’s PPR value IMO
I think being a big bodied, fast receiver who can get downfield will always be valuable. Lazard saw more targets but so much of his fantasy damage is on long bombs and touchdowns. MW’s is no longer a factor IMO, his targets will mostly go to Lazard, as they served somewhat similar roles from what I have gathered. Maybe 3-6 targets a game, but with a higher ADOT and softer coverage.I'd say the guy taking the hit is Lazard who is currently 24th in the league among WR's for targets. Granted some injuries to other WR's and bye weeks but he's still 67th in the entire NFL for all positions in team target share.Biggest hit in value is Breece Hall’s PPR value IMO
Mike Williams and Lazard combined for just over 8 targets a game. I'd venture to guess that drops down to 3-4 a week between those two, with the idea that MW is not active for as long as he's on the team.
Except Lazard is not fast.I think being a big bodied, fast receiver who can get downfield will always be valuable. Lazard saw more targets but so much of his fantasy damage is on long bombs and touchdowns. MW’s is no longer a factor IMO, his targets will mostly go to Lazard, as they served somewhat similar roles from what I have gathered. Maybe 3-6 targets a game, but with a higher ADOT and softer coverage.I'd say the guy taking the hit is Lazard who is currently 24th in the league among WR's for targets. Granted some injuries to other WR's and bye weeks but he's still 67th in the entire NFL for all positions in team target share.Biggest hit in value is Breece Hall’s PPR value IMO
Mike Williams and Lazard combined for just over 8 targets a game. I'd venture to guess that drops down to 3-4 a week between those two, with the idea that MW is not active for as long as he's on the team.
Think Tee Higgins as the very best scenario.Not a dream come true by any means, but I don't think it's a huge hit to his value.
Rodgers probably looks to pass more with the combination of Adams and Wilson. Wilson goes from being the absolute focus of the secondary to being the 2nd option, as crazy as that is. He should be open a lot.
I think that's a fair comparison.Think Tee Higgins at the very best scenario.Not a dream come true by any means, but I don't think it's a huge hit to his value.
Rodgers probably looks to pass more with the combination of Adams and Wilson. Wilson goes from being the absolute focus of the secondary to being the 2nd option, as crazy as that is. He should be open a lot.
I think Tee is a better athlete. Burrow in 2024>Rodgers in 2024. The Bengals have a worse running game, worse defense, and want to pass more.
Wilson I think is better at route running and getting open. The Jets obviously should look to pass a good bit more now that they've added Adams.
I can't say I agree with most of this, no offense. But specifically....It's a double edged sword with Wilson and Adams for sure. On one hand, Adams will be Rodgers safety blanket and first read. Adams will see a ton of targets imo. On the other hand, Adams will also get a ton of attention from opposing D's, thus opening things up for Wilson more.
Overall I still think this will hurt Wilson, but not to the extend where people need to send him off for nothing.
Maybe so in the sense that since Tee returned he's got more targets then Chase on the whole and in 3 of their 4 games together.Think Tee Higgins as the very best scenario.
So you would trade Chase for Higgins?Maybe so in the sense that since Tee returned he's got more targets then Chase on the whole and in 3 of their 4 games together.Think Tee Higgins as the very best scenario.
None taken.I can't say I agree with most of this, no offense. But specifically....It's a double edged sword with Wilson and Adams for sure. On one hand, Adams will be Rodgers safety blanket and first read. Adams will see a ton of targets imo. On the other hand, Adams will also get a ton of attention from opposing D's, thus opening things up for Wilson more.
Overall I still think this will hurt Wilson, but not to the extend where people need to send him off for nothing.
I don't think Adams will be his first read or some target monster relative to Wilson. Key to note the relative to Wilson part. I think it's more of a 1A/1B situation.
I also don't think Adams is going to get more attention from opposing D's, again relative to Wilson. I just don't think defensive coordinators fear him more then Wilson. I know money mattered but there is a reason no teams were paying a second for Davante. He's still good, he's not what he once was though.
These are not the same players they were in GB.
That's not relative to me because Chase does not need the volume someone like Davante does.So you would trade Chase for Higgins?Maybe so in the sense that since Tee returned he's got more targets then Chase on the whole and in 3 of their 4 games together.Think Tee Higgins as the very best scenario.
I just don't agree, at all.Like I said here and in another thread, Adams is still very much an elite WR. He is simply better than GW.
Is this based on box score scouting or what exactly?I just don't agree, at all.Like I said here and in another thread, Adams is still very much an elite WR. He is simply better than GW.
…..but…..but..,,but he’s 32. He must not be elite any longer. Yeah, that’s the ticket.Is this based on box score scouting or what exactly?I just don't agree, at all.Like I said here and in another thread, Adams is still very much an elite WR. He is simply better than GW.
Where is Rich Kotite when you need him? I think the Jets are going to go on a run. Let’s hope for their fans it isn’t to the restroom.The answer to the J-E-T-S problems
Saleh gone
Adams coming in
All is well in Jetland....![]()
No but I'd ask the same question to you.Is this based on box score scouting or what exactly?I just don't agree, at all.Like I said here and in another thread, Adams is still very much an elite WR. He is simply better than GW.
Most accurate statement you've made in this thread today.…..but…..but..,,but he’s 32. He must not be elite any longer. Yeah, that’s the ticket.Is this based on box score scouting or what exactly?I just don't agree, at all.Like I said here and in another thread, Adams is still very much an elite WR. He is simply better than GW.
Most accurate statement you've made in this thread today.…..but…..but..,,but he’s 32. He must not be elite any longer. Yeah, that’s the ticket.Is this based on box score scouting or what exactly?I just don't agree, at all.Like I said here and in another thread, Adams is still very much an elite WR. He is simply better than GW.
It’s rare, but we’ve seen it time and time again over the years from elite wrs. They are simply a different breed, and Adams certainly falls into that category.only WRs i see in the top 25 that are Adams' age are Diggs (6) and Evans (15). It's rare for a reason. Add a 40-year old QB, granted an all-timer, but i don't see "elite"
Notice how long ago those seasons were though? I've been beating this drum to death here last few years and that RB's and WR's are aging out worse then ever.It’s rare, but we’ve seen it time and time again over the years from elite wrs. They are simply a different breed, and Adams certainly falls into that category.only WRs i see in the top 25 that are Adams' age are Diggs (6) and Evans (15). It's rare for a reason. Add a 40-year old QB, granted an all-timer, but i don't see "elite"
Larry Fitzgerald
Reggie Wayne
Anquan Boldin
Steve Smith
Roddy White
Andre Johnson
That’s off the top of my head.
Let's not forget the love affair Rodgers has with a mediocre Lazard.It doesn't matter if Adams gets more targets than Wilson, what matters is the quality of targets. Likely Adams will draw the the best CB. I can see Wilson being open a ton.
Where I think Wilson's value takes a dive is targets near the goalline. Adams and Rodgers are money inside the 10. So I can easily see Wilson getting 7-10 targets but I do expect the TDs to go down.
Also, while Rodgers and Adams have a long history, it is not the exact offense in GB. It will likely take a couple of weeks for them to completely gel again. This gives a great opportunity if Wilson has a good game next week to sell him at a higher price.
Mike Evans would be an example of a more recent guy. Same age as Adams.Notice how long ago those seasons were though? I've been beating this drum to death here last few years and that RB's and WR's are aging out worse then ever.It’s rare, but we’ve seen it time and time again over the years from elite wrs. They are simply a different breed, and Adams certainly falls into that category.only WRs i see in the top 25 that are Adams' age are Diggs (6) and Evans (15). It's rare for a reason. Add a 40-year old QB, granted an all-timer, but i don't see "elite"
Larry Fitzgerald
Reggie Wayne
Anquan Boldin
Steve Smith
Roddy White
Andre Johnson
That’s off the top of my head.
Always an outlier. A Derrick Henry for instance this year at RB. Mostert last year though he had light wear and tear on his side. But it was two years ago when Adams got traded to the Raiders that Daniel Jeremiah was making post on twitter detailing the decline/productivity of WR's on the other side of 30 as a warning sign of the trade and I've not seen a lot of reasons to think otherwise in these two years.
I don't think he's an elite player or fantasy performer any longer. Absolutely still good and targets will help him a ton in fantasy, just not elite any longer.
Mmmmkay. Lets circle back the first game Adams has 10 targets and Wilson has 3 targets. Not an attack on you at all just my humble opinion. Rodgers loved Adams. Rodgers will love Adams again.some of you may be confusing D. Adams with his 2020 version. Obviously this hurts Wilson a little, but if it leads to more first downs, more plays, and more scoring, it could end up being neutral.
Jets are averaging 41.5 throws over the last 4 games. That volume and breakdown seems reasonable to me. Different team, different offense of course, but that rate of attempts/year isn't far off what AR was doing in GB.In the end what we do is math. You outlined 40 passing attempts. I can't imagine the Jets going into each game thinking Rodgers needs 40 passing attempts. They have had losing game scripts most weeks and he has hit 40 attempts in only 2 of 6 games.he may very well. there were 34 targets last night. my point is that this is obviously an overall boost to the offense. Let's say next week there are 40 targets. Could easily seeI think the point @JohnnyU made is the key here. It doesn't matter what we think of Adams at this point of his career, it's what Rodgers thinks. Until proven otherwise i'm going to bet that he is going to treat him like he was the 2020 version. I still think Wilson has tons of value in fantasy for the reasons I stated above, but I'd be very surprised if Adams doesn't lead the team in targets the rest of the season provided he is healthy.some of you may be confusing D. Adams with his 2020 version. Obviously this hurts Wilson a little, but if it leads to more first downs, more plays, and more scoring, it could end up being neutral.
Adams - 10
Wilson - 8
Lazard - 6
Hall - 5
Conklin - 5
Others - 6
seems plausible
Yes, I expect Rodgers will feed Adams like crazy in NY this year and all other receivers will take a big hit. I'm hoping to deal Adams for Wilson in dynasty to get younger at WR and suspect that Wilson's youth will demand a decent sweetener to make that happen. Maybe Adams goes out in a blaze of glory this year or next but Wilson's gonna produce for another half dozen years. He's legit.Jets are averaging 41.5 throws over the last 4 games. That volume and breakdown seems reasonable to me. Different team, different offense of course, but that rate of attempts/year isn't far off what AR was doing in GB.In the end what we do is math. You outlined 40 passing attempts. I can't imagine the Jets going into each game thinking Rodgers needs 40 passing attempts. They have had losing game scripts most weeks and he has hit 40 attempts in only 2 of 6 games.he may very well. there were 34 targets last night. my point is that this is obviously an overall boost to the offense. Let's say next week there are 40 targets. Could easily seeI think the point @JohnnyU made is the key here. It doesn't matter what we think of Adams at this point of his career, it's what Rodgers thinks. Until proven otherwise i'm going to bet that he is going to treat him like he was the 2020 version. I still think Wilson has tons of value in fantasy for the reasons I stated above, but I'd be very surprised if Adams doesn't lead the team in targets the rest of the season provided he is healthy.some of you may be confusing D. Adams with his 2020 version. Obviously this hurts Wilson a little, but if it leads to more first downs, more plays, and more scoring, it could end up being neutral.
Adams - 10
Wilson - 8
Lazard - 6
Hall - 5
Conklin - 5
Others - 6
seems plausible
That said, there was definitely no share in target share in the AR/Davante GB era. Almost no talent at the WR2 spot the whole time though.
Maybe we'll get a vintage 2014 AR performance where he targeted Jordy Nelson 151 times and Randall Cobb 127 on only 520 attempts. Bet GW could post a WR1 season on 127 targets with DA occupying coverage.
Cautiously optimistic. GW turned 24 in July and has done nothing but produce under abysmal circumstances. I'd rather have GW as WR1b with AR and DA, than GW as WR1a with Zach Wilson 10/10 times. If it doesn't work out, AR/DA are not going to be there for the long haul anyways.
I don't agree either but Adams could win some fantasy championships for folks this year on volume alone.I just don't agree, at all.Like I said here and in another thread, Adams is still very much an elite WR. He is simply better than GW.
Well. To be fair you picked a 4 game stretch in which one of the games the Jets fell behind 17-0 and Rodgers threw it 54 times. That's gonna sway the numbers a bit. Ha haJets are averaging 41.5 throws over the last 4 games. That volume and breakdown seems reasonable to me. Different team, different offense of course, but that rate of attempts/year isn't far off what AR was doing in GB.In the end what we do is math. You outlined 40 passing attempts. I can't imagine the Jets going into each game thinking Rodgers needs 40 passing attempts. They have had losing game scripts most weeks and he has hit 40 attempts in only 2 of 6 games.he may very well. there were 34 targets last night. my point is that this is obviously an overall boost to the offense. Let's say next week there are 40 targets. Could easily seeI think the point @JohnnyU made is the key here. It doesn't matter what we think of Adams at this point of his career, it's what Rodgers thinks. Until proven otherwise i'm going to bet that he is going to treat him like he was the 2020 version. I still think Wilson has tons of value in fantasy for the reasons I stated above, but I'd be very surprised if Adams doesn't lead the team in targets the rest of the season provided he is healthy.some of you may be confusing D. Adams with his 2020 version. Obviously this hurts Wilson a little, but if it leads to more first downs, more plays, and more scoring, it could end up being neutral.
Adams - 10
Wilson - 8
Lazard - 6
Hall - 5
Conklin - 5
Others - 6
seems plausible
That said, there was definitely no share in target share in the AR/Davante GB era. Almost no talent at the WR2 spot the whole time though.
Maybe we'll get a vintage 2014 AR performance where he targeted Jordy Nelson 151 times and Randall Cobb 127 on only 520 attempts. Bet GW could post a WR1 season on 127 targets with DA occupying coverage.
Cautiously optimistic. GW turned 24 in July and has done nothing but produce under abysmal circumstances. I'd rather have GW as WR1b with AR and DA, than GW as WR1a with Zach Wilson 10/10 times. If it doesn't work out, AR/DA are not going to be there for the long haul anyways.