Yes top 100 overall, someone you can get in the 8th round and laterTop 100 overall or at WR?
Are you serious? It's much more likely he stops playing WR than returning kicks.Cribbs most likely won't be risking injury by returning kicks anymore.
Not what Shurmer has been suggesting.Cribbs was clearly McCoy's go-to guy against Green Bay the other night. This WCO approach should only help his stat line.Are you serious? It's much more likely he stops playing WR than returning kicks.Cribbs most likely won't be risking injury by returning kicks anymore.
there's nothing in there that hints at all that he would not be returning kicks, is there?Not what Shurmer has been suggesting.Cribbs was clearly McCoy's go-to guy against Green Bay the other night. This WCO approach should only help his stat line.Are you serious? It's much more likely he stops playing WR than returning kicks.Cribbs most likely won't be risking injury by returning kicks anymore.
wow that guy seems pretty good. what teams he on?I'm surprised that Mark Clayton hasn't been mentioned yet. I'd think he'd be one of the first.He was on pace for 1200/8 last year before he got hurt, and he's got the best up and coming quarterback in the game throwing to him. They added only MSW in the offseason, who is nothing special.
Best down already?The loss of Mikel LeShoure means the Lions' offense must rely on the passing game. That can only mean positive things for Nate Burleson.What about Josh Cribbs in Cleveland? Massaquoi is injured, Little is new, and Cribbs most likely won't be risking injury by returning kicks anymore.
'B-Deep said:there's nothing in there that hints at all that he would not be returning kicks, is there?'Trizzler said:He is referring to the new rule that all but takes the KR out of the game.Not what Shurmer has been suggesting.'eakfootball said:Are you serious? It's much more likely he stops playing WR than returning kicks.'Trizzler said:Cribbs most likely won't be risking injury by returning kicks anymore.
Cribbs was clearly McCoy's go-to guy against Green Bay the other night. This WCO approach should only help his stat line.
I know that Brandon Lloyd blew up in his eighth season but that has to be viewed as a rare exception, I just don't see the same potential with Burleson. Frankly I don't see Burleson's ceiling as even 70% of Lloyd's numbers from last year (1000 yards, 7 TD).I think he maxes out at 800/6 and that is if everything breaks right.'BallparkFrank said:I don't know why, but the first name that popped into my head when I saw the title of this thread was:Nate Burleson
Benn is interesting...The steals this year will be Moore and Benn.
Wrong. he may get some return duties but the Norwood kid is opening eyes and may allow Josh to put more time in at WR this year. So far he's looking good. With Little still knocking off some rust and MoMass hurting Cribbs is in great position. Dont sleep on him. *Browns homer, +having been to 2 practices with son and can verify hes coming into his own. Cant wait to see because he's elusive just needs Mccoy get him the ball in space.'eakfootball said:Are you serious? It's much more likely he stops playing WR than returning kicks.'Trizzler said:Cribbs most likely won't be risking injury by returning kicks anymore.
Floyd will obviously be huge early on with Gates either playing hurt or missing games with his injury. Once/If Gates gets back and with VJax back, I think Floyd will be too inconsistent to count on. May make good trade bait in smaller roster teams to Gates ownerReally like Floyd and James Jones this deep in draft. I think Evans value will increase big time with the trade and he wont be a steal much longer
'cr8f said:ADP after 100 I like James Jones and Lance Moore59. Moore, Lance NOS WR 102.06 3 336 22860. Sims-Walker, Mike STL WR 102.60 7 346 21161. Bess, Davone MIA WR 103.38 7 308 19562. Williams, Mike SEA WR 104.05 12 323 19363. Smith, Steve PHI WR 106.65 10 275 16764. Floyd, Malcom SDC WR 109.00 12 482 21465. Kerley, Jeremy NYJ WR 109.60 29 1470 14766. Sanders, Emmanuel PIT WR 111.32 8 367 18767. Harris, Dwayne DAL WR 111.85 24 1439 18668. Williams, Roy CHI WR 118.96 7 576 20869. Hill, Jason JAC WR 119.08 1 529 18870. Johnson, Ronald SFO WR 119.47 16 579 12471. Branch, Deion NEP WR 121.55 6 371 19772. Meachem, Robert NOS WR 123.59 12 397 17773. Ward, Hines PIT WR 128.30 6 466 20374. Pilares, Kealoha CAR WR 128.30 39 1475 11675. Benn, Arrelious TBB WR 131.89 7 427 14476. Jones, James GBP WR 135.04 14 389 17277. Roberts, Andre ARI WR 136.18 8 539 16778. Decker, Eric DEN WR 138.05 13 472 13779. Burton, Stephen MIN WR 142.50 21 1471 6880. Breaston, Steve KCC WR 143.97 11 397 17581. Toliver, Terrence HOU WR 144.70 33 1445 7082. Clayton, Mark STL WR 145.76 16 471 14883. Alexander, Danario STL WR 146.20 14 447 15284. Evans, Lee BAL WR 146.46 4 480 19385. Ausberry, David OAK WR 148.38 37 663 4886. Briscoe, Dezmon TBB WR 149.54 22 603 9687. Easley, Marcus BUF WR 152.08 26 582 8888. Hester, Devin CHI WR 152.57 9 551 13489. Robinson, Aldrick WAS WR 156.62 48 1473 7490. Shipley, Jordan CIN WR 157.70 24 397 11791. Armstrong, Anthony WAS WR 158.94 14 534 12792. Jones, Jacoby HOU WR 159.38 16 436 13893. Bennett, Earl CHI WR 160.60 14 486 12894. Tate, Brandon NEP WR 160.91 20 438 9495. Avery, Donnie STL WR 162.99 15 529 12096. Fantuz, Andy CHI WR 166.20 19 677 6697. Moss, Randy FA* WR 167.37 16 494 12498. Royal, Eddie DEN WR 167.74 20 496 12599. Thomas, Demaryius DEN WR 169.14 28 347 83100. Driver, Donald GBP WR 169.48 10 647 122
'dynastyguy1000 said:wow that guy seems pretty good. what teams he on?'FreeBaGeL said:I'm surprised that Mark Clayton hasn't been mentioned yet. I'd think he'd be one of the first.He was on pace for 1200/8 last year before he got hurt, and he's got the best up and coming quarterback in the game throwing to him. They added only MSW in the offseason, who is nothing special.
I think he was referring to the fact that Clayton hasn't been re-signed by St. Louis yet, therefore he has no job in the NFL at the moment.'dynastyguy1000 said:wow that guy seems pretty good. what teams he on?'FreeBaGeL said:I'm surprised that Mark Clayton hasn't been mentioned yet. I'd think he'd be one of the first.He was on pace for 1200/8 last year before he got hurt, and he's got the best up and coming quarterback in the game throwing to him. They added only MSW in the offseason, who is nothing special.![]()
OK, I'm with you now. I guess the extreme sarcasm lost me.Last note on Mark ClaytonRams | Mark Clayton visits (Fri Aug 12, 12:03 AM) - Free-agent WR Mark Clayton (knee) visited with the St. Louis Rams Thursday, Aug. 11. His visit was to keep them up to speed on where he is in his recovery from a knee injury. He is expected to re-sign with the Rams, but it may not be for another week or longer.Our View: Clayton's eventual re-signing could take the edge off of Mike Sims-Walker's sleeper status, but Sims-Walker should still get a chance to start and have a bounce back season. It's hard to trust Clayton with his knee still being a big question this close to the season.I think he was referring to the fact that Clayton hasn't been re-signed by St. Louis yet, therefore he has no job in the NFL at the moment.'dynastyguy1000 said:wow that guy seems pretty good. what teams he on?'FreeBaGeL said:I'm surprised that Mark Clayton hasn't been mentioned yet. I'd think he'd be one of the first.He was on pace for 1200/8 last year before he got hurt, and he's got the best up and coming quarterback in the game throwing to him. They added only MSW in the offseason, who is nothing special.![]()
Easy there. With the new KO rule and there being a lot more kicks out of the endzone and touchbacks, they will need to find ways to get the ball in this playmakers hands. Not saying hes right, just saying its not worthy of an "Are you serious?"Edit: lol, just read the rest of the thrad...'eakfootball said:Are you serious? It's much more likely he stops playing WR than returning kicks.'Trizzler said:Cribbs most likely won't be risking injury by returning kicks anymore.