What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WSL2 Rounds 17-20 (1 Viewer)

Ruffrodys05 said:
(McCluster was selected as a RB in WSL4, but) I don't think it matters what the team selecting McCluster thinks he is. It matters what position he is used at on the NFL team that drafts him. As such, anybody drafting McCluster in the WSL & PDSL survivors are taking a calculated risk that he'll be a benefit to their team no matter which position he plays in the NFL. Those drafting him should cover their butts in those positions to compensate for the lack of a definitive position for McCluster...........or not.
:fishing:Pretty sure this came up when I picked Josh Cribbs for BNB in WSL1. Let me look.
 
Ruffrodys05 said:
(McCluster was selected as a RB in WSL4, but) I don't think it matters what the team selecting McCluster thinks he is. It matters what position he is used at on the NFL team that drafts him. As such, anybody drafting McCluster in the WSL & PDSL survivors are taking a calculated risk that he'll be a benefit to their team no matter which position he plays in the NFL. Those drafting him should cover their butts in those positions to compensate for the lack of a definitive position for McCluster...........or not.
:no:Pretty sure this came up when I picked Josh Cribbs for BNB in WSL1. Let me look.
This should cover it:
If cribbs lines up at QB, RB, and WR does he get all those points in this scoring system?
MFL lists Cribbs as a WR, which is what I use. As I won't change designations once the season starts, it doesn't matter where he lines up, the points will be scored as a WR.
So once MFL gives him a position, that'll be that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
19.06 Mark Clayton
:goodposting:Couldn't believe he was still out there. Good pick.
wow thought he was long gone. or I would have taken him for sure :lmao:
Clayton was positively underwhelming last year, both from an impact while healthy angle, and an ability to stay healthy angle. By the time the playoffs came around, Flacco was barely looking his way. If anyone emerges in the offseason, Clayton could become a situational player in Baltimore, and last year he had about 3-4 viable fantasy games even though he was a starter. Looks like a player on the decline to me.
 
19.06 Mark Clayton
:goodposting:Couldn't believe he was still out there. Good pick.
wow thought he was long gone. or I would have taken him for sure :lmao:
Clayton was positively underwhelming last year, both from an impact while healthy angle, and an ability to stay healthy angle. By the time the playoffs came around, Flacco was barely looking his way. If anyone emerges in the offseason, Clayton could become a situational player in Baltimore, and last year he had about 3-4 viable fantasy games even though he was a starter. Looks like a player on the decline to me.
not much to decline from, IMO. he's been a bust.
 
19.06 Mark Clayton
:(Couldn't believe he was still out there. Good pick.
wow thought he was long gone. or I would have taken him for sure :bag:
Clayton was positively underwhelming last year, both from an impact while healthy angle, and an ability to stay healthy angle. By the time the playoffs came around, Flacco was barely looking his way. If anyone emerges in the offseason, Clayton could become a situational player in Baltimore, and last year he had about 3-4 viable fantasy games even though he was a starter. Looks like a player on the decline to me.
It's Round 19, however - and he's considered to be a starter at this point. At about WR100 he's low risk / high reward as a WR6/WR7 with so few options left.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
19.06 Mark Clayton
:(Couldn't believe he was still out there. Good pick.
wow thought he was long gone. or I would have taken him for sure :bag:
Clayton was positively underwhelming last year, both from an impact while healthy angle, and an ability to stay healthy angle. By the time the playoffs came around, Flacco was barely looking his way. If anyone emerges in the offseason, Clayton could become a situational player in Baltimore, and last year he had about 3-4 viable fantasy games even though he was a starter. Looks like a player on the decline to me.
It's Round 19, however - and he's considered to be a starter at this point. At about WR100 he's low risk / high reward as a WR6/WR7 with so few options left.
I still see at least 3 WRs Id rather have than Clayton.
 
I still see at least 3 WRs Id rather have than Clayton.
Looking forward to that list.
Id rather have a WR with at least a shot at a breakout year than a WR that I know will top out at 35-500-2 - as long as you drafted well at WR earlier in the draft, a player like Clayton will have little impact on your roster.
Don't take it the wrong way Bloom - I agree - a WR6/7 has to have big upside to produce a TD or a big game to contribute, else he's worthless. I'm just curious as to your 3-man list.
 
I still see at least 3 WRs Id rather have than Clayton.
Looking forward to that list.
Id rather have a WR with at least a shot at a breakout year than a WR that I know will top out at 35-500-2 - as long as you drafted well at WR earlier in the draft, a player like Clayton will have little impact on your roster.
he seems to have a big game or two a year though which is perfect for a wr7\8 in a format like this imo.
 
20.02 Torry Holt WR ????

Maybe Chicago, Maybe Carolina???? He said he'd love to go to Chi so, it doesn't sound like someone ready to retire????

 
Considered QB3 or TE3 (Moore) or even another RB, but I still feel this is a WR-driven league.

That said, I'll take a guy who looks to be poised to be in a battle to start:



Troy Williamson, WR, Jacksonville Jaguars

I still have one other WR on my list - again curious to check my list vs. Bloom (or if TW was one of them).

Good drafting guys - see you in the analysis thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Considered QB3 or TE3 (Moore) or even another RB, but I still feel this is a WR-driven league.

That said, I'll take a guy who looks to be poised to be in a battle to start:



Troy Williamson, WR, Jacksonville Jaguars

I still have one other WR on my list - again curious to check my list vs. Bloom (or if TW was one of them).

Good drafting guys - see you in the analysis thread.
Williamson was one of them.
 
Considered QB3 or TE3 (Moore) or even another RB, but I still feel this is a WR-driven league.

That said, I'll take a guy who looks to be poised to be in a battle to start:



Troy Williamson, WR, Jacksonville Jaguars

I still have one other WR on my list - again curious to check my list vs. Bloom (or if TW was one of them).

Good drafting guys - see you in the analysis thread.
Williamson was one of them.
you guys really like Williamson over Clayton? I just don't see how he fits into the picture after what Thomas and Dillard showed last year. Not to mention Zach Miller emerging as a real target. I can't see Williamson as anything better than the 4th or 5th option (including MJD) in Jax.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Considered QB3 or TE3 (Moore) or even another RB, but I still feel this is a WR-driven league.

That said, I'll take a guy who looks to be poised to be in a battle to start:



Troy Williamson, WR, Jacksonville Jaguars

I still have one other WR on my list - again curious to check my list vs. Bloom (or if TW was one of them).

Good drafting guys - see you in the analysis thread.
Williamson was one of them.
you guys really like Williamson over Clayton? I just don't see how he fits into the picture after what Thomas and Dillard showed last year. Not to mention Zach Miller emerging as a real target. I can't see Williamson as anything better than the 4th or 5th option (including MJD) in Jax.
Williamson beat out MSW in camp, they liked him enough to re-sign him, he has deep speed. Im not saying Williamson will outproduce Clayton, just that he could still be on the rise and vastly outproduce expectations, where I think we've seen exactly what Clayton is and will be.
 
20.13, WR-106: This guy caught 40% of his 88 targets for 36 recept's, 426 yards and three TD's. He's one of the few WR's left with a reasonable shot at a weekly score worth a diddle: Bryant Johnson, DET-WR.

PM'd.

Reasonable value for the #106-WR.

Thanks for having me....GOBW shall return.

:shrug:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top