Loan Sharks, I think you're extremely mistaken that most people don't care about exclusives. In fact I think it's the complete opposite, and tons of people will buy an Xbox just for Halo.
Maybe you are right, but then how do you explain that PS3 outsold 360? It is not like we have not been hearing that "xbox has better exclusives" since last gen and it wasn't a game changer. Xbone has the same exclusives now but is being outsold at a faster rate than last gen.
If the exclusives are a console seller then why isn't it selling as well? Is the hardware sooooo much worse that it can't keep up with the software advantage?
Several points here.
Firstly, most of MS's big exclusives are shooters, so it makes sense that the 360 generally won regions where shooters are the predominate gametype (the US) while the PS3 blew the 360 out of the water in regions where people don't care at all about shooters (Japan).
Secondly, Sony closed the gap and even surpassed MS on the exclusive front in some people's eyes as the generation went on. Early on the 360 had a massive advantage in exclusives and massively outsold the PS3. As the generation neared an end, the PS3 came out with some great exclusives. However, Sony hasn't shown anything with many of those franchises for next gen whereas MS already has two huge exclusives on the docket, one right around the corner (Titanfall) and one at the end of the year (Halo).
but how much do you have to like a specific handful of games over another handful to sacrifice the quality of your 90% of cross platforms?
When you spend more than half your gaming time with some of those games, it makes a big difference. I have both a 360 and PS3 and I spent more time playing the Gears of War series than I did my entire PS3 library. Same thing with the Left for Dead series. Time spent with Halo was probably about equal to time spent on my entire PS3 library.
That story will likely be similar with Titanfall if it's as good as we've all heard it is. That makes a huge difference.
You seem to be the kind of old-school gamer that plays a single player for 10 hours, then moves on to another game for 10 hours, then another, etc. The generation where all gamers are like that is gone, and there is a large population of gamers that now stick with a few games for a long time. When about half of the franchises that bring around that big of a long-term following are Xbox exclusives (with the rest being multi-plat and really none being Sony exclusives) it makes a big deal to that subset of gamers, which is not a small one.
That's not to say that exclusives are the end-all be-all, but they play a huge role.
Loan Sharks said:
I just have a problem when xguys say I am getting the xbone because other people are but when MOST people are getting a PS4 they who cares what other people are getting.
Also I am BLOWN AWAY that people will make a purchase this large and perhaps buy something they will use for years that is their second choice because their friends did. I have never had a friend make a $500 decision for me, ever. This is like buying a car you don't like because you would hate to not hang out with your buddies in the club that tricks out Honda Civics.
The majority of the time I spend gaming is done with friends. As others have said, they're a mix of real life friends and online friends, some of whom have become real life friends. Either way, they're friends now. I don't make a habit of just replacing my friends.
Again, you're looking at this only from the perspective of the way you play games. I just checked raptr. Since I signed up I've logged 994 hours on there. 810 hours of that was spent playing Xbox exclusive games online with friends. I love some of the PS3 exclusives I've gotten to play, but by far the most important things to me in gaming are playing with my friends and playing those games that I love and can play for years. Giving up either of those would
significantly dampen the fun I have playing videogames. Far more than anything else involved. A $100 price difference has never factored so little into one of my decisions, the same way that having to pay for XBL was never a factor for me. Sure, I could have sold my 360 and just used my PS3 and saved $300 over the course of the generation, but I would have had $30,000 less worth of fun for the way I play games.