What's interesting is that from 1990 until around 2002 taking the Top 2 WR from the prior season ended up being a decent maneuver most years . . .Top 2 Receivers and how they did the following year:90Rice 1, Rison 791 Rice 2, Irvin 392 Sharpe 3, Rice 193 Rice 1, Rison 1294 Rice 1, Sharpe DNP (Mathis was #3 and ended up 17 the next year)95 Rice 4, Bruce 896 Jackson 29, Martin 2297 Moore 24, Freeman 298 Moss 2, Freeman 2099 Harrison 2, Moss 100 Moss 5, Harrison 101 Harrison 1, Owens 202Harrison 5, Owens 12Clearly 1997 would not have worked out. But most years you would have had the #1 or #2 WR and several times could have had two fantasy #1 WR (two guys in the Top 12).But then things started to get a little murkier.03 Moss 19, Holt 704 Muhammad 37, Walker 15505Smith 8, Fitzgerald 2406 Harrison 100, Owens 207Moss 10, Owens 9Even getting Moss and Owens this year probably would have been tough to overcome, as not getting at least one Top 5 WR would probably be a huge kink in the armor of going WR-WR at the turn and taking the Top 2 WR from the prior season (assuming they were still there).Of the past 18 seasons, I would say that it would have been worth it (after the fact of course) half the time (9 of the 18 seasons).It will be interesting to see how Fitz and AJ do in 09 and whether the trend from a few years ago of having some repeat levels of high production can continue.