Sabertooth
Footballguy
Who are your top 12 picks for 2015? I don't follow the college game so I need a starting point for research. Cooper seems to be a lock but who else is on your radar?
No way would I risk a high pick on Dorial Green-Beckham, especially after the Josh Gordon fiasco. DGB has pot in his past, so he could have pot in his future, so that is too much risk for a high pick IMO.1. Gordon
2. Gurley
3. Cooper
4. GreenBeckham
5. Yeldon
6. White
7. Parker
8. Abdullah
9. Ajayi
10. Cobb
11. Funchess
12. Strong
13. Coates
Why is Tevin Coleman left off you list?No way would I risk a high pick on Dorial Green-Beckham, especially after the Josh Gordon fiasco. DGB has pot in his past, so he could have pot in his future, so that is too much risk for a high pick IMO.1. Gordon
2. Gurley
3. Cooper
4. GreenBeckham
5. Yeldon
6. White
7. Parker
8. Abdullah
9. Ajayi
10. Cobb
11. Funchess
12. Strong
13. Coates
CloseI personally like parker a bit more but white will be very good imo.How close in talent are Parker and White. If you are sitting with both on the board in your rookie draft, do you take the one in the better situation or is one clearly more talented than the other?
That's not my list, but I too haven't put him in my top 12. Maybe that changes, I'm not sure.Why is Tevin Coleman left off you list?No way would I risk a high pick on Dorial Green-Beckham, especially after the Josh Gordon fiasco. DGB has pot in his past, so he could have pot in his future, so that is too much risk for a high pick IMO.1. Gordon
2. Gurley
3. Cooper
4. GreenBeckham
5. Yeldon
6. White
7. Parker
8. Abdullah
9. Ajayi
10. Cobb
11. Funchess
12. Strong
13. Coates
I like coleman but I like others more right now plus we know this will not be the top 12 come draft day.That's not my list, but I too haven't put him in my top 12. Maybe that changes, I'm not sure.Why is Tevin Coleman left off you list?No way would I risk a high pick on Dorial Green-Beckham, especially after the Josh Gordon fiasco. DGB has pot in his past, so he could have pot in his future, so that is too much risk for a high pick IMO.1. Gordon
2. Gurley
3. Cooper
4. GreenBeckham
5. Yeldon
6. White
7. Parker
8. Abdullah
9. Ajayi
10. Cobb
11. Funchess
12. Strong
13. Coates
Sounds good, after the draft is done I can see Coleman and Ajayi fighting to be the 3rd RB off the board.I like coleman but I like others more right now plus we know this will not be the top 12 come draft day.That's not my list, but I too haven't put him in my top 12. Maybe that changes, I'm not sure.Why is Tevin Coleman left off you list?No way would I risk a high pick on Dorial Green-Beckham, especially after the Josh Gordon fiasco. DGB has pot in his past, so he could have pot in his future, so that is too much risk for a high pick IMO.1. Gordon
2. Gurley
3. Cooper
4. GreenBeckham
5. Yeldon
6. White
7. Parker
8. Abdullah
9. Ajayi
10. Cobb
11. Funchess
12. Strong
13. Coates
It's a fair offer IMO. I'd be tempted to take it. I think Hill is clearly better than Gio, and will get most TDs to boot. I think Gio is likely going to be the lesser portion of a RBBC going forward.I got an offer today giving me Gio in exchange for the 6 overall pick in a superflex. Think I'll pass based on some of the information I'm seeing above.
no offense but your complaining is petty people are being nice to start a discussion and provide some early lists and you bring up names and positions. Im under the impression people who visit this site in january have a basic understanding of the rokkies in the first round.Pet peeve time.
I know everyone wants to be cool and speak short hand but its early January and not everyone is up on the players mentioned on lists let alone where they went to school or basic things like oh, what position they played and one of the most basic things that people can do is to make a list where they put in the first and last names of the players and to also put in the position they play before adding other basic information like how much they weigh, their height, if they are seniors or underclassmen, what system they come from, etc.
But come on.
How about doing the absolute minimum and put in the first and last name of players because these are draft prospects that not everyone knows and some guys share the same last names, oh and put in the positions they play. The only one who put in basic information about what position these guy play was menobrown. I don't think its really that difficult to put in first and last names and what position a guy plays. Sure it would take a bit more effort to put in their draft status and ht./wt. and some other tidbits but most people who are not as familiar as the guys who make lists would really appreciate as much information as possible rather than just lists of last names.
I watch zero college football and have no idea who most of those players are so I agree that perhaps posting a full name and position would be nice to see. I'm on the site daily but not to read up necessarily on rookies yet, the NFL season is still happening.no offense but your complaining is petty people are being nice to start a discussion and provide some early lists and you bring up names and positions. Im under the impression people who visit this site in january have a basic understanding of the rokkies in the first round.Pet peeve time.
I know everyone wants to be cool and speak short hand but its early January and not everyone is up on the players mentioned on lists let alone where they went to school or basic things like oh, what position they played and one of the most basic things that people can do is to make a list where they put in the first and last names of the players and to also put in the position they play before adding other basic information like how much they weigh, their height, if they are seniors or underclassmen, what system they come from, etc.
But come on.
How about doing the absolute minimum and put in the first and last name of players because these are draft prospects that not everyone knows and some guys share the same last names, oh and put in the positions they play. The only one who put in basic information about what position these guy play was menobrown. I don't think its really that difficult to put in first and last names and what position a guy plays. Sure it would take a bit more effort to put in their draft status and ht./wt. and some other tidbits but most people who are not as familiar as the guys who make lists would really appreciate as much information as possible rather than just lists of last names.
While I agree with dirtyjay, I just went through and added first names and position and school. Most people here probably know that info, but the OP did say he doesn't follow college football.no offense but your complaining is petty people are being nice to start a discussion and provide some early lists and you bring up names and positions. Im under the impression people who visit this site in january have a basic understanding of the rokkies in the first round.Pet peeve time.
I know everyone wants to be cool and speak short hand but its early January and not everyone is up on the players mentioned on lists let alone where they went to school or basic things like oh, what position they played and one of the most basic things that people can do is to make a list where they put in the first and last names of the players and to also put in the position they play before adding other basic information like how much they weigh, their height, if they are seniors or underclassmen, what system they come from, etc.
But come on.
How about doing the absolute minimum and put in the first and last name of players because these are draft prospects that not everyone knows and some guys share the same last names, oh and put in the positions they play. The only one who put in basic information about what position these guy play was menobrown. I don't think its really that difficult to put in first and last names and what position a guy plays. Sure it would take a bit more effort to put in their draft status and ht./wt. and some other tidbits but most people who are not as familiar as the guys who make lists would really appreciate as much information as possible rather than just lists of last names.
Why not simply ask for more detail and throw in a please.Bracie Smathers said:Pet peeve time.
I know everyone wants to be cool and speak short hand but its early January and not everyone is up on the players mentioned on lists let alone where they went to school or basic things like oh, what position they played and one of the most basic things that people can do is to make a list where they put in the first and last names of the players and to also put in the position they play before adding other basic information like how much they weigh, their height, if they are seniors or underclassmen, what system they come from, etc.
But come on.
How about doing the absolute minimum and put in the first and last name of players because these are draft prospects that not everyone knows and some guys share the same last names, oh and put in the positions they play. The only one who put in basic information about what position these guy play was menobrown. I don't think its really that difficult to put in first and last names and what position a guy plays. Sure it would take a bit more effort to put in their draft status and ht./wt. and some other tidbits but most people who are not as familiar as the guys who make lists would really appreciate as much information as possible rather than just lists of last names.
I would jump all over that deal if I were you. But I am much higher on Gio than most. I own Hill and I gave what turned out to be the 4 and 5 overall for gio mid season last year. I would still give close to that now. How do we know that Parker or white are legit nfl stars? Could be looking at aj Jenkins or tavon Austin career paths for all I know. I think Gio has proven that he can excel in fantasy even splitting time with Hill. I trust that offense to be very run heavy next few years and I'll start both Hill and Gio every week until that proves ineffective.Sabertooth said:I agree. I thought about it but the value of that 6 overall pick is going to increase once all the rookies find a team. I also own Hill so there is some serious handcuff value there.
The best thing for Gio and Hill owners would be for them to trade Gio, but his cost is cheap and he's not a FA until 2017. That's the bad news. The good news is they can both be productive if the Bengals uses Gio correctly in the passing game and quit trying to run him between the tackles. However, I doubt either will ever reach stud status consistently as long as both are on the team.In a couple of startup dynasty mocks I've seen, Gio is going early 4th while the 1.06 goes early 5th, FWIW.Sabertooth said:I got an offer today giving me Gio in exchange for the 6 overall pick in a superflex. Think I'll pass based on some of the information I'm seeing above.
Trading shouldnt be about getting one over on someone it should be about bettering your team. What does that the pick or gio?The best thing for Gio and Hill owners would be for them to trade Gio, but his cost is cheap and he's not a FA until 2017. That's the bad news. The good news is they can both be productive if the Bengals uses Gio correctly in the passing game and quit trying to run him between the tackles. However, I doubt either will ever reach stud status consistently as long as both are on the team.In a couple of startup dynasty mocks I've seen, Gio is going early 4th while the 1.06 goes early 5th, FWIW.Sabertooth said:I got an offer today giving me Gio in exchange for the 6 overall pick in a superflex. Think I'll pass based on some of the information I'm seeing above.
No idea but Path to the Draft starts after the combine.Anyone know if NFL network has some sort of fantasy rookie special coming up anytime soon?
I didn't say it wasTrading shouldnt be about getting one over on someone it should be about bettering your team. What does that the pick or gio?The best thing for Gio and Hill owners would be for them to trade Gio, but his cost is cheap and he's not a FA until 2017. That's the bad news. The good news is they can both be productive if the Bengals uses Gio correctly in the passing game and quit trying to run him between the tackles. However, I doubt either will ever reach stud status consistently as long as both are on the team.In a couple of startup dynasty mocks I've seen, Gio is going early 4th while the 1.06 goes early 5th, FWIW.Sabertooth said:I got an offer today giving me Gio in exchange for the 6 overall pick in a superflex. Think I'll pass based on some of the information I'm seeing above.
I said the best thing for Gio and Hill owners would be if the Bengals traded Gio, but that wouldn't be good for the Bengals because Gio's contract is cheap and he isn't a FA until 2017.Two different human beings. I don't like comparisons with this type of stuff. DGB has kept his act clean and made zero noise in the past year. I can see that continuing. Some guys "get it" after they get made an example of. I feel like he's one of them. Let's not forget, is there weed in his past? Sure. But he never failed a drug test while at school. They were possession incidents. Am I saying he doesn't smoke weed? Of course not. Am I saying he might actually be in control of his use unlike Gordon? Yes.No way would I risk a high pick on Dorial Green-Beckham, especially after the Josh Gordon fiasco. DGB has pot in his past, so he could have pot in his future, so that is too much risk for a high pick IMO.
That's a big risk to take when you're risking an early 1st rd pick, say 1.4 or better, on a guy with this much baggage. I would much rather throw a dart at Parker or White over DGB.Two different human beings. I don't like comparisons with this type of stuff. DGB has kept his act clean and made zero noise in the past year. I can see that continuing. Some guys "get it" after they get made an example of. I feel like he's one of them. Let's not forget, is there weed in his past? Sure. But he never failed a drug test while at school. They were possession incidents. Am I saying he doesn't smoke weed? Of course not. Am I saying he might actually be in control of his use unlike Gordon? Yes.No way would I risk a high pick on Dorial Green-Beckham, especially after the Josh Gordon fiasco. DGB has pot in his past, so he could have pot in his future, so that is too much risk for a high pick IMO.
I agree with that part of what you said. Especially when you're talking about a guy who hasn't actually taken the next step statistically to show he can dominate.JohnnyU said:That's a big risk to take when you're risking an early 1st rd pick, say 1.4 or better, on a guy with this much baggage.
Me thinks you two either need to do some research on your own, or deal with the info in this thread. You kidding me?I watch zero college football and have no idea who most of those players are so I agree that perhaps posting a full name and position would be nice to see. I'm on the site daily but not to read up necessarily on rookies yet, the NFL season is still happening. A pet peeve I have is punctuation. That first sentence from Bracie might be the longest single sentence I've ever read. How about a period here and there to break that thing up?no offense but your complaining is petty people are being nice to start a discussion and provide some early lists and you bring up names and positions. Im under the impression people who visit this site in january have a basic understanding of the rokkies in the first round.Pet peeve time.
I know everyone wants to be cool and speak short hand but its early January and not everyone is up on the players mentioned on lists let alone where they went to school or basic things like oh, what position they played and one of the most basic things that people can do is to make a list where they put in the first and last names of the players and to also put in the position they play before adding other basic information like how much they weigh, their height, if they are seniors or underclassmen, what system they come from, etc.
But come on.
How about doing the absolute minimum and put in the first and last name of players because these are draft prospects that not everyone knows and some guys share the same last names, oh and put in the positions they play. The only one who put in basic information about what position these guy play was menobrown. I don't think its really that difficult to put in first and last names and what position a guy plays. Sure it would take a bit more effort to put in their draft status and ht./wt. and some other tidbits but most people who are not as familiar as the guys who make lists would really appreciate as much information as possible rather than just lists of last names.
Well, who is your top 2?Anyone else done with rookie rankings pre draft?
I have a very good idea of my preferences, but situation will swing everything after the top 2.
A lot needs to happen between now and May for me to put Gordon over Gurley, and I love Gordon.Well, who is your top 2?Anyone else done with rookie rankings pre draft?
I have a very good idea of my preferences, but situation will swing everything after the top 2.
I would love to see your list MAC with the understanding that much of this will change after the draft.Anyone else done with rookie rankings pre draft?
I have a very good idea of my preferences, but situation will swing everything after the top 2.
Coleman is my third rb. I'm at odds behind him. Knee jerk, between my talent eval and where I expect them to be picked, Duke and Mike Davis. Abdullah is the most interesting, but I hate that he hasn't performed well vs stronger defenses. I can look past the size issues with production, but... Ajayi's a hot name, but I really haven't been wowed watching him. Apparently this David Johnson guy is making a name for himself now too. Yieldon will probably be drafted into the best situation, and I think he is a very good rb, but he barely makes my top ten from a talent perspective in this stacked class. All that said, on the field, I like Buck Allen and David Cobb more than all of them.Wr? Cooper and Parker are probably going to be somewhere in my top 7. Where depends on the backs. After them? I'm a Strong fan, but I also understand that White will probably be drafted before him. I know I appear anti Funchess, but I'm not. He's next. He just frustrates the hell out of me watching him. DGB is the wild card. Those are the last I'll consider inside the top 12. I think there's a significant drop off after them, situation and value will steer me in certain directions but they all have warts at this point. Funchess and DGB included.I would love to see your list MAC with the understanding that much of this will change after the draft.Anyone else done with rookie rankings pre draft?
I have a very good idea of my preferences, but situation will swing everything after the top 2.
Here is my attempt at a top 12 for fantasy football-
RB Melvin Gordon
WR Amari Cooper
WR DeVante Parker
WR Sammie Coates
WR Kevin White
RB Todd Gurley
RB Jay Ajayi
RB Tevin Coleman
WR Jalen Strong
RB Duke Johnson
WR Dorial Green-Beckham
RB TJ Yeldon
WR/TE Devin Funchess
I generally use WalterFootball to figure out the names of the guys I'm not familiar with. Put them all on a sheet and watch them 1 by 1.This time of year I like to rely on NFLDraftScout for general info of the kind the OP and Bracie are looking for.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/2015/RB for example is their RB list, and go to the drop down menu for other positions.
In addition to full name, school, and ht/wt (which gets adjusted I believe after the combine), they also give their guesses as to NFL draft round. And they are continually updating these lists up to the NFL draft.
While it's not a rookie fantasy ranking, for most this is a good source early on so you have a handle on the names and ballpark NFL draft round.