Your Thoughts on my dynasty startup settings (1 Viewer)

[NBusiness]

I am starting a new dynasty this year its a 10 team ppr league with 24 roster spots. 2 qbs, 2rbs, 3wrs, 1 rb/wr, 1 wr/te , k, and dst. Obviously the starters are very deep im doing this to encourage more strategy less luck. The startup will be an auction with a $400 budget. Qb tds are worth 4. There will only be a 4 rookie round draft next year. Any thought on any improvements to league settings, or a strategy i can look at in this very important auction.

 

[adrenaline]

I'd go with 30+ roster spots, you want to have room for players to develop in dynasty.

 

[NBusiness]

top 240 is too shallow?

 

[adrenaline]

Is this Jeopardy?

 

[NBusiness]

Does anyone with longstanding dynasties feel like this could be too shallow like adrenaline does. I want a good amount of prospects on each squad , is 300 players closer to the sweet spot?

 

[Jail]

Does anyone with longstanding dynasties feel like this could be too shallow like adrenaline does. I want a good amount of prospects on each squad , is 300 players closer to the sweet spot?

I have been in one league that keeps 264 for about 5 years now. Seems like every year we need to find 1-2 new owners because the crappy teams seem to stay crappy as its harder to build them back up. In my other leagues we have cut downs in the offseason that bring roster totals to 216-224 players. Seems like those are better balanced with more even competition. I like that setting much more because there seems to be less owner turnover. If everyone of the owners in your league are hardcore into football(college and NFL) than it is probably easier to get away with such large rosters.Edit to add: Not sure if it was clear above, but I like it when the rosters are larger in season(+260 players) but in the offseason you have to cut down your roster to about 220.

 

[FUBAR]

Does anyone with longstanding dynasties feel like this could be too shallow like adrenaline does. I want a good amount of prospects on each squad , is 300 players closer to the sweet spot?

I have been in one league that keeps 264 for about 5 years now. Seems like every year we need to find 1-2 new owners because the crappy teams seem to stay crappy as its harder to build them back up. In my other leagues we have cut downs in the offseason that bring roster totals to 216-224 players. Seems like those are better balanced with more even competition. I like that setting much more because there seems to be less owner turnover. If everyone of the owners in your league are hardcore into football(college and NFL) than it is probably easier to get away with such large rosters.Edit to add: Not sure if it was clear above, but I like it when the rosters are larger in season(+260 players) but in the offseason you have to cut down your roster to about 220.

I like this idea but most of my leagues work the other way, larger rosters off season to give room for the draft and IR players going back to your roster.Size depends on what you want. You want turnover, have smaller rosters. You want to give guys a chance to develop players, larger works better or have a taxi squad.

 

[NBusiness]

Ok guys thanks for your input. Appreciated. I'm goin to go with the 240. I'm goin to do a Cutdown on the last day of the year of 4 players (no k). Then during the 4 round rookie draft all dropped players and rookies will be draftable. Anyone have an opinion on 3 or 4 point tds if Im goin to have 2 qb starters. Im thinking 3 so they're not overly valuable. Any thoughts on a draft strategy Fir an auction like this