I would agree but would focus on either the O-Line or D-Line.......The O-Line helps average skill players get to be above average or better and the D-line would help average DB's get to above average or better. If you can't keep people off your QB or get to the QB it causes significant issues elsewhere.It is very tempting to just load up on one area to try to create an overwhelming advantage. Something like
Mahomes, Beckham, Thomas, Tyreek, Kittle
or
Derwin James, Eddie Jackson, Marshon Lattimore, Jalen Ramsey and Desmond King.
True, with OL though it actually seems to me that most of the top players are a bit older. This is especially true at tackle. As for D-Line, it does make DBs better but great DBs can make an average DL better as well. Better coverage= QB takes longer to release the ball. However, starting with Chris Jones, Aaron Donald, Joey Bosa, Myles Garrett and Khalil Mack sure would be awesome as well.I would agree but would focus on either the O-Line or D-Line.......The O-Line helps average skill players get to be above average or better and the D-line would help average DB's get to above average or better. If you can't keep people off your QB or get to the QB it causes significant issues elsewhere.
Because they are blatant Browns homers and have little credibility. It's laughable really.Honest question - for those taking Mayfield over Mahomes. Why?
He's done well no doubt. He looks good, but do you really think he has shown better than Mahomes? Are you forecasting forward, accounting for better coaching, assuming Hill and kelce make a huge difference (they do), or what?
I might take Mayfield as a top 5 pick but not as my top QB.
The bold is true but there are a lot more ways you can take great DB's out of a game and still have success. However, a great DL affects all aspects of the offensive game plan and will be significantly more disruptive in more aspects than just the passing game.True, with OL though it actually seems to me that most of the top players are a bit older. This is especially true at tackle. As for D-Line, it does make DBs better but great DBs can make an average DL better as well. Better coverage= QB takes longer to release the ball. However, starting with Chris Jones, Aaron Donald, Joey Bosa, Myles Garrett and Khalil Mack sure would be awesome as well.
he did dig out of the hole and put his team in the lead with 3 minutes to go...I was referring to the 1st half where he didn't put up any points and dug a hole that he couldn't get out of. Looked like a case of the yips.
I think it is complex- depends on scheme and what quality of players we get to fill out of the rest of the team. There is always a counter. A great DL can be countered with lots of quick passes.The bold is true but there are a lot more ways you can take great DB's out of a game and still have success. However, a great DL affects all aspects of the offensive game plan and will be significantly more disruptive in more aspects than just the passing game.
Lol I get it though. For years, their hope was to win a game or two. They improved a great deal this past year and they go into 2019 with hopes of a playoff run. It's a great time to be a Browns fan. But you're right their overestimation of what Mayfield.Because they are blatant Browns homers and have little credibility. It's laughable really.
I practically invented Browns bashing.Because they are blatant Browns homers and have little credibility. It's laughable really.
You could tell who the suckers are- the ones choosing a QB. Imagine starting your football team with a guy who can't run, block, tackle or catch. You think Baker Mayfield is going to learn a rip move and put pressure on the QB? Is Mahomes going to field a punt and house it? Not a chance. My first pick would be Sanu. He can run, catch, block and certainly is big enough to tackle. Plus he can play QB as he one of the highest career passer ratings in NFL history.you guys are nuts. You should only be choosing names from players who can play multiple positions since they're the Greatest Football Players, obviously.
signed,
Sorry for Crossing the Streams
Tom Brady has dropped back to pass 90 times in the post season and has not been sacked. The Patriots starting 5 OL men had a combined base salary of $8,337,000 this year.I am surprised that nobody has gone with 5 lineman. I would go with the top 2 tackles and center (I am not an expert on O-Line so I am not sure who those would be) with the best combination of age and salary and fill out the last two spots with Donald and Mack for half of my DL. This game is won and lost in the trenches and I would build from there.
You are also talking about the best QB of all time that changes protections/plays based on his ability to diagnose defenses and put his team into a better play. That hides a lot of deficiencies on the O-Line. There are not many QB's that can do that these days.Tom Brady has dropped back to pass 90 times in the post season and has not been sacked. The Patriots starting 5 OL men had a combined base salary of $8,337,000 this year.
That being said, I would likely not pick those guys early in a new league draft. Those guys (or similar players) can be had late and had pretty cheap late in the phantom draft.
If I had the time and felt motivated, I would compare player salaries to PFF performance grades for the season to see which guys were the best values.
That won't be the case going forward as they gave Shaq Mason a 5/yr $45 million extension. Which to be fair, he deserves as arguably the best interior o-lineman in the NFL. I think you are underrating Mason, if you think he's just a guy.Tom Brady has dropped back to pass 90 times in the post season and has not been sacked. The Patriots starting 5 OL men had a combined base salary of $8,337,000 this year.
That being said, I would likely not pick those guys early in a new league draft. Those guys (or similar players) can be had late and had pretty cheap late in the phantom draft.
If I had the time and felt motivated, I would compare player salaries to PFF performance grades for the season to see which guys were the best values.
Saw a stat earlier this season that went something like the collective record of Rodgers, Brady, Manning, Montana, Elway (you get the picture) was 126-1 when they put up 40 points. Mahomes is 2-2.In his losses this year, Mahomes had a QB rating of 111.4 which would be the 3rd highest of any QB this season behind only himself and Drew Brees.I don't think those losses where the Chiefs offense scored 40, 51, 28, 31 and 31 were Mahomes fault. This also assumes that at Chargers, at Steelers weren't big games and an NFL playoff game isn't a big game.
at the beginning of the season Mahomes had what looked to be one of the toughest 6 game stretches imaginable....STEADYMOBBIN 22 said:You guys are aware that Mahomes has lost every single big game of his NFL career?
That’s a whole lot of effort for a throw away hyperbolic line. No he hasn’t lost EVERY[/] big game. Christ on a bike.at the beginning of the season Mahomes had what looked to be one of the toughest 6 game stretches imaginable....
@Chargers...one of the best teams in the league....W
@ PIT....see Chargers.....now 2-0 on the road against two of the best in the AFC....W
vs SF....who were coming off a solid end of the previous season and at the time still had Jimmy G....still ended up being a decent team....W
@ Den....third road game in first 4....never an easy place to go....now with Miller/Chubb....W
vs JAC....AFC championship game previous year and picked by many to go to playoffs/super bowl....great defense, blah, blah, blah....W
@ NE....toe to toe with Brady at his house....lose by 3 in a team with ball last situation....L.....5-1 to start
I'd say many of those were big games and on the road....especially the first two......set the tone for the season....and they were not considered the favorite in some...
fast forward to game of the year against LAR....a 3 point loss....a huge win over BAL....etc
but quite honestly the "biggest" game of the year was the win over IND in the playoffs with the 6 game home losing streak gorilla on the Chiefs back and going against a hot IND team with Andrew Luck.....people don't understand the pressure 6 straight home loses create....Mahomes was supposed to be "the difference" and he came through...to be honest, everything after that in his first full year as a starter was gravy....so you are wrong, he has not lost every big game.... and he then gave his team the lead against the GOAT with 3 minutes to play and a chance at the Super Bowl....and then ties it up again after getting the ball back with 39 seconds....so not sure how you define "big games" but IMO he hasn't lost every big game of his career....he got his team the #1 seed....you can't get a higher seed....so he must of won a few "big" ones....and his four loses prior to the AFC championship were by a total of 14 points.....he did HIS part in every game this year really....gave his team a chance in every game....the defense is what really hurt them and he couldn't cover them each time....there were "plenty" of big games, but I guess our definitions might be different...
My team would whoop your ###Terron Armstead OT
David Bakhtiari OT
Jason Kelce C
Patrick Mahomes QB
Khalil Mack DE
Koochkly is one hit away from retirementMahomes to Nuk....unstoppable
Kuechly
Donald
Mack
Draft O line and DB's like a mofo
That was my thought process with Mack, Donald, and Garrett.It is very tempting to just load up on one area to try to create an overwhelming advantage. Something like
Mahomes, Beckham, Thomas, Tyreek, Kittle
or
Derwin James, Eddie Jackson, Marshon Lattimore, Jalen Ramsey and Desmond King.
Yep. Had the same idea, just Bosa over Mack. Debatable for sure, but Joey is 4 years younger.That was my thought process with Mack, Donald, and Garrett.
The team he quarterbacked scored more points than the opposing team seven times.Define "won".
He won games. Fair enough.The team he quarterbacked scored more points than the opposing team seven times.
There are some things that just don't need to be over complicated.
This is just cheating the scenario. If I play along with your strategy of taking both Baker Mayfield and Patrick Mahomes to trade one, why stop there? If your whole plan is just to trade one of them then you would be foolish not to take it to its logical conclusion and do that with all 5 players.If you really want to maximize those players and build a team then quite frankly I would take both Baker and Patrick and then fill out my roster with Quentin, Myles, and Donald.
I then would open up bidding on Mahomes and demand at least one top player in return plus multiple high draft picks.
I think Denver, NYG, Washington, and many other teams would make huge offers.
Something to be said for that. My thinking is that you want players at the key places that market (ie NFL teams) pay the most for. QB/DE/WR/CB/LT. Players that you need for the passing game, and players you need to stop it. Jalen Ramsey would be on more lists if he didn't keep running his mouth without backing it up. As appealing as Barkley/Gurley is, that position is just not that valuable. If you have Nelson (or Nelson and Martin in your example) anchoring your line, you're going to have running lanesI'll take a strong OL/DL/pass rush and make due with non top 5 QB/WR/RB/DB.
He's 27....I'd say he's got a few more seasons, and at his production and ability, I'd take thatIlov80s said:Koochkly is one hit away from retirement
He's got a long concussion history is what he was getting at. His age is irrelevant to that. He's got a lot more longevity risk than a typically 27 year old, he may still be worth it, but personally, I'd prefer Bobby Wagner to him, partially because of the concussions, and partially because he might just be better right now. Of course, if I wanted to burn a top-5 choice on a LB, it'd probably be Vander Esch.He's 27....I'd say he's got a few more seasons, and at his production and ability, I'd take that
Completely agree. MLB is a rough position in the modern NFL. VanderEsch has been a machine, he is who I would take.He's got a long concussion history is what he was getting at. His age is irrelevant to that. He's got a lot more longevity risk than a typically 27 year old, he may still be worth it, but personally, I'd prefer Bobby Wagner to him, partially because of the concussions, and partially because he might just be better right now. Of course, if I wanted to burn a top-5 choice on a LB, it'd probably be Vander Esch.He's 27....I'd say he's got a few more seasons, and at his production and ability, I'd take that