What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Your top five players if you were starting a team today (1 Viewer)

It is very tempting to just load up on one area to try to create an overwhelming advantage. Something like

Mahomes, Beckham, Thomas, Tyreek, Kittle 

or

Derwin James, Eddie Jackson, Marshon Lattimore, Jalen Ramsey and Desmond King.

 
It is very tempting to just load up on one area to try to create an overwhelming advantage. Something like

Mahomes, Beckham, Thomas, Tyreek, Kittle 

or

Derwin James, Eddie Jackson, Marshon Lattimore, Jalen Ramsey and Desmond King.
I would agree but would focus on either the O-Line or D-Line.......The O-Line helps average skill players get to be above average or better and the D-line would help average DB's get to above average or better.  If you can't keep people off your QB or get to the QB it causes significant issues elsewhere. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would agree but would focus on either the O-Line or D-Line.......The O-Line helps average skill players get to be above average or better and the D-line would help average DB's get to above average or better.  If you can't keep people off your QB or get to the QB it causes significant issues elsewhere. 
True, with OL though it actually seems to me that most of the top players are a bit older. This is especially true at tackle. As for D-Line, it does make DBs better but great DBs can make an average DL better as well. Better coverage= QB takes longer to release the ball. However, starting with Chris Jones, Aaron Donald, Joey Bosa, Myles Garrett and Khalil Mack sure would be awesome as well. 

 
Honest question - for those taking Mayfield over Mahomes. Why? 

He's done well no doubt. He looks good, but do you really think he has shown better than Mahomes? Are you forecasting forward, accounting for better coaching, assuming Hill and kelce make a huge difference (they do), or what? 

I might take Mayfield as a top 5 pick but not as my top QB.
Because they are blatant Browns homers and have little credibility.  It's laughable really.  

 
True, with OL though it actually seems to me that most of the top players are a bit older. This is especially true at tackle. As for D-Line, it does make DBs better but great DBs can make an average DL better as well. Better coverage= QB takes longer to release the ball. However, starting with Chris Jones, Aaron Donald, Joey Bosa, Myles Garrett and Khalil Mack sure would be awesome as well. 
The bold is true but there are a lot more ways you can take great DB's out of a game and still have success.  However, a great DL affects all aspects of the offensive game plan and will be significantly more disruptive in more aspects than just the passing game. 

 
The bold is true but there are a lot more ways you can take great DB's out of a game and still have success.  However, a great DL affects all aspects of the offensive game plan and will be significantly more disruptive in more aspects than just the passing game. 
I think it is complex- depends on scheme and what quality of players we get to fill out of the rest of the team. There is always a counter. A great DL can be countered with lots of quick passes. 

 
Because they are blatant Browns homers and have little credibility.  It's laughable really.  
Lol  I get it though. For years, their hope was to win a game or two. They improved a great deal this past year and they go into 2019 with hopes of a playoff run. It's a great time to be a Browns fan.  But you're right their overestimation of what Mayfield.

 
you guys are nuts. You should only be choosing names from players who can play multiple positions since they're the Greatest Football Players, obviously.

signed,

Sorry for Crossing the Streams ;)

 
you guys are nuts. You should only be choosing names from players who can play multiple positions since they're the Greatest Football Players, obviously.

signed,

Sorry for Crossing the Streams ;)
You could tell who the suckers are- the ones choosing a QB. Imagine starting your football team with a guy who can't run, block, tackle or catch. You think Baker Mayfield is going to learn a rip move and put pressure on the QB? Is Mahomes going to field a punt and house it? Not a chance. My first pick would be Sanu. He can run, catch, block and certainly is big enough to tackle. Plus he can play QB as he one of the highest career passer ratings in NFL history. 

 
I am surprised that nobody has gone with 5 lineman.  I would go with the top 2 tackles and center (I am not an expert on O-Line so I am not sure who those would be) with the best combination of age and salary and fill out the last two spots with Donald and Mack for half of my DL.  This game is won and lost in the trenches and I would build from there. 
Tom Brady has dropped back to pass 90 times in the post season and has not been sacked. The Patriots starting 5 OL men had a combined base salary of $8,337,000 this year.
That being said, I would likely not pick those guys early in a new league draft. Those guys (or similar players) can be had late and had pretty cheap late in the phantom draft.

If I had the time and felt motivated, I would compare player salaries to PFF performance grades for the season to see which guys were the best values.

 
Tom Brady has dropped back to pass 90 times in the post season and has not been sacked. The Patriots starting 5 OL men had a combined base salary of $8,337,000 this year.
That being said, I would likely not pick those guys early in a new league draft. Those guys (or similar players) can be had late and had pretty cheap late in the phantom draft.

If I had the time and felt motivated, I would compare player salaries to PFF performance grades for the season to see which guys were the best values.
You are also talking about the best QB of all time that changes protections/plays based on his ability to diagnose defenses and put his team into a better play.  That hides a lot of deficiencies on the O-Line.  There are not many QB's that can do that these days. 

 
Tom Brady has dropped back to pass 90 times in the post season and has not been sacked. The Patriots starting 5 OL men had a combined base salary of $8,337,000 this year.
That being said, I would likely not pick those guys early in a new league draft. Those guys (or similar players) can be had late and had pretty cheap late in the phantom draft.

If I had the time and felt motivated, I would compare player salaries to PFF performance grades for the season to see which guys were the best values.
That won't be the case going forward as they gave Shaq Mason a 5/yr $45 million extension. Which to be fair, he deserves as arguably the best interior o-lineman in the NFL. I think you are underrating Mason, if you think he's just a guy. 

I don't have the time either to look up everyone, but I'd be shocked if Eddie Jackson wasn't the top value. He's the best DB in the NFL, and made $766,452. 

Desmond King was the #2 CB, and made $670,000.

$674, 574 for George Kittle seems like an excellent value too. $8.5 million less than Kelce, and Kittle might be the better player.

 
In his losses this year, Mahomes had a QB rating of 111.4 which would be the 3rd highest of any QB this season behind only himself and Drew Brees.I don't think those losses where the Chiefs offense scored 40, 51, 28, 31 and 31 were Mahomes fault. This also assumes that  at Chargers, at Steelers weren't big games and an NFL playoff game isn't a big game. 
Saw a stat earlier this season that went something like the collective record of Rodgers, Brady, Manning, Montana, Elway (you get the picture) was 126-1 when they put up 40 points.  Mahomes is 2-2.

 
STEADYMOBBIN 22 said:
You guys are aware that Mahomes has lost every single big game of his NFL career? 
at the beginning of the season Mahomes had what looked to be one of the toughest 6 game stretches imaginable....

@Chargers...one of the best teams in the league....W

@ PIT....see Chargers.....now 2-0 on the road against two of the best in the AFC....W

vs SF....who were coming off a solid end of the previous season and at the time still had Jimmy G....still ended up being a decent team....W

@ Den....third road game in first 4....never an easy place to go....now with Miller/Chubb....W

vs JAC....AFC championship game previous year and picked by many to go to playoffs/super bowl....great defense, blah, blah, blah....W

@ NE....toe to toe with Brady at his house....lose by 3 in a team with ball last situation....L.....5-1 to start

I'd say many of those were big games and on the road....especially the first two......set the tone for the season....and they were not considered the favorite in some...

fast forward to game of the year against LAR....a 3 point loss....a huge win over BAL....etc

but quite honestly the "biggest" game of the year was the win over IND in the playoffs with the 6 game home losing streak gorilla on the Chiefs back and going against a hot IND team with Andrew Luck.....people don't understand the pressure 6 straight home loses create....Mahomes was supposed to be "the difference" and he came through...to be honest, everything after that in his first full year as a starter was gravy....so you are wrong, he has not lost every big game.... and he then gave his team the lead against the GOAT with 3 minutes to play and a chance at the Super Bowl....and then ties it up again after getting the ball back with 39 seconds....so not sure how you define "big games" but IMO he hasn't lost every big game of his career....he got his team the #1 seed....you can't get a higher seed....so he must of won a few "big" ones....and his four loses prior to the AFC championship were by a total of 14 points.....he did HIS part in every game this year really....gave his team a chance in every game....the defense is what really hurt them and he couldn't cover them each time....there were "plenty" of big games, but I guess our definitions might be different...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
at the beginning of the season Mahomes had what looked to be one of the toughest 6 game stretches imaginable....

@Chargers...one of the best teams in the league....W

@ PIT....see Chargers.....now 2-0 on the road against two of the best in the AFC....W

vs SF....who were coming off a solid end of the previous season and at the time still had Jimmy G....still ended up being a decent team....W

@ Den....third road game in first 4....never an easy place to go....now with Miller/Chubb....W

vs JAC....AFC championship game previous year and picked by many to go to playoffs/super bowl....great defense, blah, blah, blah....W

@ NE....toe to toe with Brady at his house....lose by 3 in a team with ball last situation....L.....5-1 to start

I'd say many of those were big games and on the road....especially the first two......set the tone for the season....and they were not considered the favorite in some...

fast forward to game of the year against LAR....a 3 point loss....a huge win over BAL....etc

but quite honestly the "biggest" game of the year was the win over IND in the playoffs with the 6 game home losing streak gorilla on the Chiefs back and going against a hot IND team with Andrew Luck.....people don't understand the pressure 6 straight home loses create....Mahomes was supposed to be "the difference" and he came through...to be honest, everything after that in his first full year as a starter was gravy....so you are wrong, he has not lost every big game.... and he then gave his team the lead against the GOAT with 3 minutes to play and a chance at the Super Bowl....and then ties it up again after getting the ball back with 39 seconds....so not sure how you define "big games" but IMO he hasn't lost every big game of his career....he got his team the #1 seed....you can't get a higher seed....so he must of won a few "big" ones....and his four loses prior to the AFC championship were by a total of 14 points.....he did HIS part in every game this year really....gave his team a chance in every game....the defense is what really hurt them and he couldn't cover them each time....there were "plenty" of big games, but I guess our definitions might be different...
:lmao:  That’s a whole lot of effort for a throw away hyperbolic line. No he hasn’t lost EVERY[/] big game. Christ on a bike. 





 


 
It is very tempting to just load up on one area to try to create an overwhelming advantage. Something like

Mahomes, Beckham, Thomas, Tyreek, Kittle 

or

Derwin James, Eddie Jackson, Marshon Lattimore, Jalen Ramsey and Desmond King.
That was my thought process with Mack, Donald, and Garrett.

 
I think I would go with youth and hope to get a lot of years out of them:

Patrick Mahomes

Juju Smith-Schuster 

Joey Bosa

Derwin James

Quenton Nelson 

 
If you really want to maximize those players and build a team then quite frankly I would take both Baker and Patrick and then fill out my roster with Quentin, Myles, and Donald.

I then would open up bidding on Mahomes and demand at least one top player in return plus multiple high draft picks.

I think Denver, NYG, Washington, and many other teams would make huge offers.
This is just cheating the scenario.  If I play along with your strategy of taking both Baker Mayfield and Patrick Mahomes to trade one, why stop there?   If your whole plan is just to trade one of them then you would be foolish not to take it to its logical conclusion and do that with all 5 players. 

My team (by these rules):

1) Patrick Mahomes

2) Baker Mayfield

3) Russell Wilson

4) Andrew Luck

5) Jared Goff or Aaron Rodgers or Desean Watson or Cam or Wentz (whichever one you think you can trade for the most picks and players, it doesnt matter)

Then (if I go by your strategy) I offer them all up for trade and just keep one.  Really it shouldnt matter because each guy on this list is worth AT LEAST a top pick AND a top player if not multiples of both.  Whoever I am left with will have a great team around them and many top draft picks.

 
Myles Garrett

Q Nelson

Z Martin

A Donald

Mack

I'll take a strong OL/DL/pass rush and make due with non top 5 QB/WR/RB/DB.

 
I'll take a strong OL/DL/pass rush and make due with non top 5 QB/WR/RB/DB.
Something to be said for that.  My thinking is that you want players at the key places that market (ie NFL teams) pay the most for.  QB/DE/WR/CB/LT.  Players that you need for the passing game, and players you need to stop it.  Jalen Ramsey would be on more lists if he didn't keep running his mouth without backing it up.  As appealing as Barkley/Gurley is, that position is just not that valuable.  If you have Nelson (or Nelson and Martin in your example) anchoring your line, you're going to have running lanes

 
He's 27....I'd say he's got a few more seasons, and at his production and ability, I'd take that 
He's got a long concussion history is what he was getting at. His age is irrelevant to that. He's got a lot more longevity risk than a typically 27 year old, he may still be worth it, but personally, I'd prefer Bobby Wagner to him, partially because of the concussions, and partially because he might just be better right now. Of course, if I wanted to burn a top-5 choice on a LB, it'd probably be Vander Esch.

 
He's 27....I'd say he's got a few more seasons, and at his production and ability, I'd take that 
He's got a long concussion history is what he was getting at. His age is irrelevant to that. He's got a lot more longevity risk than a typically 27 year old, he may still be worth it, but personally, I'd prefer Bobby Wagner to him, partially because of the concussions, and partially because he might just be better right now. Of course, if I wanted to burn a top-5 choice on a LB, it'd probably be Vander Esch.
Completely agree.  MLB is a rough position in the modern NFL.  VanderEsch has been a machine, he is who I would take.

 
I'm building an offense

Todd Gurley

Alvin Kamara

Julio Jones

DeAndre Hopkins

Patrick Mahommes

I'll plug in an adequate OL and DL, and you can try to stop me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top