I was wondering about that myself...Did anyone else notice that Yudkin's redraft rankings are missing?
I think that's the reason this was brought up...I set "within the last X days" pulldown to 20, 35 and even 200 andthe results are always identical to the 7 day results. Looks like somethingmay be broken with that page.He's on vacation this week, and our rankings are set to roll off the main list after 7 days. You can manually toggle to see rankings that extend further back, but expect him to crop back up on the list upon his return.
I think that's the reason this was brought up...I set "within the last X days" pulldown to 20, 35 and even 200 andthe results are always identical to the 7 day results. Looks like somethingmay be broken with that page.He's on vacation this week, and our rankings are set to roll off the main list after 7 days. You can manually toggle to see rankings that extend further back, but expect him to crop back up on the list upon his return.
Thanks...was also wondering where his rankings had gone.Hey Guys...have on fear, Anarchy99 is alive and well and still getting a paycheck from Joe & David.He's on vacation this week, and our rankings are set to roll off the main list after 7 days. You can manually toggle to see rankings that extend further back, but expect him to crop back up on the list upon his return.
Work? Is that what he calls it? More like excellence in action. After he won the hot dog eating contest in a helium balloon dressed as a clown he should be glad to get to get back to "work".radballs said:This thread is awesome. The hot dog thing above is terrific. Get back to work DY following your holiday. We miss your contributions.![]()
Sort of.Because of screen width considerations, we limit the number of rankings shown to the most recent 12 submitted. That's why changing the time period has no effect.So what's wrong is the word "All." I probably should change that.Garrett said:joey said:I think that's the reason this was brought up...I set "within the last X days" pulldown to 20, 35 and even 200 andthe results are always identical to the 7 day results. Looks like somethingmay be broken with that page.Jason Wood said:He's on vacation this week, and our rankings are set to roll off the main list after 7 days. You can manually toggle to see rankings that extend further back, but expect him to crop back up on the list upon his return.![]()
So when the pre-season gets really rolling and all the footballguys are givingup to date rankings pretty often, we still only get to see the 12 most recent.Kind of partially defeats the purpose of "concensus" rankings, eh? I want to seewhat EVERYONE thinks and, especially, be able to at least see everyone's rankingsso I have to option to sort by specific FBGs or omit certain FBGs.Is the page screen width that big an issue? Please say that this can be fixed.thanksSort of.Because of screen width considerations, we limit the number of rankings shown to the most recent 12 submitted. That's why changing the time period has no effect.So what's wrong is the word "All." I probably should change that.Garrett said:joey said:I think that's the reason this was brought up...I set "within the last X days" pulldown to 20, 35 and even 200 andthe results are always identical to the 7 day results. Looks like somethingmay be broken with that page.Jason Wood said:He's on vacation this week, and our rankings are set to roll off the main list after 7 days. You can manually toggle to see rankings that extend further back, but expect him to crop back up on the list upon his return.![]()
I agree. I have my own list of trusted experts. If one of them has updated their rankings within the last 2 weeks I would still value their opinion more than another staff FootballGuy's opinion that is a couple of days newer.So when the pre-season gets really rolling and all the footballguys are givingup to date rankings pretty often, we still only get to see the 12 most recent.Kind of partially defeats the purpose of "concensus" rankings, eh? I want to seewhat EVERYONE thinks and, especially, be able to at least see everyone's rankingsso I have to option to sort by specific FBGs or omit certain FBGs.Is the page screen width that big an issue? Please say that this can be fixed.thanksSort of.Because of screen width considerations, we limit the number of rankings shown to the most recent 12 submitted. That's why changing the time period has no effect.So what's wrong is the word "All." I probably should change that.Garrett said:joey said:I think that's the reason this was brought up...I set "within the last X days" pulldown to 20, 35 and even 200 andthe results are always identical to the 7 day results. Looks like somethingmay be broken with that page.Jason Wood said:He's on vacation this week, and our rankings are set to roll off the main list after 7 days. You can manually toggle to see rankings that extend further back, but expect him to crop back up on the list upon his return.![]()
Certainly this has been an odd thread. But for those that are interested I updated/refreshed my player rankings.
Will update again tomorrow. The problem is that there are more staff submitting rankings than fit on the screen.They're missing again![]()
again I'll ask if there's any way to *not* limit the number of staff rankingcolumns we see? We are already limiting the number of days back we wantto see. If all the staff redo their rankings over a 2 day period, does this meanwe have no way of seeing everyone's rankings even though they're all equallyvalid.?Maybe you can add a "max # of columns" menu if folks don't want to see morethan 12 columns.Is this possible?Will update again tomorrow. The problem is that there are more staff submitting rankings than fit on the screen.They're missing again![]()
I second that motion.again I'll ask if there's any way to *not* limit the number of staff rankingcolumns we see? We are already limiting the number of days back we wantto see. If all the staff redo their rankings over a 2 day period, does this meanwe have no way of seeing everyone's rankings even though they're all equallyvalid.?Maybe you can add a "max # of columns" menu if folks don't want to see morethan 12 columns.Is this possible?Will update again tomorrow. The problem is that there are more staff submitting rankings than fit on the screen.They're missing again![]()
There's a difference between the rankings and the DD projections. The staff can update their rankings any time 24/7. The data dominator has updated releases with new projections throughout the preseason but I don't know the release schedule.I don't want to start another thread, and maybe I've missed this in this thread but when exactly are the rankings updated. Just curious as to which day I should update my DD.
Keep in mind the PD projections are only done by Dodds, Henry, Smith, Tremblay and Wood (whose name I will now forever get right) for offense, Dodds, Smith and Herman for Kickers, Dodds and Smith for Team Defense and Bloom and Norton for IDP.JoelThere's a difference between the rankings and the DD projections. The staff can update their rankings any time 24/7. The data dominator has updated releases with new projections throughout the preseason but I don't know the release schedule.I don't want to start another thread, and maybe I've missed this in this thread but when exactly are the rankings updated. Just curious as to which day I should update my DD.
When are you going to release dynasty rankings?There's a difference between the rankings and the DD projections. The staff can update their rankings any time 24/7. The data dominator has updated releases with new projections throughout the preseason but I don't know the release schedule.I don't want to start another thread, and maybe I've missed this in this thread but when exactly are the rankings updated. Just curious as to which day I should update my DD.
When we collectively agree on what the dynasty rankings are based on. Some rank based on now until infinity. I generally would rank now through three seasons. Because of that, there will be guys that are established that I would be way higher on (and rookies that I would not be as high on) as others.When are you going to release dynasty rankings?There's a difference between the rankings and the DD projections. The staff can update their rankings any time 24/7. The data dominator has updated releases with new projections throughout the preseason but I don't know the release schedule.I don't want to start another thread, and maybe I've missed this in this thread but when exactly are the rankings updated. Just curious as to which day I should update my DD.
Huge issue here. This has to be fixed.I second that motion.again I'll ask if there's any way to *not* limit the number of staff rankingcolumns we see? We are already limiting the number of days back we wantto see. If all the staff redo their rankings over a 2 day period, does this meanwe have no way of seeing everyone's rankings even though they're all equallyvalid.?Maybe you can add a "max # of columns" menu if folks don't want to see morethan 12 columns.Is this possible?Will update again tomorrow. The problem is that there are more staff submitting rankings than fit on the screen.They're missing again![]()
Yes, but he last updated 8/11 so you don't see them in the default 7-day ranking period. Change it to 14 and you'll see them.Also, you won't find them in the overall but will by position.Are Yudkin's rankings up currently?
Thanks dude.Yes, but he last updated 8/11 so you don't see them in the default 7-day ranking period. Change it to 14 and you'll see them.Also, you won't find them in the overall but will by position.Are Yudkin's rankings up currently?
http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/v...mp;howrecent=14
I'm working on all of these again today including overall rankings . . .Yes, but he last updated 8/11 so you don't see them in the default 7-day ranking period. Change it to 14 and you'll see them.Also, you won't find them in the overall but will by position.Are Yudkin's rankings up currently?
http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/v...mp;howrecent=14