This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Well if he can catch everything, he should make the team. With his size it should give TB the big target he needs with all of the other TE issues in NE.
He's probably pretty likely to make the roster now if they keep 4 TEs, and I'd say a lock if Gronk starts on PUP.
not really, because he will get more double coverage... bump Vereen
lazy reporting, speculating
Correct.
I believe hes just calling it as he sees it. Also, not the only one who was impressed by Sudfeld. If you don't like longshots why open a thread with one as the title?Is Sudfeld going to replace Aaron? Probably not. Will be a mixture of guys getting a boost. I don't think Gronk&Amendola qualify ther because the extra defensive attention cancels out any extra targets and their obstacles are health. More like Vereen, Edelman, Sudfeld, Jenkins, Ballard, and potentially one of those rookies. Don't forget that Lloyd's production is also missing. Can Sudfeld earn a large role? He certainly has flashed so it's possible. Guy has pretty good athleticism for a guy that big. Mix in Gronk's injury and the door open. Certainly worth a roster spot at the price of a waiver claim to find out if he can do it especially in those leagues with expanded offseason rosters.Keith Lewis said:
agree with this assessment. 11.56 of 200 was too much, but his popularity seems To be growing although he certainly is worth an add. He's add% doubled yesterday in MFL leagues
these are my first hand observations from traveling to the Shrine, Senior, Texas vs Nation Game each of the past seven years. Called several lonshots from UDFA and late round picks, written articles here about guys like Arian Foster, Tony Romo, Willie Parker, Pierre Garcon, Danny Amendola, Cecil Shorts, Bryce Brown, Marcel Reece, etc when they weren't household names.Keith Lewis said:
how often do we see trades in the NFL?domvin said:
Often enough that you have to consider it a possibility. I was gonna point out Kendricks, too. Not sure how the current St. Louis staff feels about him but they did give Cook a ton of money.
Arian Foster?
This is a topic about Zach Sudfeld, not about your beef with my insight. All that I mentioned are available in our archives and on episodes of The Audible. I wrote a college Dark Phoenix about Arian Foster when he was a junior at Tennessee (2007) and identified him as a player to watch. We also talked plenty about him when Bloom & I watched him at the Senior Bowl in January of 2009. He was looking like a candidate for Draftguys TV before he was injured on Wednesday's practice.
Believe it or not I'm the biggest fan of your insight. Your endorsement of Ronnie Hillman netted me Andrew Luck in my rookie draft last year.
Keith,
Everyone hits and misses, so why the attitude toward Lammey? Be thankful someone is actually at some of these practices and actually talks to coaches and players. I'd rather listen to someone like that than someone who posts Youtube videos and calls it breaking down film, lol.
On the chiefs side I agree. But Thomas actually played for the patriots so that makes sense and Clark was actually brought in last year for a look before he was deemed completely healthy. Given what is available, I can see both those options making sense. Not much out there really so why not have a look at something you have a baseline for?Keith Lewis said:
Good luck with that.
because you already have 5 other TE's on the roster?
In name they do, but in talent...they SHOULD be shopping around. Personally, I think their best shot at an in-house TE replacement is to convert Mark Harrison. But anyway, they may have a number of people who play TE, but they are significantly weakend at the TE position right now. Just my opinion but I think they need more than they currently have.
Tried for a bit to find a list of trades by Googling but here we go OTTOMH:
