Playing under Dodds is going well. I've started shortstacking NL ring games(min. buy in). This was a PM I sent Dodds a week ago:
Buy in for the minimum($40 at $1/2, $80 at $2/4). If you ever double that, leave that table as soon as your next blinds get to you.
-The strategy works for a few reasons. First off, many short stacked players are very bad in general I've found. Of course I'm not bad(I hope), yet most opponents instantly label a shortstacked player as below average. Thats good for us. Secondly, many players simply don't adjust for a shortstack. For example, if I raise to $8 and an opponent has a small PP then hes getting correct implied odds to call if I'm a normal stack, but not if I'm a shortstack. Third, many times in multiway pots it will be correct for a shortstack to maximize his EV by actually playing -EV vs you(but +EV towards the other bigger stacks in the hand of course). Obviously this is good for us. And finally, people simply are more willing to gamble when you have no chips behind you. I dunno....maybe these players really have been playing this bad all along and they just havn't shown down their hands, but just in this past session I got called on my all ins with hands like 77, Q8!!!, and AJ.
-Rolf Slotboom(sp?) wrote an Omaha book that explains his shortstacked strategy. I take a lot from that but apply it to hold em....its an interesting read if you get the chance(even if you don't care for Omaha).
-Basically what I do is to raise all monsters(JJ-AA) my normal amount as if I were deepstacked....this lets people make the mistake of not properly calculating their implied odds. If there are limpers or a raise in front of me then I'll push with these hands as well as with AK, AQ, TT, and 99. With any raise in front of me, I'm folding anything else unless I have a great read. Thats basically it....sounds too simple to work, but I really think it does.
-This strategy has the added benefit of letting us gain FPPs with minimum risk. If it works at these lower levels(which I'm fairly certain it will, as I have done it in the past with solid success at $1/2 and lower) and our bankroll increases then we could even sample it at higher stakes and see how it goes. Since I'm 100% sure to beat the Omaha8 games, all I really want from this strategy is to be a slight winner and gain massive FPPs...anything else is gravy.
-In blind vs blind situations, I believe that Sklansky had a section of one of his books(forget which one...maybe his NLHE T&P) where he went through each hand against a random opponent's hand and said how much you could have in your stack and still profitably push preflop....I'll have to go back and re-read that section to refine my game.
-I'm experimenting with slowplaying(limping with AA or KK), but I don't think its really that necessary. Also since I'm not limping AT ANY OTHER TIME, I think it'd become obvious after a while. If I get a monster in the SB and its folded to me, then I usually will slowplay since most aggressive players will raise when the SB completes.
-There are a few hands that I'm unsure how to play:
AQ, 88, 99 in EP/MP when its folded to me.
99,TT, JJ, AQs facing a raise in front of me.
77, 88, AJ, QK in LP when folded to me.
I've since refined it quite a bit and am constantly making adjustments. I think it is a very very successful strategy, and I've worked my way up to playing $5/10 already using it.