2011 was a total aberration for Rodgers, but the point I've been making is that he never again needs to reach those heights to justify a premium pick. Aaron Rodgers has been a starter for 6 years. In 2011, Aaron Rodgers was the #1 player at any position in terms of VBD (despite sitting a game). Aberration. In his other 5 years, though, if you pro-rate his stats, Rodgers would have ranked 19th, 11th, 5th, 4th, and 11th in season-ending VBD (regardless of position). So even if we pretend that 2011 was all a magical mushroom-inspired hallucination and delete all records of it from existence, Aaron Rodgers is still far and away the #1 dynasty QB in the land by a significant margin.
Even if we wipe the 2011 season off the map entirely, Aaron Rodgers has consistently provided a 5+ PPG advantage over a QB12 baseline. His worst- his WORST, very worst, absolute worst-in-history season- was "only" a 4.7 PPG advantage over a QB12 baseline.
And yes, I know it's ironic that I'm using VBD numbers one post after I bashed VBD, but like I said, it's quick, it's easy to calculate (actually, it's freely available on PFR, no calculations necessary), and it's a good place to start the discussion.
I do think Rogers is worth a premium pick. While someone has always liked him more than me--so it hasn't mattered to this point--I'd spend a late 2nd round startup pick on him. That's at least a round earlier than I'd touch another QB (Cam).
Also, I'm not so concerned with having my opinion validated by a single number. My claim was never that Rodgers' best season didn't provide an advantage on par with Gronk/Graham. My claim was that
he doesn't provide an advantage over his peers in terms of dynasty value. Yes, fantasy points are a huge part of that, and I do think Gronk/Graham will have the edge there most healthy seasons. But I don't need to prove that Rodgers' best season--by far!--wasn't better than a single season of Gronk/Graham (save 2011 Gronk), to feel comfortable with my stance.
The depth at QB does show up in the VBD numbers, but it goes beyond that, too. Unlike the top TEs, Rodgers shares his tier with two young foundation pieces in Luck and Newton. Until the Panthers made it clear that Newton won't be the GL back, he was my top QB. I see a valid argument for liking Luck more, too. In addition, there are 2 players in Peyton and Brees who match Rodgers' short-term production. If the QB depth dropped of there--I think there could be reason to treat Rodgers as a late first round startup pick, but it doesn't. Stafford, Ryan, Wilson, Kaepernick, Rivers, and a major wildcard in Foles. People have cooled on both players, but I like the chances of Manziel and Teddy being fantasy relevant. Looking ahead, I love Mariota and Winston seems to be very safe, too. On top of all of this, Brady, Romo, Ben, and maybe even Dalton are the worst case scenarios for owners who don't invest much at the spot. And, perhaps my favorite value in all of fantasy football is a QB currently going in the 6th round of startup drafts--a QB that you and I were both very early in treating as a tier 1 player, on par with Rodgers and Cam, as a rookie: Bobby Three Sticks.
The QB spot is less divided by situation than the TE spot is, right now. For the most part, the best QBs are allowed to throw the ball around. At TE, while the number is increasing--there are only 5 or so situations which would allow one to compete with Gronk and Graham, even if one was a like talent.
I love Jordan Reed, but he has questions. All of the young guys after the top tier have questions. Thomas is likely the 3rd most valuable TE right now and I don't know anyone that thinks he's the 3rd most talented TE in the NFL. Cameron is a major question mark with Norv and Chud gone, and after tailing off last season. Eifert is a solid prospect, but is still a coinflip, as is Ebron and Ertz. Davis is solid, but doesn't provide much of an advantage over his peers. Witten's getting older, Gonzo's gone. I just see a VERY clear path to VORP for both top TEs--both in points (VBD) and the other things we measure our dyansty assets by (talent, age, security, etc).
Aaron Rodgers hasn't come close to his 2011 numbers in his last two tries, and I don't expect him to on a year-by-year basis. My expectations are much closer to his baseline than his peak. That is a very solid part, worth building around. But not quite the special advantage that Gronk and Graham are when healthy.