In a TE required league, I would accept either of those offers to receive Gates.Two weeks ago...
I offered Gates/Jarrett for B.Edwards/Marshall - rejected.
I offered Eli/Gabriel for Leinart/Marshall - rejected
I offered Gates/Bruce for Edwards/Marshall - rejected (probably not the best offer)
It's not a TE required league. WR and TE are grouped as the same.In a TE required league, I would accept either of those offers to receive Gates.Two weeks ago...
I offered Gates/Jarrett for B.Edwards/Marshall - rejected.
I offered Eli/Gabriel for Leinart/Marshall - rejected
I offered Gates/Bruce for Edwards/Marshall - rejected (probably not the best offer)
Those are the first two guys that popped into my head when I started reading this post. All share the good measurables and have talent, but the speed just isn't there, so they all will be limited target-wise. And this is coming from an Ernest Wilford apologist.I've always been a little bit wary of him. He looked painfully slow in college. The camp buzz was good and he closed out last year in good form, but I'm still seeing too many shades of Ernest Wilford and Clarence Moore here.
where's bloom?
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEwhere's bloom?
1) Wilford and Moore don't have the agility/athleticism of Marshall - they are both as big as Marshall, but much stiffer.2) Moore doesn't have ball skills approaching Marshall's, and Wilford does, but he also struggles with drops.3) Wilford and Moore don't have the run after catch ability, both in speed and tackle breaking/moves, of Marshall. Did Marshall look painfully slow on his 71 yard TD catch and run vs. Seattle?Usually I agree with you EBF, but I believe you're missing the boat here.I've always been a little bit wary of him. He looked painfully slow in college. The camp buzz was good and he closed out last year in good form, but I'm still seeing too many shades of Ernest Wilford and Clarence Moore here.
Marshall is actually one of the guys on my teams I deemed untouchable this offseason. I really want to see what he can do this year.1) Wilford and Moore don't have the agility/athleticism of Marshall - they are both as big as Marshall, but much stiffer.2) Moore doesn't have ball skills approaching Marshall's, and Wilford does, but he also struggles with drops.3) Wilford and Moore don't have the run after catch ability, both in speed and tackle breaking/moves, of Marshall. Did Marshall look painfully slow on his 71 yard TD catch and run vs. Seattle.Usually I agree with you EBF, but I believe you're missing the boat here.I've always been a little bit wary of him. He looked painfully slow in college. The camp buzz was good and he closed out last year in good form, but I'm still seeing too many shades of Ernest Wilford and Clarence Moore here.
Very true Colin, sometimes you just have the roster space to let a guy sit and develop. With receivers though it can be a crap shoot at times whether or not they pan out.I tend to let young receivers sit on someone else's bench for a while. While I applaud those of you with the foresight to grab Brandon Marshall and other young receivers, I find that veterans with the same production can often be had for half the price.
Now is a bad time to go for Marshall.Wait for week 3, he'll have 5 catches for 40 yards, 0 TDs, and people will be screaming he's a bust. =)Very true Colin, sometimes you just have the roster space to let a guy sit and develop. With receivers though it can be a crap shoot at times whether or not they pan out.I tend to let young receivers sit on someone else's bench for a while. While I applaud those of you with the foresight to grab Brandon Marshall and other young receivers, I find that veterans with the same production can often be had for half the price.
This isn't a bad strategy. Lee Evans started out ice cold last year too.Now is a bad time to go for Marshall.Wait for week 3, he'll have 5 catches for 40 yards, 0 TDs, and people will be screaming he's a bust. =)Very true Colin, sometimes you just have the roster space to let a guy sit and develop. With receivers though it can be a crap shoot at times whether or not they pan out.I tend to let young receivers sit on someone else's bench for a while. While I applaud those of you with the foresight to grab Brandon Marshall and other young receivers, I find that veterans with the same production can often be had for half the price.
Then again, it's still a bit of a crap shoot. You can pay a lower price, but what are you really getting? If they turn it around like Lee Evans...you're a genius. If not, you are looking like a BMW ower. Well, you get the point.This isn't a bad strategy. Lee Evans started out ice cold last year too.Now is a bad time to go for Marshall.Wait for week 3, he'll have 5 catches for 40 yards, 0 TDs, and people will be screaming he's a bust. =)Very true Colin, sometimes you just have the roster space to let a guy sit and develop. With receivers though it can be a crap shoot at times whether or not they pan out.I tend to let young receivers sit on someone else's bench for a while. While I applaud those of you with the foresight to grab Brandon Marshall and other young receivers, I find that veterans with the same production can often be had for half the price.
Any openings?He's available on the waiver wire in my dynasty league, I'm planning on pick him up in the second or third round probably. No one in my league seems to have much interest in him, either that or he's just not on their radar at all
Any openings?He's available on the waiver wire in my dynasty league, I'm planning on pick him up in the second or third round probably. No one in my league seems to have much interest in him, either that or he's just not on their radar at all
Awesome trade for the other guy.I traded the 1.09 selection for Marshall myself
He would have been on my leagues waivers had I not picked him up last year. Not every dynasty league has waivers opened year round or huge rosters to stash project players away on for a few years.Any openings?He's available on the waiver wire in my dynasty league, I'm planning on pick him up in the second or third round probably. No one in my league seems to have much interest in him, either that or he's just not on their radar at all
Clarence Moore is a 6'6" beanpole who can't catch. Ernest Wilford is as slow as molasses and can't catch.Marshall is bigger, faster and has better hands that either of those two bums.I've always been a little bit wary of him. He looked painfully slow in college. The camp buzz was good and he closed out last year in good form, but I'm still seeing too many shades of Ernest Wilford and Clarence Moore here.
Yea I would have stashed him long ago but waivers close in week 14 and its only a 22 man roster with IDP'sHe would have been on my leagues waivers had I not picked him up last year. Not every dynasty league has waivers opened year round or huge rosters to stash project players away on for a few years.Any openings?He's available on the waiver wire in my dynasty league, I'm planning on pick him up in the second or third round probably. No one in my league seems to have much interest in him, either that or he's just not on their radar at all
Good for you. Your fantasy football priviledges would have been suspended had you made that awful trade.Who makes an offer like that? Marty Booker for Brandon Marshall? C'mon!Mister CIA said:I rejected a straight-up Marty Booker for Marshall offer.
This offer was accepted for those interestedPatoons said:Just offered Gates/2.03/2008 second for Marshall/1.03 - ---- No TE required leagueHowever, we have a one roundc ollege draft each and most of the solid players are taken... russell, meachem, bowe are some of the guys not taken in the top 14
concurIn a TE required league, I would accept either of those offers to receive Gates.Two weeks ago...
I offered Gates/Jarrett for B.Edwards/Marshall - rejected.
I offered Eli/Gabriel for Leinart/Marshall - rejected
I offered Gates/Bruce for Edwards/Marshall - rejected (probably not the best offer)
Not TE reqconcurIn a TE required league, I would accept either of those offers to receive Gates.Two weeks ago...
I offered Gates/Jarrett for B.Edwards/Marshall - rejected.
I offered Eli/Gabriel for Leinart/Marshall - rejected
I offered Gates/Bruce for Edwards/Marshall - rejected (probably not the best offer)
nevermind.Not TE reqconcurIn a TE required league, I would accept either of those offers to receive Gates.Two weeks ago...
I offered Gates/Jarrett for B.Edwards/Marshall - rejected.
I offered Eli/Gabriel for Leinart/Marshall - rejected
I offered Gates/Bruce for Edwards/Marshall - rejected (probably not the best offer)
I didn't see anyone catching him. I did see him run over some guys. That slows you down. Yet no one caught him. he's fast enough. Video os on the denverbroncos.com site under Brand Marshall's profile.For comparison, Marshall, who caught 20 passes as a rookie for the Broncos, was clocked in 4.49 seconds at the Combine last year, then 4.44 at pro day. Walker did not run the 40 Thursday.1) Wilford and Moore don't have the agility/athleticism of Marshall - they are both as big as Marshall, but much stiffer.2) Moore doesn't have ball skills approaching Marshall's, and Wilford does, but he also struggles with drops.I've always been a little bit wary of him. He looked painfully slow in college. The camp buzz was good and he closed out last year in good form, but I'm still seeing too many shades of Ernest Wilford and Clarence Moore here.
3) Wilford and Moore don't have the run after catch ability, both in speed and tackle breaking/moves, of Marshall.
Did Marshall look painfully slow on his 71 yard TD catch and run vs. Seattle?
Usually I agree with you EBF, but I believe you're missing the boat here.
Always solid. I love Brandon Marshall, and I feel that his personality (he's a bit of a nut - Jeff Legwold told Bloom & me that at the Senior Bowl) keeps him level headed. I know that he's one of the earliest to arrive at Dove Valley, and one of the latest to leave. He's taking his opportunity seriously, and I would love to see it translate into on-the-field performance.As a Denver fan, I'd be a lot more excited about Brandon Marshall if it weren't for Darius Watts, Triandos Luke, Adrian Madise, Chris Cole, Kelvin Kight, and Marcus Nash. Who are they? My point exactly.For two straight years now in Lammey's Denver camp reports I have made a joke about the lifecycle of the "next big WR" in Denver. Basically, what it boils down to is this:Step #1- he gets drafted (usually reasonably late, although occasionally he's drafted early and viewed as a rather large reach). Step #2- he gets hyped as potentially the next Rod Smith. Step #3- he gets into training camps, makes a few circus catches with shorts on. Step #4- the media whips the hype into a veritable frenzy. The WR's replica jerseys start selling like hotcakes. Watercooler discussions center on whether the WR will go for 1,000 yards this year, or if it will take him until next season. Step #5- the season rolls around and the WR spends most of it on the inactive list. Step #6- the WR finally cracks the active list, has a lot of ill-timed drops, generally plays well below-average, fans declare WR a collosal disappointment. Step #7- WR makes one or two absolute circus plays very late in the season, but otherwise remains stuck in his well-below-average ways. Step #8- Offseason rolls around. If Denver drafts a new WR late or reaches on a new WR early, return to step #1. Otherwise, advance to step #9. Step #9- Despite slump, WR is projected as the #2 in the upcoming season again. Fans forget the discussion of said WRs mediocrity and wax nostalgically about the aforementioned circus catches. Return to step #2.Now, Brandon Marshall may be the WR to break that cycle, but then again, Darius Watts and Triandos Luke might have been, as well. Until he shows me something more than 20 catches for 300 yards, I'm going to remain guarded in my optimism. Give me a proven performer any day of the week.
Missing Ashley Lelie and Eddie Kennison. A valid list regardless.As a Denver fan, I'd be a lot more excited about Brandon Marshall if it weren't for Darius Watts, Triandos Luke, Adrian Madise, Chris Cole, Kelvin Kight, and Marcus Nash. Who are they? My point exactly.
The fact that Marshall is a "beat of a different drummer" guy just earns him more points in my book. and he's from Pittsburgh.Cecil Lammey said:I love Brandon Marshall, and I feel that his personality (he's a bit of a nut - Jeff Legwold told Bloom & me that at the Senior Bowl) keeps him level headed.