matuski
Footballguy
There we go.. he fits.
There we go.. he fits.
Would destroy you. Now and superMatsuki of 5 years agoThere we go.. he fits.
He'd take out both of them at the same time.Would destroy you. Now and superMatsuki of 5 years agoThere we go.. he fits.
It doesn't matter about the parameters - he'd clap the bacon grease acne off a 280 pound man.matuski said:Neither 135 nor 230 fall into the weight parameters set.. and I'm betting your friend is also outside the height parameters.rizzler said:FWIW, Im friends with Mike Strange (he was a Canadian Olympic Boxer). He won gold in the commonwealth games.
He fought at approx 135 pounds he said - and he was confident, because he's done it before, that he would beat the living #### out of any 230+ pound "fit" man, with no professional training, in seconds.
This isn't backyard brawling, you numbskulls. These guys put in 8+hr days for 10-15yrs honing their craft.
You lardasses wouldn't be able to eat another chicken wing for months.
Hold on, I'll check. Michael Strange 5'9" 139lbs. Not even close. Knock half a foot or more, and 15 lbs off this guy.
5 foot nothing 125 lbs. I didn't make the claim versus anyone smaller than me, the claim was made versus the teeniest of tiny.
Bucky86 said:SacramentoBob said:rizzler said:You lardasses wouldn't be able to eat another chicken wing for months.
Yeah, his fist, your ###.matuski said:There we go.. he fits.SacramentoBob said:
No way is there a 161 lbs between those two guys. 40 lbs, maxCliff Clavin said:
Punches weren't phasing fattie so the Ethiopian kid had to spidermonkey his ###.Cliff Clavin said:
You got your ### kicked, didn't you?I appreciate everyone trying to rehash things covered in this thread ad nauseam through the years.... but perhaps read it before jumping 6.5 years later?
Forgive me for not responding to all the johnny come lately's... you aren't adding anything new.
This is my favorite thread ever but it is unfortunately becoming predictable and repetitive. I'm barely a shadow of my physical self from back then (30 then, 37 now), I've lost the curiosity and interest.
You'd never hit him. You never would have hit him when you were 30. You are delusional. Which is the entire appeal of the thread.I appreciate everyone trying to rehash things covered in this thread ad nauseam through the years.... but perhaps read it before jumping 6.5 years later?
Forgive me for not responding to all the johnny come lately's... you aren't adding anything new.
This is my favorite thread ever but it is unfortunately becoming predictable and repetitive. I'm barely a shadow of my physical self from back then (30 then, 37 now), I've lost the curiosity and interest.
read as: "I've left my moms basement and seen the world finally..."I appreciate everyone trying to rehash things covered in this thread ad nauseam through the years.... but perhaps read it before jumping 6.5 years later?
Forgive me for not responding to all the johnny come lately's... you aren't adding anything new.
This is my favorite thread ever but it is unfortunately becoming predictable and repetitive. I'm barely a shadow of my physical self from back then (30 then, 37 now), I've lost the curiosity and interest.
And he won a fight after his leg was broken.matuski said:There we go.. he fits.SacramentoBob said:
See my last post.. this is same as the first page of the thread years and years ago. And every page since.You have no idea how to generate power like a trained boxer does. I'd love to see your big ####### in there trying to hit a "tiny person" or evade some of their punches while trying to hit back. You would either give up or just fall down like you really were knocked out, keeping one eye open to see when the ref finished counting.What a difference 5 years makes. Damn age, damn kids, damn career.
While not completely gone athletically.. I am certainly a shell of the guy that would whoop any tiny person's ###. I must admit I don't feel quite so strong in my abilities now as then. I'll drop the "any", and replace it with "damn near any".
Was never a doubt until recently, however.
Still my favorite thread ever, and still awesome to watch so many people stay so riled up so long over the obvious conclusion that size matters assuming a base level of athleticism.
Dont take too long, I was about to post how a six foot former olympic boxer I know can kick your butt. Unless that was already coveredSee my last post.. this is same as the first page of the thread years and years ago. And every page since.You have no idea how to generate power like a trained boxer does. I'd love to see your big ####### in there trying to hit a "tiny person" or evade some of their punches while trying to hit back. You would either give up or just fall down like you really were knocked out, keeping one eye open to see when the ref finished counting.What a difference 5 years makes. Damn age, damn kids, damn career.
While not completely gone athletically.. I am certainly a shell of the guy that would whoop any tiny person's ###. I must admit I don't feel quite so strong in my abilities now as then. I'll drop the "any", and replace it with "damn near any".
Was never a doubt until recently, however.
Still my favorite thread ever, and still awesome to watch so many people stay so riled up so long over the obvious conclusion that size matters assuming a base level of athleticism.
I stand by myself in my prime versus guy that is smaller than any adult male I've seen since this thread started.
I'll check back to see if someone has a new angle every now and then.
no big deal. The thread can continue, except it's no longer about veatherweight vs Matsuki, it's now about featherweight vs Matsukis'-Self-Image-from-7-Years -Ago.I appreciate everyone trying to rehash things covered in this thread ad nauseam through the years.... but perhaps read it before jumping 6.5 years later?
Forgive me for not responding to all the johnny come lately's... you aren't adding anything new.
This is my favorite thread ever but it is unfortunately becoming predictable and repetitive. I'm barely a shadow of my physical self from back then (30 then, 37 now), I've lost the curiosity and interest.
Yeah, but the featherweight's 7 years older, too.no big deal. The thread can continue, except it's no longer about veatherweight vs Matsuki, it's now about featherweight vs Matsukis'-Self-Image-from-7-Years -Ago.I appreciate everyone trying to rehash things covered in this thread ad nauseam through the years.... but perhaps read it before jumping 6.5 years later?
Forgive me for not responding to all the johnny come lately's... you aren't adding anything new.
This is my favorite thread ever but it is unfortunately becoming predictable and repetitive. I'm barely a shadow of my physical self from back then (30 then, 37 now), I've lost the curiosity and interest.
That's a damn good point.Yeah, but the featherweight's 7 years older, too.no big deal. The thread can continue, except it's no longer about veatherweight vs Matsuki, it's now about featherweight vs Matsukis'-Self-Image-from-7-Years -Ago.I appreciate everyone trying to rehash things covered in this thread ad nauseam through the years.... but perhaps read it before jumping 6.5 years later?
Forgive me for not responding to all the johnny come lately's... you aren't adding anything new.
This is my favorite thread ever but it is unfortunately becoming predictable and repetitive. I'm barely a shadow of my physical self from back then (30 then, 37 now), I've lost the curiosity and interest.
It's up there.This thread definitely ranks in my top 10 favorites
One of the my favorite posts of all time.I would give myself good odds with the likes of Pacquiao.
One of the my favorite posts of all time.I would give myself good odds with the likes of Pacquiao.
infinity.Better question: how long would matsuki have to train in MMA to get to the point of being able to reliably defeat an in-prime Manny Pacquaio?
infinity.Better question: how long would matsuki have to train in MMA to get to the point of being able to reliably defeat an in-prime Manny Pacquaio?
If I were 6'4 I would have made a bolder claim versus Pacq. But he did not fit the original parameters so I stepped back a good deal versus him off the original claim.There comes a point where superior boxing skill gives way to size and strength. I doubt OP is big enough to be in that zone. But a dude who's 6'4 and has considerable muscle would take a featherweight, I'm pretty confident in that.
Pac rolls any 6'4 muscular guy in less than 30 seconds who isn't a fighter.If I were 6'4 I would have made a bolder claim versus Pacq. But he did not fit the original parameters so I stepped back a good deal versus him off the original claim.There comes a point where superior boxing skill gives way to size and strength. I doubt OP is big enough to be in that zone. But a dude who's 6'4 and has considerable muscle would take a featherweight, I'm pretty confident in that.
ok, Paq vs Shaq. (in their primes). Who wins?There comes a point where superior boxing skill gives way to size and strength. I doubt OP is big enough to be in that zone. But a dude who's 6'4 and has considerable muscle would take a featherweight, I'm pretty confident in that.
Sweep the knee?maybe a better question is could I whup a guy 6'5", 250 lbs, athletic with no fighting training? I'd be giving up a full 1 ft in height, and 100 lbs in weight. I don't think I could, but I'm not that great of a fighter.
I know for a fact my MMA instructor, a professional fighter who stands 5'5" and fights at 145 could...I've seen him do it.
nah. Body shots until opponent buckles over, then head kick. Or, take him down and submit him. Either way.Sweep the knee?maybe a better question is could I whup a guy 6'5", 250 lbs, athletic with no fighting training? I'd be giving up a full 1 ft in height, and 100 lbs in weight. I don't think I could, but I'm not that great of a fighter.
I know for a fact my MMA instructor, a professional fighter who stands 5'5" and fights at 145 could...I've seen him do it.
Today (150lbs), perhaps... in his featherweight days (relevant to this thread), no.Pac rolls any 6'4 muscular guy in less than 30 seconds who isn't a fighter.If I were 6'4 I would have made a bolder claim versus Pacq. But he did not fit the original parameters so I stepped back a good deal versus him off the original claim.There comes a point where superior boxing skill gives way to size and strength. I doubt OP is big enough to be in that zone. But a dude who's 6'4 and has considerable muscle would take a featherweight, I'm pretty confident in that.
I just ran into this video. Very topical to your postJeez, MMA today is like karate in the 1970s -- makes up for any and all size/age/experience discrepancies. Must have a ton of teenage MMA hotshots get their arzses handed to them in barrooms all across America.
Skill makes up for the discrepancies.Jeez, MMA today is like karate in the 1970s -- makes up for any and all size/age/experience discrepancies. Must have a ton of teenage MMA hotshots get their arzses handed to them in barrooms all across America.
I believe Gracie jiu jitsu was designed specifically for smaller, weaker fighters to over come size disadvantage.Skill makes up for the discrepancies.Jeez, MMA today is like karate in the 1970s -- makes up for any and all size/age/experience discrepancies. Must have a ton of teenage MMA hotshots get their arzses handed to them in barrooms all across America.
You have a collegiate wrestling background and have trained MMA long enough to go for a shot without getting punched. I have no doubt you'd be able to take a guy that size down since he has no idea how to defend himself against a wrestler.maybe a better question is could I whup a guy 6'5", 250 lbs, athletic with no fighting training? I'd be giving up a full 1 ft in height, and 100 lbs in weight. I don't think I could, but I'm not that great of a fighter.
I know for a fact my MMA instructor, a professional fighter who stands 5'5" and fights at 145 could...I've seen him do it.
I have a hard time dealing with reach. Even in my wrestling days, I struggled against tall skinny guys. Its not the weight that gives me pause, its an inability to get in close enough to execute my game.Im working on that part, but its not easy. At all.You have a collegiate wrestling background and have trained MMA long enough to go for a shot without getting punched. I have no doubt you'd be able to take a guy that size down since he has no idea how to defend himself against a wrestler.maybe a better question is could I whup a guy 6'5", 250 lbs, athletic with no fighting training? I'd be giving up a full 1 ft in height, and 100 lbs in weight. I don't think I could, but I'm not that great of a fighter.
I know for a fact my MMA instructor, a professional fighter who stands 5'5" and fights at 145 could...I've seen him do it.
LSU or Orlando Shaq destroys Paq.ok, Paq vs Shaq. (in their primes). Who wins?There comes a point where superior boxing skill gives way to size and strength. I doubt OP is big enough to be in that zone. But a dude who's 6'4 and has considerable muscle would take a featherweight, I'm pretty confident in that.
I think you're comparing yourself to taller, bigger guys who are also wrestlers. Did any of your non-wrestling friends in HS/college ever challenge you to a wrestling match to see if you could take them down?I have a hard time dealing with reach. Even in my wrestling days, I struggled against tall skinny guys. Its not the weight that gives me pause, its an inability to get in close enough to execute my game.Im working on that part, but its not easy. At all.You have a collegiate wrestling background and have trained MMA long enough to go for a shot without getting punched. I have no doubt you'd be able to take a guy that size down since he has no idea how to defend himself against a wrestler.maybe a better question is could I whup a guy 6'5", 250 lbs, athletic with no fighting training? I'd be giving up a full 1 ft in height, and 100 lbs in weight. I don't think I could, but I'm not that great of a fighter.
I know for a fact my MMA instructor, a professional fighter who stands 5'5" and fights at 145 could...I've seen him do it.