First time poster - and I have to say of all the boards discussing the Vick situation I think this has been the most above board discussion. Lots of good points on different aspects of the situation. While it is painfully obvious, there are several murky issues - with no clearly defined lines separating them. I see the four main issues as 1) rush to judgment; 2) Innocent until proven guilty; 3) What will/Can the NFL do; and, 4) what will/can the Falcons do.1. Rush to judgment - I have gone back to read a few threads that have evolved over the last few months. There was plenty of back and forth as to Vick's guilt or innocence (sort of like ESPN). It looks like the pendulum has swung back in favor of those who believe Vick is guilty of something. But, I would caution to judge slowly. The indictment, as many have pointed out, is very serious. It is also very specific, and the Feds clearly have cooperating witnesses feeding them this story. Taken on its face, it is a very damning document. But, we have not heard Vick's side of the story. We also do not know anything about the credibility of the cooperating witnesses. There are always multiple sides to every story - form your judgments, but keep an open mind for a different version of facts.2. Innocent until proven guilty - this has been the rallying cry of those who believe (or desperately want) Vick to be innocent. The problem is that standard has only one place - a criminal court of law. In a criminal case the government bears the burden of proving a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Nobody else has to meet that burden. Not a civil plaintiff, not an employer, not a sponsor, and certainly not the court of public opinion. Don't be fooled into thinking that simply because the government can not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, that someone is innocent.3. What will/can the NFL do - many posters have pointed out the various clauses in collective bargaining agreement that would allow the NFL to impose punishment - personal conduct, gambling, etc. At the end of the day, Goodell and the NFL will act just like you or I - They will act in their own self-preservation. If public interests builds to the point that the NFL feels it is damaging the league, Vick will be gone. If the public outcry is muted, Vick will stick around. This will have nothing to do with Vick's actual guilt or innocense, but rather the verdict (and punishment) delivered by the court of public opinion. (See Don Imus). I am certain that Goodell will weigh the results of his own investigation with the likelihood of Vick's ultimate conviction, and with the financial consequences of not acting. 4. What will the Falcons do - they will be governed by the same principles. They will act when they feel it is in their best interests to act. Blank has more at stake than just the Falcons, but the team also has to consider the impact of having Vick on the team in short-term and long-term. If it will cost the team money and/or value Blank will cut his ties, otherwise he will ride it out.The league and the Team can cut ties with Vick anytime they want - regardless of any language in the CBA or contract. The consequences of potential breaches of the CBA and/or player contract will be the subject of grievances or suits - but those are money damages (which can also be delayed ad infinitum). When the cost of keeping Vick exceeds the cost of cutting/suspending Vick the NFL and/or the Falcons will act.We won't know the fallout until after the initial surge of publicity - we will see if advertisers and season ticket holders start putting real pressure on the league.For the record, I am a former Falcon season-ticket holder (moved away from the area). I originally bought my season tickets the day the Falcon's drafted Vick. I also believe he is guilty of something here (if nothing else - bad judgment in picking friends), and is likely a big player in the dog-fighting world. If Blank or Goodell were to ask my advice, I would say they should cut bait as soon as practical. From the Falcon's perspective, they need to move on a quickly as possible to get a fresh start. This is probably going to be a lost season regardless - and I think it is clear that Vick is not the long-term solution at QB. From the NFL's perspective, they do not want the NBA to be known as the "Clean" league.