hutchins929
Footballguy
Risk...nough said.
Risk...nough said.
Regular Risk sucks (sorry, no other way to put it). However, the new version coming out is supposed to be pretty darn good.Risk Black Ops - available only to reviewers (unfortunately).Risk...nough said.
Falconeyed:Great big thanks to you and everyone else that recommended these games. My wife and I have one child - daughter, age 7. Bought three of these games:1. Carcossonne - played it a few times. So far so good.2. Settlers of Catan - haven't played it yet.3. Ticket to Ride - wow. All three of us love this game. We play it several times a week. Absolutely fantastic.1 - Ticket to Ride2 - Carcassonne3 - Yspahan4 - Settlers of Catan5 - Thebes
I loved Statis Pro Baseball, Bowl Bound and Title Bout. I have the new CD version of Title Bout for my computer.Statis pro baseball, football, basketball. All are highly addictive. baseball is my fav though.Also Avalon hill made a superb boxing game called Title Bout. I actually busted out all these a few months ago and played some baseball and boxing. Both are great solitare games while football and basketball make for awesome head to head play.
One of the best games eva. Make sure you get a line into the Southeast!!!Avalon Hill's Rail Baron
Speaking of this, anyone play the new version of A&A, Spring 1942? They've rebalanced the game a bunch. I like it a lot. I've only played it twice, but the Axis won both times without any rule modification. Definitely a new feel to the game.Russia attacking on the first move increases the Axis chances of winning.You need to have your own modifications of the rules, eg., Russia can't attack on their first move.I don't think I ever saw the Axis win this game if the Allies weren't morons.Axis and Allies: While a fun game, I have a problem with any war game that takes longer to set up than the actual war it was based on.
Is this the one where the split the game by theaters? Or is it something else?Speaking of this, anyone play the new version of A&A, Spring 1942? They've rebalanced the game a bunch. I like it a lot. I've only played it twice, but the Axis won both times without any rule modification. Definitely a new feel to the game.Russia attacking on the first move increases the Axis chances of winning.You need to have your own modifications of the rules, eg., Russia can't attack on their first move.I don't think I ever saw the Axis win this game if the Allies weren't morons.Axis and Allies: While a fun game, I have a problem with any war game that takes longer to set up than the actual war it was based on.
No, it is still the entire world. They've made a few revisions to the basic rules over the years. They've had the second edition rules, the 25th anniversary edition, and maybe one more. This is the most recent that combines some of them all.Is this the one where the split the game by theaters? Or is it something else?
I've found that the Axis still loses most of the time, just not as fast. It's still fun though.Unless they've changed the rules in the last couple of years, haven't played it in a while.No, it is still the entire world. They've made a few revisions to the basic rules over the years. They've had the second edition rules, the 25th anniversary edition, and maybe one more. This is the most recent that combines some of them all.Is this the one where the split the game by theaters? Or is it something else?
I believe the Spring 1942 edition is new this year. I could be wrong though.TexanFan02 said:I've found that the Axis still loses most of the time, just not as fast. It's still fun though.Unless they've changed the rules in the last couple of years, haven't played it in a while.Bull Dozier said:No, it is still the entire world. They've made a few revisions to the basic rules over the years. They've had the second edition rules, the 25th anniversary edition, and maybe one more. This is the most recent that combines some of them all.SierraKiloBravo said:Is this the one where the split the game by theaters? Or is it something else?
Is the key still to cut off the initial supplies from the US to the UK?I believe the Spring 1942 edition is new this year. I could be wrong though.TexanFan02 said:I've found that the Axis still loses most of the time, just not as fast. It's still fun though.Unless they've changed the rules in the last couple of years, haven't played it in a while.Bull Dozier said:No, it is still the entire world. They've made a few revisions to the basic rules over the years. They've had the second edition rules, the 25th anniversary edition, and maybe one more. This is the most recent that combines some of them all.SierraKiloBravo said:Is this the one where the split the game by theaters? Or is it something else?
I'm definitely not an expert. I've only played the new one a couple of times, and the old one a dozen or so. I've always felt there were a few different routes to Axis victory, but that how Japan was played was the most important key. I don't think I've ever seen the Axis win in spite of Japan, but I've seen the Axis win in spite of Germany.Is the key still to cut off the initial supplies from the US to the UK?I believe the Spring 1942 edition is new this year. I could be wrong though.TexanFan02 said:I've found that the Axis still loses most of the time, just not as fast. It's still fun though.Unless they've changed the rules in the last couple of years, haven't played it in a while.Bull Dozier said:No, it is still the entire world. They've made a few revisions to the basic rules over the years. They've had the second edition rules, the 25th anniversary edition, and maybe one more. This is the most recent that combines some of them all.SierraKiloBravo said:Is this the one where the split the game by theaters? Or is it something else?
SCRABBLE IS DEAD.SCRABBLE
I'm gonna go get my torch and pitchfork and storm the Mattel HQ. Who's with me?Proper nouns come into play in Scrabble rule change
The rules of word game Scrabble are being changed for the first time in its history to allow the use of proper nouns, games company Mattel has said.
Place names, people's names and company names or brands will now count.
Mattel, which brings out a new version of the game containing amended rules in July, hopes the change will encourage younger people to play.
Until now a few proper nouns had been allowed which were determined by a word list based on the Collins dictionary.
In Scrabble, players try to gain the highest points by making words with individual letter tiles on a grid board.
Each letter tile has a points value between one and 10, based on the letter's frequency in standard English.
Various coloured squares on the board can double or triple a player's points.
'New dimension'
Mattel said there would be no hard and fast rule over whether a proper noun was correct or not.
A spokeswoman for the company said the use of proper nouns would "add a new dimension" to Scrabble and "introduce an element of popular culture into the game".
She said: "This is one of a number of twists and challenges included that we believe existing fans will enjoy and will also enable younger fans and families to get involved."
However, Mattel said it would not be doing away with the old rules altogether.
It will continue to sell a board with the original rules.
Scrabble was invented in 1938 by American-born architect Alfred Butts. He later sold the rights and it was trademarked in 1948.
Another great game. Gobblet Jr. is nice for the kids.Went to a 'board game' type toy store and picked up a game called Gobblet. At first it seems simple enough, but you soon find out it is complex with a touch of maddening frustration. Has won multiple international awards for game play, design, etc...
Imagine crossing chess, go and connect four.
That was one of my favorites growing up.Stop Thief was awesome
Not so.NOW COMES THE DEATH OF SCRABBLE:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8604625.stm
Proper nouns come into play in Scrabble rule change
The rules of word game Scrabble are being changed for the first time in its history to allow the use of proper nouns, games company Mattel has said.
Don't Panic: Proper Nouns Will Not Be Allowed in Scrabble
Posted Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:36 PM | By Josh Levin
A guest post from Slate contributor Stefan Fatsis:
No, world, the rules of Scrabble are not changing.
Despite what you may have heard this morning on NPR or read on Kotaku or CBS or learned from the BBC or the Telegraph, the companies that own Scrabble—the word game to which I have devoted thousands of hours of my adult life—have not decided to allow proper nouns to desecrate the 15-by-15 board. But it sure makes for a good story. "Mattel changes the rules of Scrabble for the first time since 1948," the London Times trumpeted. "Beyonce on a triple-word score?" asked the Daily Mail.
Put a sock in it. Here's what's actually happening. Mattel, which owns the rights to Scrabble outside of North America, is introducing a game this summer called Scrabble Trickster. The game will include cards that allow players to spell words backward, use proper nouns, and steal letters from opponents, among other nontraditional moves. The game will not be available in North America, where rival toy company Hasbro owns Scrabble. Hasbro, I'm told, has no plans for a similar variation.
...
That is a good game. You can play it online, too.Here I Stand is the best game ever. 6 players, 8-10 hours simulating the Wars of the Reformation.
Thank god. Those wacky brits can have whatever game they want, but if they mess with Scrabble in the Western Hemisphere, I'm personally going to burn the place down. Call it the Monroe Doctrine of Board Games. "Qi" and "Za" are bad enough. Borderline treasonous. That far and no further! I'm drawing the line right there.Not so.NOW COMES THE DEATH OF SCRABBLE:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8604625.stm
Proper nouns come into play in Scrabble rule change
The rules of word game Scrabble are being changed for the first time in its history to allow the use of proper nouns, games company Mattel has said.Don't Panic: Proper Nouns Will Not Be Allowed in Scrabble
Posted Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:36 PM | By Josh Levin
A guest post from Slate contributor Stefan Fatsis:
No, world, the rules of Scrabble are not changing.
Despite what you may have heard this morning on NPR or read on Kotaku or CBS or learned from the BBC or the Telegraph, the companies that own Scrabble—the word game to which I have devoted thousands of hours of my adult life—have not decided to allow proper nouns to desecrate the 15-by-15 board. But it sure makes for a good story. "Mattel changes the rules of Scrabble for the first time since 1948," the London Times trumpeted. "Beyonce on a triple-word score?" asked the Daily Mail.
Put a sock in it. Here's what's actually happening. Mattel, which owns the rights to Scrabble outside of North America, is introducing a game this summer called Scrabble Trickster. The game will include cards that allow players to spell words backward, use proper nouns, and steal letters from opponents, among other nontraditional moves. The game will not be available in North America, where rival toy company Hasbro owns Scrabble. Hasbro, I'm told, has no plans for a similar variation.
...
I NEVER GET LAID!Thank god. Those wacky brits can have whatever game they want, but if they mess with Scrabble in the Western Hemisphere, I'm personally going to burn the place down. Call it the Monroe Doctrine of Board Games. "Qi" and "Za" are bad enough. Borderline treasonous. That far and no further! I'm drawing the line right there.Not so.NOW COMES THE DEATH OF SCRABBLE:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8604625.stm
Proper nouns come into play in Scrabble rule change
The rules of word game Scrabble are being changed for the first time in its history to allow the use of proper nouns, games company Mattel has said.Don't Panic: Proper Nouns Will Not Be Allowed in Scrabble
Posted Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:36 PM | By Josh Levin
A guest post from Slate contributor Stefan Fatsis:
No, world, the rules of Scrabble are not changing.
Despite what you may have heard this morning on NPR or read on Kotaku or CBS or learned from the BBC or the Telegraph, the companies that own Scrabble—the word game to which I have devoted thousands of hours of my adult life—have not decided to allow proper nouns to desecrate the 15-by-15 board. But it sure makes for a good story. "Mattel changes the rules of Scrabble for the first time since 1948," the London Times trumpeted. "Beyonce on a triple-word score?" asked the Daily Mail.
Put a sock in it. Here's what's actually happening. Mattel, which owns the rights to Scrabble outside of North America, is introducing a game this summer called Scrabble Trickster. The game will include cards that allow players to spell words backward, use proper nouns, and steal letters from opponents, among other nontraditional moves. The game will not be available in North America, where rival toy company Hasbro owns Scrabble. Hasbro, I'm told, has no plans for a similar variation.
...
Here is a Java version of Scotland Yard. You control the detectives, and the computer controls Mr. X.Might want to check out Scotland Yard or Mr. Jack if you liked that Clue game.Risk, Monopoly, Scrabble, Stratego, Trivial Pursuit, Cribbage...hell, I like any board game.
But, have you played Clue: The Great Museum Caper? I loved that game. You couldn't nab me if I was the thief. Great game for those that couldn't possibly like Dane Cook.
Yeah, I own it (and the Growing Hunger expansion set). This game is neither long nor complicated (at least not compared to the games I usually play). However, it is longer and more complicated than most of the Zombie-themed games (like Zombies!!! or Mall of Horrors). And it comes with a soundtrack that you can put on while playing. It sucks, but still, how awesome is that?Some new games that have hit my "awesome" list since the last time I visited this thread:Has anyone here ever played Last Night on Earth: The Zombie Game?
It's got good reviews and a board game based on killing zombies sounds like fun but I am not a game geek and would have a hard time finding anyone to play a long complicated game. Supposedly this one isn't too nerdy.
So you would rcommend it to non-hardcore gamers?Yeah, I own it (and the Growing Hunger expansion set). This game is neither long nor complicated (at least not compared to the games I usually play). However, it is longer and more complicated than most of the Zombie-themed games (like Zombies!!! or Mall of Horrors). And it comes with a soundtrack that you can put on while playing. It sucks, but still, how awesome is that?Has anyone here ever played Last Night on Earth: The Zombie Game?
It's got good reviews and a board game based on killing zombies sounds like fun but I am not a game geek and would have a hard time finding anyone to play a long complicated game. Supposedly this one isn't too nerdy.
Only if they're zombie fans.If you want to watch a video review so you can judge for yourself, try this one:So you would rcommend it to non-hardcore gamers?Yeah, I own it (and the Growing Hunger expansion set). This game is neither long nor complicated (at least not compared to the games I usually play). However, it is longer and more complicated than most of the Zombie-themed games (like Zombies!!! or Mall of Horrors). And it comes with a soundtrack that you can put on while playing. It sucks, but still, how awesome is that?Has anyone here ever played Last Night on Earth: The Zombie Game?
It's got good reviews and a board game based on killing zombies sounds like fun but I am not a game geek and would have a hard time finding anyone to play a long complicated game. Supposedly this one isn't too nerdy.
So let's say I'm out of the game loop.I used to like chess, and I used to like Risk.Chess, because it's a complex strategy game based on simple concepts, where the outcome is entirely based on your skill vis a vis your opponent. And it didn't take all day to play one game.Risk, because it's a good game that combines strategy with chance in very simple ways, yet requires just enough brainpower that you don't feel like you're playing Candyland (NTTAWWT). Also, it's good for any number of players, and it too doesn't take all day to play one game.What modern games might I like?
Hungry Hungry Hippos!
Risk...nough said.
I play a lot of serious wargames that women would never play. But one that many hardcore gamers have said their wives enjoyed is Twilight Struggle . It's an interesting game that's not overly complicated.I'm going to jump in too and ask for suggestions that are good to play with two or three people. I'm afraid game night means just the wife and me. If we're really cutting loose, her sister will be over.
Carasconne is supposed to be OK with two, right?
Well first of all, this is not a modern game by any stretch. But if you like Chess, you should really learn Go. The concepts are even simpler than Chess, it's entirely skill based, it doesn't take any longer to play than Chess, but it's so much more complex. Because (1) the board is bigger and (2) you aren't restricted by specific piece movement rules, as Chess is. Very deep game.Second, I'm going to recommend one game that borrows its theme heavily from Risk, but does it in a more Eurogamey way. Basically, this is a modern board game company doing an "interpretation" of Risk, sort of like "this is how Risk would have been done if we had all these board game advances back then". The game is called Dust. Read about it, watch some reviews. What I'm saying is that if you like Dust more than Risk, then you're ready for more. If not, then stick with Risk.So let's say I'm out of the game loop.
I used to like chess, and I used to like Risk.
Chess, because it's a complex strategy game based on simple concepts, where the outcome is entirely based on your skill vis a vis your opponent. And it didn't take all day to play one game.
Risk, because it's a good game that combines strategy with chance in very simple ways, yet requires just enough brainpower that you don't feel like you're playing Candyland (NTTAWWT). Also, it's good for any number of players, and it too doesn't take all day to play one game.
What modern games might I like?
Carcassonne is very good with 2. I would also recommend Lost Cities and Hive as excellent two-player games (but neither of those two will work with 3, whereas Carcassonne will). My final recommendation for a great game for 2-4 players is Dominion. A little hard to explain, but it's very elegant, plays very quickly, and isn't tough to learn once you sit down with it. It's an extremely popular game, so a YouTube search of "Dominion review" will probably give you a bunch of hits, if you want to check it out.I'm going to jump in too and ask for suggestions that are good to play with two or three people. I'm afraid game night means just the wife and me. If we're really cutting loose, her sister will be over.Carasconne is supposed to be OK with two, right?
I certainly know Go. Was hoping for something modern-gamier I didn't know of yet. If you've got any suggestions, much appreciated.Will check out Dust. Thx for the recommendation.Well first of all, this is not a modern game by any stretch. But if you like Chess, you should really learn Go. The concepts are even simpler than Chess, it's entirely skill based, it doesn't take any longer to play than Chess, but it's so much more complex. Because (1) the board is bigger and (2) you aren't restricted by specific piece movement rules, as Chess is. Very deep game.Second, I'm going to recommend one game that borrows its theme heavily from Risk, but does it in a more Eurogamey way. Basically, this is a modern board game company doing an "interpretation" of Risk, sort of like "this is how Risk would have been done if we had all these board game advances back then". The game is called Dust. Read about it, watch some reviews. What I'm saying is that if you like Dust more than Risk, then you're ready for more. If not, then stick with Risk.So let's say I'm out of the game loop.
I used to like chess, and I used to like Risk.
Chess, because it's a complex strategy game based on simple concepts, where the outcome is entirely based on your skill vis a vis your opponent. And it didn't take all day to play one game.
Risk, because it's a good game that combines strategy with chance in very simple ways, yet requires just enough brainpower that you don't feel like you're playing Candyland (NTTAWWT). Also, it's good for any number of players, and it too doesn't take all day to play one game.
What modern games might I like?