Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I prefer BBQ's, myself.What the hell is ABQ?The planes colliding over ABQ because Jesse's dead girlfriend's air traffic controller father screwed up because he was still messed up over the death of his daughter.
Wow, that was a pretty epic runon sentence there. Calling aon myself, but not changing it because blah.
It's the airport code for Phoenix, where the show is based.What the hell is ABQ?The planes colliding over ABQ because Jesse's dead girlfriend's air traffic controller father screwed up because he was still messed up over the death of his daughter.
Wow, that was a pretty epic runon sentence there. Calling a
I'm sure I do understand the concept of laundering money. The concept is to provide a seemingly legitimate means of spending beyond what you could normally afford, like say a charitable gift between family members.Um...I don't think you understand the concept of laundering money. If you do it just to hand it off under the counter to someone else, well...
Apple Barbecue. There's a brisket for that.What the hell is ABQ?The planes colliding over ABQ because Jesse's dead girlfriend's air traffic controller father screwed up because he was still messed up over the death of his daughter.
Wow, that was a pretty epic runon sentence there. Calling a
How long do you think a charitable gift between family members could go on? Once Hank left the hospital, the rationale dries up, don't you think?I'm sure I do understand the concept of laundering money. The concept is to provide a seemingly legitimate means of spending beyond what you could normally afford, like say a charitable gift between family members.Um...I don't think you understand the concept of laundering money. If you do it just to hand it off under the counter to someone else, well...
I think you're overstating the importance of who's name is on the car wash title and who's paying the taxes on that money. Plus, as we know an operation the size of Walt's generates far more revenue than any small business could launder. So Walt having some visible cash isn't nearly enough compared to how much the kingpin should have made.
Hank, like Fring, isn't trying to live beyond his means. However, he needed a significant cash infusion to afford his treatment. Other than that he's been extremely careful.How long do you think a charitable gift between family members could go on? Once Hank left the hospital, the rationale dries up, don't you think?I'm sure I do understand the concept of laundering money. The concept is to provide a seemingly legitimate means of spending beyond what you could normally afford, like say a charitable gift between family members.Um...I don't think you understand the concept of laundering money. If you do it just to hand it off under the counter to someone else, well...
I think you're overstating the importance of who's name is on the car wash title and who's paying the taxes on that money. Plus, as we know an operation the size of Walt's generates far more revenue than any small business could launder. So Walt having some visible cash isn't nearly enough compared to how much the kingpin should have made.
I am pretty sure thats not a coincidence that we see that tank as they pull away. Foreshadowing
I'd imagine your point is the one Walt would try to make.I'm sure I do understand the concept of laundering money. The concept is to provide a seemingly legitimate means of spending beyond what you could normally afford, like say a charitable gift between family members.Um...I don't think you understand the concept of laundering money. If you do it just to hand it off under the counter to someone else, well...
I think you're overstating the importance of who's name is on the car wash title and who's paying the taxes on that money. Plus, as we know an operation the size of Walt's generates far more revenue than any small business could launder. So Walt having some visible cash isn't nearly enough compared to how much the kingpin should have made.
Actually, that's a great catch. She's feeling guilty and her subconscious is acting on that. Maybe she will be the weak link in the end after all.
Certainly seems possible. She definitely seem terribly comfortable going from "say nothing" to "pin it all on my sister's husband".
But it really isn't important, because it's not like they're going to go before a judge or a panel and argue about who was the kingpin some time soon. The purpose of the confession was to present enough complications to corner Hank and force him to back off for now. Hank might think he'd win the argument if there ever were one like that, and he might even be correct, but that doesn't matter at all. The tape beats Hank to the punch. Hank was having enough trouble compiling credible evidence to take to the feds before; how does it look if he does it after Walt records a tearful confession about his brother in law destroying his life? Even if he'd eventually be vindicated, it would now take far longer than before and Walt would almost certainly be long dead.I'd imagine your point is the one Walt would try to make.I'm sure I do understand the concept of laundering money. The concept is to provide a seemingly legitimate means of spending beyond what you could normally afford, like say a charitable gift between family members.Um...I don't think you understand the concept of laundering money. If you do it just to hand it off under the counter to someone else, well...
I think you're overstating the importance of who's name is on the car wash title and who's paying the taxes on that money. Plus, as we know an operation the size of Walt's generates far more revenue than any small business could launder. So Walt having some visible cash isn't nearly enough compared to how much the kingpin should have made.
But the bold is important. Walt would be trying to weave one wild tale, with the kingpin not show much profit from the venture (other than the treatment).
Anyway, we shouldn't be talking about this. This thread is for making tired jokes about a poor question tim asked 30 pages ago.
I also thinks it's worth noting that the tank appeared to be about half full...so one half of the barrel (we assume) has been cooked. Apparently, that was done in a few months and netted Walt 6 barrels of cash.
I was mentioning it in terms of Hank going to the DEA. I know Walt mentions as something to be released if shows up murdered, but we can assume he'd take the same route if Hank went to the DEA (in which case Hank would've beat him to the punch).But it really isn't important, because it's not like they're going to go before a judge or a panel and argue about who was the kingpin some time soon. The purpose of the confession was to present enough complications to corner Hank and force him to back off for now. Hank might think he'd win the argument if there ever were one like that, and he might even be correct, but that doesn't matter at all. The tape beats Hank to the punch. Hank was having enough trouble compiling credible evidence to take to the feds before; how does it look if he does it after Walt records a tearful confession about his brother in law destroying his life? Even if he'd eventually be vindicated, it would now take far longer than before and Walt would almost certainly be long dead.I'd imagine your point is the one Walt would try to make.I'm sure I do understand the concept of laundering money. The concept is to provide a seemingly legitimate means of spending beyond what you could normally afford, like say a charitable gift between family members.Um...I don't think you understand the concept of laundering money. If you do it just to hand it off under the counter to someone else, well...
I think you're overstating the importance of who's name is on the car wash title and who's paying the taxes on that money. Plus, as we know an operation the size of Walt's generates far more revenue than any small business could launder. So Walt having some visible cash isn't nearly enough compared to how much the kingpin should have made.
But the bold is important. Walt would be trying to weave one wild tale, with the kingpin not show much profit from the venture (other than the treatment).
Anyway, we shouldn't be talking about this. This thread is for making tired jokes about a poor question tim asked 30 pages ago.
The only way I could think of it is if they took a bunch of it ($20K+) and got caught with it or spending it.
This. Neither of the other two characters are significant enough to warrant a build-up to anything.
No, the confession was already recorded and presumably has some sort of time stamp.I was mentioning it in terms of Hank going to the DEA. I know Walt mentions as something to be released if shows up murdered, but we can assume he'd take the same route if Hank went to the DEA (in which case Hank would've beat him to the punch).But it really isn't important, because it's not like they're going to go before a judge or a panel and argue about who was the kingpin some time soon. The purpose of the confession was to present enough complications to corner Hank and force him to back off for now. Hank might think he'd win the argument if there ever were one like that, and he might even be correct, but that doesn't matter at all. The tape beats Hank to the punch. Hank was having enough trouble compiling credible evidence to take to the feds before; how does it look if he does it after Walt records a tearful confession about his brother in law destroying his life? Even if he'd eventually be vindicated, it would now take far longer than before and Walt would almost certainly be long dead.I'd imagine your point is the one Walt would try to make.I'm sure I do understand the concept of laundering money. The concept is to provide a seemingly legitimate means of spending beyond what you could normally afford, like say a charitable gift between family members.Um...I don't think you understand the concept of laundering money. If you do it just to hand it off under the counter to someone else, well...
I think you're overstating the importance of who's name is on the car wash title and who's paying the taxes on that money. Plus, as we know an operation the size of Walt's generates far more revenue than any small business could launder. So Walt having some visible cash isn't nearly enough compared to how much the kingpin should have made.
But the bold is important. Walt would be trying to weave one wild tale, with the kingpin not show much profit from the venture (other than the treatment).
Anyway, we shouldn't be talking about this. This thread is for making tired jokes about a poor question tim asked 30 pages ago.
I agree that it'll certainly prevent Hank from going to the DEA. I'm just not convinced he shouldn't, but that's probably been beat to death.
He doesn't need to do that. Walt can claim that the real owner of the car wash is Walt, and he bought it with money he made cooking meth.
Probably, but Bill Burr's been seen by two of the people that would most love to assist in any sort of investigation into Walt.
The customer had a $5 income tax bill from the IRS, and Skyler was trying to help him out by giving him enough money to pay it.
I think it's implied that Walt turned over his operation, including the tank, to Declan and/or Lydia with Todd as the cook. Declan replaced Todd with another cook, but they've still been working off of that tank.
He's saying that Walt doesn't need to come up with any stories to explain the car wash. He can tell the truth about the car wash without poking any holes in his "confession."
Walt can say that he owns a car wash, and his story will check out because -- and this is where it gets a bit tricky -- he does in fact own a car wash.
I'd still consider Hank taking his suspicions and that video (confirming them) to the DEA as beating Walt to the punch on it. Not as good as taking his suspicions in immediately, but at least it was after his meltdown and having agents take him Heisenberg case files to his garage. Hank would need them to believe that video was made after he became suspicious, and there's evidence to support that.No, the confession was already recorded and presumably has some sort of time stamp.I was mentioning it in terms of Hank going to the DEA. I know Walt mentions as something to be released if shows up murdered, but we can assume he'd take the same route if Hank went to the DEA (in which case Hank would've beat him to the punch).But it really isn't important, because it's not like they're going to go before a judge or a panel and argue about who was the kingpin some time soon. The purpose of the confession was to present enough complications to corner Hank and force him to back off for now. Hank might think he'd win the argument if there ever were one like that, and he might even be correct, but that doesn't matter at all. The tape beats Hank to the punch. Hank was having enough trouble compiling credible evidence to take to the feds before; how does it look if he does it after Walt records a tearful confession about his brother in law destroying his life? Even if he'd eventually be vindicated, it would now take far longer than before and Walt would almost certainly be long dead.I'd imagine your point is the one Walt would try to make.I'm sure I do understand the concept of laundering money. The concept is to provide a seemingly legitimate means of spending beyond what you could normally afford, like say a charitable gift between family members.Um...I don't think you understand the concept of laundering money. If you do it just to hand it off under the counter to someone else, well...
I think you're overstating the importance of who's name is on the car wash title and who's paying the taxes on that money. Plus, as we know an operation the size of Walt's generates far more revenue than any small business could launder. So Walt having some visible cash isn't nearly enough compared to how much the kingpin should have made.
But the bold is important. Walt would be trying to weave one wild tale, with the kingpin not show much profit from the venture (other than the treatment).
Anyway, we shouldn't be talking about this. This thread is for making tired jokes about a poor question tim asked 30 pages ago.
I agree that it'll certainly prevent Hank from going to the DEA. I'm just not convinced he shouldn't, but that's probably been beat to death.
The fact that the confession exists is evidence that hank knew about Walt and withheld it from the DEA long enough for walt to come up with a DVD.I'd still consider Hank taking his suspicions and that video (confirming them) to the DEA as beating Walt to the punch on it. Not as good as taking his suspicions in immediately, but at least it was after his meltdown and having agents take him Heisenberg case files to his garage. Hank would need them to believe that video was made after he became suspicious, and there's evidence to support that.No, the confession was already recorded and presumably has some sort of time stamp.I was mentioning it in terms of Hank going to the DEA. I know Walt mentions as something to be released if shows up murdered, but we can assume he'd take the same route if Hank went to the DEA (in which case Hank would've beat him to the punch).But it really isn't important, because it's not like they're going to go before a judge or a panel and argue about who was the kingpin some time soon. The purpose of the confession was to present enough complications to corner Hank and force him to back off for now. Hank might think he'd win the argument if there ever were one like that, and he might even be correct, but that doesn't matter at all. The tape beats Hank to the punch. Hank was having enough trouble compiling credible evidence to take to the feds before; how does it look if he does it after Walt records a tearful confession about his brother in law destroying his life? Even if he'd eventually be vindicated, it would now take far longer than before and Walt would almost certainly be long dead.I'd imagine your point is the one Walt would try to make.I'm sure I do understand the concept of laundering money. The concept is to provide a seemingly legitimate means of spending beyond what you could normally afford, like say a charitable gift between family members.Um...I don't think you understand the concept of laundering money. If you do it just to hand it off under the counter to someone else, well...
I think you're overstating the importance of who's name is on the car wash title and who's paying the taxes on that money. Plus, as we know an operation the size of Walt's generates far more revenue than any small business could launder. So Walt having some visible cash isn't nearly enough compared to how much the kingpin should have made.
But the bold is important. Walt would be trying to weave one wild tale, with the kingpin not show much profit from the venture (other than the treatment).
Anyway, we shouldn't be talking about this. This thread is for making tired jokes about a poor question tim asked 30 pages ago.
I agree that it'll certainly prevent Hank from going to the DEA. I'm just not convinced he shouldn't, but that's probably been beat to death.
Certainly far better than that video showing up at the DEA without Hank ever mentioning his suspicions, which would only happen in the gutted Walt scenario.
Congrats, you've excerpted three words from the original post and chosen to highlight the only one of the three that was used/spelled correctly!
Sure, I wanted him to take "Leaves of Grass" straight from the can to the DEA.The fact that the confession exists is evidence that hank knew about Walt and withheld it from the DEA long enough for walt to come up with a DVD.I'd still consider Hank taking his suspicions and that video (confirming them) to the DEA as beating Walt to the punch on it. Not as good as taking his suspicions in immediately, but at least it was after his meltdown and having agents take him Heisenberg case files to his garage. Hank would need them to believe that video was made after he became suspicious, and there's evidence to support that.No, the confession was already recorded and presumably has some sort of time stamp.I was mentioning it in terms of Hank going to the DEA. I know Walt mentions as something to be released if shows up murdered, but we can assume he'd take the same route if Hank went to the DEA (in which case Hank would've beat him to the punch).But it really isn't important, because it's not like they're going to go before a judge or a panel and argue about who was the kingpin some time soon. The purpose of the confession was to present enough complications to corner Hank and force him to back off for now. Hank might think he'd win the argument if there ever were one like that, and he might even be correct, but that doesn't matter at all. The tape beats Hank to the punch. Hank was having enough trouble compiling credible evidence to take to the feds before; how does it look if he does it after Walt records a tearful confession about his brother in law destroying his life? Even if he'd eventually be vindicated, it would now take far longer than before and Walt would almost certainly be long dead.I'd imagine your point is the one Walt would try to make.I'm sure I do understand the concept of laundering money. The concept is to provide a seemingly legitimate means of spending beyond what you could normally afford, like say a charitable gift between family members.Um...I don't think you understand the concept of laundering money. If you do it just to hand it off under the counter to someone else, well...
I think you're overstating the importance of who's name is on the car wash title and who's paying the taxes on that money. Plus, as we know an operation the size of Walt's generates far more revenue than any small business could launder. So Walt having some visible cash isn't nearly enough compared to how much the kingpin should have made.
But the bold is important. Walt would be trying to weave one wild tale, with the kingpin not show much profit from the venture (other than the treatment).
Anyway, we shouldn't be talking about this. This thread is for making tired jokes about a poor question tim asked 30 pages ago.
I agree that it'll certainly prevent Hank from going to the DEA. I'm just not convinced he shouldn't, but that's probably been beat to death.
Certainly far better than that video showing up at the DEA without Hank ever mentioning his suspicions, which would only happen in the gutted Walt scenario.
I don't think Lydia's overseas buyers are going to take Todd's product, bringing them back into play. I still think they are the true threat and unlike many of the others in the show will prove to be immune to Walt's manipulation (just my speculation)
