How are we defining "In the hunt"?In the hunt on Sunday in a major.
TIA
How are we defining "In the hunt"?In the hunt on Sunday in a major.
Found it...top 10 may do it: https://www.golfchannel.com/article/golf-central-blog/woods-needs-top-10-open-qualify-wgc/What does he need to do to qualify for Firestone again?
As a Tottenham fan you should be familiar with it - it’s usually the team just ahead of you in the table.How are we defining "In the hunt"?
TIA
So, we are going with - top-3?As a Tottenham fan you should be familiar with it - it’s usually the team just ahead of you in the table.
Just stop - he’s in the hunt and you know it. He’s 3 back - maybe ends up 5-6 back. If he shot another 66 tomorrow he’s top-5 or 10. That’s “in the hunt”.So, we are going with - top-3?
I do not think he is in the hunt right now.Just stop - he’s in the hunt and you know it. He’s 3 back - maybe ends up 5-6 back. If he shot another 66 tomorrow he’s top-5 or 10. That’s “in the hunt”.
Anything within 6 after Saturday round is in the hunt, for any tournament everI do not think he is in the hunt right now.
But, it was a genuine question about what constitutes "being in the hunt" - how many strokes back and/or how many golfers to pass.
Certainly, golfers can come from way back on a Sunday to win - but that is more the exception than the rule, I think. I would love to know what the average Saturday position is for the winners on tour.
I would not consider 5 strokes and 10+ golfers to pass to be in the hunt - that combination seems tough to break through.
Last 2 winners at Carnoustie were 10 shots and 6 shots back entering Sunday.I do not think he is in the hunt right now.
But, it was a genuine question about what constitutes "being in the hunt" - how many strokes back and/or how many golfers to pass.
Certainly, golfers can come from way back on a Sunday to win - but that is more the exception than the rule, I think. I would love to know what the average Saturday position is for the winners on tour.
I would not consider 5 strokes and 10+ golfers to pass to be in the hunt - that combination seems tough to break through.
I'll biteHow many majors has Tiger won when he was not leading going into the final round?
In the hunt.Last 2 winners at Carnoustie were 10 shots and 6 shots back entering Sunday.
He's 4 back tied for 6th.
I'll let you decide.
yeah - not buying that.Anything within 6 after Saturday round is in the hunt, for any tournament ever
A better question might be what is the biggest deficit Tiger has made up to win on Sunday.yeah - not buying that.
Through 25 PGA events this year - the winner of the tournament was an average of 1 stroke back after 3 rounds.
15 led, or shared the lead after 3
2 were 1-shot back
4 were 2-shots back
2 were 3 shots back
1 was 4 shots back
1 was 5 shots back
That averages out to exactly 1 stroke back for the winner.
So, being 6 strokes back - is definitely not "in the hunt"
And at the two majors, the winner was also leading after 3.
Tiger is 4 shots out of the lead - he is not in the hunt right now. If he can claw back to 2 shots - then he is in the hunt.
The young one that dominated or the one with the fused roboback?A better question might be what is the biggest deficit Tiger has made up to win on Sunday.
You’re right...you have to go all the way back to June 24, 2018 to the last time someone 6 shots back on the final day came back to win a PGA Tour event.yeah - not buying that.
Through 25 PGA events this year - the winner of the tournament was an average of 1 stroke back after 3 rounds.
15 led, or shared the lead after 3
2 were 1-shot back
4 were 2-shots back
2 were 3 shots back
1 was 4 shots back
1 was 5 shots back
That averages out to exactly 1 stroke back for the winner.
So, being 6 strokes back - is definitely not "in the hunt"
And at the two majors, the winner was also leading after 3.
Tiger is 4 shots out of the lead - he is not in the hunt right now. If he can claw back to 2 shots - then he is in the hunt.
Tiger is 4 shots out of the lead - he is not in the hunt right now.
You’re right...you have to go all the way back to June 24, 2018 to the last time someone 6 shots back on the final day came back to win a PGA Tour event.
I am pretty sure this is considered trolling these days....
So once a year = "Every Tournament"You’re right...you have to go all the way back to June 24, 2018 to the last time someone 6 shots back on the final day came back to win a PGA Tour event.
In 2017, the winner of a PGA Tour event came from 4 strokes back 8 times to win...So once a year = "Every Tournament"
I hate this new math
You are definitely right that someone is trolling this thread.I am pretty sure this is considered trolling these days....
Admittedly not as much trolling as you are doing to these poor people and the money you owe them...
But, i was told 6 back is in the hunt - EVERY TOURNAMENT
Sorry, I thought we were talking about Tiger. At the Hero World Challenge in December, Fowler came from 7 back. At the HSBC World Golf Championship in October, Justin Rose came back from 8 down. James Hahn came back from 7 down at the Sony Open in January to force a playoff.But, i was told 6 back is in the hunt - EVERY TOURNAMENT
what you are saying is that is happens once every 2 years...
Do you hunt with Don Trump, Jr, by any chance?
Every two years for majors = 1 in 8? Not the worst odds, right?But, i was told 6 back is in the hunt - EVERY TOURNAMENT
what you are saying is that is happens once every 2 years...
Do you hunt with Don Trump, Jr, by any chance?
If the weather gets crazy (like he said), this task of passing more people becomes more realistic.He probably needs to shoot 8-10 under tomorrow to win. Too many people ahead of him, and you know darn well ONE of them will have a good round.
I chuckled.Don't make me put Norman Paperman on ignore our of principle here.
You going to address what has happened the last two times on this very course or nah?But, i was told 6 back is in the hunt - EVERY TOURNAMENT
what you are saying is that is happens once every 2 years...
You have no idea what you're talking about, at allyeah - not buying that.
Through 25 PGA events this year - the winner of the tournament was an average of 1 stroke back after 3 rounds.
15 led, or shared the lead after 3
2 were 1-shot back
4 were 2-shots back
2 were 3 shots back
1 was 4 shots back
1 was 5 shots back
That averages out to exactly 1 stroke back for the winner.
So, being 6 strokes back - is definitely not "in the hunt"
And at the two majors, the winner was also leading after 3.
Tiger is 4 shots out of the lead - he is not in the hunt right now. If he can claw back to 2 shots - then he is in the hunt.
The Bet shtick aside, Tiger can take a big step tomorrow without winning. No more excuses though...he’s needs to show he can finish.All this is doing is delaying Otis paying off his bet for another bunch of years.
I agree. If he can shoot 66-68 tomorrow it would be a huge confidence builder, even if he doesn't win. Not sure when the last time he shot 2 rounds in the 60's on the weekend when he was in relative contention.The Bet shtick aside, Tiger can take a big step tomorrow without winning. No more excuses though...he’s needs to show he can finish.
Agreed. Hope and change. Hope and change.This thread is a prime example of how this country got into the mess we are in...people will believe anything.
He choke when the pressure is onThe Bet shtick aside, Tiger can take a big step tomorrow without winning. No more excuses though...he’s needs to show he can finish.
I am pretty sure this is considered trolling these days....
Admittedly not as much trolling as you are doing to these poor people and the money you owe them...