OC Zed
Footballguy
I sort of remember Raiders of the Lost Ark... I think I was 6 years old when it came out. I didn't understand what the heck was going on.I know that my opinion is being dismissed here because you think I don't know anything about it, but that's entirely false. I purchased the game the Christmas it released for full price with money I received for Christmas. It's not like I'm looking back and saying the opposite of what people believe. It's been my firm belief that people who didn't like the game were morons that couldn't read a manual and learn to play. I still believe that.It absolutely was that bad. I'd play everything and anything back then and I remember thinking that game was a steaming pile.Honestly, I will never get how someone who owned a 2600 can say that game was that bad. I can understand someone looking back at the game and seeing the flaws in hindsight, and apparently so many people have played the game without ever reading the f'n manual to understand what you were doing. It's the "cool" thing to look back at E.T. and think "what a piece of garbage!" But, it just wasn't THAT bad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9BdV6WmGQcLike a bunch of people my age, I started off with the Atari 2600. Adventure, Chopper Command, River Raid, Yar's Revenge, Asteroids, Space Invaders, Raiders of the Lost Ark, etc. I owned both the 2600 version of Pac-Man (an abomination) and ET (there's no word in the English language that properly captures how crappy this game was). Pretty sure that's why I'm so jaded and cynical today.
There were hundreds of worse games out for the 2600 and have been much worse since - and that's the biggest reason for the crash and why Nintendo put the "seal of approval" into place. Also, we accepted the abomination of the 2600 version of Pac-Man because that was the closest we were gonna come to having it in our homes (for the time). It was either that or pouring salt on snails.
I'm not saying the game was a great game. I wouldn't put it in a top 10 games list for the system. But it wouldn't fall into a bottom 10 games for the system either.
The only game that was worse was the completely enigmatic one where you wandered around and there were astrological signs and no instructions on what you were supposed to do.
What I find odd is that no one complains about Raiders of the Lost Ark on the 2600. A game made by the same developer as E.T - Howard Scott Warshaw (who also developed Yar's Revenge, by the way). The game was as clumsy as E.T and was even more difficult. I can't imagine trying to play that game without reading a manual. The menu system had to be navigated by the second controller (or was the player control on the second controller and menu using the first? I can't remember, but it's one of those ways). But Raiders is considered by most to be one of the best games on the system, yet it still has most, if not more of the same flaws people complain about E.T.