@Elise_JesseWLWT@RapSheet
The #Browns are interviewing former #Bengals OC Ken Zampese today for their vacant OC job under Hue Jackson, source said. They'll interview #Texans QB coach Sean Ryan on Wednesday.
Right. I find it funny how many Browns fans are excited about the Browns drafting Barkley. That would be an awful awful pick. They don't need a RB at all, and they didn't use the very good ones they had, in addition to RB's simply not being worth top-5 picks. So basically, he's a lock for Cleveland, and this is a bad year to have the #1 rookie pick.Too bad the run game coordinator couldn't convince the HC to run the ball more. Another casualty at the hands of Hue.
So who would you take at 1?Right. I find it funny how many Browns fans are excited about the Browns drafting Barkley. That would be an awful awful pick. They don't need a RB at all, and they didn't use the very good ones they had, in addition to RB's simply not being worth top-5 picks. So basically, he's a lock for Cleveland, and this is a bad year to have the #1 rookie pick.
Assuming you mean for the Browns, I'd want Bradley Chubb at #1 and Minkah Fitzpatrick at #4. Try to shoot for being like Jacksonville. Great defense, conservative offense, with occasional shots to Gordon/Coleman/Njoku.So who would you take at 1?
I did mean for the Browns and I agree that the Browns don't need a RB. You choices make sense but Barkley is a game changer. You could still grab Chubb or Fitzpatrick at 4.Assuming you mean for the Browns, I'd want Bradley Chubb at #1 and Minkah Fitzpatrick at #4. Try to shoot for being like Jacksonville. Great defense, conservative offense, with occasional shots to Gordon/Coleman/Njoku.
For fantasy drafts, I have no idea. Depends a lot on landing spots.
I admit I need to do more research on Barkley, but even as a game changer, RB has proven to not be worth a top-5 pick. Elliott and Fournette were both top-5 picks and they were both objectively bad picks. Dallas would have been much better off taking Jalen Ramsey(equal or better player at a far more important position) and Jags would have been better off taking DeShaun Watson. Doesn't mean Elliott or Fournette are bad players, far from it, but RB's simply aren't worth that much draft capital.I did mean for the Browns and I agree that the Browns don't need a RB. You choices make sense but Barkley is a game changer. You could still grab Chubb or Fitzpatrick at 4.
Just downright amazing what continues to go on in Berea.Conflicting reports on Ryan as OC...
Per MKC via 92.3, Ryan was extended an offer because Hue wasn't willing to give up play calling duties to Ryan this year. Take what MKC gives with a grain of salt, but she's been the mouthpiece of the coaching staff this year.
John McClain (via Houston Chronicle) has talked about the Browns signing him and he would call plays his second year.
I see more truth in the MKC report than McClain, who typically retweets/regurgitates everyone else.
It's looking more and more like Hue won't hire an OC and has put those closest to that position (Zampese and Saunders) in position to not have to hire one. 2018 is going to lose a lot of promise if he comes back next year.
Ryan was not extended an offer.Per MKC via 92.3, Ryan was extended an offer because Hue wasn't willing to give up play calling duties to Ryan this year. Take what MKC gives with a grain of salt, but she's been the mouthpiece of the coaching staff this year.
"Per MKC via 92.3, Ryan was extended an offer because Hue wasn't willing to give up play calling duties to Ryan this year. " - that makes no sense unless it's saying that Ryan was willing to wait to take on play calling?Peak said:Conflicting reports on Ryan as OC...
Per MKC via 92.3, Ryan was extended an offer because Hue wasn't willing to give up play calling duties to Ryan this year. Take what MKC gives with a grain of salt, but she's been the mouthpiece of the coaching staff this year.
John McClain (via Houston Chronicle) has talked about the Browns signing him and he would call plays his second year.
I see more truth in the MKC report than McClain, who typically retweets/regurgitates everyone else.
It's looking more and more like Hue won't hire an OC and has put those closest to that position (Zampese and Saunders) in position to not have to hire one. 2018 is going to lose a lot of promise if he comes back next year.
3Assuming a top coach instead, how many wins in 2017 (with Kizer at QB)?
THIS year?? With Kizer at QB and a good head coach, with our picks and cap room? Anywhere from 4-8 depending what route they wanna take with the picks and cap room.I think we're all resigned to it, but that doesn't mean we have to like it.
A competent coach that would build the offense around a QB like Kizer, I'd say at least 5-11 is the bottom. This team was within one score from winning several games with subpar coaching and offensive planning. Give them a competent HC and I see a 5-7 win team this year.
Consider how many close games we lost in 2017. With a competent HC, yes I think they could have been a 5-7 win team. Consider that a competent HC would have brought at least one more score (FG or TD), they were in many games until the 4th qtr, including two in OT.THIS year?? With Kizer at QB and a good head coach, with our picks and cap room? Anywhere from 4-8 depending what route they wanna take with the picks and cap room.
NE is really dumb.https://twitter.com/terrypluto/status/950345388468432896
Seems like the Browns were willing to offer the 1.04 (Houston pick) for Garopolo and the Pats had no interest in moving him there.
While its hard to place an exact number on it, I think the Browns with a good, but not elite coach(Andy Reid for example) and Kizer, win more games than Hue and a good but not elite QB(say a guy like Stafford) would have.I think we're all resigned to it, but that doesn't mean we have to like it.
A competent coach that would build the offense around a QB like Kizer, I'd say at least 5-11 is the bottom. This team was within one score from winning several games with subpar coaching and offensive planning. Give them a competent HC and I see a 5-7 win team this year.
I like Kizer's potential, but no, he wasn't even close to NFL level in 2017. Hue was right to bench him for sloppiness. QB in the NFL is tough enough for the best of them (think Big Ben vs jax, earlier in the season). When you add in rookie mistakes, you get 0-16. BTW, the defense wasn't all that stellar, either.travdogg said:While its hard to place an exact number on it, I think the Browns with a good, but not elite coach(Andy Reid for example) and Kizer, win more games than Hue and a good but not elite QB(say a guy like Stafford) would have.
Kizer certainly is nowhere near a finished product, but Jackson basically made it as hard as possible for him. Pass heavy game plans, despite an excellent running game(2nd in the NFL in yards per carry as a team) and a complete lack of weapons(especially before Gordon came back) was seemingly the weekly game plan. Of course Kizer was sloppy, but you don't yo-yo a guy and expect him to get better.I like Kizer's potential, but no, he wasn't even close to NFL level in 2017. Hue was right to bench him for sloppiness. QB in the NFL is tough enough for the best of them (think Big Ben vs jax, earlier in the season). When you add in rookie mistakes, you get 0-16. BTW, the defense wasn't all that stellar, either.
We have Duke Johnson and the Crow. We've finished in the top three/four in terms of average per carry and Duke is second in the entire NFL in terms of missed tackles as a receiver and fourth overall in terms of missed tackles. That does not garner a 5 on a scale of 10. Duke is one of the best receivers from the RB position in the league. The numbers indicates they were not used properly by the coaching staff.So... talking about talent only, how good is this team? (I guess I mean "probable production level" rather than pure talent) How good are the starters? How good are the backups? On a scale of 0-10, 5 being NFL average, how do you rate each position group? IMHO...
QB-2, RB-5, WR-4, TE-3, OL-5, DL-7, LB-5, DB-3
We got a lot of work to do.
TEs are going to be much better next year.So... talking about talent only, how good is this team? (I guess I mean "probable production level" rather than pure talent) How good are the starters? How good are the backups? On a scale of 0-10, 5 being NFL average, how do you rate each position group? IMHO...
QB-2, RB-5, WR-4, TE-3, OL-5, DL-7, LB-5, DB-3
We got a lot of work to do.
and when you throw 45 times in crappy weather, you get a lot more rookie mistakesI like Kizer's potential, but no, he wasn't even close to NFL level in 2017. Hue was right to bench him for sloppiness. QB in the NFL is tough enough for the best of them (think Big Ben vs jax, earlier in the season). When you add in rookie mistakes, you get 0-16. BTW, the defense wasn't all that stellar, either.
So you swayed his opinion by simply letting him know that JT is under contract for a huge amount of money?Talked to a guy who has a personal connection to Joe Thomas last night. He said he doesn't think he will return for 2018. Said Joe is the same guy who spent the day fishing with his dad on draft day. He's happy. I said, "Doesn't he have a contract for the next couple years?" He agreed that Joe might return to fulfill that obligation.
No team in the history of any sport has had the combination of draft assets and salary cap room that we have right now. It is downright staggering how much we COULD improve with halfway competent drafting and if we actually use our salary cap.So... talking about talent only, how good is this team? (I guess I mean "probable production level" rather than pure talent) How good are the starters? How good are the backups? On a scale of 0-10, 5 being NFL average, how do you rate each position group? IMHO...
QB-2, RB-5, WR-4, TE-3, OL-5, DL-7, LB-5, DB-3
We got a lot of work to do.
Isn't this flat out amazing? Even more amazing he is still out coach.Hue Jackson in 2017 was the worst coach in NFL history in my opinion.
This is messed up. I actually agree with this.Most of us in this thread would have won at least 1 game as Browns head coach these 2 years.
I don't think his opinion changed, but he DID acknowledge that JT is a man of honor & my point could be valid.So you swayed his opinion by simply letting him know that JT is under contract for a huge amount of money?
I see it closer to:So... talking about talent only, how good is this team? (I guess I mean "probable production level" rather than pure talent) How good are the starters? How good are the backups? On a scale of 0-10, 5 being NFL average, how do you rate each position group? IMHO...
QB-2, RB-5, WR-4, TE-3, OL-5, DL-7, LB-5, DB-3
We got a lot of work to do.
I've said this year's ago when the Browns squandered away all their picks. No amount of picks make up for bad drafting. I would be more worried if Travdogg was doing the drafting, then the idiots that draft for the Browns.No team in the history of any sport has had the combination of draft assets and salary cap room that we have right now. It is downright staggering how much we COULD improve with halfway competent drafting and if we actually use our salary cap.
yes we have a lot of work to do, but it's work that we have the ability to do.
If we signed Cousins to the richest contract in NFL history, draft players at 1,4,33,35,60,65...................after paying all them, we still have like 70 million in cap room. Sign a top WR, sign two of the top DBs. Sign some other stuff.
I mean, yeah, easier said than done cause guys dont wanna come here, but wow, if we could get someone to Jedi mind trick some folks we will be playing at this time next year and the year after and the year after
So Haslam keeps firing people before their contracts are finished and has to keep paying them while paying new people in the same positions as a profit scheme?I have seen nothing that shows me this Owner cares about winning. He hires cheap inexperienced team managers that sold him on a "moneyball" (I.E. cheap) way of winning. He finally fired a legit GM, but I think thats just to buy him more time to make $$$ with a poor product by selling the "future",. This franchise will not win with this owner..mark my words. Empty seats, anda team in the RED will force a sale to a legit owner.
I never said rooting for a winning tea makes me a "better person", please show me where a said that. I will say that if my team has made the playoffs one year in 18, I would be looking for a better organization to root for.
It hasn't worked out yet.Yeah how did that work out? Perfect example of a grasping at straws attempt to turn a franchise around. They could have had an Elite QB to build around (Wentz), and they passed on him, they made a number of poor personnel decisions and they have a horrible roster. The Owner hired a poor staff who took a bad roster and made it worse while distracting the fans with "wow" moves that only bought them time.
Come on man why so pessimistic?I think the bed's been made for 2018. Just hope that whatever happens between now and Hue getting canned Dec 31 doesn't negatively impact 2019.
I asked you nicely to be cooler. Come back in a couple of weeks and if you can contribute without constant insults, you can post here. If not, please find another board.I guess going 0-16 is historic, so is 1-31...oh and making the playoffs once this century...yep....exactly what makes players with short careers want to play for you. The playoffs are such a pain with all the extra work, and who wants to win trophies....they are so much clutter.
I know, how about getting a stud WR by overpaying him....maybe Kenny Britt??? oh wait....
Ugh....sure, why not. At this point, I don't see Hue bringing in anyone competent, or someone with an opposing voice to his direction.Hue gonna dust off the play sheet for Mularky?
I'd be cool with that, assuming Mularky knows Hue's offense.Hue gonna dust off the play sheet for Mularky?
Thanks to those of you who chimed in on this. It's always fun to see what people are thinking. That being said, I guess I should have posted MY reasons. Sorry.So... talking about talent only, how good is this team? (I guess I mean "probable production level" rather than pure talent) How good are the starters? How good are the backups? On a scale of 0-10, 5 being NFL average, how do you rate each position group? IMHO...
QB-2, RB-5, WR-4, TE-3, OL-5, DL-7, LB-5, DB-3
We got a lot of work to do.
Hiring mediocre recycled bums is a proven failure. Expect the Browns to hire him. Then he will in turn help get Robiskie a gig as well. It's all coming together browns fans.I'd be cool with that, assuming Mularky knows Hue's offense.
Jackson would be willing to hand over play-calling duties to an experienced coordinator such Mularkey, 56.