The Man With No Name
Footballguy
Acquiring picks to be able to move up in 2014?
More 'star' players next year
More 'star' players next year
Hmnn, maybe they have a player in mind to trade for.Acquiring picks to be able to move up in 2014?
More 'star' players next year
Frankbot, meet Mac32. Good luck getting him to stop whining at every available opportunity. For the record, I wasn't happy about switching back to the 3-4 but it's way past time to move on.ETA: Sorry about chopping your post FrankBot, You made a lot great points but that one rang the same bell a few of us have rang for some time now.I haven't had much to say this offseason so......... random thoughts...I was a bit leery about the new regime, especially with being a big Tom Heckert fan, but this offseason has actually brightened my spirits a bit. For the most part, I like the FA acquisitions and it seems like they went into this draft with a plan and stuck to it. First, I hated losing Cribbs and Dawson, but that's business. I've always liked Jason Campbell and as far as NFL backups that suit Turner's system, good luck finding a better one. I'm a huge Dion Lewis fan, loved that trade obviously.. One criticism I had of Heckert was that he should have spent a little money to bring in a decent veteran WR. Well, they got one for peanuts in acquiring Bess. I thought they paid a bit more for Kruger than was necessary, but as much as it pains me to admit, the Browns aren't going to bring the top FAs in at this point without overpaying. That said, nothing in that contract is devestating. The Browns will survive if it doesn't work out. Bryant is a very good DT and with the already exisiting talent at tackle, well, these young guys should be fresh and getting after it at all times. Can't wait to see how the competition at tackle unfolds this year. I don't think anyone will ever replace Phil Dawson. He's the only man I've ever seen that won against Mother Nature. However, Graham is a pro and will do a nice job.In general, the best players on this team are young, really young. Perhaps give the guys a chance to develop? Barring an insane amount of injuries, I don't see how the offense doesn't improve. Weeden will be in a system better suited to his strengths. If he regresses, then bring in Campbell. Gordon and Richardson appear to have a bright future, IMO; this isn't even up for debate. Little, maybe he's not progressing as fast as we'd like, but the dropsies were not a problem over the 2nd half of the season and he plays hard (good run blocker). Hopefully Cameron will develop under 2 coaches who have a great history of developing and featuring TEs. Barnridge is a solid pro. Good, young offensive line that is growing together. If Pinkston is healthy and shows the same promise he did during his rookie season then this line could be one of the best in the league.A decent amount has to go right to sniff the playoffs, but it's certainly not impossible. Anything less than 7 - 9 and I will be disappointed. I really like the young talent on both sides of the ball and I think the current coaching staff is an upgrade over last season.Frankbot, on 27 Apr 2013 - 12:41, said:
It just feels like you're hating for the sake of hating sometimes in this thread...MAC_32, on 27 Apr 2013 - 12:04, said:
our problem last year was not defense. It was offense. We have fixed a problem that didn't exist and ignored the real issue.Frankbot, on 27 Apr 2013 - 11:49, said:
Weak retort.MAC_32, on 27 Apr 2013 - 11:12, said:How many points will this new defense score?
Excellent analysis, Mike.Frankbot, meet Mac32. Good luck getting him to stop whining at every available opportunity. For the record, I wasn't happy about switching back to the 3-4 but it's way past time to move on.ETA: Sorry about chopping your post FrankBot, You made a lot great points but that one rang the same bell a few of us have rang for some time now.I haven't had much to say this offseason so......... random thoughts...I was a bit leery about the new regime, especially with being a big Tom Heckert fan, but this offseason has actually brightened my spirits a bit. For the most part, I like the FA acquisitions and it seems like they went into this draft with a plan and stuck to it. First, I hated losing Cribbs and Dawson, but that's business. I've always liked Jason Campbell and as far as NFL backups that suit Turner's system, good luck finding a better one. I'm a huge Dion Lewis fan, loved that trade obviously.. One criticism I had of Heckert was that he should have spent a little money to bring in a decent veteran WR. Well, they got one for peanuts in acquiring Bess. I thought they paid a bit more for Kruger than was necessary, but as much as it pains me to admit, the Browns aren't going to bring the top FAs in at this point without overpaying. That said, nothing in that contract is devestating. The Browns will survive if it doesn't work out. Bryant is a very good DT and with the already exisiting talent at tackle, well, these young guys should be fresh and getting after it at all times. Can't wait to see how the competition at tackle unfolds this year. I don't think anyone will ever replace Phil Dawson. He's the only man I've ever seen that won against Mother Nature. However, Graham is a pro and will do a nice job.In general, the best players on this team are young, really young. Perhaps give the guys a chance to develop? Barring an insane amount of injuries, I don't see how the offense doesn't improve. Weeden will be in a system better suited to his strengths. If he regresses, then bring in Campbell. Gordon and Richardson appear to have a bright future, IMO; this isn't even up for debate. Little, maybe he's not progressing as fast as we'd like, but the dropsies were not a problem over the 2nd half of the season and he plays hard (good run blocker). Hopefully Cameron will develop under 2 coaches who have a great history of developing and featuring TEs. Barnridge is a solid pro. Good, young offensive line that is growing together. If Pinkston is healthy and shows the same promise he did during his rookie season then this line could be one of the best in the league.A decent amount has to go right to sniff the playoffs, but it's certainly not impossible. Anything less than 7 - 9 and I will be disappointed. I really like the young talent on both sides of the ball and I think the current coaching staff is an upgrade over last season.Frankbot, on 27 Apr 2013 - 12:41, said:
It just feels like you're hating for the sake of hating sometimes in this thread...MAC_32, on 27 Apr 2013 - 12:04, said:
our problem last year was not defense. It was offense. We have fixed a problem that didn't exist and ignored the real issue.Frankbot, on 27 Apr 2013 - 11:49, said:
Weak retort.MAC_32, on 27 Apr 2013 - 11:12, said:How many points will this new defense score?
Browns trade fourth-rounder to Steelers, reportedly interested in Cardinals backup QB Brian Hoyer
BEREA, Ohio --In a surprising move today, the Browns traded their fourth-round pick -- No. 111 overall -- to their arch-rival Pittsburgh Steelers for a third-rounder in 2014.
It was the first time since May 14, 1968 when the Browns sent quarterback Bill Nelson to Pittsburgh that the bitter rivals executed a trade. The deal happened a pick after the Giants jumped up one slot ahead of the Browns to nab Syracuse quarterback Ryan Nassib.
Did the Browns trade out of the round because Nassib was gone?
A source told the Plain Dealer that wasn't the case.
But the Browns needed a safety and there were still some good ones on the board at the time, including Fresno State's Phillip Thomas, who went No. 119 overall to the Redskins. Thomas (6-0, 208) was a third- to fourth-round projection according to Pro Football Weekly.
The Steelers, in fact, drafted a safety with the No. 111 pick they acquired from the Browns, Syracuse's Shamarko Thomas (5-9, 213). Thomas, a projected late-round pick to priority free agent, has a history of concussions, but fits the Steelers mold if he can stay healthy.
Pro Football Weekly described Thomas as a "physical, explosive, motivated strong-safety who packs a wallop.''
The Steelers came back four picks later and drafted Oklahoma quarterback Landry Jones. Arkansas quarterback Tyler Wilson also went to the Raiders at No. 112.
The message was clear in the round: the Browns were not drafting a quarterback to come in and challenge for the starting job this season.
However, early in the round, a report surfaced on NFL Network that the Browns were interested in Cardinals backup quarterback Brian Hoyer, a Cleveland native and St. Ignatius grad.
The weaknesses remain weaknesses. QB - same guy. OG - same guys. TE - lesser guy. PK - New hole. DL - was a strength. LB - were good as 4-3, added guys to fill holes created by going 3-4. CB - not improved. S - not improved.Good posts guys. I didn't like some of the moves, but when you look at the offseason as a whole I do think the Browns are better off than they were in 2012.
Certainly possible. Or they like the current roster and want to see who steps up, who doesn't, who fits where, etc.Acquiring picks to be able to move up in 2014?
More 'star' players next year
Exactly what they are doing. Getting the ammo to trade for a qb if we win too many games to pick a qb but not enough to justify keeping weeden around.Acquiring picks to be able to move up in 2014?More 'star' players next year
QB same guy better coaching and system. OG pinks ton back not a primary needTE fair point we will see about Jordan DL all main guys still there plus Bryant LB were ok added guys who can rush the qbCb have added 3 guysS agreeK just stop Switch to 3-4 it happened get over itThe weaknesses remain weaknesses. QB - same guy. OG - same guys. TE - lesser guy. PK - New hole. DL - was a strength. LB - were good as 4-3, added guys to fill holes created by going 3-4. CB - not improved. S - not improved.Good posts guys. I didn't like some of the moves, but when you look at the offseason as a whole I do think the Browns are better off than they were in 2012.
So a five win team didn't get much better while others did.QB same guy better coaching and system. OG pinks ton back not a primary needTE fair point we will see about Jordan DL all main guys still there plus Bryant LB were ok added guys who can rush the qbCb have added 3 guysS agreeK just stop Switch to 3-4 it happened get over itThe weaknesses remain weaknesses. QB - same guy. OG - same guys. TE - lesser guy. PK - New hole. DL - was a strength. LB - were good as 4-3, added guys to fill holes created by going 3-4. CB - not improved. S - not improved.Good posts guys. I didn't like some of the moves, but when you look at the offseason as a whole I do think the Browns are better off than they were in 2012.
Wha? I was just addressing his mostly horrible points. You may resume the fetal position.So a five win team didn't get much better while others did.QB same guy better coaching and system. OG pinks ton back not a primary needTE fair point we will see about Jordan DL all main guys still there plus Bryant LB were ok added guys who can rush the qbCb have added 3 guysS agreeK just stop Switch to 3-4 it happened get over itThe weaknesses remain weaknesses. QB - same guy. OG - same guys. TE - lesser guy. PK - New hole. DL - was a strength. LB - were good as 4-3, added guys to fill holes created by going 3-4. CB - not improved. S - not improved.Good posts guys. I didn't like some of the moves, but when you look at the offseason as a whole I do think the Browns are better off than they were in 2012.
My "horrible" point is that they have not improved any weaknesses. The OGs were weak and still are. Do you disagree? The QB was weak, and we hope he gets better, but nobody knows for sure. The DL was already good, so adding to it didn't make the team better overall. "Get over it" is an irrational statement. If you think we're not worse at PK, you're just wrong. And, do you really think the defensive backfield is significantly improved? Anybody with any sense would have to say, "We can only hope", because taking the eighth best CB in the draft is crossing your fingers at best!Wha? I was just addressing his mostly horrible points. You may resume the fetal position.So a five win team didn't get much better while others did.QB same guy better coaching and system.OG pinks ton back not a primary needTE fair point we will see about JordanDL all main guys still there plus BryantLB were ok added guys who can rush the qbCb have added 3 guysS agreeK just stopSwitch to 3-4 it happened get over itThe weaknesses remain weaknesses. QB - same guy. OG - same guys. TE - lesser guy. PK - New hole. DL - was a strength. LB - were good as 4-3, added guys to fill holes created by going 3-4. CB - not improved. S - not improved.Good posts guys. I didn't like some of the moves, but when you look at the offseason as a whole I do think the Browns are better off than they were in 2012.
Uh. Why?Ok even I have to admit those last two picks totally killed my boner
Exactly.So the 2013 draft shakes out like this...
OLB Barkevious Mingo
*WR Josh Gordon*
CB Leon McFadden
S Jamoris Slaughter
DE Armonty Bryant
OG Garrett Gilkey
WR Davone Bess, a 2014 3rd rounder and a 2014 4th rounder.
Filled a lot of needs and set up for a nice draft next year. Can't say I'm disappointed with that.
That's a lot of bang considering they had relatively few bucks. And, as you say, they're set up nicely to make a big splash in 2014.So the 2013 draft shakes out like this...
OLB Barkevious Mingo
*WR Josh Gordon*
CB Leon McFadden
S Jamoris Slaughter
DE Armonty Bryant
OG Garrett Gilkey
WR Davone Bess, a 2014 3rd rounder and a 2014 4th rounder.
Filled a lot of needs and set up for a nice draft next year. Can't say I'm disappointed with that.
This might be your dumbest one yet. Which is saying something.daveR said:Davonne Bess is the biggest player addition to a poor offense. He's a decent slot / possession receiver, which we already had in Little. Net = 0.
Your commentary is worthless without reasoning.This might be your dumbest one yet. Which is saying something.daveR said:Davonne Bess is the biggest player addition to a poor offense. He's a decent slot / possession receiver, which we already had in Little. Net = 0.
Your commentary is worthless with reasoning.Your commentary is worthless without reasoning.This might be your dumbest one yet. Which is saying something.daveR said:Davonne Bess is the biggest player addition to a poor offense. He's a decent slot / possession receiver, which we already had in Little. Net = 0.
Can't argue with that. I guess all these new regimes like to buy time when they come in. That way when the pitchforks come out in year 3, they can point to year 1 being wasted.MAC_32 said:This feels like the first year of the old regime, wasting it evaluating the roster and letting weeden bury his own grave like mangini.
Yes!! If the discount rate is high enough, we should be taking advantage of other teams' desire to win now while we are not in a championship window, Admittedly who knows when we would get to that point, but that is just another reason to arbitrage the picks.laughing at people that think trading our 4th and 5th rounders somehow equates to throwing in the towel this year. I am on this train....................this year and every year trade our 4th and 5th for a future 3rd and 4th. If we do this every year from here on out, starting next year we enter every draft with 1,2,3,3,4,4,5,6,7 and actually draft with 1,2,3,3,4,6,7 So we draft with a 3rd instead of a 5th every year. EVERY year. And all because we decided not to use a 4th and 5th in just this one draft. Music to my ears. it won't happen........................but it should, and easily could.I may even take it a step further and say every year we trade a 3/4 for 2/3. And every year we draft with 1,2,2,3,5,6,7
What's not making any sense to me about the above take, if Heckert was everything all of his supporters say he was - then why do so many have this take now? Had he not been fired this would be year 4...and we're still not ready to compete for a title. That tells me he failed at his job, which I agree with - as well as us not being ready to compete, but at the time of his firing it seemed most did not.Yes!! If the discount rate is high enough, we should be taking advantage of other teams' desire to win now while we are not in a championship window, Admittedly who knows when we would get to that point, but that is just another reason to arbitrage the picks.laughing at people that think trading our 4th and 5th rounders somehow equates to throwing in the towel this year. I am on this train....................this year and every year trade our 4th and 5th for a future 3rd and 4th. If we do this every year from here on out, starting next year we enter every draft with 1,2,3,3,4,4,5,6,7 and actually draft with 1,2,3,3,4,6,7 So we draft with a 3rd instead of a 5th every year. EVERY year. And all because we decided not to use a 4th and 5th in just this one draft. Music to my ears. it won't happen........................but it should, and easily could.I may even take it a step further and say every year we trade a 3/4 for 2/3. And every year we draft with 1,2,2,3,5,6,7
I absolutely would have preferred the Rams's 1st and 2nd this year over Mingo at pick 6. I wish we made that deal.MAC_32 said:What's not making any sense to me about the above take, if Heckert was everything all of his supporters say he was - then why do so many have this take now? Had he not been fired this would be year 4...and we're still not ready to compete for a title. That tells me he failed at his job, which I agree with - as well as us not being ready to compete, but at the time of his firing it seemed most did not.cdubz said:Yes!! If the discount rate is high enough, we should be taking advantage of other teams' desire to win now while we are not in a championship window, Admittedly who knows when we would get to that point, but that is just another reason to arbitrage the picks.ghostguy123 said:laughing at people that think trading our 4th and 5th rounders somehow equates to throwing in the towel this year. I am on this train....................this year and every year trade our 4th and 5th for a future 3rd and 4th. If we do this every year from here on out, starting next year we enter every draft with 1,2,3,3,4,4,5,6,7 and actually draft with 1,2,3,3,4,6,7 So we draft with a 3rd instead of a 5th every year. EVERY year. And all because we decided not to use a 4th and 5th in just this one draft. Music to my ears. it won't happen........................but it should, and easily could.I may even take it a step further and say every year we trade a 3/4 for 2/3. And every year we draft with 1,2,2,3,5,6,7
The only big issue I have with their approach to this draft is not taking the Rams trade. Jarvis Jones and a #2 would be so much better than Mingo, I'd rather have Jarvis straight up to Mingo tbh. Still, this is just setting things up for 2014 and beyond. Don't expect more wins this year, just hope for progress. Whether that's with or without Weeden at season's end...my patience will be gone if we don't get more aggressive next year though.
According to Dan Pompei of the National Football Post, the Browns draft board was arranged alphabetically.
Pompei writes this is "very unorthodox and can make it difficult to make decisions on the fly. Front office men around the league were buzzing about the unusual board last week. Also noteworthy is that the Browns did not allow the majority of their scouts in the draft room. But they are not the only team that locks out scouts." Most teams have a horizontal board by position and a vertical board by grade.
Source: National Football Post
sounds like an Onion article. although i'm pretty sure Al Davis's draft board was arranged soley by 40 timesfrom Rotoworld:
According to Dan Pompei of the National Football Post, the Browns draft board was arranged alphabetically.
Pompei writes this is "very unorthodox and can make it difficult to make decisions on the fly. Front office men around the league were buzzing about the unusual board last week. Also noteworthy is that the Browns did not allow the majority of their scouts in the draft room. But they are not the only team that locks out scouts." Most teams have a horizontal board by position and a vertical board by grade.
Source: National Football Post
Concerns me that he kept watching past season 5.Josh Gordon @JOSH_GORDONXII 7 May
It's been a "Weeds"marathon all week.. Seasons 1-8..
Concerns me with his history.....
Good article, thanks.Chuck Klosterman (one of my favorite writers) spent some time in the Browns war room. He's got an article about it on Grantland. Interesting read. I am not sure how it makes me feel about the new regime, though.
link