Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

**** CLEVELAND BROWNS THREAD ****

wadegarrett

By wadegarrett,
in The Shark Pool (NFL Talk)

 Share Followers 12

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 24.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • MAC_32

    2630

  • ghostguy123

    2330

  • amnesiac

    1944

  • Bracie Smathers

    1944

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Peak

Of course he was concussed...I'm sure Haley kept reminding him on the sideline he was concussed.  Haley wasn't going to let him back in that game, Hue be damned.   Taylor: Coach, I can play.  I ju

Joe Bryant

This isn't going to be a "only positive comments allowed" type thing. But don't do what you did. And you know what you did. If you've got something constructive to discuss about how the team

Bracie Smathers

Ryan Engle‏ @rengle83 13h13 hours ago I read the survival handbook for these situations. If you’re attacked by a Jermaine Whitehead, just pretend like you’re a tight end running at a moderate pac

DawgPoundNJ

DawgPoundNJ 0

Posted
Posted

Jake Delhomme is f'ing H O R R I B L E. :wall:Didn't look like Lafell caught that ball going out of bounds near the end of the game. Thought it hit the ground.Will take the win though. :thumbup:

Wallace gives the Browns the best chance to win now, while developing McCoy gives them their best chance to win in the future. If they're playing Delhomme simply because they don't want to admit their $7mm mistake, shame on them. Who cares if he's playing his former team.I thought Lafell's catch was called correctly. It's about time we get a break- seems like kickers always knock those through against us. And it's nice to beat a team (even if it is the Panthers) when we're not at our best.
Link to post
Share on other sites
The Man With No Name

The Man With No Name 1,146

Posted
Posted

Jake Delhomme is f'ing H O R R I B L E. :wall:Didn't look like Lafell caught that ball going out of bounds near the end of the game. Thought it hit the ground.Will take the win though. :shrug:

Wallace gives the Browns the best chance to win now, while developing McCoy gives them their best chance to win in the future. If they're playing Delhomme simply because they don't want to admit their $7mm mistake, shame on them. Who cares if he's playing his former team.I thought Lafell's catch was called correctly. It's about time we get a break- seems like kickers always knock those through against us. And it's nice to beat a team (even if it is the Panthers) when we're not at our best.
Mangini said early in the week that Delhomme would star because of his familiarity with Carolina, their defense, etc.
Link to post
Share on other sites
amnesiac

amnesiac 890

Posted
Posted

When I was watching this game, and when I watched the Browns against the Jets, I was impressed by the play of their NT, Rubin (sp?). What do Browns homers think of him? Is he going to be a Brown long term?

they had a whole article on him in the paper the other day, team and coaches love him.

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/...e_tackle_a.html

Link to post
Share on other sites
amnesiac

amnesiac 890

Posted
Posted

Kind of went under the radar, but our 5th rounder, Larry Asante, was claimed by Tampa off the practice squad. They also cut Clifton Smith, so hopefully that means Cribbs will be near full speed this week. Either that, or Haden will be returning KO's and punts.

i believe Smith fumbled one of his returns. wouldn't be surprised if that was part of the reason he was cut.
Link to post
Share on other sites
amnesiac

amnesiac 890

Posted
Posted

Who would you guys rather have starting this Sunday: Jake Delhomme or Derek Anderson? :blackdot:

i'll take my chances with Delhomme over DA.also, while i thought Wallace did an OK job when he was in, i think defenses still have to respect Delhomme more, so it opens more things up for the run game.i don't think Delhomme gets benched for one INT. if (when?) he throws two, there is a strong possibility he gets benched. depends how bad they look.
Link to post
Share on other sites
amnesiac

amnesiac 890

Posted
Posted

Who would you guys rather have starting this Sunday: Jake Delhomme or Derek Anderson? :blackdot:

Would rather have 61 year old Ken Anderson.
Would rather have Jake Anderson from Deadliest Catch, if we're going in that direction. ;)
how about a young Loni Anderson?
Link to post
Share on other sites
wadegarrett

wadegarrett 207

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Who would you guys rather have starting this Sunday: Jake Delhomme or Derek Anderson? :ph34r:

Would rather have 61 year old Ken Anderson.
Would rather have Jake Anderson from Deadliest Catch, if we're going in that direction. :confused:
how about a young Loni Anderson?
:towelwave:
Link to post
Share on other sites
amnesiac

amnesiac 890

Posted
Posted

so, Mangini now has 5 wins.

will 2 more wins allow him to keep his job?

can they do it?

i think if he somehow beats the Ravens and Steelers at home to end the season, they would have a very hard time firing him.

(i think they will probably split those two.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
MAC_32

MAC_32 12,866

Posted
Posted

Bills and Bengals are certainly beatable, but they are road games.i think the Browns end with at least 7 wins.

If Delhomme starts all four I'd be hard pressed to believe we'll be any better than 5-11.I'm still trying to figure out how we've won the last 2, been some pretty awful football since Colt went down.
Link to post
Share on other sites
guest 1553

guest 1553 0

Posted
Posted

Here are my Larry King style thoughts:

I see 7-8 wins as well. Buffalo lost 2 OL starters yesterday. As long as Wright stays on the bench, they can deal with Fitzpatrick. I suspect we'll see alot of amoeba defense next week since Buffalo isn't a strong running team. They should beat Cincy, and I think they will win one of the Pit/Balt games.

As for the offense, Daboll is still an 'effing idiot, and needs to go the day after the season ends, if not sooner. Maybe RRyan will eat him on the bus ride to Buffalo.

One thing I would love to see, that I don't think they've run at all, is some 22 personnel groupings with Hillis, Vickers, Watson, and Moore on the field at the same time. 3rd and 5 or less, and it gives them a ton of run/play-action options.

I know Moore got dinged yesterday, but even before that we barely saw him on the field, and he has better hands than any of our WR's. Dude needs more minutes.

I'm so tired of seeing routes that are turned 2 yards short of the sticks.

Delhomme looked way worse than his stat line would indicate, but at least he didn't turn the ball over (Thank you Miami CB!)

If not for Hillis, Hodges would be the team MVP. Glad they re-upped him for two more years.

Haden was phenomenal. Granted, he was burned badly on the play that he ultimately intercepted, but the guy was everywhere. I freely admit that I was wrong about him at draft time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Bobcat10

Bobcat10 1,991

Posted
Posted

so, Mangini now has 5 wins.will 2 more wins allow him to keep his job?can they do it?i think if he somehow beats the Ravens and Steelers at home to end the season, they would have a very hard time firing him.(i think they will probably split those two.)

I think they're gonna have to have a really bad month for Holmgren to fire Mangini. I'd still be on board with a Chucky move probably...even though I don't dislike Mangini. The QB situation sorta blurs everything for me though. Something isn't right trotting Delhomme out there. Maybe my gap is too narrow in the Delhomme vs Wallace passing debate and who helps the running game more....I'm not sure. But I'd like to know what the real reasons are because Delhomme almost did it AGAIN late yesterday. Actually, he did, the CB just dropped it.
Link to post
Share on other sites
amnesiac

amnesiac 890

Posted
Posted

some of the talking heads were saying today that Mangini's fate was sealed with losing in Buffalo.

but i don't get that, since part of the reason they lost was because of Delhomme, who was Holmgren's decision.

Daboll's definitely done, even if they keep Mangini.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Bobcat10

Bobcat10 1,991

Posted
Posted

some of the talking heads were saying today that Mangini's fate was sealed with losing in Buffalo.but i don't get that, since part of the reason they lost was because of Delhomme, who was Holmgren's decision.Daboll's definitely done, even if they keep Mangini.

Did I hear correctly that this all started based on comments from a certain female named Sabrina?
Link to post
Share on other sites
MAC_32

MAC_32 12,866

Posted
Posted

some of the talking heads were saying today that Mangini's fate was sealed with losing in Buffalo.but i don't get that, since part of the reason they lost was because of Delhomme, who was Holmgren's decision.Daboll's definitely done, even if they keep Mangini.

A win this week and one against Baltimore and Pittsburgh and those comments from the talking heads will be long forgotten.We need Colt back, end of story.
Link to post
Share on other sites
amnesiac

amnesiac 890

Posted
Posted

yeah, Mangini is screwed.

i don't think it's fair, and i really would like to see him back for one more year, but i think he's gone.

you just can't lose to two 2 win teams and expect to hang on to your job.

Link to post
Share on other sites
PizzaDeliveryGuy

PizzaDeliveryGuy 26

Posted
Posted

yeah, Mangini is screwed.i don't think it's fair, and i really would like to see him back for one more year, but i think he's gone.you just can't lose to two 2 win teams and expect to hang on to your job.

This is pretty much where I am at. I really really want them to hang onto Mangini but it would surprise me if they did. I think if Holmgren looks at the big picture instead of Ws and Ls he would be wise.
Link to post
Share on other sites
daveR

daveR 241

Posted
Posted

yeah, Mangini is screwed.

i don't think it's fair, and i really would like to see him back for one more year, but i think he's gone.

you just can't lose to two 2 win teams and expect to hang on to your job.

This is pretty much where I am at. I really really want them to hang onto Mangini but it would surprise me if they did. I think if Holmgren looks at the big picture instead of Ws and Ls he would be wise.
It's LeBron's fault!

Let me explain... Without him, there's nothing to talk about in Cleveland. Cav's :goodposting: Indians :lmao: Monsters :lmao:

Only topic worth discussing is Mangini, and the talkers are pushing it.

IMO, the man came into a situation where there was little talent and crappy attitude on the team. Both have improved, but we're still lacking. (Who is our top wr & where would he rank in the NFLs top 50?) Who has more talent, Browns or Bengals? Why couldn't Ryan stop the Cinci running game? Honestly, who has more talent, Browns or Bills?

Mangini has the team heading in the right direction. We still need a game-changing WR, help on the DL, another cb, and another OL. Let's see what sort of results he could get with good talent against an average schedule!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
MAC_32

MAC_32 12,866

Posted
Posted

You need to give Mangini the boot. How do you let your big brother come into your house and give you a wedgie like this???

Could it be superior talent at every position?
Mangini brought in a third of that talent, and an OC who is clearly in over his head.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Raider Nation

Raider Nation 5,597

Posted
Posted

You need to give Mangini the boot. How do you let your big brother come into your house and give you a wedgie like this???

Could it be superior talent at every position?
Mangini brought in a third of that talent, and an OC who is clearly in over his head.
Not to mention you beat teams this year which were clearly more talented. This game was an embarrassment.

And believe me, I know ALL about embarrassing football.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nxmehta

nxmehta 12

Posted
Posted

You need to give Mangini the boot. How do you let your big brother come into your house and give you a wedgie like this???

Could it be superior talent at every position?
Mangini brought in a third of that talent, and an OC who is clearly in over his head.
Not to mention you beat teams this year which were clearly more talented. This game was an embarrassment.

And believe me, I know ALL about embarrassing football.

:rolleyes:

There is no way to defend that game. Lack of talent doesn't get you a 41-9 beatdown- that's heart. Mangini is gone. He's made decent progress but clearly not enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites
MAC_32

MAC_32 12,866

Posted
Posted

Looking at the bright side, the Browns have the 5/6 pick (T-ARZ at 5-11) in the 2011 Draft. I'll be interested to see if they opt for one of the top QBs there or settle on Colt as their guy.

Colt's the guy, if AJ Green is there he is the pick.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Frenchy Fuqua

Frenchy Fuqua 19

Posted
Posted

Looking at the bright side, the Browns have the 5/6 pick (T-ARZ at 5-11) in the 2011 Draft. I'll be interested to see if they opt for one of the top QBs there or settle on Colt as their guy.

Colt's the guy, if AJ Green is there he is the pick.
Maybe, but...

McCoy concluded what started as a very promising rookie season with losses of 20-10 to Baltimore and 41-9 to Pittsburgh in cold weather in Cleveland Browns Stadium. In those two games, he completed 35 of 70 passes for 358 yards for one touchdown and had six interceptions. His passer rating was 34.1 against the two playoff rivals.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Fensalk

Fensalk 2

Posted
Posted (edited)

The last mock I saw had Auburn QB Cam Newton going at #6 to the 49ers. The 49ers won today bumping them down, and the Browns now own that pick. This is a good spot for the Browns. Now they can evaluate Colt McCoy and determine if he can make all the throws. If they decide he can't, they could select a QB with a strong arm at #6. If they really believe McCoy is a franchise QB, then the Browns could trade down in the first round with someone who really wants Newton and stockpile draft picks. The #6 pick will be valuable because of Newton. Holmgren is the QB guru, and there might not be a better guy to have making the call on this.

The Browns only invested a 3rd round pick in McCoy.

Edited by Fensalk
Link to post
Share on other sites
Fallerjw

Fallerjw 2

Posted
Posted

Which player(s) are you accusing of "lack of heart"?

Robert Royal, Mohamed Massaquoi, John St Claire, Matt Roth, Abe Elam to name a few. Would you also like me to call out individual plays? I can do that if you want.
:lmao: Even though I thought he had a good season, I though Ben Watson quit on some plays. Bottom line is, they didn't show up to compete yesterday.Does the off-season thread start somewhere else now that Mangini is gone?
Link to post
Share on other sites
abe froman

abe froman 0

Posted
Posted (edited)

Looking at the bright side, the Browns have the 5/6 pick (T-ARZ at 5-11) in the 2011 Draft. I'll be interested to see if they opt for one of the top QBs there or settle on Colt as their guy.

Colt's the guy, if AJ Green is there he is the pick.
?? Although I like Colt ALOT and was pleasantly surprised at how well he did considering being a rookie, If Cam is there you HAVE to go get him. The guy is special, has great size and big arm which Colt does not. Colt could be a very good QB in the NFL but I highly doubt his ceiling is anywhere near Cams. As for Green WR's are scary to draft in the 1st. Id rather invest 1st round money into a "stud QB" like Cam then a WR. We need to sign a solid vet there. If we do not draft DE Clayborn here then I say the pick has to be Cam. Screw needs.. you go get the best football player available period. **If CLE signs Gruden as HC then its probably safe to bet Colt is here to stay as Gruden is rumored to be the main driving force to Holmgren drafting him..(per Sig B tweet today). Im not a Gruden to CLE fan fwiw.. Give me Fisher!! Edited by abe froman
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Followers 12
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...