What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

***OFFICIAL 'The Walking Dead' TV Series Thread*** (4 Viewers)

I would bet the overall story lines, like Herchel's farm and Atlanta are going to be present. So any big story lines in the future will most likely be in the TV show.
I'm not sure we can count on that. I believe Shane died early in the comics and isn't Sophia still alive but Carol is dead? Seems like they're picking and choosing which elements of the comics they are using and even if they use something similar they often give it a twist. Because of that, I'm not bothered by comic spoilers. It can give us a possible idea of what might happen but I wouldn't necessarily view it as an actual precursor of what's going to come.
But that isn't what I said. Herchel's farm is a story line. They went to the farm in the comics after going to Atlanta, correct? Characters aren't the same as story lines. You know Lost and I am sure you remember how the producers talked about how they initially planned to kill Jack (when they approached Kurt Russell) and then someone else would have played the role Jack played. It doesn't mean that the smoke monster and the Others story lines would have changed. Juliet could have switched places with Kate and the show wouldn't have been that different in the overall story. Lots of episode changes, etc.Anything Sophia may have done later in the comics will be done by someone else and an alive Shane will take over things someone else did in the comic, but if the next big story line is going to Fort Benning (I don't know what is next), then I would bet they go to Fort Benning.
 
It's not too hard to believe they had an easy way to move zombies in and out. Apparently Otis was handling with little trouble, and Otis wasn't too quick on his feet. A simple two door system could be set-up to handle the problem. Sure, they didn't show it to us, but it's such a simple problem to handle, and I don't see why we needed proof they could figure it out.

 
Great episode. Can't wait until Feb.

Also, haven't read this whole thread, but I'm calling dibs on Maggie. :wub: Glenn can EAD.

Lauren Cohan
is she the one with the country accent they meet at that farmhouse?
The one that's been a recurring character in all 6 episodes of season 2 of The Walking Dead, the Drama on AMC?

Yeah, her.
nope didnt see her in the first two episodes. epic fail scrooge
She was in 6 of the 7 episodes, just not the first one.

Either way, you're right. that was pretty epic. :thumbup:

 
How were they planning on getting the zombies INTO the barn?
--Removed for others
SPOILER TAGS PLEASE
:goodposting: This is why knowing about the comics is something for spoiler tags. What if this is the way for the zombies to get out? I want to be surprised. If something happens in the comics that would have already happened and they did something different, then fine, but I don't want to know what may happen.
 
Great episode. Can't wait until Feb.

Also, haven't read this whole thread, but I'm calling dibs on Maggie. :wub: Glenn can EAD.

Lauren Cohan
is she the one with the country accent they meet at that farmhouse?
The one that's been a recurring character in all 6 episodes of season 2 of The Walking Dead, the Drama on AMC?

Yeah, her.
nope didnt see her in the first two episodes. epic fail scrooge
Sophia is a zombie
 
Great episode. Can't wait until Feb.

Also, haven't read this whole thread, but I'm calling dibs on Maggie. :wub: Glenn can EAD.

Lauren Cohan
is she the one with the country accent they meet at that farmhouse?
The one that's been a recurring character in all 6 episodes of season 2 of The Walking Dead, the Drama on AMC?

Yeah, her.
nope didnt see her in the first two episodes. epic fail scrooge
She was in 6 of the 7 episodes, just not the first one.

Either way, you're right. that was pretty epic. :thumbup:
:goodposting:
 
I would bet the overall story lines, like Herchel's farm and Atlanta are going to be present. So any big story lines in the future will most likely be in the TV show.
I'm not sure we can count on that. I believe Shane died early in the comics and isn't Sophia still alive but Carol is dead? Seems like they're picking and choosing which elements of the comics they are using and even if they use something similar they often give it a twist. Because of that, I'm not bothered by comic spoilers. It can give us a possible idea of what might happen but I wouldn't necessarily view it as an actual precursor of what's going to come.
But that isn't what I said. Herchel's farm is a story line. They went to the farm in the comics after going to Atlanta, correct? Characters aren't the same as story lines. You know Lost and I am sure you remember how the producers talked about how they initially planned to kill Jack (when they approached Kurt Russell) and then someone else would have played the role Jack played. It doesn't mean that the smoke monster and the Others story lines would have changed. Juliet could have switched places with Kate and the show wouldn't have been that different in the overall story. Lots of episode changes, etc.Anything Sophia may have done later in the comics will be done by someone else and an alive Shane will take over things someone else did in the comic, but if the next big story line is going to Fort Benning (I don't know what is next), then I would bet they go to Fort Benning.
I see that but everything I've read/heard is that the series and comics have a lot of differences - even when settings (such as the farm) are the same. Just saying for myself that it doesn't bother me if people talk about what's happened in the comics because it's been pretty apparent from the outset the TV series is going to venture in different and original areas. But I understand if people want the comic info posted with spoiler tags. I'm cool with it either way. :)
 
I would bet the overall story lines, like Herchel's farm and Atlanta are going to be present. So any big story lines in the future will most likely be in the TV show.
I'm not sure we can count on that. I believe Shane died early in the comics and isn't Sophia still alive but Carol is dead? Seems like they're picking and choosing which elements of the comics they are using and even if they use something similar they often give it a twist. Because of that, I'm not bothered by comic spoilers. It can give us a possible idea of what might happen but I wouldn't necessarily view it as an actual precursor of what's going to come.
But that isn't what I said. Herchel's farm is a story line. They went to the farm in the comics after going to Atlanta, correct? Characters aren't the same as story lines. You know Lost and I am sure you remember how the producers talked about how they initially planned to kill Jack (when they approached Kurt Russell) and then someone else would have played the role Jack played. It doesn't mean that the smoke monster and the Others story lines would have changed. Juliet could have switched places with Kate and the show wouldn't have been that different in the overall story. Lots of episode changes, etc.Anything Sophia may have done later in the comics will be done by someone else and an alive Shane will take over things someone else did in the comic, but if the next big story line is going to Fort Benning (I don't know what is next), then I would bet they go to Fort Benning.
I see that but everything I've read/heard is that the series and comics have a lot of differences - even when settings (such as the farm) are the same. Just saying for myself that it doesn't bother me if people talk about what's happened in the comics because it's been pretty apparent from the outset the TV series is going to venture in different and original areas. But I understand if people want the comic info posted with spoiler tags. I'm cool with it either way. :)
:goodposting: Exactly how I feel and what was trying to get at.ETA: I will continue to read the comic spoiler tags, and I am one of those people who almost ALWAYS hates knowing what will happen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great episode. Can't wait until Feb.

Also, haven't read this whole thread, but I'm calling dibs on Maggie. :wub: Glenn can EAD.

Lauren Cohan
is she the one with the country accent they meet at that farmhouse?
The one that's been a recurring character in all 6 episodes of season 2 of The Walking Dead, the Drama on AMC?

Yeah, her.
nope didnt see her in the first two episodes. epic fail scrooge
Sophia is a zombie
:lmao:
 
Pretty sure the first episode in Feb will deal with how the baby is really Dale's as per the comics
 
How were they planning on getting the zombies INTO the barn?
--Removed for others
SPOILER TAGS PLEASE
:goodposting: This is why knowing about the comics is something for spoiler tags. What if this is the way for the zombies to get out? I want to be surprised. If something happens in the comics that would have already happened and they did something different, then fine, but I don't want to know what may happen.
Pretty sure that zombie is out of the bag.
 
How were they planning on getting the zombies INTO the barn?
--Removed for others
SPOILER TAGS PLEASE
:goodposting: This is why knowing about the comics is something for spoiler tags. What if this is the way for the zombies to get out? I want to be surprised. If something happens in the comics that would have already happened and they did something different, then fine, but I don't want to know what may happen.
I don't think they are going to be putting any zombies in the barn now, so why would that matter?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Shane is one of the stronger characters (both the actor and the character), so killing him off anytime soon would be bad for the show, unless they find one or two others along the way that could hold one's interest. Same with Daryl. Anyone else is zombie food (except Rick of course).

 
How were they planning on getting the zombies INTO the barn?
--Removed for others
SPOILER TAGS PLEASE
:goodposting: This is why knowing about the comics is something for spoiler tags. What if this is the way for the zombies to get out? I want to be surprised. If something happens in the comics that would have already happened and they did something different, then fine, but I don't want to know what may happen.
I don't think they are going to be putting any zombies in the barn now, so why would that matter?
:wall: LOL, I wasn't even thinking about that. Duh, massacre, zombies in the barn can't escape anymore. I just remember the previews looking like zombies attacked and just thought about someone standing in front of the secret door and getting snagged and feeling like I knew it was going to happen. You are correct, I am an idiot and it doesn't matter anymore.
 
I think Shane is one of the stronger characters (both the actor and the character), so killing him off anytime soon would be bad for the show, unless they find one or two others along the way that could hold one's interest. Same with Daryl. Anyone else is zombie food (except Rick of course).
I agree although I do like how Andrea's character is developing (part of that is me liking Laurie Holden from her "X-Files" days). I like the Rick/Shane stuff a lot although I do wonder how much of a shelf life it has. Maybe Kirkman saw that when he was first writing the comics too. As far as Daryl, his character has grown by leaps and bounds and he's become infinitely more interesting this season. Of course, it wouldn't surprise me to see him get off'd for that very reason. It wouldn't be a surprise to see him get killed just when he's starting to really evolve as a person - especially if he and Carol start making sweet post-zombie apocalypse your daughter is dead but you do have me love.
 
How were they planning on getting the zombies INTO the barn?
--Removed for others
SPOILER TAGS PLEASE
:goodposting: This is why knowing about the comics is something for spoiler tags. What if this is the way for the zombies to get out? I want to be surprised. If something happens in the comics that would have already happened and they did something different, then fine, but I don't want to know what may happen.
What the hell are you talking about? This already happened in the show. There are no more Zombies in the barn. How they normally got them IN there is no longer a spoiler.
 
How were they planning on getting the zombies INTO the barn?
--Removed for others
SPOILER TAGS PLEASE
:goodposting: This is why knowing about the comics is something for spoiler tags. What if this is the way for the zombies to get out? I want to be surprised. If something happens in the comics that would have already happened and they did something different, then fine, but I don't want to know what may happen.
I don't think they are going to be putting any zombies in the barn now, so why would that matter?
:wall: LOL, I wasn't even thinking about that. Duh, massacre, zombies in the barn can't escape anymore. I just remember the previews looking like zombies attacked and just thought about someone standing in front of the secret door and getting snagged and feeling like I knew it was going to happen. You are correct, I am an idiot and it doesn't matter anymore.
There's still no shortage of zombies. :shrug:
 
How were they planning on getting the zombies INTO the barn?
--Removed for others
SPOILER TAGS PLEASE
:goodposting: This is why knowing about the comics is something for spoiler tags. What if this is the way for the zombies to get out? I want to be surprised. If something happens in the comics that would have already happened and they did something different, then fine, but I don't want to know what may happen.
What the hell are you talking about? This already happened in the show. There are no more Zombies in the barn. How they normally got them IN there is no longer a spoiler.
See my post above. Brain fart by me.
 
How were they planning on getting the zombies INTO the barn?
--Removed for others
SPOILER TAGS PLEASE
:goodposting: This is why knowing about the comics is something for spoiler tags. What if this is the way for the zombies to get out? I want to be surprised. If something happens in the comics that would have already happened and they did something different, then fine, but I don't want to know what may happen.
What the hell are you talking about? This already happened in the show. There are no more Zombies in the barn. How they normally got them IN there is no longer a spoiler.
See my post above. Brain fart by me.
Ah, gotcha, sorry. No worries then!
 
The entire notion of giving up the search and being in such a hurry to go wandering out into the apocalypse is every bit as dumb as hiding the guns in a swamp.
Please. No way a girl her age was surviving alone in the Fire Swamp.
Probably not, but you still take a reasonable amount of time to try and confirm that. Especially when the search involves living at such a safe place. If she got lost in downtown Atlanta, that'd be one thing. But she pretty much got lost in the opposite sort of place.
 
I think Shane is one of the stronger characters (both the actor and the character), so killing him off anytime soon would be bad for the show, unless they find one or two others along the way that could hold one's interest. Same with Daryl. Anyone else is zombie food (except Rick of course).
I agree although I do like how Andrea's character is developing (part of that is me liking Laurie Holden from her "X-Files" days). I like the Rick/Shane stuff a lot although I do wonder how much of a shelf life it has. Maybe Kirkman saw that when he was first writing the comics too. As far as Daryl, his character has grown by leaps and bounds and he's become infinitely more interesting this season. Of course, it wouldn't surprise me to see him get off'd for that very reason. It wouldn't be a surprise to see him get killed just when he's starting to really evolve as a person - especially if he and Carol start making sweet post-zombie apocalypse your daughter is dead but you do have me love.
I think Daryl is the future. He's almost literaly the halfway point between Shane and Rick. Although Rick stepped up to be the leader, I can see that being passed to Daryl as he eventually works his way up the group ladder. He's smart, tough, realistic and detached enough to be pragmatic about a number of things while still developing a side that values the moral well being of the group over the empirically self preservationist ethos of Dark Shane. I can see it coming down to, much like Shane and Sophia, Rick needing to and being in a position to put Shane down but can't and Daryl makes that hard choice. I really thought it was going to come down to Daryl choosing the group over a reappearing Merle, but that choice seems to be have passed. Daryl, IMO is the key to the group's survival as a moral group. Second choice to put down Shane is Andrea, who in essence will choose between Dale and Shane.
 
I think Shane is one of the stronger characters (both the actor and the character), so killing him off anytime soon would be bad for the show, unless they find one or two others along the way that could hold one's interest. Same with Daryl. Anyone else is zombie food (except Rick of course).
I agree although I do like how Andrea's character is developing (part of that is me liking Laurie Holden from her "X-Files" days). I like the Rick/Shane stuff a lot although I do wonder how much of a shelf life it has. Maybe Kirkman saw that when he was first writing the comics too. As far as Daryl, his character has grown by leaps and bounds and he's become infinitely more interesting this season. Of course, it wouldn't surprise me to see him get off'd for that very reason. It wouldn't be a surprise to see him get killed just when he's starting to really evolve as a person - especially if he and Carol start making sweet post-zombie apocalypse your daughter is dead but you do have me love.
I think Daryl is the future. He's almost literaly the halfway point between Shane and Rick. Although Rick stepped up to be the leader, I can see that being passed to Daryl as he eventually works his way up the group ladder. He's smart, tough, realistic and detached enough to be pragmatic about a number of things while still developing a side that values the moral well being of the group over the empirically self preservationist ethos of Dark Shane. I can see it coming down to, much like Shane and Sophia, Rick needing to and being in a position to put Shane down but can't and Daryl makes that hard choice. I really thought it was going to come down to Daryl choosing the group over a reappearing Merle, but that choice seems to be have passed. Daryl, IMO is the key to the group's survival as a moral group. Second choice to put down Shane is Andrea, who in essence will choose between Dale and Shane.
I can see that and it fits with what I said earlier about Rick and Shane being extreme view points and Daryl being more in the middle of the two. He has gravitated toward both at various times and it may be that middle ground which is ultimately the best course of action. One of the best themes in my opinion of this season has been about Daryl's evolution into being more of a pivotal figure within the group. Carol's comment to him about him being as good a man as Rick wasn't just a pleasantry. I think it struck at the core of what we're seeing with Daryl's character so far this season.
 
At the end of the day, when the zombie apocalypse comes, me and everyone else in the Shane camp will survive and the rest of you will die. We will impregnate your wives and your families, shave our heads, beat up wife abusers, nail the blonde just to piss off the old man, your sons will come to us for advice, and we will shoot you in your legs and leave you for zombie bait. Bottom line.
Short sighted approach. Your allies in the "Shane camp" will be the last ones you can trust. Better to align oneself with people who won't put a bullet in your back because of a simple disagreement.
Did Shane do this? I must've missed that episode.
 
I get that everyone seems to have come around on Shane. That's fine.However, just because the girl was in the barn doesn't mean Shane was right to want to give up the search and leave. Searching for the girl was the right thing to do. Searching for her was more or less the same level of danger as travelling to Fort Benning. Probably much less so. The only "danger" from the woods came from living humans doing stupid things with guns.No zombie packs in the woods around the farm. Daryl got attacked, but still he was by himself and survived. That's not possible in the places they've been.Hell, they were shooting guns for fun with no fear of it attracting a pack of zombies. Again, not possible anywhere else they were going.Had Otis not put the girl in the barn, they certainly would've found her. Nobody (except Herschel and Family) could've known that. That hindsight doesn't mean looking for her wasn't the right thing to do.The entire notion of giving up the search and being in such a hurry to go wandering out into the apocalypse is every bit as dumb as hiding the guns in a swamp.
:lmao: @ "being in such a hurry." They spent practically the entire season on that farm.Your "just because Shane was right doesn't mean I'm willing to admit that he was right" point [paraphrased] is also very interesting logic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rick is also a midpoint between Shane and Herschel. It would probably go more like:

Shane

Daryl

Rick

Herschel

Shane and Daryl are both the middle ground thus far.

 
I think Shane is one of the stronger characters (both the actor and the character), so killing him off anytime soon would be bad for the show, unless they find one or two others along the way that could hold one's interest. Same with Daryl. Anyone else is zombie food (except Rick of course).
I agree although I do like how Andrea's character is developing (part of that is me liking Laurie Holden from her "X-Files" days). I like the Rick/Shane stuff a lot although I do wonder how much of a shelf life it has. Maybe Kirkman saw that when he was first writing the comics too. As far as Daryl, his character has grown by leaps and bounds and he's become infinitely more interesting this season. Of course, it wouldn't surprise me to see him get off'd for that very reason. It wouldn't be a surprise to see him get killed just when he's starting to really evolve as a person - especially if he and Carol start making sweet post-zombie apocalypse your daughter is dead but you do have me love.
I think Daryl is the future. He's almost literaly the halfway point between Shane and Rick. Although Rick stepped up to be the leader, I can see that being passed to Daryl as he eventually works his way up the group ladder. He's smart, tough, realistic and detached enough to be pragmatic about a number of things while still developing a side that values the moral well being of the group over the empirically self preservationist ethos of Dark Shane. I can see it coming down to, much like Shane and Sophia, Rick needing to and being in a position to put Shane down but can't and Daryl makes that hard choice. I really thought it was going to come down to Daryl choosing the group over a reappearing Merle, but that choice seems to be have passed. Daryl, IMO is the key to the group's survival as a moral group. Second choice to put down Shane is Andrea, who in essence will choose between Dale and Shane.
I can see that and it fits with what I said earlier about Rick and Shane being extreme view points and Daryl being more in the middle of the two. He has gravitated toward both at various times and it may be that middle ground which is ultimately the best course of action. One of the best themes in my opinion of this season has been about Daryl's evolution into being more of a pivotal figure within the group. Carol's comment to him about him being as good a man as Rick wasn't just a pleasantry. I think it struck at the core of what we're seeing with Daryl's character so far this season.
The writers have done a great job moving his character from a more stereotyped/ one note to where he is now. Lori's me-me-me-me character is another story altogether.
 
I get that everyone seems to have come around on Shane. That's fine.However, just because the girl was in the barn doesn't mean Shane was right to want to give up the search and leave. Searching for the girl was the right thing to do. Searching for her was more or less the same level of danger as travelling to Fort Benning. Probably much less so. The only "danger" from the woods came from living humans doing stupid things with guns.No zombie packs in the woods around the farm. Daryl got attacked, but still he was by himself and survived. That's not possible in the places they've been.Hell, they were shooting guns for fun with no fear of it attracting a pack of zombies. Again, not possible anywhere else they were going.Had Otis not put the girl in the barn, they certainly would've found her. Nobody (except Herschel and Family) could've known that. That hindsight doesn't mean looking for her wasn't the right thing to do.The entire notion of giving up the search and being in such a hurry to go wandering out into the apocalypse is every bit as dumb as hiding the guns in a swamp.
:lmao: @ "being in such a hurry." They spent practically the entire season on that farm.Your "just because Shane was right doesn't mean I'm willing to admit that he was right" point [paraphrased] is also very interesting logic.
How long did they look? A week?Shane's decision turned out to look correct because a critical and wild-card piece of information was missing. If zombie Sophia was roaming the woods or still stuck in the marsh, it's reasonable to assume they would've found her and been done with the search long ago.I'm not denying Shane's reasoning isn't good or important for some things, but desire to give up the search and leave the farm after a week or 2 was dumb.He kept mentioning the danger of the search, but searching for Sophia and living at the farm was, by far, the safest thing they could be doing in the short-term.I think the excitement of the final scene clouds the fact that Shane spent the whole season lobbying to do something really stupid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Shane is one of the stronger characters (both the actor and the character), so killing him off anytime soon would be bad for the show, unless they find one or two others along the way that could hold one's interest. Same with Daryl. Anyone else is zombie food (except Rick of course).
I agree although I do like how Andrea's character is developing (part of that is me liking Laurie Holden from her "X-Files" days). I like the Rick/Shane stuff a lot although I do wonder how much of a shelf life it has. Maybe Kirkman saw that when he was first writing the comics too. As far as Daryl, his character has grown by leaps and bounds and he's become infinitely more interesting this season. Of course, it wouldn't surprise me to see him get off'd for that very reason. It wouldn't be a surprise to see him get killed just when he's starting to really evolve as a person - especially if he and Carol start making sweet post-zombie apocalypse your daughter is dead but you do have me love.
I think Daryl is the future. He's almost literaly the halfway point between Shane and Rick. Although Rick stepped up to be the leader, I can see that being passed to Daryl as he eventually works his way up the group ladder. He's smart, tough, realistic and detached enough to be pragmatic about a number of things while still developing a side that values the moral well being of the group over the empirically self preservationist ethos of Dark Shane. I can see it coming down to, much like Shane and Sophia, Rick needing to and being in a position to put Shane down but can't and Daryl makes that hard choice. I really thought it was going to come down to Daryl choosing the group over a reappearing Merle, but that choice seems to be have passed. Daryl, IMO is the key to the group's survival as a moral group. Second choice to put down Shane is Andrea, who in essence will choose between Dale and Shane.
I can see that and it fits with what I said earlier about Rick and Shane being extreme view points and Daryl being more in the middle of the two. He has gravitated toward both at various times and it may be that middle ground which is ultimately the best course of action. One of the best themes in my opinion of this season has been about Daryl's evolution into being more of a pivotal figure within the group. Carol's comment to him about him being as good a man as Rick wasn't just a pleasantry. I think it struck at the core of what we're seeing with Daryl's character so far this season.
The writers have done a great job moving his character from a more stereotyped/ one note to where he is now.
Yup. Norman Reedus has done really good work as an actor this season too.
 
sorry, was late to the party this week... outstanding episode, my fav so far this season I think!

Gotta say i didnt expect to see sophia in the barn.
Was pretty obvious she was in there.
I didn't think it was obvious, but certainly possible. I wasn't sure if Merle might not be in there too. Either way, I'm just glad they closed out the Sophia storyline.
Last scene was great.

Dale is REALLY starting to annoy me.
:eek:
- Farmer Girl was said when everyone in the barn got killed, but you could see when she gave the gun to Shorty, she understands now. the people that they knew are gone. curious to see how Herschel feels now.
Maggie = even hotter now! :wub:
I don't think Shane froze when the girl came out. I think it had more to do with the conversation Shane had with Rick's wife. He told her Rick wasn't equipped to live in this new world, much less lead the group.

Rick shooting the girl not only proved to his own group (especially Shane) that he is, after all, ready to live and lead them in this new world, and that he is ready to move on. He got closure on the girl because he felt it was his fault she got lost in the first place. But he also showed Hershel that he is prepared to treat walkers the same way, regardless of personal ties or affiliation with his group. Hershel viewed them as sick family members/friends. Rick had to shoot the girl, because if Shane had done it, the question of Rick's leadership would have remained an issue. But I have no doubt that Shane or Daryl would have shot the girl before she had a chance to hurt anyone else. But Rick needed to do it.
:goodposting:
Great episode. Can't wait until Feb.

Also, haven't read this whole thread, but I'm calling dibs on Maggie. :wub: Glenn can EAD.

Lauren Cohan
wayyyyy too late for dibs, GB...get in line! ;)
Pretty sure the first episode in Feb will deal with how the baby is really Dale's as per the comics
:eek: :eek:
Concerning the horse, I always got the sense that the farm, while isolated isn't completely enclosed.
the horses could navigate through the swamp (whereas the walkers could not without getting stuck), no?
 
The spoiler tags regarding the comics probably aren't even neccessary at this point. In fact, it might provoke further discussion of the show in relation to the comics without them. :shrug:Either way is fine though imo. I can see why people wouldn't want to know what happens in the comics regarding future happenings in the show, but that has pretty much proved pointless thus far.
How do you figure? They've gone away from the comics in a LOT of ways, but if you didn't read them and had read some of the spoilers this season, much of the mystery of Herschel's farm would have been ruined.
And if they do anything with the prison/Governor/Michonne/etc. that would be ruined as well, talking about it.
Agree (although I didn't look at the spoiler tag).Move that into another thread if you don't want to spoiler tag everything. Lots of us watch the show without wanting to know what is upcoming per the comics. :goodposting: I don't even watch the previews for the next episode.
 
Best episode to date. Seems the show is getting better as it goes along. I fall in the "surprised about Sophie" crew. It will make a nice story line for the next episode. Did Hershel know she was in there. If so, I can see Shane being awefully pissed off that the old man knew it and still let the others go out searching for Sophie and risking their lives.

I don't read too much in Shane not taking out Sophie. To me Sophie didn't look too bad. She was easily recogniseable and wasn't chewed up at all. It looks like they just took a step back seeing her and she sure as hell didn't appear to eager to get lunch. I mean, I've seen zombies with no legs move faster than her.
Being that:a) Herschel didn't want them there in the first place

b) He would have loved for them to move on up the road, and

c) He didn't want them to know that there were Walkers in the barn to begin with;

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that that theory is off the mark.
Are your points arguments that Hershel didn't know she was in the barn or are you arguing that the others (especially Shane) wouldn't be ticked off that he knew and didn't tell them?
I'm arguing that there is no way Herschel would have let them keep looking for her if he knew she was in the barn. He doesn't want them there (which they are going to be for as long as they are looking for her) and he doesn't want them to find the barn. IF he knew, he would have had to try to get her out of there, and have the group find her. I'm just saying he wouldn't have left her in there, knowing that they would stay until she was found.
I'm not sure I believe that. How could he keep them from looking for her without compromising the secret of what's in the barn? Them being distracted with looking for her (which they really didn't seem to do very much) would be the best way to keep them from discovering what's in there. Of course, so would having them camp somewhere else on a huge farm farther away from the barn, and not wheelbarrowing sacks of crippled chickens in broad daylight. I don't see how, once he operated on Carl, he could've kicked them out before Carl was well enough to travel and all this seemed to happen on the first day or two that Carl was out of bed and he'd already given them the ultimatum that they had to leave, which covers them not staying until she was found. Of course, Carl goes from bed ridden to target practice in a day just like T-Bone's miraculous recovery from a near septic infection.As far as the point above about not reading too much into Shane not taking out Sophia, that's couldn't be more wrong. It was the entire point of the episode and half-season: who is the leader of their group and by proxy, if Shane will continue to be in it.
On the Talking Dead Kirkman explained that Herschel didn't know Sophia was in the barn because Otis put her in but was killed by Shane before they started talking about Sophia being lost.
 
How do they get power at the farm? Did they ever say? Generator I am assuming?

Also, what about the utilities and dams and nuclear power plants and stuff. No one to maintain them or run them.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top