What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

WR Antonio Brown, FA (4 Viewers)

Short term I think it’s a huge boost to TyWill because of the chemistry / trust developing with Carr. 

Long term the ideal situation is a healthy Brown returning to the fold, because that opens up everything for Tyrell Williams when Brown is drawing top coverage. 

So this is a win-win for Tyrell right now.  The only downside is if Brown doesn’t come back (which seems like a really slim chance) and Williams is constantly doubled. But with a massive target increase (in that scenario) that could be mitigated a bit.
I'd be pretty shocked if Brown doesn't play. But this is definitely an unbelievable #### show and anything is possible. I think my reticence with Tyrell is based on how bad Carr might fall off without Brown. But yes he is good and yes he would get a lot of volume if Brown is out. 

 
So, basically, Brown wants to keep using his specific helmet. He can wear the same model, it just has to be a new one. Or, more accurately, one that it fewer than 10 years old. Antonio Brown is resisting that, for reasons that may be clear only to Antonio Brown
This is at odds with Schefter's reporting that his issue with the helmet is that it impacts his vision. The same helmet, just newer, shouldn't do that. 
"The helmet that Brown is comfortable in and wore throughout his career with the Pittsburgh Steelers -- believed to be the Schutt Air Advantage helmet, which the company has discontinued making -- is no longer certified by the National Operating Committee for Standards and Athletic Equipment."

 
You knew when Pittsburgh took all that dead cap money on and got nothing for him that there were serious problems with this guy. 

A helmet can mean a lot to guys, but most guys sort of roll with the punches. 

 
The same helmet, just newer, shouldn't do that.
But this isn't true. Anyone who has worn a newer model of any piece of equipment can tell you that things change a bit to meet safety or engineering specs. His helmet could very well be impacting his vision, same company and updated model or not. 

And football helmets are the suck. Taking one and pulling it off is not much fun. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
But SChefter also reported the helmet was discontinued and no longer certified,so more than an issue of the helmet just being ten years old.

Also reported deficient by Mike Silver, who 1st had the story:
"The pushback began in May, when the receiver was informed by the Raiders that the NFL had officially eliminated the one-year grace period for certain helmet models, including the one worn by Brown, which had fallen short in laboratory testing for head-impact severity..."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So can he hit EBay and find an 8 year old version of his helmet or nah? Seems to be conflicting with Florio’s blurb.

 
I'd take Schefter/Silver over Florio and go with nah.
eta- Silver on now saying a ten year old helmet can't be re-certified, so it is a little muddy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd be pretty shocked if Brown doesn't play. But this is definitely an unbelievable #### show and anything is possible. I think my reticence with Tyrell is based on how bad Carr might fall off without Brown. But yes he is good and yes he would get a lot of volume if Brown is out. 
Yeah, well - chicken & the egg - Carr could be a lot better with a Tyrell Williams to throw to. 

Like I said, it’s a slim chance AB doesn’t play, but that it’s a greater than 0% chance is staggering; really. 

 
But this isn't true. Anyone who has worn a newer model of any piece of equipment can tell you that things change a bit to meet safety or engineering specs. His helmet could very well be impacting his vision, same company and updated model or not. 

And football helmets are the suck. Taking one and pulling it off is not much fun. 
Even if that’s the case, the rules are the rules and NFL players make a hell of a lot of money - he should wear whatever helmet he has a choice of. Think of all the NFL players not making a stink over this. 

This reeks of shenanigans. 

 
Yeah, well - chicken & the egg - Carr could be a lot better with a Tyrell Williams to throw to. 

Like I said, it’s a slim chance AB doesn’t play, but that it’s a greater than 0% chance is staggering; really. 
I’m wondering if he could keep jerking Oakland around to try to force them to cut him. Keep his 30 mill or so and only be walking away from 20 instead of 50.

 
Even if that’s the case, the rules are the rules and NFL players make a hell of a lot of money - he should wear whatever helmet he has a choice of. Think of all the NFL players not making a stink over this. 

This reeks of shenanigans. 
Oh, don't get me wrong. My post above should be clear that if this about shenanigans or a new deal already, then it's bogus. I seriously think the Steelers thought they'd exhausted every last thing with this guy.

Don't get nothing for free, is all I'm saying. 

 
My post above should be clear that if this about shenanigans or a new deal already, then it's bogus. 
I don't think it is. I think he's afraid it will hurt his stats and he doesn't want to bother with the adjustment process, Since he knew the grace period was ending, he should've been practicing with it to get used to it.

 
I don't think it is. I think he's afraid it will hurt his stats and he doesn't want to bother with the adjustment process, Since he knew the grace period was ending, he should've been practicing with it to get used to it.
Fair enough. I can also see where there are real performance issues with football and hockey helmets. Played football at the end of high school and part of college and hockey all the way through boarding school and can see that there are legitimate performance issues with respect to headgear, too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Whoo boy, this is getting messier by the hour. 

According to Sports Illustrated's Michael Silver, Antonio Brown's "vocal" frustration over the league's new helmet rules has "contributed to a disconnect" with the Raiders.

Silver's thread is worth reading in its entirety. Brown, who flamed out of Pittsburgh in spectacular fashion last season, has reportedly been a similar headache since arriving in Oakland, lashing out over the league's new helmet requirements. Of the 32 players required to change helmets this year including Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady, only Brown has refused to comply, going as far as to repaint his old helmet in hopes that the Raiders wouldn't notice (spoiler: it didn't work). One member of the Raiders organization called Brown's continued resistance "honestly the most insane thing I've ever heard" while another noted that AB "hasn't been here for awhile, and no one knows where he's at." Silver adds that Brown has also ruffled feathers by barely paying attention in team meetings, often showing up late while spending most of the time glued to his phone. The Raiders may be feeling buyer's remorse after seeing some of Brown's recent antics.

SOURCE: Michael Silver on Twitter
😳
 
Fair enough. I can also see where there are real performance issues with football and hockey helmets. Played football at the end of high school and part of college and hockey all the way through boarding school and can see that there are legitimate performance issues with respect to headgear, too.
I've never worn headgear/helmets, but could imagine it affects you and line of sight.

 
I've never worn headgear/helmets, but could imagine it affects you and line of sight.
It really can -- and does. Some of the padding in the older hockey helmets when they got more conscious of concussions definitely impacted both the feel and comfort on your head, down to the padding forcing down on your head and affecting one's vision. Football helmets were always a chore. Especially as a specialist, they're unwieldy and unwanted. 

Kind of why you hear the thing about looking good out of "pads" in camp.

 
53 man roster X 32 teams = 1696 players

Do we know for sure it's only one player who is boycotting the new helmet?

 
53 man roster X 32 teams = 1696 players

Do we know for sure it's only one player who is boycotting the new helmet?
I can’t answer that but there’s only a few players in the league with the clout and financial stability to even contemplate such a boycott. Rodgers and Brady maybe could’ve gotten away with it but Brown, not sure he’s a big enough ticket, especially with the recent (mostly self inflicted) hits to his reputation

 
It's great because if this was any other player, this wouldn't be flying. Antonio Brown good go AWOL until Week 1 game day and Gruden would still let him suit up, lmao.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's great because if this was any other player, this wouldn't be flying. Antonio Brown good go AWOL until Week 1 game day and Gruden would still let him suit up, lmao.
  That’s true but I don’t think it’ll be enough for him to get his way. It would be one thing if this was Tom Brady Or Drew Brees but Brown has gotten a reputation of making demands in the last year, not all of them reasonable. The NFL might cave and make an exception a superstar who appears to be level headed, Brown looks crazy of late though. Allowing him to use his helmet would set a bad precedent, even worse because he looks nuts

 
It really can -- and does. Some of the padding in the older hockey helmets when they got more conscious of concussions definitely impacted both the feel and comfort on your head, down to the padding forcing down on your head and affecting one's vision. Football helmets were always a chore. Especially as a specialist, they're unwieldy and unwanted. 

Kind of why you hear the thing about looking good out of "pads" in camp.
As a former hockey goalie I wore a "catseye" cage on my mask for visibility. It wasn't legal in minor hockey but after that you can essentially do whatever you want. In terms of sightlines, it makes a big difference.

 
I’m wondering if he could keep jerking Oakland around to try to force them to cut him. Keep his 30 mill or so and only be walking away from 20 instead of 50.
I think he's a very  unhappy camper because of  the contract Michael  Thomas got and what the Falcons say they are willing to pay Julio Jones.

 
You knew when Pittsburgh took all that dead cap money on and got nothing for him that there were serious problems with this guy. 

A helmet can mean a lot to guys, but most guys sort of roll with the punches. 
I sold him dirt cheap. Straight up for Mike Williams. Even if he gets it together I have no regrets, one less idiot to worry about every time you see his thread bumped.

 
  That’s true but I don’t think it’ll be enough for him to get his way. It would be one thing if this was Tom Brady Or Drew Brees but Brown has gotten a reputation of making demands in the last year, not all of them reasonable. The NFL might cave and make an exception a superstar who appears to be level headed, Brown looks crazy of late though. Allowing him to use his helmet would set a bad precedent, even worse because he looks nuts
The NFL isn’t going to cave to anyone. They can’t. Their own testing showed these helmets to be inferior or not worthy of being certified. With all the CTE stuff there isn’t a chance in the world they’re letting someone suit up with an inferior helmet. And agreed, as you mention in your last sentence they can’t set the precedent that they’ll give in to players protests. And they certainly can’t go down the slippery slope of accommodating certain players desires but not others.

 
The NFL isn’t going to cave to anyone. They can’t. Their own testing showed these helmets to be inferior or not worthy of being certified. With all the CTE stuff there isn’t a chance in the world they’re letting someone suit up with an inferior helmet. And agreed, as you mention in your last sentence they can’t set the precedent that they’ll give in to players protests. And they certainly can’t go down the slippery slope of accommodating certain players desires but not others.
Can't the NFL just have a waiver form players can sign acknowledging the dangers of older helmets? The NFL shared their concerns. It should be on the players.

 
About a week ago, Tom Brady posted a picture of his draft card with caption, " never forget where you came from". Brady as we all know was drafted in the 6th round, pick #199.

Antonio Brown was also drafted in the 6th round, pick # 195. He has definitely forgotten where he came from.

 
Can't the NFL just have a waiver form players can sign acknowledging the dangers of older helmets? The NFL shared their concerns. It should be on the players.
They won’t go down the route of letting their players sign waivers for rules they don’t want to abide by. Have to draw a line somewhere and stick to it. And if AB gets a waiver and ends up with a concussion and has CTE later he won’t be the only person affected. His family/estate, his team, really anyone he interacts with could blame the NFL for letting him play with an inferior helmet resulting in CTE and potentially erratic and damaging behavior. NFL won’t mess with that.

 
Can't the NFL just have a waiver form players can sign acknowledging the dangers of older helmets? The NFL shared their concerns. It should be on the players.
You can't be serious?  Why not a waiver form for not wearing any helmet at all?

 
From that hack Florio's website...

A very weird story keeps getting very, very weirder.

The latest wrinkle to Antonio Brown‘s absence from the Raiders comes from his refusal to replace his old helmet with an approved model. Unlike Tom Brady, however, the model of helmet Brown wears has not been prohibited. Per a league source, the specific helmet Brown wants to wear is simply too old.

Yes, the grace period for 11 prohibited helmet models has ended, requiring players like Brady to ditch wearing models that were not deemed to be sufficiently safe. For Brown, the prohibiton comes from the requirement that each and every helmet must be certified by the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment, and that the NOCSAE will not certify a helmet that is more than 10 years old.

So, basically, Brown wants to keep using his specific helmet. He can wear the same model, it just has to be a new one. Or, more accurately, one that it fewer than 10 years old. Antonio Brown is resisting that, for reasons that may be clear only to Antonio Brown.

And it may be quite as simple as this: Ever since becoming one of the best players in the NFL, Antonio Brown has always gotten his way, on everything. So, naturally, he expects to eventually get his way on this, too.
I don't think Florio really understands this. The model of helmet that Brown has worn is 10+ years old. It is the Schutt Air Advantage. Schutt discontinued the model and no longer makes it. As such, they have not had it re-certified by the National Operating Committee for Standards and Athletic Equipment.

It's possible that the reason they discontinued it and did not have it re-certified is because they know that it would not meet the newer standards that have been created to try to reduce head injuries. 

So, no, Brown can not wear a new one of the same model of helmet because that model is no longer made and that model no longer carries a NOCSAE certification.

Brown claims that the newer models have reduced sightlines for him and apparently thinks that it will affect his performance to the point he's rather retire than play with slightly reduced vision.

 
They won’t go down the route of letting their players sign waivers for rules they don’t want to abide by. Have to draw a line somewhere and stick to it. And if AB gets a waiver and ends up with a concussion and has CTE later he won’t be the only person affected. His family/estate, his team, really anyone he interacts with could blame the NFL for letting him play with an inferior helmet resulting in CTE and potentially erratic and damaging behavior. NFL won’t mess with that.
I think he may have CTE now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top