mquinnjr
Footballguy
the average cord-cutter saves $104 a month—about 56% of their bill—from dropping cable TV.
I see lots of people in denial claiming it doesn't save you any money. The ~$100 from the survey matches my numbers almost exactly. I save $160 from my old cable bill to my internet only cable bill. That leaves $60 if I choose to go pay for any streaming services and still pocket $100/month.
the average cord-cutter saves $104 a month—about 56% of their bill—from dropping cable TV.
I have to imagine that most cord cutters just go with something wildly used like netflix and/or amazon which would cost less than $20 per month.I see lots of people in denial claiming it doesn't save you any money. The ~$100 from the survey matches my numbers almost exactly. I save $160 from my old cable bill to my internet only cable bill. That leaves $60 if I choose to go pay for any streaming services and still pocket $100/month.
We were using Dish plus Netflix, Prime, Kodi and InternetI see lots of people in denial claiming it doesn't save you any money. The ~$100 from the survey matches my numbers almost exactly. I save $160 from my old cable bill to my internet only cable bill. That leaves $60 if I choose to go pay for any streaming services and still pocket $100/month.
I guess a lot depends on how expensive your current service is.I see lots of people in denial claiming it doesn't save you any money. The ~$100 from the survey matches my numbers almost exactly. I save $160 from my old cable bill to my internet only cable bill. That leaves $60 if I choose to go pay for any streaming services and still pocket $100/month.
I'm guessing the survey tried to account for that, since it wouldn't make much sense if they didn't, you must be on the far left of the bell curve.I guess a lot depends on how expensive your current service is.
I haven't experienced this once since I cut the cord. Not once!Comcast hit with biggest FCC fine EVER for cheating their customers. Not surprised one bit, f them.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/11/news/companies/comcast-fine-fcc/
Wrong thread. There is a directv thread though if you like that sort of thing.Anyone get some great deals through Directv?
and their response AFTER the fine is still to place blame with the customer. ("Customer confusion")Comcast hit with biggest FCC fine EVER for cheating their customers. Not surprised one bit, f them.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/11/news/companies/comcast-fine-fcc/
can you break this down?I guess a lot depends on how expensive your current service is.
I get everything my family wants for $70 a month which includes Sunday ticket. As much as I want to cord cut, the savings is not that much once I factor in the increased cost of getting a better internet service, it is difficult to find any real savings with out dropping a ton of items.
If I was spending over $120 a month, the savings would be much easier to justify losing a bit of content.
"I didn't get an overpriced bill after I cut the cord. I'm so confused!!!!!"and their response AFTER the fine is still to place blame with the customer. ("Customer confusion")
I am not sure what you are looking for. PM with more questions since this is not the DTV thread.can you break this down?
message sent....didn't realize you meant DTV.I am not sure what you are looking for. PM with more questions since this is not the DTV thread.
Wow, they're pretty much saying "#### YOU" to rural customers who can only get satellite or nothing.Reports coming out that ATT is pushing to phase out Directv satellite service in the next 3-5 years. Link
As the article says, "The writing is the on the wall for the traditional hardware TV platforms, the set-top cable box and satellite dish." Well, Duh!! And we're still waiting for their streaming service, Directv Now, to come to market along with news about it's pricing structure. Directv Now has been scheduled to launch in the fourth quarter this year for a long time now.
As you may have heard, AT&T is launching a new over-the-top (OTT) service called DIRECTV NOW on November 4, 2016. OTT services provide potential customers with a streaming-only option when they are unable to have traditional DIRECTV or U-Verse TV service installed.
Though DIRECTV NOW does not require professional installation, technicians may want to be aware of the service and what it entails. For instances where a DIRECTV or U-Verse installation cannot be completed due to line-of-sight, landlord permission or other issues, technicians can provide information on the DIRECTV NOW service and let customers know they can visit directvnow.com to learn more.
Please note that DIRECTV NOW is a completely separate offering from traditional DIRECTV and U-Verse and should only be mentioned to customers when those services cannot be installed. If the customer is able to receive broadcast TV service, technicians should not proactively mention DIRECTV NOW as it is redundant with the DIRECTV and U-Verse Apps, which still offer streaming capabilities to subscribers of the DIRECTV and U-Verse TV services respectively.
Key points to keep in mind for DIRECTV NOW:
The DIRECTV App is still available to DIRECTV satellite TV customers. DIRECTV NOW is a completely separate service.
No set-top box is required to utilize DIRECTV NOW. Instead, customers can stream content via iOS and Android mobile devices, Web browsers, as well as streaming media players that connect to the TV like Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV and Stick, and Chromecast. More streaming options are expected to be available in the future.
DIRECTV NOW offers programming packages that are similar to those of traditional DIRECTV service. No annual contract is required. Add-on packages like HBO are also available. More information is available at directvnow.com.
Customers need high-speed broadband service to stream content at a high quality. It is recommended that DIRECTV NOW be used with 12 Mbps broadband at a minimum. Customers can take advantage of a free 7 day trial by visiting directvnow.com if they are unsure whether they have broadband service capable of streaming content, or just want to get a feel for the service.
I can't say I've got a solution for you, but I have the same problem with SlingTV. If you figure out what to do about it, I'd love to hear it.Sling TV App question:
I have Sling running via a Mac and Xbox One. The Mac version is stuttering like crazy. It is unwatchable. It is acting like its a connection issue, but the connection is solid. Meanwhile, the Xbox picture is fantastic and its a mile away from the router (it does an annoying loop / repeat sometimes but I can live with it).
Anyone have an issue with stuttering on the app? I am sure it is pointless, but I am wondering if deleting and reinstalling the app will make any difference.
Rumor that the $35 a month price is only if you are bundled with AT&T phone service. If true how directvesque of them to conveniently leave that piece of info out of their press releases. List of devices DirectvNow will be available on at launch:
Now DirecTV has announced that their new DirecTV Now service will work just by login into DirecTVNow.com. Making them the first OTT streaming service to offer in browser streaming.
They also announced that they will support Amazon Fire TV, Google Cast to players such as Nvidia Shield and the Mi Box, Apple TV 4th Generation+, Android 4.4+, iPad iOS9+, iPhone 5+, iPod Touch, Internet Explorer 11+, Chrome 50+, and Safari 8+.
They list that the Chromecast and the Fire TV Stick are both coming soon.
You may be shocked to see that Roku is not listed. Our best guess is they are waiting for the new Roku OS to be released later this year. Developers already have access to the beta of the new Roku OS, and it makes sense for them to develop an app for the new, more powerful Roku OS. No need to build an app today and pay developers to do it again in a month or two.
As for why the Fire TV is supported but not the Fire TV Stick, it likely has to do with the power of the Stick. They may be making a more stripped down app for the Stick, a slower device.
I anxiously await the channel listing on this one. I've been checking daily, feel free to bump if you see it released.If the $35 price point is to be believed some estimates have the margin being made from Directv going down from $60 per subscriber for traditional cable to $1 per subscriber for the streaming service. Some of the ways they plan on making money is innovative advertising to make the advertising space more valuable (think facebook or google adds).
This has been predicted for a long time. Once the shuttle was shut down it was just a matter of time before the cost of operating the sats got too expensive.Wow, they're pretty much saying "#### YOU" to rural customers who can only get satellite or nothing.
The "over 100 channels" thing seems so much like 80's thinking. I used to have something like 300 channels and never once watched 290 of them. Give me the 7 or 8 channels I need, a good picture, sensible interface and other features like a good dvr function and I'll consider it.
I read that article and a few others. Read that they promise that the 100 channels will be the type of programming people want and not just fluff. Really glad to see these things spurring competition. I think this version offered by att includes free data on their platform. That might not be a good thing if they try to break out. Don't know.If the $35 price point is to be believed some estimates have the margin being made from Directv going down from $60 per subscriber for traditional cable to $1 per subscriber for the streaming service. Some of the ways they plan on making money is innovative advertising to make the advertising space more valuable (think facebook or google adds).
I everything about the OTT movement. I check like 2-3x a day to see if/when the channel list will be released. I'm really excited for this if they deliver 100 channels of solid sports & other coverage. I've had ST streaming before and that (3-4 years ago, haven't had it since) experience was buffer central on a fast connection. I really hope DTV gets it right this time, will definitely try the free trial.DiectvNow to have local channels in a lot of markets, but, haven't reached a deal with CBS.
621,000 downgrade or cancelled cable tv subscriptions in October alone. Estimates have that as a loss of 52 million just for espn.
Hulu signing deals for their streaming service package on target to release early 2017.
I keep checking today too. If this has locals then I'm in.Well, the much hyped DirectvNow is supposed to launch today. I guess technically they have until the end of today, however, those hoping to log on and find out exactly what the channel lineup and price structure is this morning are met with the same coming soon webpage that we've been staring at for weeks. If DirectvNow fails to launch today it will most certainly will be because they have failed to reach deals with two of the major network channel providers; Fox and CBS.
Rumor is they are supposed to have locals in a lot of major areas. Other rumors include that the $35 price is only available to AT&T phone subscribers. Their competitors have questioned if the price versus 100 channels advertised is really going to stack up. Link Plus they seem to still be up to their old tricks, another link. I have my doubts, but, we shall see. Along the lines of the leaked email, just the fact that DirectvNow.com isn't the first link that pops up in Google search shows how reluctant they really are in making the transition.I keep checking today too. If this has locals then I'm in.
Cord Cutters News has received a report that says DirecTV Now will miss the November 4th release date. It is our understanding that the hold up is a combination of technical and contract issues.......Hopefully we will get some DirecTV Now news early next week.
Pay the extra to kill the commercials. It is soooo worth it.just added Hulu to our streaming options. $6/month is pretty cheap, even if it is with commercials. That means Netflix, Amazon Prime and now Hulu for now.
I fear there is no way to avoid this issue for the services that want to stream tv channels.Streaming TV services are running into the exact same obstacles as cable TV providers.
1) I don't think I understand your question entirely, but you won't lose bandwidth.Thinking of cutting the cord soon. Read Tony's document. Thanks. Thinking I'll do something like PS Vue or DirecTVNow. I have a couple of basic questions:
1) If I have a cable internet/TV connection now, am I losing any bandwidth by just going to streaming? Or is the bandwidth the same without cable TV being used?
2) Most of my TVs do not use the TV speaker. I go through a receiver for surround sound speakers. Does this work with a Firestick or Fire TV? Or do I have to use the TV speakers now?
Thanks for any help.
Thanks. Three more questions for you or anyone:1) I don't think I understand your question entirely, but you won't lose bandwidth.
2) The Fire TV is just another HDMI input, treated the same as any other - the sound goes from the Fire TV to your TV, which distributes it the same way it does now. For me, that's through a receiver to speakers, same as you.