What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Jerry Sandusky accused of child molestation (2 Viewers)

Usually when there's a routine scandal I get a little kick out of the scrambling/cover-up/fake apologies, ala Tressel. This presser is bound to be just brutal though. Talk about making a disgusting situation worse. The only thing he can do right at this point is apologize and retire on the spot. And we know that's not coming. Football only.. oof :rolleyes:

This is where it really gets ####ty for PSU fans and players. And of course that team deserves all the support in the world.. as soon as their sham of a "leader" steps out of the way.

 
93.7 just said that PSU just told the media that Paterno will only answer questions relating to senior day on Saturday.

PSU just doesn't seem to get it.

 
I can tell you right now, ahead of the news conference, that I will be disappointed if he does not resign. That's the least he should do right now.
I will be shocked if Paterno resigns today. I am guessing that in his mind that would be admitting he didn't act properly and if he does that he tarnishes his own legacy. Better to maintain his current stance that he did what he was supposed to do and let people think what they want rather than apologize and resign in shame.
Based on everything I have read, I don't think Paterno thinks he has done anything wrong.I suspect he (or his folks) were the source of the "Paterno will testify for the prosecution" stories. As if that makes him the hero in this story.
 
I can tell you right now, ahead of the news conference, that I will be disappointed if he does not resign. That's the least he should do right now.
I will be shocked if Paterno resigns today. I am guessing that in his mind that would be admitting he didn't act properly and if he does that he tarnishes his own legacy. Better to maintain his current stance that he did what he was supposed to do and let people think what they want rather than apologize and resign in shame.
Based on everything I have read, I don't think Paterno thinks he has done anything wrong.I suspect he (or his folks) were the source of the "Paterno will testify for the prosecution" stories. As if that makes him the hero in this story.
There's a PSU alum on the local radio here, he is awful, but anyway he was saying he did not think Joepa did anything wronghe wanted the VP, the AD, and the president all fired, but Joepa did what he needed to do, and did nothing wrong.
 
not sure if people saw this, but it goes into some of the victim story details:http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/11/mothers_of_two_of_jerry_sandus.html
Sandusky, through his attorney, denies all the charges. Attorney Joe Amendola, said Sandusky attributes the allegations to troubled kids who are acting out.
What a disgusting human being. Prey on troubled boys and then when they speak out try to blame it on them being troubled kids.
:shrug: there have been plenty of false accusations involving child abuse over the years. I am willing to wait for Sandusky's version.What I find disturbing though is the allegation by the GA, and then Paterno, that Sandusky was doing something with a presumably naked boy in the showers. Even in the best light possible - that he was just "horsing around" - there is no justification for a grown man to be "horsing around" with a kid in the shower.
 
93.7 just said that PSU just told the media that Paterno will only answer questions relating to senior day on Saturday.PSU just doesn't seem to get it.
In my experience what usually happens in these situations is that the press will simply ignore this and ask one question after another relating to the scandal. (See Herman Cain only a few days back.) The question then becomes, how will Paterno react to this? Will he answer? Will he shut down the press conference and walk out of the room? Will he claim, as Sandusky did the other day, that he has been instructed by another party (perhaps in this case the University rather than an attorney) that he is not allowed to answer? I am betting the last option is what he will do.
 
93.7 just said that PSU just told the media that Paterno will only answer questions relating to senior day on Saturday.PSU just doesn't seem to get it.
any journalist that only asks about senior day should be fired
Exactly. So why is PSU playing this game of putting Paterno out there for a press conference and trying to pretend like they think that people will only ask football questions?
 
When I worked in a baseball card shop in the 90's, there was a guy who would come in with kids from his neghborhood, a few were the same kids each time, but sometimes different kids. He would buy them cards and we would hear them talk about hanging out at this single guy's (no kids of his own) house playing video games and sleeping over. We felt really creeped out whenever he was there and on a couple of occassions my boss asked the kids if their parents knew they were there with "Ralph" and if he was allowed to buy them things. They said yes, never gave any sign that they were being taken advantage of. But the situation just wasn't right, and we all knew it.

Eventually Ralph stopped coming around and one day it was in the newspaper how he had been charged with rape on young boys, etc. Point is, seeing this guy a few minutes a month it was obvious the situation wasn't right. There's no way, with this guy always having a young boy at his side for PSU events and functions, that people like Paterno didn't already think it was a suspicious situation. And then when presented with what happened in 2002 and someone being distraught at what they saw, there is no way Paterno and others couldn't put the pieces together.

The actions they took (or, didn't take) were clearly done with their own best interests and minimizing a potentially devistating scandal to their school and football program. Legal crime or not, you'll never convince me otherwise that they are all guilty.

 
93.7 just said that PSU just told the media that Paterno will only answer questions relating to senior day on Saturday.PSU just doesn't seem to get it.
yeah. there will be NATIONAL media there, not the normal local sports reporters. You really think ABC, CBS, CNN cares who the starting QB will be??
 
I'm not sure why he is meeting the press today. I would think that a prompt resignation/retirement would be best for the the program. I Have serious doubts how much "coaching" he has actually been doing the past few years. The university and the football program need a clean sweep from this issue as soon as possible.

The folks from Pittsburgh seem to be getting an unusually creepy high in burying anyone who has ever driven through Happy Valley. Reminds me of the football announcer who mocked WVa fans during the game. We are missing many facts here. In time we will know all that we need to know. In the meantime, please allow justice to run its course.

 
Coach, regarding Senior Day- do you think if the seniors knew the Penn State football program would be disgraced in this manner, and that your name and reputation would be severely damaged as well, they would have chosen another university to attend? Do you suppose some of them have regrets over their choice at this point?

 
not sure if people saw this, but it goes into some of the victim story details:

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/11/mothers_of_two_of_jerry_sandus.html
Sandusky, through his attorney, denies all the charges. Attorney Joe Amendola, said Sandusky attributes the allegations to troubled kids who are acting out.
What a disgusting human being. Prey on troubled boys and then when they speak out try to blame it on them being troubled kids.
:shrug: there have been plenty of false accusations involving child abuse over the years. I am willing to wait for Sandusky's version.What I find disturbing though is the allegation by the GA, and then Paterno, that Sandusky was doing something with a presumably naked boy in the showers. Even in the best light possible - that he was just "horsing around" - there is no justification for a grown man to be "horsing around" with a kid in the shower.
40 counts and 8 victims? They're all lying? McQueary didn't see anything? The janitor didn't see anything? All these kids made all this stuff up?
 
This is correct. My FIL is a professor at a university and if you have to report something, you go through the chain of command, and you trust that the matter is handled thoroughly.
No offense but your FIL is not Joe Paterno.
Who said he was? I was just addressing the chain of command in a university to another poster.
Right, but the situations aren't comparable because of the power differential. Your Father-in-Law might get in trouble for circumventing the proper chain of command. Paterno wouldn't.
There is no chain of command when it comes to a violent crime. You report it to the police.
 
If PSU keeps stonewalling, will this effect student enrollment? I know that if my kids were college age, and had been accepted into Penn State, University of Wisconsin and Purdue for instance, I'd toss Penn State in the trash right now.

 
There is no chain of command when it comes to a violent crime. You report it to the police.
:goodposting: Not sure how this continues to elude so many people here. If one of my guys tells me he saw another coworker raping the receptionist, I don't just go tell my supervisor and forget about it. Talk about living in la la land.
 
There is no chain of command when it comes to a violent crime. You report it to the police.
:goodposting: Not sure how this continues to elude so many people here. If one of my guys tells me he saw another coworker raping the receptionist, I don't just go tell my supervisor and forget about it. Talk about living in la la land.
wellyou may if you do not care about anything other than covering your ###and in (mocking) fairness, the NCAA is all about coaches covering their ###. You primary jobs as a football coach are:1) cover your ###2) don't ask questions you do not want the answers too3) know as little as possible to maintain deniabilityone would just hope that when you move from tatoos free houses and hookers to child molestation that these practices would fly out the window
 
93.7 just said that PSU just told the media that Paterno will only answer questions relating to senior day on Saturday.PSU just doesn't seem to get it.
yeah. there will be NATIONAL media there, not the normal local sports reporters. You really think ABC, CBS, CNN cares who the starting QB will be??
That press conference will be a disaster if Paterno tries to avoid all scandal questions.
 
93.7 just said that PSU just told the media that Paterno will only answer questions relating to senior day on Saturday.PSU just doesn't seem to get it.
Oh they get it, it's called CYA
They're just going to make themselves look worse. Why even have the press conference?Unless maybe they are hoping to make Paterno look bad. Throw him out there and let him hang himself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
93.7 just said that PSU just told the media that Paterno will only answer questions relating to senior day on Saturday.PSU just doesn't seem to get it.
yeah. there will be NATIONAL media there, not the normal local sports reporters. You really think ABC, CBS, CNN cares who the starting QB will be??
That press conference will be a disaster if Paterno tries to avoid all scandal questions.
He must really think he is bigger than all of this.
 
93.7 just said that PSU just told the media that Paterno will only answer questions relating to senior day on Saturday.PSU just doesn't seem to get it.
yeah. there will be NATIONAL media there, not the normal local sports reporters. You really think ABC, CBS, CNN cares who the starting QB will be??
That press conference will be a disaster if Paterno tries to avoid all scandal questions.
The press has a duty to turn it into a disaster if PSU insists upon not talking about it.
 
93.7 just said that PSU just told the media that Paterno will only answer questions relating to senior day on Saturday.

PSU just doesn't seem to get it.
You think they are calling this press conference because they want to? Im sure they're contractually obligated to do a weekly press conference. All Joe can really do is repeat his statement from yesterday, take 2-3 questions with a stock "can't comment right now" answer and then say thanks, gotta go. Anyone expecting or hoping for more is going to be disappointed.
 
Pretty "good" read on Grantland from a guy who lived there and went there. More about how Penn State will never be the same then the actual crimes.

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/7205085/growing-penn-state

Growing Up Penn State

The end of everything at State CollegeBy Michael WeinrebPOSTED NOVEMBER 8, 2011

Something terrible happened on my street when I was kid, something that I had screened from my consciousness for many years until last weekend. My neighbor Scott Holderman and I were futzing about near the side of his house, setting up one of those epic Star Wars tête-à-têtes or digging for earthworms or doing whatever children do on nice days in quiet neighborhoods, and then there came a horrible screeching, the braking of an automobile that could not stop in time. The car had crested the steep hill of our street and slammed into a child who wandered into it. I can still see the child lying there, and I can still hear the mother's tortured shriek when she realized it was one of hers. An ambulance arrived, and then a medevac helicopter touched down 30 feet from our house, and they took the child away. He survived, but he wasn't the same.

A few years earlier, back when I was 5, my parents moved from suburban New York City to State College, Pa. They did this because my father took a job as a professor at Penn State, but I assume they also did this because State College was considered a good place to raise children, a placid college town set in the geographic center of Pennsylvania. Those of us who grew up there like to say we lived three hours from everywhere. We resided in a development called Park Forest, on a street named after a British county.

The kids from the neighborhood would gather to play basketball in my driveway, not because I was particularly popular, but because we had a good hoop. In high school, we engaged in epic pick-up football games in Sunset Park, a little patch of grass right next to a house owned by Joe and Sue Paterno. In the second grade, my Little League coach was an enormous neighbor of ours named Mr. McQueary, and his son Mike was the best player on our team.1 We went to school at Park Forest Junior High, and then we went to State College High School, where we learned how to drive and how to date and how to do quadratic equations. We were the sons of farmers and college professors and football coaches. One of my brother's classmates was named Sandusky; one of my classmates was named Sandusky, too.2 I goofed off in the back of Latin class with a kid named Scott Paterno.3 We knew who their fathers were; their fathers were royalty to us, even if we acted like it was no big deal. Our football team's nickname was the Little Lions. There was no way to extricate the happenings at our school from the happenings at the university, and the happenings at the university always centered around football. Everything in State College — even the name of our town — was one all-encompassing, synergistic monolith, and Joe Paterno was our benevolent dictator, and nothing truly bad ever happened, and even when it did, it was easier just to blot it from our lives and move on.

I can't add a lot to what's been written about the facts of the burgeoning scandal at Penn State, except to tell you how strange it feels to type the phrase "burgeoning scandal at Penn State." I know that I'm in denial. I know that I'm working through multiple layers of anger and disgust and neurosis and angst. I know that I'm too emotionally attached to the situation to offer any kind of objective take, though I don't think I realized how emotionally attached I was until this occurred. I never understood how much of an effect both football and a sense of place had on my persona. I apologize if what follows seems disjointed, because I am still coming to terms with the fact that this is real. "What can I say?" my mom wrote me from State College on Monday afternoon. "We're sort of going around in a daze."

I do not mean to make excuses for anyone involved, nor have any of the alums or townspeople I've spoken to or corresponded with, including my friend Brad, who is the most rigidly optimistic Penn State booster I've ever met. There's a group, about 15 or 20 of us, who have kept in touch since college, and I haven't seen some of them in years, and I've never met some of the others, but I still consider them close friends because we share a bond that was forged through football. And I know that, if you attended a secondary institution where football was not a priority, that sounds like an absurd basis for a relationship. But this is why college football evokes such extreme emotion, and this is why schools work so damn hard and often take ethical shortcuts to forge themselves into football powers: If they are successful, then the game serves as the lifelong bond between alums and townspeople and the university, thereby guaranteeing the institution's self-preservation through donations and season-ticket sales and infusions into the local economy. It is a crass calculus, when you put it that way, which is why there will always be skeptics and there will always be those of us for whom college football is (other than our own families) the purest emotional attachment of our adulthood, and there will always be some of us who bound between those two poles.

Every year, Brad sends out an eight-page e-mail, a meticulous scouting report on a team that is inevitably destined for an Outback Bowl berth but that Brad believes really has a shot at 12-0 this time around. This is what Brad wrote on September 6, a few days before Alabama pounded Penn State in a game none of us believed we could win: "We're gonna hang on Saturday. I think we're gonna give 'em a run."

And this is what Brad wrote on Monday: "The nature of this crime is the worst that has ever happened anywhere."

We moved to State College in 1978, the season Penn State lost to Alabama on a goal-line stand in the Sugar Bowl. I was in first grade, and I didn't have much in the way of social skills, and Penn State football was the language by which I could relate to the world and through which I could speak to the adults around me. I drew pictures of Curt Warner and Todd Blackledge; I memorized the rosters so that when people in our section at Beaver Stadium would ask who made that play, I could tell them. To this day, when I try to recall the combination of my gym locker or a friend's birthday or the license plate of my rental car, I think in terms of uniform numbers. It is not 31-17-03; it is Shane Conlan-Harry Hamilton-Chip LaBarca. Those were great years, and Penn State was in its heyday and Joe Paterno was the Sportsman of the Year and State College was a community that never gave in to the ethical lapses of the '80s and early '90s, because our coaching staff would not stand for it. One former player called it Camelot, and that sounds apt enough.

Jerry Sandusky had been promoted to defensive coordinator the year before we arrived in town. For decades, Penn State defined itself through its ability to stop people when it mattered, and, speaking from a strict football perspective, Sandusky was as responsible for the school's glory years as Paterno was. Linebacker U. thrived under Sandusky, and Penn State won its first national championship in 1982, and then won another in 1986, defeating Miami 14-10 in the Fiesta Bowl in a game predicated entirely on defense. It is widely acknowledged that Sandusky's game plan was the difference, that he rattled Vinny Testaverde and Miami's impetuous wide receivers by devising confusing coverage schemes and instructing his defensive backs to hit Michael Irvin until he cried. The day after it happened, they played that game on a continuous loop in our high school cafeteria. It is still my favorite football game of all time, a metaphoric triumph of the unadorned hero over the flamboyant villain. I wrote a long piece about it for ESPN, and a portion of a book, that now rings completely hollow. I have the original video recording of it in my living room, and I have thought several times over the past couple of days about taking a hammer to it.

I remember one Saturday morning in the autumn of my adolescence, the coach shambling along in his parka, brow furrowed, glasses shadowed in the sharp glare of the sun, black sneakers kicking at the leaves as they eddied and then parted on the asphalt path before him. I did not intend to follow him; it just happened that way, so that one moment I was headed to a football tailgate and the next moment I was trailing along behind Joe Paterno.

I walked behind him for several miles that day. Back then, in the late 1980s, it was still a routine of his to walk from his house to the stadium where he coached, slipping across the Penn State campus, past science labs and classroom buildings and parking lots occupied by stunned tailgaters who could never quite get over the fact that it was really him. Sometimes we were guilty of regarding him as more deity than man,4 as if he presided over us in mythological stand-up form. He was as much our own conscience as he was a football coach, and we made that pact and imbued him with that sort of power because we believed he would wield it more responsibly than any of us ever could. Maybe that was naïve, but we came of age in a place known as Happy Valley and naïveté was part of the package, and now that word isn't in our dictionaries anymore.

As a journalist, of course, you're taught to be skeptical of everything, and in college, we tried our damndest at the college newspaper to cover Penn State football like professional journalists did. At one point, a talented young reporter thought she'd caught Paterno in a loophole regarding the housing policy at the school, but nothing much ever came of it. Most of the time, Joe got what he wanted. We grew older, and we came to understand one of the central truths of human nature, which is that when you brush up against a truly powerful force, it is never quite as benevolent as you imagined it to be. In order to acquire power, you have to be at least a little ruthless.5 All you can hope for is that those who do acquire power operate by some sort of rough ethical standard, and even if I no longer deified Paterno, I continued to believe that the monolith I'd grown up inside was essentially a force for good. They did things I found untoward, but I always presumed they did them for the right reasons.

A few years ago, I drove down to the University of Maryland to research a story on Len Bias. I'd gone to see his mother speak at a high school, and now I sat in her office, and I asked her what went wrong at Maryland, whether the administration and the people in power deserved to share any of the responsibility for her son's death, and I remember precisely what she told me. "There was no covering," she said.

I don't know if there are any apt analogies to anything when it comes to this case, but this seems a little bit like our Len Bias moment at Penn State. Our leaders failed to cover, and while they deserve the benefit of due process, they deserve to be held accountable for whatever mistakes they made. If it means that this is how Joe Paterno goes out, then so be it; if it means that 30 years of my own memories of Penn State football are forever tarnished, then I will accept it in the name of finding some measure of justice. Every sane person I know agrees on this. It took Maryland the better part of two decades to regain its soul, and it will take us many years, as well, and in some way it will never be the same. We've come to terms with the corruptibility of the human soul in State College, and we've swept away the naïve notion that this place where we lived so quietly was different from the rest of America.

I have two close friends, a husband and wife, both alums, who moved to State College from New York City a few years ago. They did this because they couldn't afford to raise children in Manhattan, but they also did it because he couldn't imagine a safer place to raise their kids than a little town in a valley situated three hours from everywhere. I don't know what it feels like to grow up there now. I want these things to disappear from my consciousness, but they won't. The place where I grew up is gone, and it's not coming back.

Michael Weinreb is a Grantland staff writer and the author, most recently, of Bigger Than the Game: Bo, Boz, the Punky QB and How the '80s Created the Modern Athlete.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.Mike McQueary, now an assistant coach at Penn State, was allegedly the graduate assistant in the horrifying grand jury report who witnessed Sandusky in the showers of the Penn State football building with a young boy in 2002. The graduate assistant allegedly reported it to Paterno, who passed some form of this information on to his superiors, but no one in the chain of command ever called the police. The outrage at both Paterno and the graduate assistant appears to be moral rather than legal, none of which makes it any less of an emotional bombshell.Jump

2.While the Sanduskys could not have children of their own, they adopted six, which is one of those facts that feels telling only in retrospect.Jump

3.Joe Paterno's youngest child. One of Scott's older brothers, Jay, was also a quarterback at State College High and is now the quarterbacks coach at Penn State. He often serves as a ready scapegoat for the Penn State fan base when things go wrong. Jump

4.The irony to this, of course, is that Paterno tried so hard, at least in the media, not to present himself as anything more than a common man. And yet this only elevated his public stature.Jump

5.See: Jobs, Steve, et al.Jump
 
93.7 just said that PSU just told the media that Paterno will only answer questions relating to senior day on Saturday.

PSU just doesn't seem to get it.
You think they are calling this press conference because they want to? Im sure they're contractually obligated to do a weekly press conference. All Joe can really do is repeat his statement from yesterday, take 2-3 questions with a stock "can't comment right now" answer and then say thanks, gotta go. Anyone expecting or hoping for more is going to be disappointed.
have someone push Joepa down a very small flight of stairs, send him to the emergency room, cancel the presser, get him on crutches foe a sprained anklei should do PR

 
This is correct. My FIL is a professor at a university and if you have to report something, you go through the chain of command, and you trust that the matter is handled thoroughly.
That's such a cop-out. You don't go through the chain-of-command to report a murder.
 
not sure if people saw this, but it goes into some of the victim story details:http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/11/mothers_of_two_of_jerry_sandus.html
Sandusky, through his attorney, denies all the charges. Attorney Joe Amendola, said Sandusky attributes the allegations to troubled kids who are acting out.
What a disgusting human being. Prey on troubled boys and then when they speak out try to blame it on them being troubled kids.
:shrug: there have been plenty of false accusations involving child abuse over the years. I am willing to wait for Sandusky's version.
If it was one allegation from one kid then maybe but there seem to be a lot of kids that were abused and adults that witnessed it. Makes me suspect that Sandusky's story has a few holes in it...
 
This is correct. My FIL is a professor at a university and if you have to report something, you go through the chain of command, and you trust that the matter is handled thoroughly.
That's such a cop-out. You don't go through the chain-of-command to report a murder.
you know there was another group of people who followed the chain of command and tried to use it as an out to say they were not responsible for heinous crimes committed...but for the life of me I cannot think of who they wereit'll come to me
 
93.7 just said that PSU just told the media that Paterno will only answer questions relating to senior day on Saturday.PSU just doesn't seem to get it.
yeah. there will be NATIONAL media there, not the normal local sports reporters. You really think ABC, CBS, CNN cares who the starting QB will be??
That press conference will be a disaster if Paterno tries to avoid all scandal questions.
The press has a duty to turn it into a disaster if PSU insists upon not talking about it.
Sure, I'm just surprised that Joe would think he can control this situation.
 
93.7 just said that PSU just told the media that Paterno will only answer questions relating to senior day on Saturday.PSU just doesn't seem to get it.
yeah. there will be NATIONAL media there, not the normal local sports reporters. You really think ABC, CBS, CNN cares who the starting QB will be??
That press conference will be a disaster if Paterno tries to avoid all scandal questions.
The press has a duty to turn it into a disaster if PSU insists upon not talking about it.
93.7 is a Pittsburgh station. They have made it a duty to turn PSU into a disaster long before this story broke.
 
This is correct. My FIL is a professor at a university and if you have to report something, you go through the chain of command, and you trust that the matter is handled thoroughly.
That's such a cop-out. You don't go through the chain-of-command to report a murder.
you know there was another group of people who followed the chain of command and tried to use it as an out to say they were not responsible for heinous crimes committed...but for the life of me I cannot think of who they wereit'll come to me
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Post of the day
 
VIrginia Tech a few years ago:

"There's a shooter loose on campus! Someone call 911!"

"No need for that. I've already contacted the school president. That was the proper procedure, and any further action would be in violation of protocal."

 
Pretty "good" read on Grantland from a guy who lived there and went there. More about how Penn State will never be the same then the actual crimes.http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/7205085/growing-penn-stateGrowing Up Penn StateThe end of everything at State CollegeBy Michael WeinrebPOSTED NOVEMBER 8, 2011

Something terrible happened on my street when I was kid, something that I had screened from my consciousness for many years until last weekend. My neighbor Scott Holderman and I were futzing about near the side of his house, setting up one of those epic Star Wars tête-à-têtes or digging for earthworms or doing whatever children do on nice days in quiet neighborhoods, and then there came a horrible screeching, the braking of an automobile that could not stop in time. The car had crested the steep hill of our street and slammed into a child who wandered into it. I can still see the child lying there, and I can still hear the mother's tortured shriek when she realized it was one of hers. An ambulance arrived, and then a medevac helicopter touched down 30 feet from our house, and they took the child away. He survived, but he wasn't the same.A few years earlier, back when I was 5, my parents moved from suburban New York City to State College, Pa. They did this because my father took a job as a professor at Penn State, but I assume they also did this because State College was considered a good place to raise children, a placid college town set in the geographic center of Pennsylvania. Those of us who grew up there like to say we lived three hours from everywhere. We resided in a development called Park Forest, on a street named after a British county.The kids from the neighborhood would gather to play basketball in my driveway, not because I was particularly popular, but because we had a good hoop. In high school, we engaged in epic pick-up football games in Sunset Park, a little patch of grass right next to a house owned by Joe and Sue Paterno. In the second grade, my Little League coach was an enormous neighbor of ours named Mr. McQueary, and his son Mike was the best player on our team.1 We went to school at Park Forest Junior High, and then we went to State College High School, where we learned how to drive and how to date and how to do quadratic equations. We were the sons of farmers and college professors and football coaches. One of my brother's classmates was named Sandusky; one of my classmates was named Sandusky, too.2 I goofed off in the back of Latin class with a kid named Scott Paterno.3 We knew who their fathers were; their fathers were royalty to us, even if we acted like it was no big deal. Our football team's nickname was the Little Lions. There was no way to extricate the happenings at our school from the happenings at the university, and the happenings at the university always centered around football. Everything in State College — even the name of our town — was one all-encompassing, synergistic monolith, and Joe Paterno was our benevolent dictator, and nothing truly bad ever happened, and even when it did, it was easier just to blot it from our lives and move on.I can't add a lot to what's been written about the facts of the burgeoning scandal at Penn State, except to tell you how strange it feels to type the phrase "burgeoning scandal at Penn State." I know that I'm in denial. I know that I'm working through multiple layers of anger and disgust and neurosis and angst. I know that I'm too emotionally attached to the situation to offer any kind of objective take, though I don't think I realized how emotionally attached I was until this occurred. I never understood how much of an effect both football and a sense of place had on my persona. I apologize if what follows seems disjointed, because I am still coming to terms with the fact that this is real. "What can I say?" my mom wrote me from State College on Monday afternoon. "We're sort of going around in a daze."I do not mean to make excuses for anyone involved, nor have any of the alums or townspeople I've spoken to or corresponded with, including my friend Brad, who is the most rigidly optimistic Penn State booster I've ever met. There's a group, about 15 or 20 of us, who have kept in touch since college, and I haven't seen some of them in years, and I've never met some of the others, but I still consider them close friends because we share a bond that was forged through football. And I know that, if you attended a secondary institution where football was not a priority, that sounds like an absurd basis for a relationship. But this is why college football evokes such extreme emotion, and this is why schools work so damn hard and often take ethical shortcuts to forge themselves into football powers: If they are successful, then the game serves as the lifelong bond between alums and townspeople and the university, thereby guaranteeing the institution's self-preservation through donations and season-ticket sales and infusions into the local economy. It is a crass calculus, when you put it that way, which is why there will always be skeptics and there will always be those of us for whom college football is (other than our own families) the purest emotional attachment of our adulthood, and there will always be some of us who bound between those two poles.Every year, Brad sends out an eight-page e-mail, a meticulous scouting report on a team that is inevitably destined for an Outback Bowl berth but that Brad believes really has a shot at 12-0 this time around. This is what Brad wrote on September 6, a few days before Alabama pounded Penn State in a game none of us believed we could win: "We're gonna hang on Saturday. I think we're gonna give 'em a run."And this is what Brad wrote on Monday: "The nature of this crime is the worst that has ever happened anywhere."We moved to State College in 1978, the season Penn State lost to Alabama on a goal-line stand in the Sugar Bowl. I was in first grade, and I didn't have much in the way of social skills, and Penn State football was the language by which I could relate to the world and through which I could speak to the adults around me. I drew pictures of Curt Warner and Todd Blackledge; I memorized the rosters so that when people in our section at Beaver Stadium would ask who made that play, I could tell them. To this day, when I try to recall the combination of my gym locker or a friend's birthday or the license plate of my rental car, I think in terms of uniform numbers. It is not 31-17-03; it is Shane Conlan-Harry Hamilton-Chip LaBarca. Those were great years, and Penn State was in its heyday and Joe Paterno was the Sportsman of the Year and State College was a community that never gave in to the ethical lapses of the '80s and early '90s, because our coaching staff would not stand for it. One former player called it Camelot, and that sounds apt enough.Jerry Sandusky had been promoted to defensive coordinator the year before we arrived in town. For decades, Penn State defined itself through its ability to stop people when it mattered, and, speaking from a strict football perspective, Sandusky was as responsible for the school's glory years as Paterno was. Linebacker U. thrived under Sandusky, and Penn State won its first national championship in 1982, and then won another in 1986, defeating Miami 14-10 in the Fiesta Bowl in a game predicated entirely on defense. It is widely acknowledged that Sandusky's game plan was the difference, that he rattled Vinny Testaverde and Miami's impetuous wide receivers by devising confusing coverage schemes and instructing his defensive backs to hit Michael Irvin until he cried. The day after it happened, they played that game on a continuous loop in our high school cafeteria. It is still my favorite football game of all time, a metaphoric triumph of the unadorned hero over the flamboyant villain. I wrote a long piece about it for ESPN, and a portion of a book, that now rings completely hollow. I have the original video recording of it in my living room, and I have thought several times over the past couple of days about taking a hammer to it.I remember one Saturday morning in the autumn of my adolescence, the coach shambling along in his parka, brow furrowed, glasses shadowed in the sharp glare of the sun, black sneakers kicking at the leaves as they eddied and then parted on the asphalt path before him. I did not intend to follow him; it just happened that way, so that one moment I was headed to a football tailgate and the next moment I was trailing along behind Joe Paterno.I walked behind him for several miles that day. Back then, in the late 1980s, it was still a routine of his to walk from his house to the stadium where he coached, slipping across the Penn State campus, past science labs and classroom buildings and parking lots occupied by stunned tailgaters who could never quite get over the fact that it was really him. Sometimes we were guilty of regarding him as more deity than man,4 as if he presided over us in mythological stand-up form. He was as much our own conscience as he was a football coach, and we made that pact and imbued him with that sort of power because we believed he would wield it more responsibly than any of us ever could. Maybe that was naïve, but we came of age in a place known as Happy Valley and naïveté was part of the package, and now that word isn't in our dictionaries anymore.As a journalist, of course, you're taught to be skeptical of everything, and in college, we tried our damndest at the college newspaper to cover Penn State football like professional journalists did. At one point, a talented young reporter thought she'd caught Paterno in a loophole regarding the housing policy at the school, but nothing much ever came of it. Most of the time, Joe got what he wanted. We grew older, and we came to understand one of the central truths of human nature, which is that when you brush up against a truly powerful force, it is never quite as benevolent as you imagined it to be. In order to acquire power, you have to be at least a little ruthless.5 All you can hope for is that those who do acquire power operate by some sort of rough ethical standard, and even if I no longer deified Paterno, I continued to believe that the monolith I'd grown up inside was essentially a force for good. They did things I found untoward, but I always presumed they did them for the right reasons.A few years ago, I drove down to the University of Maryland to research a story on Len Bias. I'd gone to see his mother speak at a high school, and now I sat in her office, and I asked her what went wrong at Maryland, whether the administration and the people in power deserved to share any of the responsibility for her son's death, and I remember precisely what she told me. "There was no covering," she said.I don't know if there are any apt analogies to anything when it comes to this case, but this seems a little bit like our Len Bias moment at Penn State. Our leaders failed to cover, and while they deserve the benefit of due process, they deserve to be held accountable for whatever mistakes they made. If it means that this is how Joe Paterno goes out, then so be it; if it means that 30 years of my own memories of Penn State football are forever tarnished, then I will accept it in the name of finding some measure of justice. Every sane person I know agrees on this. It took Maryland the better part of two decades to regain its soul, and it will take us many years, as well, and in some way it will never be the same. We've come to terms with the corruptibility of the human soul in State College, and we've swept away the naïve notion that this place where we lived so quietly was different from the rest of America.I have two close friends, a husband and wife, both alums, who moved to State College from New York City a few years ago. They did this because they couldn't afford to raise children in Manhattan, but they also did it because he couldn't imagine a safer place to raise their kids than a little town in a valley situated three hours from everywhere. I don't know what it feels like to grow up there now. I want these things to disappear from my consciousness, but they won't. The place where I grew up is gone, and it's not coming back.Michael Weinreb is a Grantland staff writer and the author, most recently, of Bigger Than the Game: Bo, Boz, the Punky QB and How the '80s Created the Modern Athlete.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1.Mike McQueary, now an assistant coach at Penn State, was allegedly the graduate assistant in the horrifying grand jury report who witnessed Sandusky in the showers of the Penn State football building with a young boy in 2002. The graduate assistant allegedly reported it to Paterno, who passed some form of this information on to his superiors, but no one in the chain of command ever called the police. The outrage at both Paterno and the graduate assistant appears to be moral rather than legal, none of which makes it any less of an emotional bombshell.Jump2.While the Sanduskys could not have children of their own, they adopted six, which is one of those facts that feels telling only in retrospect.Jump3.Joe Paterno's youngest child. One of Scott's older brothers, Jay, was also a quarterback at State College High and is now the quarterbacks coach at Penn State. He often serves as a ready scapegoat for the Penn State fan base when things go wrong. Jump4.The irony to this, of course, is that Paterno tried so hard, at least in the media, not to present himself as anything more than a common man. And yet this only elevated his public stature.Jump5.See: Jobs, Steve, et al.Jump
this is a good read
 
Any DCguys listen to Lavar and Dukes yesterday? Just wondering if Lavar Arrington discussed this.

 
I wonder how his wife didnt pickup on this. There had to be signs
They are foster parents. I would bet she's complicit in whatever sick #### he's doing.
Oof - that's a little much to assume.
It's def alot to assume. But a week ago, it was too much to assume that Jerry Sandusky was a child rapist and Joe Paterno helped cover it up. Now?
Now we have some evidence suggesting that Sandusky was a molester and Paterno may have helped cover it up. Until or unless some evidence comes forward that his wife was complicit i absolutely will not assume that and think it is irresponsible to assume it. His family are most likely just more of the long string of victims of what he has done.
 
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/133435418.html

The nonprofit agency at the center of the Penn State University child sex abuse scandal had warning signs of questionable conduct by its founder, longtime football defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky, a full decade before it acted to ban him from contact with children it served.

The Second Mile, a program for at-risk youth, said in a statement that it immediately acted in 2008 to ban Mr. Sandusky from programs involving children when he told them he was under investigation for sexual contact with a juvenile but had denied any wrongdoing.

However, the organization knew as early as 1998 that Mr. Sandusky was under investigation for similar sexual misconduct in a Penn State shower involving a different boy from the program, according to a presentment by a statewide investigating grand jury.

The Second Mile learned of another investigation involving Mr. Sandusky in 2002. In its statement, the agency said its chief executive officer, Jack Raykovitz, testified at the investigating grand jury that he had been told by Penn State athletic director Tim Curley that an internal investigation had found no corroboration for an allegation of inappropriate contact by Mr. Sandusky with a youth in a university locker room.

Despite those two allegations, it wasn't until November 2008 that the program took steps to keep Mr. Sandusky away from children. It was then, according to the organization's statement, that "Mr. Sandusky informed The Second Mile that he had learned he was being investigated as a result of allegations made against him by an adolescent male in Clinton County, Pa. Although he maintained there was no truth to the claims, we are an organization committed first and foremost to the safety and well-being of the children we serve.

"Consistent with that commitment and with The Second Mile policy, we immediately made the decision to separate him from all of our program activities involving children. Thus, from 2008 to present, Mr. Sandusky has had no involvement with Second Mile programs involving children."

Mr. Sandusky, who retired from coaching in 1999, was still affiliated with The Second Mile until he retired from there in September 2010.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder how his wife didnt pickup on this. There had to be signs
They are foster parents. I would bet she's complicit in whatever sick #### he's doing.
Oof - that's a little much to assume.
It's def alot to assume. But a week ago, it was too much to assume that Jerry Sandusky was a child rapist and Joe Paterno helped cover it up. Now?
Now we have some evidence suggesting that Sandusky was a molester and Paterno may have helped cover it up. Until or unless some evidence comes forward that his wife was complicit i absolutely will not assume that and think it is irresponsible to assume it. His family are most likely just more of the long string of victims of what he has done.
You don't have to. That's why I'm doing it for you. :thumbup:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top