eakfootball
Footballguy
Matt Barkley just announced live on ESPN that he will be staying.
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, Barkley fooled eak with his talk about being ready for the NFL.was this changed
I would think he'd have gone in the top 12 this year, is there any true benefit in being #1 next year vs. maybe Seattle or Arizona this year? Some $ I suppose, but not what it used to be.Smart move, since he is easily the favorite for #1 in 2012.
You sure those 2 pics are the same girl? 1st image I agree she's hot.....2nd, um, not so much.
No. Got them from another board. Might have more than one sister. Smiles are similar.You sure those 2 pics are the same girl? 1st image I agree she's hot.....2nd, um, not so much.
They're being compared because they both went to USC only, right? I'm guessing you know about as much about Barkley as I do so calling it a bad decision is your opinion only.ETA: Just quickly visiting Wickipedia, looks like Barkley may be Tim Tebow version 2.0.Matt Leinart called, he wants his bad decision back.
Same high school as well.They're being compared because they both went to USC only, right?Matt Leinart called, he wants his bad decision back.
Didn't the new CBA eliminate the mega millions that the #1 pick gets vs the simply millions that the lower 1st rounders get?The comparison is that Matt Leinart stayed an extra year and his draft stock suffered.It's a huge risk to stay an extra year and pass up millions. Barkley should call Greg Oden, who left early, got paid, and has been injured ever since. if he had stayed, then none of that would have happened.
agreed.1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2You sure those 2 pics are the same girl? 1st image I agree she's hot.....2nd, um, not so much.
oden still goes no1 overall if he stays an extra year. and no, the cba hardly changed how rookies are payed. their compensation was already drastically curtailed after the glenn robinson debacle.Didn't the new CBA eliminate the mega millions that the #1 pick gets vs the simply millions that the lower 1st rounders get?The comparison is that Matt Leinart stayed an extra year and his draft stock suffered.It's a huge risk to stay an extra year and pass up millions. Barkley should call Greg Oden, who left early, got paid, and has been injured ever since. if he had stayed, then none of that would have happened.
Leinart had won the Heisman, the national championship, and would have easily been the #1 pick over Alex Smith. He had nothing more to do(except for more college girls in the hottub I guess), nothing more to prove, his stock couldn't get any higher. I'm not sure Barkley's resume really compares.The comparison is that Matt Leinart stayed an extra year and his draft stock suffered.It's a huge risk to stay an extra year and pass up millions. Barkley should call Greg Oden, who left early, got paid, and has been injured ever since. if he had stayed, then none of that would have happened.
What was the bad joke?leinart's stock stayed similarly high until the draft workouts. ofc, alex smith wasnt even supposed to be the no1 pick until rodgers made an egregiously bad joke in his interview. nfl gms win some and lose some.
Leinart was and is a knucklehead, Barkley seems to be pretty well grounded. I don't like comparing the 2 because I think the reasons each stayed are probably pretty different.Leinart had won the Heisman, the national championship, and would have easily been the #1 pick over Alex Smith. He had nothing more to do(except for more college girls in the hottub I guess), nothing more to prove, his stock couldn't get any higher. I'm not sure Barkley's resume really compares.The comparison is that Matt Leinart stayed an extra year and his draft stock suffered.It's a huge risk to stay an extra year and pass up millions. Barkley should call Greg Oden, who left early, got paid, and has been injured ever since. if he had stayed, then none of that would have happened.
haha, i dunno. just know that rodgers was the consensus no1 (not undisputed but a decent fav) until his interview and then reports came out that he had an attitude problem.What was the bad joke?leinart's stock stayed similarly high until the draft workouts. ofc, alex smith wasnt even supposed to be the no1 pick until rodgers made an egregiously bad joke in his interview. nfl gms win some and lose some.
really? that surprises me. Not saying it isn't true, I have no idea. Just doesn't strike me as a bad dude nor does he strike me as arrogant.haha, i dunno. just know that rodgers was the consensus no1 (not undisputed but a decent fav) until his interview and then reports came out that he had an attitude problem.What was the bad joke?leinart's stock stayed similarly high until the draft workouts. ofc, alex smith wasnt even supposed to be the no1 pick until rodgers made an egregiously bad joke in his interview. nfl gms win some and lose some.