Ilov80s
Footballguy
I don't think he got traded. The Rams just released him after 2 bad seasons.Kurt Warner maybe...although I think injuries played a role in that decision at the time...still went on to have some good years after the Rams
I don't think he got traded. The Rams just released him after 2 bad seasons.Kurt Warner maybe...although I think injuries played a role in that decision at the time...still went on to have some good years after the Rams
Got it...sorry, could not remember and lazily posted without researching. Joe Montana and Brett Fabre obviously but neither in their prime at time. I would say this would be the biggest QB trade ever considering age and prime of career status.I don't think he got traded. The Rams just released him after 2 bad seasons.
Good ones. I looked it up and Montana was 36 and coming off a season lost to injury. He was traded for 1st round pick. Favre was for a 4th but he was 39 and had already retired once.Got it...sorry, could not remember and lazily posted without researching. Joe Montana and Brett Fabre obviously but neither in their prime at time. I would say this would be the biggest QB trade ever considering age and prime of career status.
The value that Seattle would get is moving up in the first from 21 to 17 and moving down out the 4th round to the 5th. They would only get one first round pick 6 and Rosen for Russell Wilson in his prime.I wont take credit for this as it's on a different forum site from a different poster, but it was a fun hypothetical trade:
Giants get Russell Wilson
Seahawks get Josh Rosen, 1.06, 1.17, 4.01
Cardinals get 1.21, 5.21
Yes I'm not real sure it would be enough for Seattle but its interesting to include a 3 way deal on it. all speculation and for fun of courseThe value that Seattle would get is moving up in the first from 21 to 17 and moving down out the 4th round to the 5th. They would only get one first round pick 6 and Rosen for Russell Wilson in his prime.
The Giants ate a lot of dead cap on the OBJ and Olivier Vernon deals so this would more than likely have to include Eli getting dealt away which would create even more dead cap.
I don't think getting a 1st and Rosen with other throw-ins is a fair value for Wilson before trying to figure out cap implications.
I'd agree it could make sense to a team that fits this. Just not sure there is a team like thatespecially by a team who has needed a QB forever, and has the rest of the team.
Titans jump to mind for me. They would have won the AFC South last year, if the offense could have done anything with consistency. They get Wilson, and I think they'd be a Super Bowl candidate. The defense is there, and the weapons are just as talented as Seattle's. Also a chance Seattle would be interested in Mariota, as they could, in theory, not have to drastically alter their offense much.Dr. Dan said:I'd agree it could make sense to a team that fits this. Just not sure there is a team like that
Interesting idea given the recent turmoil with Packers/Rodgers. Instead of firsts for Russell, what about a trade involving Rodgers going to SEA and Russell going to GB? While I don't think it would ever happen, I feel like it's not a terrible idea for either side. Fresh starts in new places for both QBs, Wilson has WI ties from college (though a step in the wrong direction in terms of social opportunities).Just Win Baby said:The Packers also have 2 first rounders, but I can't see them trading for Wilson. Their picks are also less compelling than the Giants and Raiders picks.
The Patriots trading Drew Bledsoe to the Bills seems like a close comparison. The Patriots got a single 2003 first round draft pick for him.Just Win Baby said:You cannot make any claim about the trade market for Wilson. No QB of Wilson's combined level of play, health, and age/projected years remaining has ever been traded in the history of the NFL. There is no precedent.
good piece.There's nothing wrong with dreaming, even if the dream is silly. It's OK to wish upon a star, imagine the unimaginable, or hope against hope.
So go ahead and buy your Russell Wilson Giants jersey, because it's your money to waste. No matter what the rumor mill says, no matter what Tyrann Mathieu Tweets, no matter how many times Jimmy Fallon asks him, Russell Wilson is not going to be the quarterback of the Giants. Not this year. Not next year. Not a few years from now.
And probably not ever.
Sorry for the reality check, but that's the way it is with franchise quarterbacks in the NFL -- even as Wilson closes in on his self-imposed deadline of Monday to have a new contract in place. The most honest thing that's been said in the months since this silly story started making the rounds came from Wilson when he was asked about the Giants rumors by Fallon on The Tonight Show back in March.
"I'm not sure if the Seahawks are going to let me get away," he said.
He's right. They're not. Because they're not dumb or crazy. And on a planet where there are barely 32 people talented enough to play quarterback at a high level in the NFL, and only a fraction of those exceptional enough to lead their team to a Super Bowl, teams know it would be absolutely insane to let a quarterback like Wilson get away.
Think about it: When has there ever been an elite quarterback who hit free agency or was traded away in his prime? It was stunning last offseason when Kirk Cousins was available, though some thought he might have stretched the definition of a true franchise quarterback. Cousins was 30, just like Wilson, and with zero playoff wins under his belt. Yet he still had to turn down extension after extension and endure the franchise tag twice before he finally became free.
Wilson would have to agree to a new contract with any team that traded for him. I very seriously doubt he would do that in TEN or DEN. Those teams also do not have enough 2019 draft capital to make it worthwhile to SEA.Titans jump to mind for me. They would have won the AFC South last year, if the offense could have done anything with consistency. They get Wilson, and I think they'd be a Super Bowl candidate. The defense is there, and the weapons are just as talented as Seattle's. Also a chance Seattle would be interested in Mariota, as they could, in theory, not have to drastically alter their offense much.
Denver, though I don't know how easy to get out of Flacco's deal it would be, but I think Elway would happily trade 3 1st round picks and then some if it meant he didn't have to worry about finding a franchise QB again. Broncos had a playoff caliber team last year, they just couldn't finish games. Now with Fangio on board, and some solid defensive upgrades, I think they could have a top defense again, the running game is good, they just need a QB to make a few plays. Wilson can do a lot more than that.
The Patriots trading Drew Bledsoe to the Bills seems like a close comparison. The Patriots got a single 2003 first round draft pick for him.
Bledsoe was 30 when traded. Wilson is also 30.
Bledsoe was not only coming off an injury year where he only started two games (both losses) and the previous year the Patriots had a 5-11 record with him but after his injury he was replaced by a young guy named Tom Brady who took over and won the Super Bowl.The Patriots trading Drew Bledsoe to the Bills seems like a close comparison. The Patriots got a single 2003 first round draft pick for him.
Bledsoe was 30 when traded. Wilson is also 30.
Brees was the highest paid QB when he signed his contract. 2-3 guys have passed him since.Id be pissed if my team gave up two firsts for him. And I am a Dolphins fan. And a Wilson fan. And a Phish fan.
Its not the picks that are the problem. Paying one player that large of a percentage of your salary cap is crippling. The teams that win Super Bowls seem to be for the most part teams with QBS on rookie deals, or a team where the star QB takes a very team-friendly deal. We know Brady does, and I think Brees does too (although I dont know that for sure). Stafford and Rodgers are making bank, and they arent even taking their teams to the playoffs. Probably because they cannot afford to build a team around them with so much money tied to one player.
ESPN showed the top 12 highest paid QBs today. Wilson is 12th. Brees was middle of the pack around 7-8. Brady wasn't even on the list, and it's easy to understand why.Brees was the highest paid QB when he signed his contract. 2-3 guys have passed him since.
Yeah a few more guys have passed him that were due for extensions:ESPN showed the top 12 highest paid QBs today. Wilson is 12th. Brees was middle of the pack around 7-8. Brady wasn't even on the list, and it's easy to understand why.
Lot's of overpaid QBs on that list including Rodgers. He's going to go down as the most overrated, stat-padding QBs of all time.Yeah a few more guys have passed him that were due for extensions:
1. Packers QB Aaron Rodgers: $33.5 million
2. Falcons QB Matt Ryan: $30 million
3, Vikings QB Kirk Cousins: $28 million
4. 49ers QB Jimmy Garoppolo: $27.5 million
5. Lions QB Matthew Stafford: $27 million
6. Raiders QB Derek Carr: $25 million
7. Saints QB Drew Brees: $25 million
8. Colts QB Andrew Luck: $24.6 million
9. Redskins QB Alex Smith: $23.5 million
10. Broncos QB Joe Flacco: $22.1 million
How do you figure? He's no more overrated than Drew BreesLot's of overpaid QBs on that list including Rodgers. He's going to go down as the most overrated, stat-padding QBs of all time.
Hes anti Packer. Dont mind himHow do you figure? He's no more overrated than Drew Brees
Not sure where you came up with this, and would like to see the evidence to back it up since I'm a Saints fan.Dr. Dan said:Hes anti Packer. Dont mind him
That's definitely an arguable point and merely is a matter of opinion. The Saints run of three consecutive 7-9 seasons were with 3 historically horrible defenses. This was not due to not being able to pay defensive players, but rather busts in FA signings. I'm a Saints fan and obviously biased, but when it comes to the game being on the line, Brees doesn't seem to worry about stats or making mistakes. I see the opposite in Rodgers. Brees has only done more with less talent. This is taken from another board and seems to sum things up pretty accurately:Ilov80s said:How do you figure? He's no more overrated than Drew Brees
True but also Seattle has missed the playoffs once in his career (still were 9-7). Seattle could also draft better. Since Wilson was drafted, they managed to draft 2 Pro Bowlers, a punter and kick returner. Although Frank Clark certainly is a Pro Bowl caliber player.It's true a QB like Wilson has never been traded, but many teams are capsizing after pouring half their cap into a QB. Seattle was a legit contender when Wilson was making peanuts, same thing is playing out with the Eagles, Rams, Bears, Chiefs, even the Patriots since Brady plays at a discount. There's an argument to be made that Seattle would be better off rolling the dice with someone like Murray and allocating all that extra money to their defense like they did before. If Seattle signs Wilson to a mega deal they'll always be relevant, kind of like the Packers are with Rodgers, but they might not be able put enough talent around Wilson to win it all.
It's true a QB like Wilson has never been traded, but many teams are capsizing after pouring half their cap into a QB. Seattle was a legit contender when Wilson was making peanuts, same thing is playing out with the Eagles, Rams, Bears, Chiefs, even the Patriots since Brady plays at a discount. There's an argument to be made that Seattle would be better off rolling the dice with someone like Murray and allocating all that extra money to their defense like they did before. If Seattle signs Wilson to a mega deal they'll always be relevant, kind of like the Packers are with Rodgers, but they might not be able put enough talent around Wilson to win it all.
Guess he isn't interested in any more rings.Per reppaport
Full details for the #Seahawks and QB Russell Wilson: 4 new years, $140M. $65M to sign. Total guarantee: $107M. A no-trade clause. ... Now, Wilson is under contract for 5 years and $157M. And staying in Seattle.
Neither is Seattle, they made that clear when they took a backup RB in the first round last year lolGuess he isn't interested in any more rings.
So 8 of 10 teams didn't make the playoffs last year.. Guess Seattle isn't interested in making playoffs any time soon..Dr. Octopus said:Yeah a few more guys have passed him that were due for extensions:
1. Packers QB Aaron Rodgers: $33.5 million
2. Falcons QB Matt Ryan: $30 million
3, Vikings QB Kirk Cousins: $28 million
4. 49ers QB Jimmy Garoppolo: $27.5 million
5. Lions QB Matthew Stafford: $27 million
6. Raiders QB Derek Carr: $25 million
7. Saints QB Drew Brees: $25 million
8. Colts QB Andrew Luck: $24.6 million
9. Redskins QB Alex Smith: $23.5 million
10. Broncos QB Joe Flacco: $22.1 million
What were they supposed to do? Cause they weren’t sniffing the playoffs without him either. To be fair, GB is a perennial playoff team, Atl just came off a Superbowl, Jimmy got hurt and half those QBs are just plain bad.So 8 of 10 teams didn't make the playoffs last year.. Guess Seattle isn't interested in making playoffs any time soon..
Agreed. So GB should dump Rodgers and then do what exactly at the QB position? Draft from the bursting supply of franchise rookie QBs entering the league? Go with an UFA QB and load up elsewhere on the roster? Same with Altaltan, Detroit, Indianapolis, I mean people can cry all they want about paying QBs but what is the option?What were they supposed to do? Cause they weren’t sniffing the playoffs without him either. To be fair, GB is a perennial playoff team, Atl just came off a Superbowl, Jimmy got hurt and half those QBs are just plain bad.
That list doesn't look good for last season, what did a similar list look like for say the last 5 or 6 seasons?So 8 of 10 teams didn't make the playoffs last year.. Guess Seattle isn't interested in making playoffs any time soon..