The Eagles were down six late in the third when Murray's fumble was returned for a TD. That turnover was not Bradford's fault so to that point he had put his team in a position to win despite an absurd number of drops (including a TD drop that would've given Philadelphia the lead) and critical drive-killing turnovers (including one that directly resulted in a defensive touchdown). I don't think anyone is trying to argue that Bradford is Joe Montana but I don't know how anyone who watched the game could blame him for the loss. He was easily one of the few bright spots the Eagles had.
No one is blaming him for the loss but maybe I'm old school in the thought that yardage totals mean very little when you get blown out. Was he bad? No. Was he good? No. Playing well to me means giving yourself a chance to win the game. Converting 3rd downs. Making plays. I saw very little of that from Bradford Saturday night. Sure he had some drops but he also had some over throws. A good performance to me would be overcoming some of the negative plays.To me Bradford is a very average QB. I'm sure you could win with him but he's not going to win you many games. I think there's enough data on the guy to back that up.
I think he did everything he could to give his team a chance to win. The shoddy defense and all the issues on offense he had nothing to do with were the primary reasons why the Eagles lost in my opinion. I've been very impressed by how Bradford has closed out this season so far. The Eagles are a gigantic mess but I think Bradford's play has been a real bright spot, especially given how I thought he was pretty poor in the first half of the season. He played well enough to win against Washington. Unfortunately, he was about the only one on the team who did.
I agree. And this, IMO, has been the case much of the 2nd half of 2015. Some interesting things for a new staff and owner Jeff Lurie to consider:
- In the last 8 games he started and finished for Philly, the team went 6-2.
- In his last 7 games, he has completed 66.4 percent of his passes for eight touchdowns while throwing only three interceptions. His passer rating during that stretch is a respectable 94.9. If that was his number for the season, he would rank 13th in the NFL, right behind Eli Manning of the New York Giants and Aaron Rodgers of the Green Bay Packers.
- He has thrown to the drop squad all season. The Eagles have let more passes slip through their hands than any other team in the NFL
He's obviously a talented guy (#1 overall pick, Heisman, etc.) and has had bad luck with injuries. 2 ACL tears. That being said, it was encouraging to see him make it through a full season without any issues there, and I can tell you he's tough. That OLine did him no favors, he was sacked and hit lots, but stood tall in the pocket. IMO what a young QB needs is health, stability, and weapons. His health is it's own thing, but stability and weapons have been lacking as well.
- Bradford has had the same system/staff ONCE in his entire 6 year career, and this will be the case again in his 7th next year. That's ridiculous.
- His weapons in STL and PHI have been sub-par to say the least. Leading receivers in STL/PHI during his tenures: Danny Amendola, Brandon Lloyd, Brandon Gibson, Jared Cook, Kenny Britt, Jordan Matthews. And the #2/#3 guys are wretched. :X
To date, his legacy will be as a good, talented guy who had some bad luck with injuries, never got into a system for any length of time to develop comfort or rapport with his teammates, and never had very good weapons in any event.
I honestly think I have seen enough to state that he could be pretty darn good, though. Gun to head, all else being equal, I'd take him today over 15-20 other starting NFL QBs going forward.