strong
Footballguy
I was just tinkering around, sifting through some of the greatest seasons for receivers, and I noticed something bizarre.
Of the top twelve marks for receiving yards in a season, four occurred in 1995. That's Jerry Rice 1848 (still #1), Isaac Bruce 1781 (still #2), Herman Moore 1686, and Michael Irvin 1603. At the time, those receivers posted four of the top five single season efforts of all time.
The same holds true for single season leaders for receptions: four of the top eight seasons occurred in that year and at the time in 1995 four of the top five marks were posted.
I vaguely remember that year, but I can't seem to find any explanation as to why that season stands out as the best year for stud receivers ever. Obviously, Rice, Bruce, and Irvin are three of the best receivers of all time, but to do it all at the same time and be joined by the likes of Herman Moore?
It's not like 1995 was especially kind to the passing game. On the list of the top 250 single season passing yardage totals, 1995 has 11 quarterbacks. A decent mark, but not that special. 2011 has 14 quarterbacks on the list. 2010 has 12. 2009 has 17. 1995 was the highwater mark of the 90s, but it's been far surpassed in the last 12 years. And yet the receiving marks stand.
Of the 1995 quarterbacks on that list, only Scott Mitchell of Detroit was tossing balls to a receiver on the short list of best seasons ever. The highest 1995 quarterback on the list is Brett Favre at 38 with 4413 yards.
1995 Steve Young doesn't appear in the top 250 single-season marks for passing yards. He might have made the list if he wasn't hurt and replaced by Elvis Grbac for five games. The two quarterbacks combined for nearly 4600 yards, which would have been good for top 25 numbers. But think about that: Elvis Grbac is 1/3 responsible for the best receiving year ever?!?! That's absurd.
No 1995 St. Louis QB appears on the list. (Chris Miller and Mark Rypien split duty. YIKES!) And 1995 Troy Aikman only threw for 3,300 yards that season. Nearly half of which were to Irvin.
Relatively speaking, passing yards were high that year but in recent years have been surpassed multiple times over. Yet more current receivers aren't shattering those 1995 marks. If overall passing yards weren't that high, why all the great single seasons? Were shut down corners required to play without hands? Wear two left shoes? Were the top receivers juicing?
Perhaps there's some members here who remember that year and can offer an explanation. But my google-fu turned up very little by way of explanation as to why 1995 still stands as the greatest year for #1 receivers.
Of the top twelve marks for receiving yards in a season, four occurred in 1995. That's Jerry Rice 1848 (still #1), Isaac Bruce 1781 (still #2), Herman Moore 1686, and Michael Irvin 1603. At the time, those receivers posted four of the top five single season efforts of all time.
The same holds true for single season leaders for receptions: four of the top eight seasons occurred in that year and at the time in 1995 four of the top five marks were posted.
I vaguely remember that year, but I can't seem to find any explanation as to why that season stands out as the best year for stud receivers ever. Obviously, Rice, Bruce, and Irvin are three of the best receivers of all time, but to do it all at the same time and be joined by the likes of Herman Moore?
It's not like 1995 was especially kind to the passing game. On the list of the top 250 single season passing yardage totals, 1995 has 11 quarterbacks. A decent mark, but not that special. 2011 has 14 quarterbacks on the list. 2010 has 12. 2009 has 17. 1995 was the highwater mark of the 90s, but it's been far surpassed in the last 12 years. And yet the receiving marks stand.
Of the 1995 quarterbacks on that list, only Scott Mitchell of Detroit was tossing balls to a receiver on the short list of best seasons ever. The highest 1995 quarterback on the list is Brett Favre at 38 with 4413 yards.
1995 Steve Young doesn't appear in the top 250 single-season marks for passing yards. He might have made the list if he wasn't hurt and replaced by Elvis Grbac for five games. The two quarterbacks combined for nearly 4600 yards, which would have been good for top 25 numbers. But think about that: Elvis Grbac is 1/3 responsible for the best receiving year ever?!?! That's absurd.
No 1995 St. Louis QB appears on the list. (Chris Miller and Mark Rypien split duty. YIKES!) And 1995 Troy Aikman only threw for 3,300 yards that season. Nearly half of which were to Irvin.
Relatively speaking, passing yards were high that year but in recent years have been surpassed multiple times over. Yet more current receivers aren't shattering those 1995 marks. If overall passing yards weren't that high, why all the great single seasons? Were shut down corners required to play without hands? Wear two left shoes? Were the top receivers juicing?
Perhaps there's some members here who remember that year and can offer an explanation. But my google-fu turned up very little by way of explanation as to why 1995 still stands as the greatest year for #1 receivers.