Sebowski
Footballguy
You think the logo itself is racist?Yeah that seems fair. I have something I consider as racist as my permanent avatar while you get the new team logo.
I think not...
You think the logo itself is racist?Yeah that seems fair. I have something I consider as racist as my permanent avatar while you get the new team logo.
I think not...
No, not the logo, per se, just what it represents.You think the logo itself is racist?
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000801421/article/previewing-the-2017-thanksgiving-day-slate
The Washington Redskins will host their NFC East rivals New York Giants in the third game on November 23. The 'Skins are no stranger to Thanksgiving games -- this will be their 10th appearance -- but they often played at Texas Stadium or AT&T Stadium.
Away fans are typically well represented. Last week looked about 50% Vikings fans.Going to the game this weekend with a friend from DC. I suggested he wear his Billy Kilmer 17.
Well the game's in NO, he's my guest.Away fans are typically well represented. Last week looked about 50% Vikings fans.
So you're telling me there's a chance.Well the game's in NO, he's my guest.
The Redskins have traditionally been a tough opponent for the Saints, historically there are like 10 teams that the Saints have beaten roughly only about a 1/3rd of the time, they're one of them.
Name should have been changed a long time ago. KC Chiefs will have to change as well, Cleveland Indians, Fighting Irish should change, FSU needs to dump Seminoles. Any name or logo that uses any group of people will probably have to be changed.I was on the fence for a while but now i say change it. I spent time on a number of Indian reservations all over the country and i would notice they am were always redskins fans. When i asked about the name not one person had a problem with it. I even had one person tell me they feared if all the teams changed their names that referenced them It would be like erasing them from history. The only name i heard someone tell me they didn’t like was the chiefs, mostly because that is a very respected name and someone needs to earn the right to be a chief. Ultimately if there are people that are offended by it which it seems there are, just change the name. But i think we definitely should keep it as a reference to American Indian culture. Even better let’s work with American Indians to find the new name.
Cowboys?Any name or logo that uses any group of people will probably have to be changed.
From what I have the read, Seminoles have no problem with FSU using their name (maybe that has changed in the last year or so).Name should have been changed a long time ago. KC Chiefs will have to change as well, Cleveland Indians, Fighting Irish should change, FSU needs to dump Seminoles. Any name or logo that uses any group of people will probably have to be changed.
Would you call an Indian man Chief?From what I have the read, Seminoles have no problem with FSU using their name (maybe that has changed in the last year or so).
Chiefs is not considered pejorative, unlike "Redskins" so that will probably remain.
Cleveland Indians should go.
I haven't seen much outrage from Irish Americans over "Fighting Irish" and clamoring for that to be changed.
Right. To people i spoke with chiefs was much more offensive. Yankees? Change that too. Change em all.Would you call an Indian man Chief?
You can`t pick and choose in PC situations. If there are any changes they have to be wholesale so I am sure you understand that.
About the Fighting Irish it does not matter, Indian logos and names have been changed by administration without people clamoring for a change or even wanting one. So it probably should go and it project people of Irish descent. Max Kellerman thinks ND should change as well. If we want real change it has to be everyone.
PETA will make sure all the animal names change as wellName should have been changed a long time ago. KC Chiefs will have to change as well, Cleveland Indians, Fighting Irish should change, FSU needs to dump Seminoles. Any name or logo that uses any group of people will probably have to be changed.
Meh. I don't think every single name that a few people find offensive or not PC has to changed wholesale.Would you call an Indian man Chief?
You can`t pick and choose in PC situations. If there are any changes they have to be wholesale so I am sure you understand that.
About the Fighting Irish it does not matter as it is not up to us. It is offends a handful that is too many today. Indian logos and names have been changed by administration without people clamoring for a change or even wanting one. So it probably should go and it makes people of Irish descent an object. Max Kellerman thinks ND should change as well. If we want real change it has to be everyone.
You don't have to look too hard to find a race component in the use of "Redskin"Why not just get rid of all team names and just say a bunch of people playing against another bunch of people. This crap is so beyond ridiculous anymore. Every single thing someone has to look for a race component.
I was on the fence for a while but now i say change it. I spent time on a number of Indian reservations all over the country and i would notice they am were always redskins fans. When i asked about the name not one person had a problem with it. I even had one person tell me they feared if all the teams changed their names that referenced them It would be like erasing them from history. The only name i heard someone tell me they didn’t like was the chiefs, mostly because that is a very respected name and someone needs to earn the right to be a chief. Ultimately if there are people that are offended by it which it seems there are, just change the name. But i think we definitely should keep it as a reference to American Indian culture. Even better let’s work with American Indians to find the new name.
And I guess you are one those that love to look for any component. If you read above some of the actual people that you say are offended seemed to want to keep it. But keep fighting the fight.You don't have to look too hard to find a race component in the use of "Redskin"
True but i did not speak to every American Indian in this country. It is apparent that some are offended by it. So if that’s the case then change it. What’s the downside? It’s not like someone said I’m offended by tigers change that name. This has actual historical context behind it.And I guess you are one those that love to look for any component. If you read above some of the actual people that you say are offended seemed to want to keep it. But keep fighting the fight.
Someone said keep the name but change the logo to a Redskin Potato. I guess that would work as the name recognition would stay but it would not be offensive to anyone.You don't have to look too hard to find a race component in the use of "Redskin"
No, not offensive, just dumb looking. Go Spuds!Someone said keep the name but change the logo to a Redskin Potato. I guess that would work as the name recognition would stay but it would not be offensive to anyone.
But it would not be offensive to anyone.
Plus it would be more representative of what they’ve lookEd like on the field the last few decades.....I can get behind this one.Someone said keep the name but change the logo to a Redskin Potato. I guess that would work as the name recognition would stay but it would not be offensive to anyone.
It would be offensive to anyone who doesn't like stupid team names or logos.But it would not be offensive to anyone.
You sure. I'm sure anything that's brown on the outside and white in the middle would offend a few peopleBut it would not be offensive to anyone.
We are talking Redskins..not Idaho's.You sure. I'm sure anything that's brown on the outside and white in the middle would offend a few people
Atlanta Braves, FSU Seminoles, Fighting Irish, Chicago Blackhawks Any nickname or logo that depicts any group of people has gotta go!Of course. And Cleveland too. Maybe even Kansas City. Gotta go.
Apparently you didn’t read my last post.Atlanta Braves, FSU Seminoles, Fighting Irish, Chicago Blackhawks Any nickname or logo that depicts any group of people has gotta go!
I remember reading a long time ago that Squis raises pigeons. So maybe he will be offended.The Washington Bohemian Fairy Swallow's could work. Who's offended by a domesticated pigeon?
Just don’t put them in an avatar.The Washington Bohemian Fairy Swallow's could work. Who's offended by a domesticated pigeon?
you get deeply offended by a team name? That's quite the privilege you have.the Washington football team name is a slur - i been carping (does that denigrate Piscean-Americans?) about it for decades because it offends me deeply. none of the other are slurs. they are characterizations of battling entities
This ain't the one to pick a fight with, compadre. nufcedyou get deeply offended by a team name? That's quite the privilege you have.
my father's on the census as a Native American, a function of he and his brothers wanting to keep their kids eligible for a free ride to Dartmouth (only one qualified). his mother was born in a grape field owned by Taylor Wines in upstate NY to an itinerate picker and had no birth certificate and my grandparents met thru a penpal service for "halfbreeds". i'm on the census as a Caucasian but i have no problem being offended by the n-word for my peepsyou get deeply offended by a team name? That's quite the privilege you have.