Capella
Footballguy
Of course it’s tampering.The other guy is right. Any communications between bell's agent and other NFL teams would be textbook tampering.
It may or may not be happening, but it's pretty unambiguous what it is.
Of course it’s tampering.The other guy is right. Any communications between bell's agent and other NFL teams would be textbook tampering.
It may or may not be happening, but it's pretty unambiguous what it is.
It wasn't clear at first if you were saying it wasn't tampering, or if you were saying teams and agents blatantly violate the rules.Capella said:Of course it’s tampering.
I was just saying they actually changed the rules because there is so much tampering.It wasn't clear at first if you were saying it wasn't tampering, or if you were saying teams and agents blatantly violate the rules.
You made reference to a rule change, which made it seem like the former.
I wouldn't equate the tampering that went on in the days before free agency opened with this Bell situation.I was just saying they actually changed the rules because there is so much tampering.
He may well not have called around the NFL, polled GMs... but I'm with Capella, the agent knows damn well what the market is.I wouldn't equate the tampering that went on in the days before free agency opened with this Bell situation.
To me it's highly unlikely, borderline ridiculous to think that bell's agent is calling around the NFL, polling GMs on contact terms they'd extend to his client.
Yes, after the July deadline passed, they couldn’t do a long term deal, but they were allowed to go above the $14.5M for this year.Good point.
But only for year 2018 right? The weekly amount was not super contentious I think? More about how many weeks do I get even if I am out?
I tried to throw some numbers out there to move the discussion forward but people just want to go back and forth with the same arguments page after page.Wondering if Bell will go for a fully guaranteed deal like Cousins, and if so what that could look like. 4 years 40 million fully guaranteed? Less total money but a nice amount guaranteed. Bell is apparently all about the guarantee. Could benefit both player and team.
Correct. Bell could have sustained a career ending injury, or he could have led the league in rushing and been Super Bowl MVP, most likely he would have had a typical LeVeon Bell year.You have absolutely no way of knowing this.
I don't think the #'s are anywhere close to what you're suggesting. I'm only guessing but would think insuring 50M or more in earnings would cost way more than 1/2M to insure. He prob figured it wasn't worth knocking that cost off the 14 M to play this year.Just saw an article about Alex Smith’s leg and that it explains, to a large extent, why Bell sat. But then I thought (and this must have come up in the past 148 pages), isn’t there insurance for that kind of thing? What was stopping Bell from playing this year, squeaking by on $10milion until he hit free agency, but backing up his investment with a comprehensive policy? What would that have cost, under a half mil, I’d guess (the odds of sustaining a career ending or even contract-damaging injury feels under 20:1)? And how much did he cost himself in free agency by his decision? I’m guessing way, way more than a policy would cost plus he misses out on a chance for a run at a ring. Seems ill-advised.
And in early March, he expects to be significantly more than $14.5M richer.Correct. Bell could have sustained a career ending injury, or he could have led the league in rushing and been Super Bowl MVP, most likely he would have had a typical LeVeon Bell year.
Anyway you slice it he would be $14.5 million richer right now.
Agreed but then I don't understand why Bell was reportedly willing to if the Steelers agreed to not use the transition tag on him in 2019. Why risk injury when you're going to get paid anyway?And in early March, he expects to be significantly more than $14.5M richer.
If you would have put that much larger payday at risk by playing, that's perfectly understandable. He chose not to, and that's perfectly understandable too.
Don't you think it would benefit both the agent and the GM(s) to interact in an upfront and non-adversarial manner? Keeping up good relations and building trust is a huge part of "business".Then I'm living in another world than you. I don't really think there is a ton of trust between agents and front offices. Just an opinion. I'm sure there are some good relationships between agents and front offices but business is business and front offices answer to upper management and agents have a fiduciary responsibility to their clients. If you think these guys don't hold their cards close to vest than I'll gladly live in my world of reality. You can live in yours.
Bell is not under contract.The other guy is right. Any communications between bell's agent and other NFL teams would be textbook tampering.
It may or may not be happening, but it's pretty unambiguous what it is.
So? He is not a free agent. The Steelers have exclusive negotiating rights.Bell is not under contract.
I'll admit it's surely a grey area and I can't speak competently enough to comment further - but I would imagine "conversations" are taking place.So? He is not a free agent. The Steelers have exclusive negotiating rights.
There's no gray area whatsoever. Bell and his agent can't discuss contract terms with other teams, period.I'll admit it's surely a grey area and I can't speak competently enough to comment further - but I would imagine "conversations" are taking place.
Anyone think that discussions are not happening?There's no gray area whatsoever. Bell and his agent can't discuss contract terms with other teams, period.
okThere's no gray area whatsoever. Bell and his agent can't discuss contract terms with other teams, period.
Bell never dropped a pass?Well, it’s clear now how much better a receiver is than Conner.
I am willing to concede that Bell is the better receiver but Conner is essentially a rookie -- he will improve. I also think his running style fits this Steelers team better than Bell and Conner is MUCH cheaper.Bell never dropped a pass?
I posted earlier that this was a situation where I feel both sides won. That was before the reports yesterday that Pitt would use the transition tag. Assuming they use the tag & match a offer sheet, I'd have to re-think that. The Steelers' players' behavior last wednesday seems to be a crossing of the rubicon. I don't see how Bell could fit in that locker room next year. Assuming they do intend to use the transition tag, if they don't match an offer sheet and get no compensation, or they do match and Bell has to come back to those teammates, I don't think it's as much of a win for either side. What do you think?I am willing to concede that Bell is the better receiver but Conner is essentially a rookie -- he will improve. I also think his running style fits this Steelers team better than Bell and Conner is MUCH cheaper.
Barring injury to Conner I think the Steelers did quite well with the whole LeVeon Bell situation. Hopefully it turns out well for Bell next season -- I have no malice towards him.
Jets would be ok but Indy would be incredible.The Jets would be great... I fully endorse this particular rumor. No interference with other RB stocks I own (SF & Philly) and minimal competition for touches.
Only if you are naïve.Anyone think that discussions are not happening?
Come on man. You are being intentionally obtuse at this point.There's no gray area whatsoever. Bell and his agent can't discuss contract terms with other teams, period.
I love this... very big of you.I am willing to concede that Bell is the better receiver
I truly don't think so in the slightest bit.Anyone think that discussions are not happening?
But Bell's YPC this year is 0.0. That proves that Bell is terrible and that Conner is going to the HOF. End of discussion.I love this... very big of you.
Good to see Bell haters digging deep to find the kindness in their hearts to "concede" Bell is better than Conner at... anything.
How so?Come on man. You are being intentionally obtuse at this point.
I'm guessing NYJ or PIT. We know (by his actions) that Bell only wants to get paid... no interest in competing for a Super Bowl... NYJ have the most $$$ to spend and no worries about having to play more than 16 games, especially if they invest all their money in a RB with that many miles on him.The Jets would be great... I fully endorse this particular rumor. No interference with other RB stocks I own (SF & Philly) and minimal competition for touches.
NYJ have the most $$$ to spend and no worries about having to play more than 16 games
Local reporters were saying the players were just having a bit of fun with it. I guess if he came back it would depend on what transpires between now and then.I posted earlier that this was a situation where I feel both sides won. That was before the reports yesterday that Pitt would use the transition tag. Assuming they use the tag & match a offer sheet, I'd have to re-think that. The Steelers' players' behavior last wednesday seems to be a crossing of the rubicon. I don't see how Bell could fit in that locker room next year. Assuming they do intend to use the transition tag, if they don't match an offer sheet and get no compensation, or they do match and Bell has to come back to those teammates, I don't think it's as much of a win for either side. What do you think?
ETA-Bell is a better receiver, but Conner (the drop yesterday not withstanding) has been impressive in that facet this year.
I saw the reports, but I also saw the videos, and I'm sure Bell did too. The situation was already bad, IMO, but that made it even worse, I'd think. Won't matter if Bell isn't back, but the application of the transition tag could change that.Local reporters were saying the players were just having a bit of fun with it. I guess if he came back it would depend on what transpires between now and then.
I think the Steelers are just holding their cards and will keep all options open and make the decision after the season.
Good thing I didn't make the bet, because I was wrong, according to recent reports that he'd have been a receiver/back-up to Conner if he returned.
Again, the Steelers don't need to do anything now so they're just keeping all options available. It would be pretty dumb of them to commit to not using the tag on Bell in 2019 if Conner would sustain a serious injury in 2018.I saw the reports, but I also saw the videos, and I'm sure Bell did too. The situation was already bad, IMO, but that made it even worse, I'd think. Won't matter if Bell isn't back, but the application of the transition tag could change that.
I understand the idea of applying the tag to try to maximize what they can get in compensation, but everything I can find leads me to believe that IF Pitt applies the transition tag, and declines to match an offer sheet, they get nothing. From what I understand, the application of the tag would be for the purpose of extracting a pick from the team making the offer to Bell; i.e.-"give us a 3rd rounder, or we'll match the offer sheet." However, that strategy could backfire if the other team refuses to give up the pick. Pitt either has to admit their bluff and loses any compensation for Bell, or sign the offer sheet and spend a big chunk of money on a RB who they intended to use in the passing game and as a backup.
If they don't transition him, they get an extra $14.5 in cap rolled over to 2019, have a very good RB for very cheap, and get a (likely) 3rd round pick in 2020. If they apply the tag, they have to find a team willing to give up a pick AND give Bell a big deal, or risk being stuck with a back-up RB/slot receiver making big money, who very well could cause locker-room issues.
Applying the transition tag seems like a stupid decision that could mess up what turned out to be a very good outcome (thus far) for Pitt.
Agreed; I was just pondering what would happen if they did use the tag.Again, the Steelers don't need to do anything now so they're just keeping all options available. It would be pretty dumb of them to commit to not using the tag on Bell in 2019 if Conner would sustain a serious injury in 2018.
Ok, then, call it a $5mill insurance policy. He plays this year and makes $14 million but pays $5M for insurance. If he gets injured, he limps away with $50 million. He doesn’t get injured and he gets a better deal in free agency (assuming he plays well) and isn’t remembered as a D-bag with a long shot of getting a ring. Legacy means something, Steeler legacy means a little more, imo, and he blew it with this decision.Tool said:I don't think the #'s are anywhere close to what you're suggesting. I'm only guessing but would think insuring 50M or more in earnings would cost way more than 1/2M to insure. He prob figured it wasn't worth knocking that cost off the 14 M to play this year.
Yes there are multiple hilariously naive people here.DocHolliday said:Anyone think that discussions are not happening?
you drive 35 in a 40davearm said:There's no gray area whatsoever. Bell and his agent can't discuss contract terms with other teams, period.
I thought we agreed this is tampering we're talking about.you drive 35 in a 40
What you do know, and what we all know - is that it is happening. It has happened. It will happen.davearm said:How so?
I have been very intentional that I don't know what is or isn't being discussed behind the scenes.
What I do know is that what was suggested would be textbook tampering.
Not sure I believe that...
Yeah,thats BS. No way they would tag him at 25m SB win or not. They were just gonna run him in the ground & dump him if they won the SB. Pretty sure Ben would have retired and the teM rebuilding.Not sure I believe that...
I'm not a sports agent. But I negotiate contracts for a living, some of them associated with M&A and other activity where discussions are subject to actual force of law. SEC, FTC, and so on. Stuff that makes the NFL's rules look like fencepost signs by comparison.I thought we agreed this is tampering we're talking about.
Well said, and I agree.I'm not a sports agent. But I negotiate contracts for a living, some of them associated with M&A and other activity where discussions are subject to actual force of law. SEC, FTC, and so on. Stuff that makes the NFL's rules look like fencepost signs by comparison.
I assure you that no matter what the circumstances, there are always, always backchannels through which discussion happens. Everyone knows the rules, and everyone knows how far you can take those discussions without running afoul of them, but everyone (even the regulators) acknowledges that business simply couldn't get done otherwise.