Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Who told you this, Weebs? Link for your source?
- NYT
I have to say I was under the impression that some had come and was willing to give Trump credit for that. What a disgrace. I hope I can give him credit for this ultimately.
I wouldn’t hold your breath. But yeah this is yet another despicable lie. Toying with people’s emotions like that. He is truly vile.
Showing up for a photo op isn’t a great accomplishment
I thought we already had 200 soldiers remains?
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
You were "under the impression" because Trump told a lie and the media reported it as fact.
The ongoing attempt to try and normalize Trump is among the media’s greatest failings right now. I give Maddow a lot of respect for not playing Trump clips. Her reason? He constantly lies and she doesn’t want to spread them further by broadcasting them.
You know if more than one person who reads one of your posts “needs a translator” then it might be YOU are the one who needs one. Just saying.
What do Tariffs have to do with either the NK negotiations or the upcoming Russia negotiations?
You keep using that phrase. Like Tim said, if you keep having to say it, maybe you need to do a better job on your posts
I read on my propaganda site that that site is a propaganda site!
No way anyone could have seen this coming. Completely unexpected.
That would require Trump admitting he was fooled. After all the fawning, I find that unlikely. KJU played him like a fiddle - in order to retaliate, Trump has to admit he’s an idiot.
Did anyone follow up and ask if there was another way of receiving the remains, other than physically?
We're going to shift them to the US? To be ready for all of the military conflicts on US soil? Or to use in a war against Canada?
There is a massive risk to this - economically. We live in a house of cards that is built largely on the strength of the US military and ability to influence policy around the world. We are starting to see the effects of the US losing influence - which is the goal of Russia, and to a lesser extent (or at least not as overt) China.
The world has shifted from using USD as the currency of record. Having nothing to do with our military strength. Economic strength is more important than military these days. If we properly reallocate the expense of our military, it could be a net win.
A lot of our economic strength is based on our projected military strength...we are and have been a safe investment for foreign dollars because of the military presence.
Their presence alone is a deterrence. And, as I said, the infrastructure is critical to operations throughout the region.
Right. This is the kind of thing that you say before you have the big summit.
Check which ambitions for China other than maybe a more aggressive assimilation of Taiwan? Is China going to attack South Korea?
Right now - China is exerting its military presence in the South China sea - which is one of the busiest trade routes in the world.
Which is why you require concessions in return for us being willing to return to the table.
