Yeah, I think he's going to be a unique bird but the question becomes how long can you hold him considering the question of whether a space back is worthy of that roster spot you're going for as a home run. As far as the twenty-five year old thing goes, that's my new(er) rule of thumb because of some work done printed up and modeled on the DLF website back about three months or so ago. It is indeed due to the two things you mention. They found that, in general, the true fantasy point accumulators above the age of twenty-five are real outliers. There are some at twenty-six, but not many, and the number falls further at twenty-seven. Others have argued that this is due to the lack of good backs in the NFL and that this will change once Elliott, Barkley, Henry, Kamara, et. al age, but the writer at DLF makes a compelling case that 21-25 are the prime ages and they seem to be right when they talk about divesting yourself of anyone twenty-six or over if you want to get their maximal value. It's a rough truth, but if you're not hitting it at twenty-three and you've got this kind of situation around you, you might just be buried. Of course, if someone signs Hill to be the man at 25 and 26 then you've got yourself a potential gold mine, but it's again something that needs to break right for him. I'm not sure the league is really that attuned to the fourth back in Baltimore. Who knows? Maybe he's coveted somewhere. His audition yesterday went swimmingly against a tough opponent. Rushed nicely, and should have had a score but for an offensive lineman.
And that's really what I've got.