Pipes
Footballguy
I'm surprised some of you still watch this hack of a show.Its not all of a sudden...
I'm surprised some of you still watch this hack of a show.Its not all of a sudden...
The seeds of doubt Sam, and to a certain extent Sansa, planted.Jon/Aegon - ever since we met him he has always been a reluctant leader. Seems a little out of character for him to not immediately tell Daenerys that he wanted no part of the iron throne or ruling the seven kingdoms. I get that he is just finding out who he really is - and a little bit about his parents - but still struck me as odd.
Jon Snow is the Jack Ryan of Game of Thrones. He doesn't want to be in charge, but it everybody else f***s it up, he will do his duty and lead even if it the last thing he wants to do.I was not a fan of the episode overall - but you had to have a show where you get all the pieces in place for the big battle.
General observations:
Daenerys seemed to be very demure this episode - that seemed out of character for her - even allowing for her shaky standing in the North. Sansa essentially proved to be much more aggressive, both in the great hall with Jamie (and also Theon coming in to say he was there for Sansa), but also in the private conversation with Daenerys. Daenerys has never been meek or played second fiddle to anyone - so it seemed out of place.
Jon/Aegon - ever since we met him he has always been a reluctant leader. Seems a little out of character for him to not immediately tell Daenerys that he wanted no part of the iron throne or ruling the seven kingdoms. I get that he is just finding out who he really is - and a little bit about his parents - but still struck me as odd.
Dany only ever solves problems by killing whoever is in her way. Seriously, think about it. She can't do that to Sansa or the North now so she's struggling. There is no one else being oppressed to free here either, which is her other move. Now she's in the position of being the potential oppressor of free people who chose their own leaders. She's been put in a situation where she has to negotiate on even footing with someone like Sansa and she's way out of her depth.Sansa essentially proved to be much more aggressive, both in the great hall with Jamie (and also Theon coming in to say he was there for Sansa), but also in the private conversation with Daenerys. Daenerys has never been meek or played second fiddle to anyone - so it seemed out of place.
She's specifically trying to win Sansa over for Jon's sake.I was not a fan of the episode overall - but you had to have a show where you get all the pieces in place for the big battle.
General observations:
Daenerys seemed to be very demure this episode - that seemed out of character for her - even allowing for her shaky standing in the North. Sansa essentially proved to be much more aggressive, both in the great hall with Jamie (and also Theon coming in to say he was there for Sansa), but also in the private conversation with Daenerys. Daenerys has never been meek or played second fiddle to anyone - so it seemed out of place.
Jon/Aegon - ever since we met him he has always been a reluctant leader. Seems a little out of character for him to not immediately tell Daenerys that he wanted no part of the iron throne or ruling the seven kingdoms. I get that he is just finding out who he really is - and a little bit about his parents - but still struck me as odd.
It wasn't the first question, but they did ask him if dragon fire would stop the NK and he responded "I don't know". I took that answer as he has no idea how to defeat the NKFirst question they should of asked.....how was the nk defeated before?I am not a fan of deus ex machina - but Bran's knowledge/power/character is severely under used.
Ep 1 - 9I'm surprised some of you still watch this hack of a show.
It is contrived when there is an undead dragon + undead army + mythical monsters looking to destroy the realms of men - before dawn.The tension between Sansa and Dany is contrived? Huh? That scene fit their respective characters/interests perfectly.
You are bad at thisMy predictions:
Tyrion* + Sansa wed and restart the Lannisters.
He was always nice to her, I don't see her dying after all the #### she went through, and I'm at a bit of a loss as to who else to pair her with other than Theon (and I agree with the majority opinion that Theon dies guarding Bran).You are bad at this
I didn't make any argument about if I thought their behavior was wise. I said it was true to their characters and motivations. Which means it isn't contrived.It is contrived when there is an undead dragon + undead army + mythical monsters looking to destroy the realms of men - before dawn.
It is contrived when it was Jon's call - as King in the North. Period.
It is contrived when Stark ancestors already bent the knee to Targs with dragons.
It is contrived when the Starks need the Targs far more than the Targs need the Starks.
Really, it is like having a scene of people arguing about the contents of a will when the nuke is already launched and is about to drop on their heads and one of the people have a key to a underground bunker with supplies. You really think, it is wise to burn the bridge/antagonize the one person who could save you over the contents of a will?
You could be on to something. No NK nor ice dragon in final scene. Not in E3 preview. Is Winterfell a big feint and NK is really targeting Cersei/Gold Company, creating an undead gold army 20k strong while the North is being weakened?noticed NK wasn't there on the last scene of the episode. noticed NK nor the dead dragon was shown in any of the previews for next week. NK has a specific target, a lot was said in last night's episode that implied the target would be Bran. But is it though? I refuse to believe this is all of a sudden lazy writing for such an epic show.
How is Sansa any different? Did she negotiate with Littlefinger or the Boltons - or just kill them? Was she able to work out something with the Tyrells or Lannisters - or just get used?Dany only ever solves problems by killing whoever is in her way. Seriously, think about it. She can't do that to Sansa or the North now so she's struggling. There is no one else being oppressed to free here either, which is her other move. Now she's in the position of being the potential oppressor of free people who chose their own leaders. She's been put in a situation where she has to negotiate on even footing with someone like Sansa and she's way out of her depth.
Please, trust me on this, I probably know more about this series than anyone on this board. You really trying to argue that last season's Sansa/Arya tension resolved magically with the execution of Littlefinger wasn't contrived? This Dany/Sansa tension is no different.I didn't make any argument about if I thought their behavior was wise. I said it was true to their characters and motivations. Which means it isn't contrived.
I think you don't have a deep enough understanding of the characters and story here if you think it's out of character for them to squabble over power among themselves while the undead descend. That's practically a perfect microcosm of the entire show's commentary on humanity.
That was different. That was essentially an editing/story-telling decision used on the viewer so that when Arya walked into that trial, it was supposed to be a twist that Littlefinger was actually going down. I do agree that even in the midst of the scenes where we were being told they were at odds, it felt a bit contrived. I wouldn't argue you on that, I didn't really like that storytelling decision and thought they could have come up with a better way to show Sansa using what she learned to outsmart Littlefinger, which was a huge character moment for her.Please, trust me on this, I probably know more about this series than anyone on this board. You really trying to argue that last season's Sansa/Arya tension resolved magically with the execution of Littlefinger wasn't contrived? This Dany/Sansa tension is no different.
Please, trust me on this, I probably know more about this series than anyone on this board.
Didn’t you quote Grand Maester Munkun in your valedictorian speech? Or was it Yoda?Please, trust me on this, I probably know more about this series than anyone on this board. You really trying to argue that last season's Sansa/Arya tension resolved magically with the execution of Littlefinger wasn't contrived? This Dany/Sansa tension is no different.
He’s probably correct. Sn0mmis is not prone to shtick nor braggadocio.
I do not doubt that he knows a stupid amount about the show. I still choose to laugh at his statement thoughHe’s probably correct. Sn0mmis is not prone to shtick nor braggadocio.
No, if Sansa was as clever or as smart as Arya claimed, there wouldn't be this tension. Even if Sansa is planning on going to war with Dany if they all make it out alive - there is *no* reason to make Dany think that. None. There is *no* reason to be antagonistic toward Dany or make Dany suspicious of her motives. I mean, we are led to believe that Sansa can hide her intentions from Littlefinger (who is probably the cleverest player in both the books and show), but can't swallow her pride, lust for power, autonomy, [insert whatever motivation you want here], when the savior of The North - and possibly the world - rides in on two freaking dragons and the largest, most skilled armies on the planet? She can't even fool people like Cersei just did?That was different. That was essentially an editing/story-telling decision used on the viewer so that when Arya walked into that trial, it was supposed to be a twist that Littlefinger was actually going down. I do agree that even in the midst of the scenes where we were being told they were at odds, it felt a bit contrived. I wouldn't argue you on that, I didn't really like that storytelling decision and thought they could have come up with a better way to show Sansa using what she learned to outsmart Littlefinger, which was a huge character moment for her.
That's nothing like what's going on between Dany/Sansa right now, who are not related and have plenty of things to be at odds about considering the different motivations they have and factions they represent. There's nothing contrived about the disagreement they have, despite the WW beating the doors down. Again, that's the type of commentary on human nature this show is all about.
Nobody really believed Arya or Sansa would turn on and kill the other, which is what made it contrived, even if it had an entertaining ending.
I don't see anything out of character about what's going on between Dany and Sansa, and in fact thought it was one of the best scenes in the episode.
Heh... Yoda. Unfortunately, the concept of Grand Maesters was only rolling around in GRRM's head at that time.Didn’t you quote Grand Maester Munkun in your valedictorian speech? Or was it Yoda?
Along those lines what was the need for Jon to tell Dani when he did. They knew the dead where going to be there by morning. Seems like he could waited until after the battle.No, if Sansa was as clever or as smart as Arya claimed, there wouldn't be this tension. Even if Sansa is planning on going to war with Dany if they all make it out alive - there is *no* reason to make Dany think that. None. There is *no* reason to be antagonistic toward Dany or make Dany suspicious of her motives. I mean, we are led to believe that Sansa can hide her intentions from Littlefinger (who is probably the cleverest player in both the books and show), but can't swallow her pride, lust for power, autonomy, [insert whatever motivation you want here], when the savior of The North - and possibly the world - rides in on two freaking dragons and the largest, most skilled armies on the planet? She can't even fool people like Cersei just did?
The options are either:
A) Sansa is still pretty naive regarding the ways of the world and can't control her emotions.
OR
B) The tension is contrived.
Based on what we have been being fed for several seasons the answer has to be B.
I just think you're looking at this entirely wrong. But we each have the right to our own opinions about it.No, if Sansa was as clever or as smart as Arya claimed, there wouldn't be this tension. Even if Sansa is planning on going to war with Dany if they all make it out alive - there is *no* reason to make Dany think that. None. There is *no* reason to be antagonistic toward Dany or make Dany suspicious of her motives. I mean, we are led to believe that Sansa can hide her intentions from Littlefinger (who is probably the cleverest player in both the books and show), but can't swallow her pride, lust for power, autonomy, [insert whatever motivation you want here], when the savior of The North - and possibly the world - rides in on two freaking dragons and the largest, most skilled armies on the planet? She can't even fool people like Cersei just did?
The options are either:
A) Sansa is still pretty naive regarding the ways of the world and can't control her emotions.
OR
B) The tension is contrived.
Based on what we have been being fed for several seasons the answer has to be B.
Exactly. So now Dany thinks/knows Sansa doesn't want her as her queen and Jon - someone close to Sansa - has a better birthright claim. Why would this be good to let Dany know? It makes no sense.Along those lines what was the need for Jon to tell Dani when he did. They knew the dead where going to be there by morning. Seems like he could waited until after the battle.
It's Jon's dumb Ned Stark honesty rearing it's head. Dany found him thinking things over in front of Lyanna's crypt. He wasn't going to lie. And she's the person who probably deserves to know most.Along those lines what was the need for Jon to tell Dani when he did. They knew the dead where going to be there by morning. Seems like he could waited until after the battle.
I lean the opposite. You've built this conflict between them. It only pays off if they both survive this battle, unless you find a way to make it rear its head during the battle. I'm not sure how that happens. So I think they both make it through the war against the dead, but I still think at least one of them dies before it's over.They aren't going to spend any time with any REAL drama between Dany and Jon. One of them has to go.....probably this episode. I think the idea of Jon being told that he's the rightful King and NOT immediately disavowing it/ignoring it only works if that is used as meand to get Jon to head South, upon Dany dying, after this battle.
I believe him.Please trust me on this, I have never seen a woman’s vagina
Foos alias?Please trust me on this, I have never seen a woman’s vagina
Bran kills the Night King with a Breaking Bad style wheelchair bomb made of wildfire. The Night King dies, cut to Emilia Clarke giving an apology for her acting, cut to acting troupe fake Sansa stripping on stage with Bronn, Jamie, Tyrion, and Davos musing below for 40 minutes.Really aren't we looking at only two possible outcomes here?
What would be the third most plausible outcome?
- NK dead at end of Ep3. This army turns and marches to KL. Gets a little awkward if Jon/Dany both survive NK battle.
- NK alive at end of Ep3. Certain surviving characters flee, regroup further south. Assumption is Bran would be among these, but remainder is TBD.
Yeah, Jon pretty much has to be the one to kill the NK, doesn't he?Foosball God said:She takes out the dragon I think. Similar to the way the NK javelin'd it. They telegraphed it when she was throwing the dragonglass knives
Unless you can convince Dany that she should be queen of a number of kingdoms less than seven - it makes no sense. Sansa doesn't have *any* bargaining power other than stubbornness and *perhaps* Dany's feelings for Jon. I suppose you could argue that a younger Dany would give up those dreams for a man (as she kind of did with Drogo until the poisoning attempt) but this Dany? No way. She was more than willing to cut Daario loose for political gain.I just think you're looking at this entirely wrong. But we each have the right to our own opinions about it.
I don't think it's about going to war with Dany and her massive army at all. That obviously isn't a winning strategy. It's about playing her well enough now, while they need each other and CAN'T fight, that she secures the North's freedom. Using Jon's relationship with her to work towards that goal is just icing on the cake. But she's laying the foundation for a bigger conversation later.
Sansa slow-played it. She knew what was going on with Jon and Dany. She was cold enough and assertive enough towards Dany that when the Mother of Dragons finally approached her, it wasn't from a position of power, like she's used to--it was in an almost intimate way, to make things right for Jon, from Dany's point of view. Sansa bonded with her to a point, let it go well enough, and then dropped the bomb she has wanted to since Dany got to Winterfell--what's the plan for the North? The North isn't going to kneel like everyone else, start to come to terms with it. Do you really want to test where Jon's allegiance's lie? Lord Royce's deference to Sansa over Dany, and then Theon's obvious loyalty to Sansa over Dany, just further hammered home that things were more complicated than simply taking the Iron Throne.
It's not a threat, she wasn't warning her that if they all survived, the North would go to war. It wasn't a strategic blunder. It was a chess move imo.
And yes, all of that went down with White Walkers breathing down their necks. That's not out of character, dumb, or contrived imo. It's what this show has always been all about.
Sorry for your loss. Perhaps you should get out more.Please trust me on this, I have never seen a woman’s vagina
NK kills off Cersei, maybe King's Landing entirely. Heads North with his newly converted golden army of undead in a classic pincer move.Really aren't we looking at only two possible outcomes here?
What would be the third most plausible outcome?
- NK dead at end of Ep3. This army turns and marches to KL. Gets a little awkward if Jon/Dany both survive NK battle.
- NK alive at end of Ep3. Certain surviving characters flee, regroup further south. Assumption is Bran would be among these, but remainder is TBD.
True. I don't think culd's answer revealed much of anything anyway. It was his opinion. IMO, there will almost certainly be another fairly large battle after Winterfell. But that doesn't mean it has to be a huge 45-minute tracking shot production that took them months to film. They've done other battles with less in the past and they came out just fine, IMO.No a lot of us actually don’t know this
Don't be ridiculous. It's clearly just lazy writing.Foosball God said:Noone talked about their dragons either. I think it is safe to say we didn't get the whole battle plan on screen.
I see a lot of where you're coming from, even if I disagree with the way you see it.Unless you can convince Dany that she should be queen of a number of kingdoms less than seven - it makes no sense. Sansa doesn't have *any* bargaining power other than stubbornness and *perhaps* Dany's feelings for Jon. I suppose you could argue that a younger Dany would give up those dreams for a man (as she kind of did with Drogo until the poisoning attempt) but this Dany? No way. She was more than willing to cut Daario loose for political gain.
Also, no one else is just kneeling to Dany. Who did? Not the south - she burned them. Not Essos - she conquered them too. Dany doesn't have a problem with conquering those that won't kneel (and it isn't like this is uncommon in this world). Sansa has one out - Jon. *Maybe* that works if Rhaegal's loyalty lies with Jon, *and* Drogon dies, *and* Jon goes back on his word to Dany (not likely), *and* Jon's King in the North title is trumped by the title Lady of Winterfell (it shouldn't). Sansa stating The North won't kneel is effectively being a traitor to one or both of Jon/Dany depending on how you want to rate their titles.
However, if you want to bet on some runner, runner scenario, it still makes zero sense to antagonize Dany. Sansa is not in any position of power now but *might* be depending on how the battle plays out.
cant tell if seriousDon't be ridiculous. It's clearly just lazy writing.
Also, did you notice how the snow was shoveled in Winterfell? They didn't even show a single shovel, not even just leaning against a wall. Very sloppy.
Jon's always been the reluctant leader....not a person even remotely interested in grabbing power. Power has always been thrust on him. To that, him finding out his lineage was one more "power thrust upon him" moment. Granted, he just told her aout itlast episode and then was immediately interrrupted...so I guess they could open this episode with him abdicating his claim/......but I kind of thought when Sam told him in the prior episode; a more true to form Jon would have told Sam rght away to keep it on the down low because he has no interest in jumping over Dany.I lean the opposite. You've built this conflict between them. It only pays off if they both survive this battle, unless you find a way to make it rear its head during the battle. I'm not sure how that happens. So I think they both make it through the war against the dead, but I still think at least one of them dies before it's over.
NEVER GO IN AGAINST THE NIGHT KING...WHEN DEATH IS ON THE LINE!...NK kills off Cersei, maybe King's Landing entirely. Heads North with his newly converted golden army of undead in a classic pincer move.