What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

The Devy Draft thread (1 Viewer)

Here's the devy draft we've just done in our start-up for you guys to pick over, some things to know, it's only 2015/16 eligible so no high schoolers. It's a contract/salary cap league so picks come with prices but they don't start ticking 'til they hit your roster.

It's also a Superflex and Tiered PPR league; 4 pts per pass TD, no penalty for ints, PPR Tiers: 0.5 for RB, 1 for WR, 1.5 for TE

Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 1 RB/WR/TE Flex, No DEF, No K

Contract prices:

1.01 - $40

1.02/3 - $30

1.04 - 6 - $20
1.07 - 9 - $15
1.10 - 12 - $10

2.01 - 2.06 - $8

2.07 - 2.12 - $6

Salary cap is $1000

Automatic 3 year deals, that can be extended.

Draft went as follows, my team is Jon's Team as I haven't decided on a name yet, would to hear thoughts in general and on my picks =)

Round 1
1 - The Replacements - Jameis Winston QB
2 - Big Sticks - Todd Gurley RB
3 - Big Deuce - Melvin Gordon RB
4 - Stogie - Dorial Green-Beckham WR
5 - Cow Tippers - Laquon Treadwell WR
6 - Plumbers - Stefon Diggs WR
7 - Plumbers via Rusty's Runners - Amari Cooper WR
8 - Jon's Team - Marcus Mariota QB
9 - Brady Bunch - Karlos Williams RB
10 - Call Me Chief - Mike Davis RB
11 - Evil Field Mice - Brett hundley QB
12 - Aces and Eights - Thomas Tyner RB

Round 2
1 - Evil Field Mice via Aces and Eights - Christian Hackenberg QB
2 - Evil Field Mice - Jaelan Strong WR
3 - Plumbers via Call me Chief - Marquez North WR
4 - Brady Bunch - Shock Linwood RB
5 - Jon's Team - Derrick Henry RB
6 - Rusty's Runners - TJ Yeldon RB
7 - Plumbers - Tyler Boyd WR
8 - Cow Tippers - Alex Collins RB
9 - Brady Bunch via Stogie - Bryce Petty QB
10 - Big Deuce - Cory Clement RB
11 - Big Sticks - Jay Ajayi RB
12 - The Replacements - OJ Howard TE

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought you don't like small WRs?
I've had Harvin, Holmes, Cobb, Cruz, Lee, and many other sub 6'0" guys on my teams over the years.

All else being equal, I would much rather have a 6'3" WR than a 5'11" one, but all else isn't always equal.

Noil is one of those guys who just fell out of the crib destined to play in the NFL. Just needs to stay healthy and stay out of trouble.

 
What does everyone think of Cory Clement? Ended up taking him 13th in our devy draft.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What does everyone think of Cory Clement? Ended up taking him 13th in our devy draft.
As a homer, he sure looks like a bona fide stud, but the vast majority of his touches were of the garbage variety.

He will most likely be the 1B to Gordon this year (as Gordon was to White last year), so he'll have big time opportunity going forward to show what he has.

I'd love to hear some outsider perspective.

 
EBF said:
Xue said:
I thought you don't like small WRs?
I've had Harvin, Holmes, Cobb, Cruz, Lee, and many other sub 6'0" guys on my teams over the years.

All else being equal, I would much rather have a 6'3" WR than a 5'11" one, but all else isn't always equal.

Noil is one of those guys who just fell out of the crib destined to play in the NFL. Just needs to stay healthy and stay out of trouble.
Some are more equal than others ;)

 
JonB86 said:
Here's the devy draft we've just done in our start-up for you guys to pick over, some things to know, it's only 2015/16 eligible so no high schoolers. It's a contract/salary cap league so picks come with prices but they don't start ticking 'til they hit your roster.

It's also a Superflex and Tiered PPR league; 4 pts per pass TD, no penalty for ints, PPR Tiers: 0.5 for RB, 1 for WR, 1.5 for TE

Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 1 RB/WR/TE Flex, No DEF, No K

Contract prices:

1.01 - $40

1.02/3 - $30

1.04 - 6 - $20

1.07 - 9 - $15

1.10 - 12 - $10

2.01 - 2.06 - $8

2.07 - 2.12 - $6

Salary cap is $1000

Automatic 3 year deals, that can be extended.

Draft went as follows, my team is Jon's Team as I haven't decided on a name yet, would to hear thoughts in general and on my picks =)

Round 1

1 - The Replacements - Jameis Winston QB

2 - Big Sticks - Todd Gurley RB

3 - Big Deuce - Melvin Gordon RB

4 - Stogie - Dorial Green-Beckham WR

5 - Cow Tippers - Laquon Treadwell WR

6 - Plumbers - Stefon Diggs WR

7 - Plumbers via Rusty's Runners - Amari Cooper WR

8 - Jon's Team - Marcus Mariota QB

9 - Brady Bunch - Karlos Williams RB

10 - Call Me Chief - Mike Davis RB

11 - Evil Field Mice - Brett hundley QB

12 - Aces and Eights - Thomas Tyner RB

Round 2

1 - Evil Field Mice via Aces and Eights - Christian Hackenberg QB

2 - Evil Field Mice - Jaelan Strong WR

3 - Plumbers via Call me Chief - Marquez North WR

4 - Brady Bunch - Shock Linwood RB

5 - Jon's Team - Derrick Henry RB

6 - Rusty's Runners - TJ Yeldon RB

7 - Plumbers - Tyler Boyd WR

8 - Cow Tippers - Alex Collins RB

9 - Brady Bunch via Stogie - Bryce Petty QB

10 - Big Deuce - Cory Clement RB

11 - Big Sticks - Jay Ajayi RB

12 - The Replacements - OJ Howard TE
How could Winston go early 1st, let alone 1.01 in a league where you only start 1 QB? That makes no sense at all.

 
JonB86 said:
Here's the devy draft we've just done in our start-up for you guys to pick over, some things to know, it's only 2015/16 eligible so no high schoolers. It's a contract/salary cap league so picks come with prices but they don't start ticking 'til they hit your roster.

It's also a Superflex and Tiered PPR league; 4 pts per pass TD, no penalty for ints, PPR Tiers: 0.5 for RB, 1 for WR, 1.5 for TE

Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 1 RB/WR/TE Flex, No DEF, No K

Contract prices:

1.01 - $40

1.02/3 - $30

1.04 - 6 - $20

1.07 - 9 - $15

1.10 - 12 - $10

2.01 - 2.06 - $8

2.07 - 2.12 - $6

Salary cap is $1000

Automatic 3 year deals, that can be extended.

Draft went as follows, my team is Jon's Team as I haven't decided on a name yet, would to hear thoughts in general and on my picks =)

Round 1

1 - The Replacements - Jameis Winston QB

2 - Big Sticks - Todd Gurley RB

3 - Big Deuce - Melvin Gordon RB

4 - Stogie - Dorial Green-Beckham WR

5 - Cow Tippers - Laquon Treadwell WR

6 - Plumbers - Stefon Diggs WR

7 - Plumbers via Rusty's Runners - Amari Cooper WR

8 - Jon's Team - Marcus Mariota QB

9 - Brady Bunch - Karlos Williams RB

10 - Call Me Chief - Mike Davis RB

11 - Evil Field Mice - Brett hundley QB

12 - Aces and Eights - Thomas Tyner RB

Round 2

1 - Evil Field Mice via Aces and Eights - Christian Hackenberg QB

2 - Evil Field Mice - Jaelan Strong WR

3 - Plumbers via Call me Chief - Marquez North WR

4 - Brady Bunch - Shock Linwood RB

5 - Jon's Team - Derrick Henry RB

6 - Rusty's Runners - TJ Yeldon RB

7 - Plumbers - Tyler Boyd WR

8 - Cow Tippers - Alex Collins RB

9 - Brady Bunch via Stogie - Bryce Petty QB

10 - Big Deuce - Cory Clement RB

11 - Big Sticks - Jay Ajayi RB

12 - The Replacements - OJ Howard TE
How could Winston go early 1st, let alone 1.01 in a league where you only start 1 QB? That makes no sense at all.
Superflex= Any position including QB.

 
JonB86 said:
Here's the devy draft we've just done in our start-up for you guys to pick over, some things to know, it's only 2015/16 eligible so no high schoolers. It's a contract/salary cap league so picks come with prices but they don't start ticking 'til they hit your roster.

It's also a Superflex and Tiered PPR league; 4 pts per pass TD, no penalty for ints, PPR Tiers: 0.5 for RB, 1 for WR, 1.5 for TE

Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 1 RB/WR/TE Flex, No DEF, No K

Contract prices:

1.01 - $40

1.02/3 - $30

1.04 - 6 - $20

1.07 - 9 - $15

1.10 - 12 - $10

2.01 - 2.06 - $8

2.07 - 2.12 - $6

Salary cap is $1000

Automatic 3 year deals, that can be extended.

Draft went as follows, my team is Jon's Team as I haven't decided on a name yet, would to hear thoughts in general and on my picks =)

Round 1

1 - The Replacements - Jameis Winston QB

2 - Big Sticks - Todd Gurley RB

3 - Big Deuce - Melvin Gordon RB

4 - Stogie - Dorial Green-Beckham WR

5 - Cow Tippers - Laquon Treadwell WR

6 - Plumbers - Stefon Diggs WR

7 - Plumbers via Rusty's Runners - Amari Cooper WR

8 - Jon's Team - Marcus Mariota QB

9 - Brady Bunch - Karlos Williams RB

10 - Call Me Chief - Mike Davis RB

11 - Evil Field Mice - Brett hundley QB

12 - Aces and Eights - Thomas Tyner RB

Round 2

1 - Evil Field Mice via Aces and Eights - Christian Hackenberg QB

2 - Evil Field Mice - Jaelan Strong WR

3 - Plumbers via Call me Chief - Marquez North WR

4 - Brady Bunch - Shock Linwood RB

5 - Jon's Team - Derrick Henry RB

6 - Rusty's Runners - TJ Yeldon RB

7 - Plumbers - Tyler Boyd WR

8 - Cow Tippers - Alex Collins RB

9 - Brady Bunch via Stogie - Bryce Petty QB

10 - Big Deuce - Cory Clement RB

11 - Big Sticks - Jay Ajayi RB

12 - The Replacements - OJ Howard TE
How could Winston go early 1st, let alone 1.01 in a league where you only start 1 QB? That makes no sense at all.
Superflex= Any position including QB.
Not according to his post. 1 Superflex, 1 RB/WR/TE Flex

 
JonB86 said:
Here's the devy draft we've just done in our start-up for you guys to pick over, some things to know, it's only 2015/16 eligible so no high schoolers. It's a contract/salary cap league so picks come with prices but they don't start ticking 'til they hit your roster.

It's also a Superflex and Tiered PPR league; 4 pts per pass TD, no penalty for ints, PPR Tiers: 0.5 for RB, 1 for WR, 1.5 for TE

Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 1 RB/WR/TE Flex, No DEF, No K

Contract prices:

1.01 - $40

1.02/3 - $30

1.04 - 6 - $20

1.07 - 9 - $15

1.10 - 12 - $10

2.01 - 2.06 - $8

2.07 - 2.12 - $6

Salary cap is $1000

Automatic 3 year deals, that can be extended.

Draft went as follows, my team is Jon's Team as I haven't decided on a name yet, would to hear thoughts in general and on my picks =)

Round 1

1 - The Replacements - Jameis Winston QB

2 - Big Sticks - Todd Gurley RB

3 - Big Deuce - Melvin Gordon RB

4 - Stogie - Dorial Green-Beckham WR

5 - Cow Tippers - Laquon Treadwell WR

6 - Plumbers - Stefon Diggs WR

7 - Plumbers via Rusty's Runners - Amari Cooper WR

8 - Jon's Team - Marcus Mariota QB

9 - Brady Bunch - Karlos Williams RB

10 - Call Me Chief - Mike Davis RB

11 - Evil Field Mice - Brett hundley QB

12 - Aces and Eights - Thomas Tyner RB

Round 2

1 - Evil Field Mice via Aces and Eights - Christian Hackenberg QB

2 - Evil Field Mice - Jaelan Strong WR

3 - Plumbers via Call me Chief - Marquez North WR

4 - Brady Bunch - Shock Linwood RB

5 - Jon's Team - Derrick Henry RB

6 - Rusty's Runners - TJ Yeldon RB

7 - Plumbers - Tyler Boyd WR

8 - Cow Tippers - Alex Collins RB

9 - Brady Bunch via Stogie - Bryce Petty QB

10 - Big Deuce - Cory Clement RB

11 - Big Sticks - Jay Ajayi RB

12 - The Replacements - OJ Howard TE
hope this auction devy works out better than last years that folded quickly...

 
JonB86 said:
Here's the devy draft we've just done in our start-up for you guys to pick over, some things to know, it's only 2015/16 eligible so no high schoolers. It's a contract/salary cap league so picks come with prices but they don't start ticking 'til they hit your roster.

It's also a Superflex and Tiered PPR league; 4 pts per pass TD, no penalty for ints, PPR Tiers: 0.5 for RB, 1 for WR, 1.5 for TE

Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 1 RB/WR/TE Flex, No DEF, No K

Contract prices:

1.01 - $40

1.02/3 - $30

1.04 - 6 - $20

1.07 - 9 - $15

1.10 - 12 - $10

2.01 - 2.06 - $8

2.07 - 2.12 - $6

Salary cap is $1000

Automatic 3 year deals, that can be extended.

Draft went as follows, my team is Jon's Team as I haven't decided on a name yet, would to hear thoughts in general and on my picks =)

Round 1

1 - The Replacements - Jameis Winston QB

2 - Big Sticks - Todd Gurley RB

3 - Big Deuce - Melvin Gordon RB

4 - Stogie - Dorial Green-Beckham WR

5 - Cow Tippers - Laquon Treadwell WR

6 - Plumbers - Stefon Diggs WR

7 - Plumbers via Rusty's Runners - Amari Cooper WR

8 - Jon's Team - Marcus Mariota QB

9 - Brady Bunch - Karlos Williams RB

10 - Call Me Chief - Mike Davis RB

11 - Evil Field Mice - Brett hundley QB

12 - Aces and Eights - Thomas Tyner RB

Round 2

1 - Evil Field Mice via Aces and Eights - Christian Hackenberg QB

2 - Evil Field Mice - Jaelan Strong WR

3 - Plumbers via Call me Chief - Marquez North WR

4 - Brady Bunch - Shock Linwood RB

5 - Jon's Team - Derrick Henry RB

6 - Rusty's Runners - TJ Yeldon RB

7 - Plumbers - Tyler Boyd WR

8 - Cow Tippers - Alex Collins RB

9 - Brady Bunch via Stogie - Bryce Petty QB

10 - Big Deuce - Cory Clement RB

11 - Big Sticks - Jay Ajayi RB

12 - The Replacements - OJ Howard TE
How could Winston go early 1st, let alone 1.01 in a league where you only start 1 QB? That makes no sense at all.
Superflex= Any position including QB.
Not according to his post. 1 Superflex, 1 RB/WR/TE Flex
It's 1 super flex and 1 "normal" flex.

 
12 team Superflex 1.5TE ppr. Notes: Startup draft, so nobody already rostered. Restricted to 2015 eligible players. My picks in italics.

1.01 Gurley

1.02 Winston

1.03 Mariota

1.04 Hundley

1.05 Gordon

1.06 DGB

1.07 Davis

1.08 Cooper

1.09 Diggs

1.10 Funchess

1.11 Yeldon

1.12 Strong

2.01 Petty

2.02 Duke Johnson

2.03 Ajayi

2.04 Karlos Williams

2.05 Keith Marshall

2.06 Mannion

2.07 Byron Marshall

2.08 Hogan

2.09 Agholor

2.10 Drake

2.11 Nick O'Leary

2.12 Greenberry

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team Superflex 1.5TE ppr. Notes: Startup draft, so nobody already rostered. Restricted to 2015 eligible players. My picks in italics.

1.01 Gurley

1.02 Winston

1.03 Mariota

1.04 Hundley

1.05 Gordon

1.06 DGB

1.07 Davis

1.08 Cooper

1.09 Diggs

1.10 Funchess

1.11 Yeldon

1.12 Strong
I know Hundley's a QB and they are gold in Superflex but I bet that the guy at 1.04 is going to regret that in one's year time.

 
12 team Superflex 1.5TE ppr. Notes: Startup draft, so nobody already rostered. Restricted to 2015 eligible players. My picks in italics.

1.01 Gurley

1.02 Winston

1.03 Mariota

1.04 Hundley

1.05 Gordon

1.06 DGB

1.07 Davis

1.08 Cooper

1.09 Diggs

1.10 Funchess

1.11 Yeldon

1.12 Strong

2.01 Petty

2.02 Duke Johnson

2.03 Ajayi

2.04 Karlos Williams

2.05 Keith Marshall

2.06 Mannion

2.07 Byron Marshall

2.08 Hogan

2.09 Agholor

2.10 Drake

2.11 Nick O'Leary

2.12 Greenberry
I don't think Nick O'Leary is a special enough talent to be selected in a Devy.

 
A few surprising picks there. I don't think Hundley is worth such a high selection. Kevin Hogan is barely a good college QB. He was probably the #1 limiting variable on Stanford's offense this past season. OL was fine. RB was fine. WRs were fine. He was the weakness. He is a good runner and a wildly inconsistent passer. Basically a poor man's Jake Locker. I don't know where the talk of him as a good NFL prospect comes from. He should be a day 3 developmental guy barring some kind of massive improvement over the next 1-2 years.

I like Ty Montgomery more than Jaelen Strong and think he's probably the best returning upper class WR or RB in the PAC for next season. He might not have first round ability, but with his overall package of skills he's pretty likely to at least be a 2nd-3rd rounder. He's a rocked up 6'1" 215 with ~4.4 speed and a 40" vertical. One of the better kickoff returners in the country. Decent catch-and-run ability. Someone will draft him high to be their #2 WR and return man.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team Superflex 1.5TE ppr. Notes: Startup draft, so nobody already rostered. Restricted to 2015 eligible players. My picks in italics.

1.01 Gurley

1.02 Winston

1.03 Mariota

1.04 Hundley

1.05 Gordon

1.06 DGB

1.07 Davis

1.08 Cooper

1.09 Diggs

1.10 Funchess

1.11 Yeldon

1.12 Strong
I know Hundley's a QB and they are gold in Superflex but I bet that the guy at 1.04 is going to regret that in one's year time.
As the owner of 1.03, I was pretty glad to see Gurley go before I picked, because I wouldn't have wanted the decision of him vs Hundley/Mariota. I think Hundley is easily a top 5 pick in Superflex/2qb formats.

12 team Superflex 1.5TE ppr. Notes: Startup draft, so nobody already rostered. Restricted to 2015 eligible players. My picks in italics.

1.01 Gurley

1.02 Winston

1.03 Mariota

1.04 Hundley

1.05 Gordon

1.06 DGB

1.07 Davis

1.08 Cooper

1.09 Diggs

1.10 Funchess

1.11 Yeldon

1.12 Strong

2.01 Petty

2.02 Duke Johnson

2.03 Ajayi

2.04 Karlos Williams

2.05 Keith Marshall

2.06 Mannion

2.07 Byron Marshall

2.08 Hogan

2.09 Agholor

2.10 Drake

2.11 Nick O'Leary

2.12 Greenberry
I don't think Nick O'Leary is a special enough talent to be selected in a Devy.
Agreed, I think the owner had set himself on wanting to take advantage of TE scoring and just looked at rankings and went with the highest ranked TE he could find.

A few surprising picks there. I don't think Hundley is worth such a high selection. Kevin Hogan is barely a good college QB. He was probably the #1 limiting variable on Stanford's offense this past season. OL was fine. RB was fine. WRs were fine. He was the weakness. He is a good runner and a wildly inconsistent passer. Basically a poor man's Jake Locker. I don't know where the talk of him as a good NFL prospect comes from. He should be a day 3 developmental guy barring some kind of massive improvement over the next 1-2 years.

I like Ty Montgomery more than Jaelen Strong and think he's probably the best returning upper class WR or RB in the PAC for next season. He might not have first round ability, but with his overall package of skills he's pretty likely to at least be a 2nd-3rd rounder. He's a rocked up 6'1" 215 with ~4.4 speed and a 40" vertical. One of the better kickoff returners in the country. Decent catch-and-run ability. Someone will draft him high to be their #2 WR and return man.
Good insight, as I didn't get to see Stanford much this year. I think the 2015 QB class appears pretty top-heavy at this moment, and I probably wouldn't have invested a pick in Hogan, Mannion, or Petty.

 
JonB86 said:
Here's the devy draft we've just done in our start-up for you guys to pick over, some things to know, it's only 2015/16 eligible so no high schoolers. It's a contract/salary cap league so picks come with prices but they don't start ticking 'til they hit your roster.

It's also a Superflex and Tiered PPR league; 4 pts per pass TD, no penalty for ints, PPR Tiers: 0.5 for RB, 1 for WR, 1.5 for TE

Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 1 RB/WR/TE Flex, No DEF, No K

Contract prices:

1.01 - $40

1.02/3 - $30

1.04 - 6 - $20

1.07 - 9 - $15

1.10 - 12 - $10

2.01 - 2.06 - $8

2.07 - 2.12 - $6

Salary cap is $1000

Automatic 3 year deals, that can be extended.

Draft went as follows, my team is Jon's Team as I haven't decided on a name yet, would to hear thoughts in general and on my picks =)

Round 1

1 - The Replacements - Jameis Winston QB

2 - Big Sticks - Todd Gurley RB

3 - Big Deuce - Melvin Gordon RB

4 - Stogie - Dorial Green-Beckham WR

5 - Cow Tippers - Laquon Treadwell WR

6 - Plumbers - Stefon Diggs WR

7 - Plumbers via Rusty's Runners - Amari Cooper WR

8 - Jon's Team - Marcus Mariota QB

9 - Brady Bunch - Karlos Williams RB

10 - Call Me Chief - Mike Davis RB

11 - Evil Field Mice - Brett hundley QB

12 - Aces and Eights - Thomas Tyner RB

Round 2

1 - Evil Field Mice via Aces and Eights - Christian Hackenberg QB

2 - Evil Field Mice - Jaelan Strong WR

3 - Plumbers via Call me Chief - Marquez North WR

4 - Brady Bunch - Shock Linwood RB

5 - Jon's Team - Derrick Henry RB

6 - Rusty's Runners - TJ Yeldon RB

7 - Plumbers - Tyler Boyd WR

8 - Cow Tippers - Alex Collins RB

9 - Brady Bunch via Stogie - Bryce Petty QB

10 - Big Deuce - Cory Clement RB

11 - Big Sticks - Jay Ajayi RB

12 - The Replacements - OJ Howard TE
How could Winston go early 1st, let alone 1.01 in a league where you only start 1 QB? That makes no sense at all.
Superflex= Any position including QB.
Not according to his post. 1 Superflex, 1 RB/WR/TE Flex
It's 1 super flex and 1 "normal" flex.
As posted here, it's 1 Superflex (QB/RB/WR/TE) and 1 Normal Flex (RB/WR/TE) which is why Winston went no.1 and why I was surprised Mariota dropped to me at 8!

 
JonB86 said:
Here's the devy draft we've just done in our start-up for you guys to pick over, some things to know, it's only 2015/16 eligible so no high schoolers. It's a contract/salary cap league so picks come with prices but they don't start ticking 'til they hit your roster.

It's also a Superflex and Tiered PPR league; 4 pts per pass TD, no penalty for ints, PPR Tiers: 0.5 for RB, 1 for WR, 1.5 for TE

Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 1 RB/WR/TE Flex, No DEF, No K

Contract prices:

1.01 - $40

1.02/3 - $30

1.04 - 6 - $20

1.07 - 9 - $15

1.10 - 12 - $10

2.01 - 2.06 - $8

2.07 - 2.12 - $6

Salary cap is $1000

Automatic 3 year deals, that can be extended.

Draft went as follows, my team is Jon's Team as I haven't decided on a name yet, would to hear thoughts in general and on my picks =)

Round 1

1 - The Replacements - Jameis Winston QB

2 - Big Sticks - Todd Gurley RB

3 - Big Deuce - Melvin Gordon RB

4 - Stogie - Dorial Green-Beckham WR

5 - Cow Tippers - Laquon Treadwell WR

6 - Plumbers - Stefon Diggs WR

7 - Plumbers via Rusty's Runners - Amari Cooper WR

8 - Jon's Team - Marcus Mariota QB

9 - Brady Bunch - Karlos Williams RB

10 - Call Me Chief - Mike Davis RB

11 - Evil Field Mice - Brett hundley QB

12 - Aces and Eights - Thomas Tyner RB

Round 2

1 - Evil Field Mice via Aces and Eights - Christian Hackenberg QB

2 - Evil Field Mice - Jaelan Strong WR

3 - Plumbers via Call me Chief - Marquez North WR

4 - Brady Bunch - Shock Linwood RB

5 - Jon's Team - Derrick Henry RB

6 - Rusty's Runners - TJ Yeldon RB

7 - Plumbers - Tyler Boyd WR

8 - Cow Tippers - Alex Collins RB

9 - Brady Bunch via Stogie - Bryce Petty QB

10 - Big Deuce - Cory Clement RB

11 - Big Sticks - Jay Ajayi RB

12 - The Replacements - OJ Howard TE
hope this auction devy works out better than last years that folded quickly...
Have we been in a league together last year? Distance Dynasty?

 
12 team Superflex 1.5TE ppr. Notes: Startup draft, so nobody already rostered. Restricted to 2015 eligible players. My picks in italics.

1.01 Gurley

1.02 Winston

1.03 Mariota

1.04 Hundley

1.05 Gordon

1.06 DGB

1.07 Davis

1.08 Cooper

1.09 Diggs

1.10 Funchess

1.11 Yeldon

1.12 Strong
I know Hundley's a QB and they are gold in Superflex but I bet that the guy at 1.04 is going to regret that in one's year time.
As the owner of 1.03, I was pretty glad to see Gurley go before I picked, because I wouldn't have wanted the decision of him vs Hundley/Mariota. I think Hundley is easily a top 5 pick in Superflex/2qb formats.
Yeah easy pick :cool:

 
Greg Russell said:
"Devy" as a word makes me cringe worse than "vacay". Everywhere else I've seen the word is shortened to "dev", no clue how it ended up getting a "y" added that isn't even in the word.
I can think of a lot more things to cringe about, such as when Obama was re-elected, or having to listen to some teenager or 20 something say the word "like" for every other word in a sentence.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Greg Russell said:
"Devy" as a word makes me cringe worse than "vacay". Everywhere else I've seen the word is shortened to "dev", no clue how it ended up getting a "y" added that isn't even in the word.
Chillax dude.

People shorten Dynasty to Dyno all the time.

 
Greg Russell said:
"Devy" as a word makes me cringe worse than "vacay". Everywhere else I've seen the word is shortened to "dev", no clue how it ended up getting a "y" added that isn't even in the word.
One of the guys who basically invented "Devy" leagues, at least in the mainstream, calls them Devy's. I've never seen just "dev", personally.

 
Greg Russell said:
"Devy" as a word makes me cringe worse than "vacay". Everywhere else I've seen the word is shortened to "dev", no clue how it ended up getting a "y" added that isn't even in the word.
Chillax dude.

People shorten Dynasty to Dyno all the time.
Well lookey here, the guy who invented Developmental Dynasty even calls it Devy Dyno: http://devydyno.com/

On a side note, if anyone wants me Devy rankings, send me a message.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No Dyer. Guppy league.
What? Dyer will be 24 by the time he is drafted. Someone can grab him in the diluted Rookie draft. If he was 21 or 22, someone would have surely taken a chance, me included.

 
I was half kidding, but it shows you that the next big thing is always more fashionable than the last big thing.

I think when you grab a guy in a typical devy draft your hope is that he eventually becomes an impact NFL player. There are a few hurdles to clear along the way. Generally only a fraction of players move from one step to the next on the following career ladder:

high school standout ---> college standout ---> coveted NFL prospect ---> productive NFL player

In general, it doesn't make sense to take a guy on a lower level of the ladder when you can take someone who has already cleared a lot of those earlier hurdles. In other words, it probably wouldn't make sense to trade Cordarrelle Patterson for Malachi Dupre because he's already on step 3-4 of the ladder whereas Dupre is just a step one guy. Likewise, Dyer has already proven himself to be a college standout so he's a step farther in his trajectory than guys like Dwayne Washington, Joe Mixon, and Barry Sanders who can basically only hope to become what Dyer already is.

That doesn't mean I would NEVER pick the less proven guy. I would do it (and have done it) in cases where I felt there was an obvious talent gap. For example, I'd take Nick Chubb ahead of Malcom Brown because even though he's less "proven," I just think he's a much better prospect. I don't see Dyer as a low-ceiling college overachiever though. He's a better pure talent than just about every RB picked in that draft, so it was a mistake to let him slide. You take a 24 year old Mike Dyer over an 18 year old Dalvin Cook for the same reason that you take a 29 year old Adrian Peterson over a 25 year old Mike Leshoure. He's simply a much better player and much more likely to make an impact for your FF team.

Interesting draft though. Lots of low-hanging fruit. I like where Chubb, Elliott, Noil, and Abdullah went. Very nice value.

I'm guessing it was superflex given how high the QBs went. Still wouldn't have spent a pick on Kevin Hogan. :X

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was half kidding, but it shows you that the next big thing is always more fashionable than the last big thing.

I think when you grab a guy in a typical devy draft your hope is that he eventually becomes an impact NFL player. There are a few hurdles to clear along the way. Generally only a fraction of players move from one step to the next on the following career ladder:

high school standout ---> college standout ---> coveted NFL prospect ---> productive NFL player

In general, it doesn't make sense to take a guy on a lower level of the ladder when you can take someone who has already cleared a lot of those earlier hurdles. In other words, it probably wouldn't make sense to trade Cordarrelle Patterson for Malachi Dupre because he's already on step 3-4 of the ladder whereas Dupre is just a step one guy. Likewise, Dyer has already proven himself to be a college standout so he's a step farther in his trajectory than guys like Dwayne Washington, Joe Mixon, and Barry Sanders who can basically only hope to become what Dyer already is.

That doesn't mean I would NEVER pick the less proven guy. I would do it (and have done it) in cases where I felt there was an obvious talent gap. For example, I'd take Nick Chubb ahead of Malcom Brown because even though he's less "proven," I just think he's a much better prospect. I don't see Dyer as a low-ceiling college overachiever though. He's a better pure talent than just about every RB picked in that draft, so it was a mistake to let him slide. You take a 24 year old Mike Dyer over an 18 year old Dalvin Cook for the same reason that you take a 29 year old Adrian Peterson over a 25 year old Mike Leshoure. He's simply a much better player and much more likely to make an impact for your FF team.

Interesting draft though. Lots of low-hanging fruit. I like where Chubb, Elliott, Noil, and Abdullah went. Very nice value.

I'm guessing it was superflex given how high the QBs went. Still wouldn't have spent a pick on Kevin Hogan. :X
No guessing necessary; 'superflex' was noted in the post.

 
EBF said:
I was half kidding, but it shows you that the next big thing is always more fashionable than the last big thing.

I think when you grab a guy in a typical devy draft your hope is that he eventually becomes an impact NFL player. There are a few hurdles to clear along the way. Generally only a fraction of players move from one step to the next on the following career ladder:

high school standout ---> college standout ---> coveted NFL prospect ---> productive NFL player

In general, it doesn't make sense to take a guy on a lower level of the ladder when you can take someone who has already cleared a lot of those earlier hurdles. In other words, it probably wouldn't make sense to trade Cordarrelle Patterson for Malachi Dupre because he's already on step 3-4 of the ladder whereas Dupre is just a step one guy. Likewise, Dyer has already proven himself to be a college standout so he's a step farther in his trajectory than guys like Dwayne Washington, Joe Mixon, and Barry Sanders who can basically only hope to become what Dyer already is.

That doesn't mean I would NEVER pick the less proven guy. I would do it (and have done it) in cases where I felt there was an obvious talent gap. For example, I'd take Nick Chubb ahead of Malcom Brown because even though he's less "proven," I just think he's a much better prospect. I don't see Dyer as a low-ceiling college overachiever though. He's a better pure talent than just about every RB picked in that draft, so it was a mistake to let him slide. You take a 24 year old Mike Dyer over an 18 year old Dalvin Cook for the same reason that you take a 29 year old Adrian Peterson over a 25 year old Mike Leshoure. He's simply a much better player and much more likely to make an impact for your FF team.

Interesting draft though. Lots of low-hanging fruit. I like where Chubb, Elliott, Noil, and Abdullah went. Very nice value.

I'm guessing it was superflex given how high the QBs went. Still wouldn't have spent a pick on Kevin Hogan. :X
Your analogies aren't even close. I won't even get into why. We know you love Dyer. He should have went the Bryce Brown route and just declare as a Junior even though he didn't even play that season. Would have entered the NFL at age 22. The older he is when he enters the NFL the less likely he'll amount to anything.

There's a reason he was a man amongst boys in high school and his Freshman season. He was already 18 in his Junior season of high school. He was already 20 in his Freshman season at Auburn. To put that into perspective, Todd Gurley will be 20 this season as a Junior!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your analogies aren't even close. I won't even get into why. We know you love Dyer. He should have went the Bryce Brown route and just declare as a Junior even though he didn't even play that season. Would have entered the NFL at age 22. The older he is when he enters the NFL the less likely he'll amount to anything.

There's a reason he was a man amongst boys in high school and his Freshman season. He was already 18 in his Junior season of high school. He was already 20 in his Freshman season at Auburn. To put that into perspective, Todd Gurley will be 20 this season as a Junior!
Talent is more important than age. Age is a tiebreaker among players of similar talent level. Not a justification for taking inferior players over a rare talent. Dyer is a top 4-5 RB talent in college football. Busch League to let him fall out of such a deep devy draft, but totally predictable. Right now he's the college football version of what Toby Gerhart was in the NFL a year ago. People have short memories and suddenly it's like he doesn't exist anymore.

 
Your analogies aren't even close. I won't even get into why. We know you love Dyer. He should have went the Bryce Brown route and just declare as a Junior even though he didn't even play that season. Would have entered the NFL at age 22. The older he is when he enters the NFL the less likely he'll amount to anything.

There's a reason he was a man amongst boys in high school and his Freshman season. He was already 18 in his Junior season of high school. He was already 20 in his Freshman season at Auburn. To put that into perspective, Todd Gurley will be 20 this season as a Junior!
Talent is more important than age. Age is a tiebreaker among players of similar talent level. Not a justification for taking inferior players over a rare talent. Dyer is a top 4-5 RB talent in college football. Busch League to let him fall out of such a deep devy draft, but totally predictable. Right now he's the college football version of what Toby Gerhart was in the NFL a year ago. People have short memories and suddenly it's like he doesn't exist anymore.
1) only you think dyer is a top college rb. I think he was very overrated and rode cam Newton's coattails his freshman season to 6 ypc. His sophomore year down to 5.2(.8 worse than yeldon's worst season).

2) gerhart hasn't done anything in 2014

3) dyer has been kicked off of 2 college teams and was a backup the last year to a nobody.

The real question is why are you still wasting a roster spot on him vs calling others bush league for not taking him

 
1) only you think dyer is a top college rb. I think he was very overrated and rode cam Newton's coattails his freshman season to 6 ypc. His sophomore year down to 5.2(.8 worse than yeldon's worst season).

2) gerhart hasn't done anything in 2014

3) dyer has been kicked off of 2 college teams and was a backup the last year to a nobody.

The real question is why are you still wasting a roster spot on him vs calling others bush league for not taking him
Most people had him rated as a first round prospect after his first two seasons at Auburn. It wasn't until his off-field issues came into play that his talent ever really came into question. I think if you look at what happened last year they were working him into the mix before he got injured and was shut down for the remainder of the year. I don't know exactly when he got dinged, but based on some of the articles I've read it sounds like he was struggling with the injury for a while.

http://blogs.courier-journal.com/ulbeat/2013/12/03/michael-dyer-to-see-a-specialist-for-injury/

Louisville running back Michael Dyer will see a specialist in Philadelphia on Monday to get an evaluation of a nagging groin and hip injury that’s limited him throughout the 2013 season.
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2013/12/16/5218334/michael-dyer-injury-louisville-russell-athletic-bowl

Dyer, who transferred to Louisville last summer, has been hampered for months by a nagging groin and hip injury.
So basically you have a guy with a 5 star high school reputation, two excellent seasons at Auburn, one season out of football, and one season essentially lost to integrating with the new team and getting injured. There are some concrete indicators of special talent in his past, but the spotty results over the past two seasons have caused people to forget all that. Hence the Gerhart comparison. Gerhart has a pretty intriguing background, but because he was basically out of the picture for several years he became a forgotten man. Contrary to what you said, he has done something already in 2014. His market value has increased exponentially based on him signing to Jacksonville and being the clear frontrunner to start.

There is definitely something to be said for having a long memory and a lot of patience when it comes to players like this. Talent doesn't disappear over night. More often than not when he's been on the field, Dyer has been an impact player. Even last season in limited duty with dubious health he was still productive running the ball. Then you look at the physical talent. Lots of people hyped up Isaiah Crowell this year and talked about him like a potential steal, but Crowell was never a guy who figured to kill the combine. Dyer is. He's listed at 5'9" 215, but looks bigger than that to me. Extremely bulky frame, both in the upper body and the lower body. For a player with his body type, he can run quite fast too. Some examples of that here, here, and here. He isn't an outright elusive back, but he's a guy who was basically born to play in the NFL. He fell out of the crib destined to be a RB on Sundays.

Looking down the checklist you have an elite pedigree (5 star prospect), excellent overall college production, and ideal physical tools for the NFL. I've been playing this game long enough to have learned a few tricks and sometimes you just see a situation where the community is whiffing on a player and opening the door for you to reap a big bounty just by making what's actually a pretty obvious play. You never know what can happen, but this certainly looks like one of those situations. This guy is free money at his nonexistent market value right now. Whether or not other people see it isn't really my concern. You can say, but...but...but I don't think he's good! That's your opinion. Everyone is entitled to his opinion, but ultimately being right is what matters, not having everyone else agree with you.

I keep bringing him up in every devy thread not to pump up his value (I don't think I've ever offered him in a trade to anybody and he's not really available), but more so to provide the opinion for others so they can think about it for themselves and consider whether or not he might be an overlooked guy. I think devy rankings that treat him like a nonentity have it wrong and are doing readers a disservice in that regard. I'm trying to fill the gap just a little bit by being the most vocal cheerleader out there.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your analogies aren't even close. I won't even get into why. We know you love Dyer. He should have went the Bryce Brown route and just declare as a Junior even though he didn't even play that season. Would have entered the NFL at age 22. The older he is when he enters the NFL the less likely he'll amount to anything.

There's a reason he was a man amongst boys in high school and his Freshman season. He was already 18 in his Junior season of high school. He was already 20 in his Freshman season at Auburn. To put that into perspective, Todd Gurley will be 20 this season as a Junior!
Talent is more important than age. Age is a tiebreaker among players of similar talent level. Not a justification for taking inferior players over a rare talent. Dyer is a top 4-5 RB talent in college football. Busch League to let him fall out of such a deep devy draft, but totally predictable. Right now he's the college football version of what Toby Gerhart was in the NFL a year ago. People have short memories and suddenly it's like he doesn't exist anymore.
Age is not a tiebreaker when said RB will be 24 as a Rookie. How many RBs who were 24 had a significant career? I'll take the guys who will eventually be 21-22 as Rookies who I think are as talented as or more talented than Dyer. In a draft this deep he should have been taken, but in a draft this deep there's also many other talented players worth being taken.

Again, your analogies aren't even close. Comparing an NFL RB situation to a college RB situation.

Also, in a league this deep, RBs in general aren't valued much unless you're a bellcow or project to be a bellcow (like Gurley). Dyer just isn't likely to amount to anything. He will likely be undrafted or be a Day 3 guys like Seastrunk. In which case, he can be grabbed in the Rookie draft for peanuts.

1) only you think dyer is a top college rb. I think he was very overrated and rode cam Newton's coattails his freshman season to 6 ypc. His sophomore year down to 5.2(.8 worse than yeldon's worst season).

2) gerhart hasn't done anything in 2014

3) dyer has been kicked off of 2 college teams and was a backup the last year to a nobody.

The real question is why are you still wasting a roster spot on him vs calling others bush league for not taking him
Most people had him rated as a first round prospect after his first two seasons at Auburn. It wasn't until his off-field issues came into play that his talent ever really came into question. I think if you look at what happened last year they were working him into the mix before he got injured and was shut down for the remainder of the year. I don't know exactly when he got dinged, but based on some of the articles I've read it sounds like he was struggling with the injury for a while.

http://blogs.courier-journal.com/ulbeat/2013/12/03/michael-dyer-to-see-a-specialist-for-injury/

Louisville running back Michael Dyer will see a specialist in Philadelphia on Monday to get an evaluation of a nagging groin and hip injury that’s limited him throughout the 2013 season.
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2013/12/16/5218334/michael-dyer-injury-louisville-russell-athletic-bowl

Dyer, who transferred to Louisville last summer, has been hampered for months by a nagging groin and hip injury.
So basically you have a guy with a 5 star high school reputation, two excellent seasons at Auburn, one season out of football, and one season essentially lost to integrating with the new team and getting injured. There are some concrete indicators of special talent in his past, but the spotty results over the past two seasons have caused people to forget all that. Hence the Gerhart comparison. Gerhart has a pretty intriguing background, but because he was basically out of the picture for several years he became a forgotten man. Contrary to what you said, he has done something already in 2014. His market value has increased exponentially based on him signing to Jacksonville and being the clear frontrunner to start.

There is definitely something to be said for having a long memory and a lot of patience when it comes to players like this. Talent doesn't disappear over night. More often than not when he's been on the field, Dyer has been an impact player. Even last season in limited duty with dubious health he was still productive running the ball. Then you look at the physical talent. Lots of people hyped up Isaiah Crowell this year and talked about him like a potential steal, but Crowell was never a guy who figured to kill the combine. Dyer is. He's listed at 5'9" 215, but looks bigger than that to me. Extremely bulky frame, both in the upper body and the lower body. For a player with his body type, he can run quite fast too. Some examples of that here, here, and here. He isn't an outright elusive back, but he's a guy who was basically born to play in the NFL. He fell out of the crib destined to be a RB on Sundays.

Looking down the checklist you have an elite pedigree (5 star prospect), excellent overall college production, and ideal physical tools for the NFL. I've been playing this game long enough to have learned a few tricks and sometimes you just see a situation where the community is whiffing on a player and opening the door for you to reap a big bounty just by making what's actually a pretty obvious play. You never know what can happen, but this certainly looks like one of those situations. This guy is free money at his nonexistent market value right now. Whether or not other people see it isn't really my concern. You can say, but...but...but I don't think he's good! That's your opinion. Everyone is entitled to his opinion, but ultimately being right is what matters, not having everyone else agree with you.

I keep bringing him up in every devy thread not to pump up his value (I don't think I've ever offered him in a trade to anybody and he's not really available), but more so to provide the opinion for others so they can think about it for themselves and consider whether or not he might be an overlooked guy. I think devy rankings that treat him like a nonentity have it wrong and are doing readers a disservice in that regard. I'm trying to fill the gap just a little bit by being the most vocal cheerleader out there.
Gerhart will have great value if you're contending, but he can easily get replaced next season. Not a good long-term investment.

Crowell didn't "kill" the Combine, but he did put up a 38" vertical at 224 lbs. He also looked great on tape and had very good Yards After Contact numbers according to ZWK. He will also only be 21 years old as a Rookie. Bryce Brown was 21 as a Rookie. Dyer will be 24. That's a largely significant gap.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Age is not a tiebreaker when said RB will be 24 as a Rookie. How many RBs who were 24 had a significant career? I'll take the guys who will eventually be 21-22 as Rookies who I think are as talented as or more talented than Dyer. In a draft this deep he should have been taken, but in a draft this deep there's also many other talented players worth being taken.
Like I said, it's about getting talented players. Not young players. Youth in the absence of talent has no value.

Ultimately, I just hold his ability in higher regard than you do. I think he's the type of guy who will be hard to keep off the field even in the NFL. There are only a couple of those per draft. Those are the guys you want on your FF team. You take them wherever you can find them, even if there's some "stuff" keeping their value down. If not for the 24 thing and the off-field stuff, Dyer would be a top 5 pick in all these leagues (well actually he'd be an NFL starter by now, but you get the point). You're talking about a 120 player dev pool. There might have been 10-15 guys taken who have comparable raw ability.

And yes, Gerhart is a pretty good analogy. The same underlying phenomenon caused both players to become undervalued. Too much emphasis on what happened yesterday. Not enough weight given to the player's talent independent of recent events. I was happy to capitalize on that by scooping Gerhart in several of my leagues and I'm happy to own Dyer in all of my devy leagues. Big time steal when all the devy lemmings are taking high school kids and college underclassmen who can only aspire to become the type of player he has already proven himself to be.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
1) only you think dyer is a top college rb. I think he was very overrated and rode cam Newton's coattails his freshman season to 6 ypc. His sophomore year down to 5.2(.8 worse than yeldon's worst season).

2) gerhart hasn't done anything in 2014

3) dyer has been kicked off of 2 college teams and was a backup the last year to a nobody.

The real question is why are you still wasting a roster spot on him vs calling others bush league for not taking him
Most people had him rated as a first round prospect after his first two seasons at Auburn. It wasn't until his off-field issues came into play that his talent ever really came into question. I think if you look at what happened last year they were working him into the mix before he got injured and was shut down for the remainder of the year. I don't know exactly when he got dinged, but based on some of the articles I've read it sounds like he was struggling with the injury for a while.

http://blogs.courier-journal.com/ulbeat/2013/12/03/michael-dyer-to-see-a-specialist-for-injury/

Louisville running back Michael Dyer will see a specialist in Philadelphia on Monday to get an evaluation of a nagging groin and hip injury thats limited him throughout the 2013 season.
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2013/12/16/5218334/michael-dyer-injury-louisville-russell-athletic-bowl

Dyer, who transferred to Louisville last summer, has been hampered for months by a nagging groin and hip injury.
So basically you have a guy with a 5 star high school reputation, two excellent seasons at Auburn, one season out of football, and one season essentially lost to integrating with the new team and getting injured. There are some concrete indicators of special talent in his past, but the spotty results over the past two seasons have caused people to forget all that. Hence the Gerhart comparison. Gerhart has a pretty intriguing background, but because he was basically out of the picture for several years he became a forgotten man. Contrary to what you said, he has done something already in 2014. His market value has increased exponentially based on him signing to Jacksonville and being the clear frontrunner to start.

There is definitely something to be said for having a long memory and a lot of patience when it comes to players like this. Talent doesn't disappear over night. More often than not when he's been on the field, Dyer has been an impact player. Even last season in limited duty with dubious health he was still productive running the ball. Then you look at the physical talent. Lots of people hyped up Isaiah Crowell this year and talked about him like a potential steal, but Crowell was never a guy who figured to kill the combine. Dyer is. He's listed at 5'9" 215, but looks bigger than that to me. Extremely bulky frame, both in the upper body and the lower body. For a player with his body type, he can run quite fast too. Some examples of that here, here, and here. He isn't an outright elusive back, but he's a guy who was basically born to play in the NFL. He fell out of the crib destined to be a RB on Sundays.

Looking down the checklist you have an elite pedigree (5 star prospect), excellent overall college production, and ideal physical tools for the NFL. I've been playing this game long enough to have learned a few tricks and sometimes you just see a situation where the community is whiffing on a player and opening the door for you to reap a big bounty just by making what's actually a pretty obvious play. You never know what can happen, but this certainly looks like one of those situations. This guy is free money at his nonexistent market value right now. Whether or not other people see it isn't really my concern. You can say, but...but...but I don't think he's good! That's your opinion. Everyone is entitled to his opinion, but ultimately being right is what matters, not having everyone else agree with you.

I keep bringing him up in every devy thread not to pump up his value (I don't think I've ever offered him in a trade to anybody and he's not really available), but more so to provide the opinion for others so they can think about it for themselves and consider whether or not he might be an overlooked guy. I think devy rankings that treat him like a nonentity have it wrong and are doing readers a disservice in that regard. I'm trying to fill the gap just a little bit by being the most vocal cheerleader out there.
Of course you're his most vocal cheerleader:1) he's 5'9 215, which gives him a high bmi. Something you value more than most.

2) he's big and quick/fast, this is probably your FF "tell" in regards to rbs.

But as you've said you've been around long enough...well I know your strengths and weaknesses as well. Let's just use jstew, Michael, dyer,as the guys you've pumped up the most. All 3 have had lower body injuries, probably a result of all that weight and power. All 3 lack football instincts and change of direction abilities.

Dougie is the only guy I've agreed with you on, which is why I left him out.

But I don't think dyer is a great talent based on everything I've seen from him:

-he has a squatty build with great acceleration and decent speed. I would classify him as a quicker than fast type.

-dyer thrived with cam newton 6 ypc. But struggled without him. 5.1 ypc. Breaking that down further, his 4 toughest games in 2011(LSU, bama, fla, uga) he had 61 carries for 229 0 TDs 3.75 ypc.

-dyer ran a ton of sweeps and read options where he's running to the outside. I don't see a lot of running inside or traditional runs.

-when he gets to the 2nd level and is 1 on 1 with a defender, he sometimes doesn't know what to do(like seastrunk) and loses far too many of those situations. Elite guys win those situations based on power, speed, moves, something.

-i don't see much change of direction abilities, outside of bouncing outside, which affects hitting holes and making defenders miss

-5 career receptions in 3 seasons

-goes down easier than he should quite often

Overall I would classify dyer as a gets you what is there type of back, not much creativity there.

Now add in the drug issue( look in the NFL right now, nobody drafted crowell, lyerla, d Rogers...despite their talent) + age + lack of production without cam + his faults as a rb + injuries. He's going to star in the NFL? I'd lean more he's wasted a roster spot vs him ever starting 1 week for your FF team.

Below is an article this spring about how dyer probably won't be getting much playing time, based on the roster. If he's a top 5 rb as you say, this article wouldn't be even out there from ESPN of all places (not some guys blog)

http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blogpost?blogname=acc&id=69514&src=desktop

5 star recruit: so was Kyle prater

Excellent college production: not really

Ideal physical traits: has size, quickness, not the rest

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think discounting the guy solely on being 24 is silly. If anything he's coming in more physically mature and stronger which would tend toward more immediate production. Who cares if the year(s) come(s) off the back end of his career, if I get 4-5 years of strong performance out of a draft pick I'll take that any day of the week vs. the miss ratio that happens with dev picks. A guy that redshirts then stays 4 years is coming in at 23, one more year doesn't change anything if the talent is there.

 
1) only you think dyer is a top college rb. I think he was very overrated and rode cam Newton's coattails his freshman season to 6 ypc. His sophomore year down to 5.2(.8 worse than yeldon's worst season).

2) gerhart hasn't done anything in 2014

3) dyer has been kicked off of 2 college teams and was a backup the last year to a nobody.

The real question is why are you still wasting a roster spot on him vs calling others bush league for not taking him
Most people had him rated as a first round prospect after his first two seasons at Auburn. It wasn't until his off-field issues came into play that his talent ever really came into question. I think if you look at what happened last year they were working him into the mix before he got injured and was shut down for the remainder of the year. I don't know exactly when he got dinged, but based on some of the articles I've read it sounds like he was struggling with the injury for a while.

http://blogs.courier-journal.com/ulbeat/2013/12/03/michael-dyer-to-see-a-specialist-for-injury/

Louisville running back Michael Dyer will see a specialist in Philadelphia on Monday to get an evaluation of a nagging groin and hip injury thats limited him throughout the 2013 season.
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2013/12/16/5218334/michael-dyer-injury-louisville-russell-athletic-bowl

Dyer, who transferred to Louisville last summer, has been hampered for months by a nagging groin and hip injury.
So basically you have a guy with a 5 star high school reputation, two excellent seasons at Auburn, one season out of football, and one season essentially lost to integrating with the new team and getting injured. There are some concrete indicators of special talent in his past, but the spotty results over the past two seasons have caused people to forget all that. Hence the Gerhart comparison. Gerhart has a pretty intriguing background, but because he was basically out of the picture for several years he became a forgotten man. Contrary to what you said, he has done something already in 2014. His market value has increased exponentially based on him signing to Jacksonville and being the clear frontrunner to start.

There is definitely something to be said for having a long memory and a lot of patience when it comes to players like this. Talent doesn't disappear over night. More often than not when he's been on the field, Dyer has been an impact player. Even last season in limited duty with dubious health he was still productive running the ball. Then you look at the physical talent. Lots of people hyped up Isaiah Crowell this year and talked about him like a potential steal, but Crowell was never a guy who figured to kill the combine. Dyer is. He's listed at 5'9" 215, but looks bigger than that to me. Extremely bulky frame, both in the upper body and the lower body. For a player with his body type, he can run quite fast too. Some examples of that here, here, and here. He isn't an outright elusive back, but he's a guy who was basically born to play in the NFL. He fell out of the crib destined to be a RB on Sundays.

Looking down the checklist you have an elite pedigree (5 star prospect), excellent overall college production, and ideal physical tools for the NFL. I've been playing this game long enough to have learned a few tricks and sometimes you just see a situation where the community is whiffing on a player and opening the door for you to reap a big bounty just by making what's actually a pretty obvious play. You never know what can happen, but this certainly looks like one of those situations. This guy is free money at his nonexistent market value right now. Whether or not other people see it isn't really my concern. You can say, but...but...but I don't think he's good! That's your opinion. Everyone is entitled to his opinion, but ultimately being right is what matters, not having everyone else agree with you.

I keep bringing him up in every devy thread not to pump up his value (I don't think I've ever offered him in a trade to anybody and he's not really available), but more so to provide the opinion for others so they can think about it for themselves and consider whether or not he might be an overlooked guy. I think devy rankings that treat him like a nonentity have it wrong and are doing readers a disservice in that regard. I'm trying to fill the gap just a little bit by being the most vocal cheerleader out there.
Of course you're his most vocal cheerleader:1) he's 5'9 215, which gives him a high bmi. Something you value more than most.

2) he's big and quick/fast, this is probably your FF "tell" in regards to rbs.

But as you've said you've been around long enough...well I know your strengths and weaknesses as well. Let's just use jstew, Michael, dyer,as the guys you've pumped up the most. All 3 have had lower body injuries, probably a result of all that weight and power. All 3 lack football instincts and change of direction abilities.

Dougie is the only guy I've agreed with you on, which is why I left him out.

But I don't think dyer is a great talent based on everything I've seen from him:

-he has a squatty build with great acceleration and decent speed. I would classify him as a quicker than fast type.

-dyer thrived with cam newton 6 ypc. But struggled without him. 5.1 ypc. Breaking that down further, his 4 toughest games in 2011(LSU, bama, fla, uga) he had 61 carries for 229 0 TDs 3.75 ypc.

-dyer ran a ton of sweeps and read options where he's running to the outside. I don't see a lot of running inside or traditional runs.

-when he gets to the 2nd level and is 1 on 1 with a defender, he sometimes doesn't know what to do(like seastrunk) and loses far too many of those situations. Elite guys win those situations based on power, speed, moves, something.

-i don't see much change of direction abilities, outside of bouncing outside, which affects hitting holes and making defenders miss

-5 career receptions in 3 seasons

-goes down easier than he should quite often

Overall I would classify dyer as a gets you what is there type of back, not much creativity there.

Now add in the drug issue( look in the NFL right now, nobody drafted crowell, lyerla, d Rogers...despite their talent) + age + lack of production without cam + his faults as a rb + injuries. He's going to star in the NFL? I'd lean more he's wasted a roster spot vs him ever starting 1 week for your FF team.

Below is an article this spring about how dyer probably won't be getting much playing time, based on the roster. If he's a top 5 rb as you say, this article wouldn't be even out there from ESPN of all places (not some guys blog)

http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blogpost?blogname=acc&id=69514&src=desktop

5 star recruit: so was Kyle prater

Excellent college production: not really

Ideal physical traits: has size, quickness, not the rest
You've made your opinion clear in the past and so have I. You can say, "I'm right." I can say, "I'm right." Nobody will be changing anybody's mind here.

Your fixation on college production isn't something that I share, but regardless you seem to move the goalposts when needed in order to justify your pre-held opinion on a player. For example, with C Michael you cite his lack of 1,000+ yard seasons as evidence of bad college production. Since you can't use that argument with Dyer (because he already has two 1,000+ yard seasons), you talk about YPC and attribute his success to Newton. But then with a player you don't like such as Seastrunk, suddenly both of those things become irrelevant (he has two 1000+ yard seasons and a 7+ career YPC -- yet you hate him). LeSean McCoy had 4.8 YPC lifetime at Pitt. Doug Martin had 4.9 YPC in his last season at Boise. Steven Jackson had 4.4 YPC in his final college season and was awful against good teams. Having an incredible YPC in college isn't all that you build it up to be. If you're determined to view Dyer's career at Auburn in a negative light then that's your prerogative, but I don't pay this talk any mind.

As for the "third string" article, it's about as meaningful as the Seahawks "We're going to be a RBBC this year" article. Petrino heavily recruited Dyer when he was at Arkansas because Dyer came out of that state. You can bet he's familiar with what Mike can do. He's also not such a choir boy as Strong. He's a mercenary type who will ride his best horse regardless of politics. After Dyer's success against the backup unit in the spring game, they flipped him over and ran him against the starters, whom he also destroyed. Think they know what he can do? I think so. Brown is an okay back. He might be drafted some day. He's not Dyer though. I would expect that to bear itself out over the course of the season. It's all speculation at this point.

Ultimately, lots of people have opinions and it doesn't really matter what they think as long as you get your calls right. I don't expect many people to agree with my opinion of Dyer either, but I often try to bang the drum for a player when I think he's grossly over- or under-valued. The problem with players who are underrated is that not many people will believe they're underrated. That's exactly why they're underrated. It's hard to get people excited about a player that they already don't believe in. Same dynamic as Gerhart a few months ago. IIRC you said he was the next Tommy Vardell. I didn't pay that any mind and I'm not paying this any mind either. I've done my homework on both players and reached different conclusions.

 
1) only you think dyer is a top college rb. I think he was very overrated and rode cam Newton's coattails his freshman season to 6 ypc. His sophomore year down to 5.2(.8 worse than yeldon's worst season).

2) gerhart hasn't done anything in 2014

3) dyer has been kicked off of 2 college teams and was a backup the last year to a nobody.

The real question is why are you still wasting a roster spot on him vs calling others bush league for not taking him
Most people had him rated as a first round prospect after his first two seasons at Auburn. It wasn't until his off-field issues came into play that his talent ever really came into question. I think if you look at what happened last year they were working him into the mix before he got injured and was shut down for the remainder of the year. I don't know exactly when he got dinged, but based on some of the articles I've read it sounds like he was struggling with the injury for a while.

http://blogs.courier-journal.com/ulbeat/2013/12/03/michael-dyer-to-see-a-specialist-for-injury/

Louisville running back Michael Dyer will see a specialist in Philadelphia on Monday to get an evaluation of a nagging groin and hip injury thats limited him throughout the 2013 season.
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2013/12/16/5218334/michael-dyer-injury-louisville-russell-athletic-bowl

Dyer, who transferred to Louisville last summer, has been hampered for months by a nagging groin and hip injury.
So basically you have a guy with a 5 star high school reputation, two excellent seasons at Auburn, one season out of football, and one season essentially lost to integrating with the new team and getting injured. There are some concrete indicators of special talent in his past, but the spotty results over the past two seasons have caused people to forget all that. Hence the Gerhart comparison. Gerhart has a pretty intriguing background, but because he was basically out of the picture for several years he became a forgotten man. Contrary to what you said, he has done something already in 2014. His market value has increased exponentially based on him signing to Jacksonville and being the clear frontrunner to start.

There is definitely something to be said for having a long memory and a lot of patience when it comes to players like this. Talent doesn't disappear over night. More often than not when he's been on the field, Dyer has been an impact player. Even last season in limited duty with dubious health he was still productive running the ball. Then you look at the physical talent. Lots of people hyped up Isaiah Crowell this year and talked about him like a potential steal, but Crowell was never a guy who figured to kill the combine. Dyer is. He's listed at 5'9" 215, but looks bigger than that to me. Extremely bulky frame, both in the upper body and the lower body. For a player with his body type, he can run quite fast too. Some examples of that here, here, and here. He isn't an outright elusive back, but he's a guy who was basically born to play in the NFL. He fell out of the crib destined to be a RB on Sundays.

Looking down the checklist you have an elite pedigree (5 star prospect), excellent overall college production, and ideal physical tools for the NFL. I've been playing this game long enough to have learned a few tricks and sometimes you just see a situation where the community is whiffing on a player and opening the door for you to reap a big bounty just by making what's actually a pretty obvious play. You never know what can happen, but this certainly looks like one of those situations. This guy is free money at his nonexistent market value right now. Whether or not other people see it isn't really my concern. You can say, but...but...but I don't think he's good! That's your opinion. Everyone is entitled to his opinion, but ultimately being right is what matters, not having everyone else agree with you.

I keep bringing him up in every devy thread not to pump up his value (I don't think I've ever offered him in a trade to anybody and he's not really available), but more so to provide the opinion for others so they can think about it for themselves and consider whether or not he might be an overlooked guy. I think devy rankings that treat him like a nonentity have it wrong and are doing readers a disservice in that regard. I'm trying to fill the gap just a little bit by being the most vocal cheerleader out there.
Of course you're his most vocal cheerleader:1) he's 5'9 215, which gives him a high bmi. Something you value more than most.

2) he's big and quick/fast, this is probably your FF "tell" in regards to rbs.

But as you've said you've been around long enough...well I know your strengths and weaknesses as well. Let's just use jstew, Michael, dyer,as the guys you've pumped up the most. All 3 have had lower body injuries, probably a result of all that weight and power. All 3 lack football instincts and change of direction abilities.

Dougie is the only guy I've agreed with you on, which is why I left him out.

But I don't think dyer is a great talent based on everything I've seen from him:

-he has a squatty build with great acceleration and decent speed. I would classify him as a quicker than fast type.

-dyer thrived with cam newton 6 ypc. But struggled without him. 5.1 ypc. Breaking that down further, his 4 toughest games in 2011(LSU, bama, fla, uga) he had 61 carries for 229 0 TDs 3.75 ypc.

-dyer ran a ton of sweeps and read options where he's running to the outside. I don't see a lot of running inside or traditional runs.

-when he gets to the 2nd level and is 1 on 1 with a defender, he sometimes doesn't know what to do(like seastrunk) and loses far too many of those situations. Elite guys win those situations based on power, speed, moves, something.

-i don't see much change of direction abilities, outside of bouncing outside, which affects hitting holes and making defenders miss

-5 career receptions in 3 seasons

-goes down easier than he should quite often

Overall I would classify dyer as a gets you what is there type of back, not much creativity there.

Now add in the drug issue( look in the NFL right now, nobody drafted crowell, lyerla, d Rogers...despite their talent) + age + lack of production without cam + his faults as a rb + injuries. He's going to star in the NFL? I'd lean more he's wasted a roster spot vs him ever starting 1 week for your FF team.

Below is an article this spring about how dyer probably won't be getting much playing time, based on the roster. If he's a top 5 rb as you say, this article wouldn't be even out there from ESPN of all places (not some guys blog)

http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blogpost?blogname=acc&id=69514&src=desktop

5 star recruit: so was Kyle prater

Excellent college production: not really

Ideal physical traits: has size, quickness, not the rest
You've made your opinion clear in the past and so have I. You can say, "I'm right." I can say, "I'm right." Nobody will be changing anybody's mind here.

Your fixation on college production isn't something that I share, but regardless you seem to move the goalposts when needed in order to justify your pre-held opinion on a player. For example, with C Michael you cite his lack of 1,000+ yard seasons as evidence of bad college production. Since you can't use that argument with Dyer (because he already has two 1,000+ yard seasons), you talk about YPC and attribute his success to Newton. But then with a player you don't like such as Seastrunk, suddenly both of those things become irrelevant (he has two 1000+ yard seasons and a 7+ career YPC -- yet you hate him). LeSean McCoy had 4.8 YPC lifetime at Pitt. Doug Martin had 4.9 YPC in his last season at Boise. Steven Jackson had 4.4 YPC in his final college season and was awful against good teams. Having an incredible YPC in college isn't all that you build it up to be. If you're determined to view Dyer's career at Auburn in a negative light then that's your prerogative, but I don't pay this talk any mind.

As for the "third string" article, it's about as meaningful as the Seahawks "We're going to be a RBBC this year" article. Petrino heavily recruited Dyer when he was at Arkansas because Dyer came out of that state. You can bet he's familiar with what Mike can do. He's also not such a choir boy as Strong. He's a mercenary type who will ride his best horse regardless of politics. After Dyer's success against the backup unit in the spring game, they flipped him over and ran him against the starters, whom he also destroyed. Think they know what he can do? I think so. Brown is an okay back. He might be drafted some day. He's not Dyer though. I would expect that to bear itself out over the course of the season. It's all speculation at this point.

Ultimately, lots of people have opinions and it doesn't really matter what they think as long as you get your calls right. I don't expect many people to agree with my opinion of Dyer either, but I often try to bang the drum for a player when I think he's grossly over- or under-valued. The problem with players who are underrated is that not many people will believe they're underrated. That's exactly why they're underrated. It's hard to get people excited about a player that they already don't believe in. Same dynamic as Gerhart a few months ago. IIRC you said he was the next Tommy Vardell. I didn't pay that any mind and I'm not paying this any mind either. I've done my homework on both players and reached different conclusions.
1) why would nobody change their minds? What's the point of posting in here if everyone had that same mindset? I think that's the core of what's wrong in the sp and life. Change/ evolving/ learning are vital.2) excellent college production is my concern. I don't think it's excellent, maybe it's a matter of semantics. I do think rushing for over 1,000 two straight season is good and not a "concern" as you posted. But going down .9 ypc in 1 season is a concern for me. I think cam was a big reason for his freshman success. Do you disagree?

I think rushing for over 1,000 yards and over 5 ypc is good. But he didn't dominate like DMC, gurley, yeldon, lacy, Ingram did. In fact, what concerned me about Ingram was his ypc dip before he declared.

Seastrunk played in a super spread offense, that was always my concern with his production/ypc. Kind of like qb stats at Houston/Texas tech/Hawaii back in the day. They're not all on the same level playing field. Again stats are useful, but they're not the end all. My #1 is watching film.

3) I agree that the article is probably a Puff piece. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought petrino is a passing guro: brohm, mallet, wku was ranked high last year too.

In the end, I broke down a bunch if individual things I didn't like about his game earlier. Things we could discuss, but you took it as me set in my ways...

Eta: gerhart to touchdown Tommy.... that's not me. I personally know gerharts college position coach... I like him as a player. I just am not going to already classify him as a rb like you. Cautious is my outlook.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
tdmills said:
1) why would nobody change their minds? What's the point of posting in here if everyone had that same mindset? I think that's the core of what's wrong in the sp and life. Change/ evolving/ learning are vital.
Not that I pay much attention, but I don't recall you ever changing your mind on a player. My recollection of dealing with you is that you make up your mind, expect everyone to agree with you, and then get testy when they don't. You blew a gasket in the Deep End when we were talking about Jeremy Langford, yet you wonder why I'm not interested in engaging you in discussion. In my experience it's about as productive and enjoyable as repeatedly banging my head into a cinderblock.

I've laid out my views on Dyer and it's cool if other people don't see it that way. I'm just putting my opinion out there. Not expecting (or even really hoping) to acquire many converts. Just throwing his name out there so people who might be in a position to acquire him for cheap might at least take a split second to run the rule over him and decide for themselves if they think he's worth a punt.

 
tdmills said:
1) why would nobody change their minds? What's the point of posting in here if everyone had that same mindset? I think that's the core of what's wrong in the sp and life. Change/ evolving/ learning are vital.
Not that I pay much attention, but I don't recall you ever changing your mind on a player. My recollection of dealing with you is that you make up your mind, expect everyone to agree with you, and then get testy when they don't. You blew a gasket in the Deep End when we were talking about Jeremy Langford, yet you wonder why I'm not interested in engaging you in discussion. In my experience it's about as productive and enjoyable as repeatedly banging my head into a cinderblock.
Well that's not very kind.

I'm overall pessimistic about players/ prospects. So it could be my posting style, but then again we're interpreting texts here. Tone is a huge piece of our language and I like discussions over opinions. Id love to be convinced of things, but not many take the time to and just resort to opinions.

Bias is a terrible thing, but check out post 1651 in the Christine Michael thread. I conceded to your way of thinking and tried to engage in a clarifying conversation... no response.

Think of me as a hater/etc. In the end all I want to do is learn more about football in here...not hear opinions of "well Christine Michael is better than Lynch" tell me why, prove it to me shark pool.

 
Lots of steals in that draft. Chubb, Dyer, and Abdullah especially.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/huskers-abdullah-says-finishing-degree-priority

The pull of the NFL couldn't overtake Nebraska running back Ameer Abdullah's desire to make his family proud and finish his college education on schedule. Abdullah said Thursday that the NFL draft advisory committee told him he probably would be selected "very high in the first half" of this year's draft if he were to turn pro.
 
Lots of steals in that draft. Chubb, Dyer, and Abdullah especially.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/huskers-abdullah-says-finishing-degree-priority

The pull of the NFL couldn't overtake Nebraska running back Ameer Abdullah's desire to make his family proud and finish his college education on schedule. Abdullah said Thursday that the NFL draft advisory committee told him he probably would be selected "very high in the first half" of this year's draft if he were to turn pro.
Of round 1?

No chance if that's the interpretation.

 
Lots of steals in that draft. Chubb, Dyer, and Abdullah especially.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/huskers-abdullah-says-finishing-degree-priority

The pull of the NFL couldn't overtake Nebraska running back Ameer Abdullah's desire to make his family proud and finish his college education on schedule. Abdullah said Thursday that the NFL draft advisory committee told him he probably would be selected "very high in the first half" of this year's draft if he were to turn pro.
Of round 1?No chance if that's the interpretation.
I interpreted it as somewhere in the top three rounds.

 
Lots of steals in that draft. Chubb, Dyer, and Abdullah especially.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/huskers-abdullah-says-finishing-degree-priority

The pull of the NFL couldn't overtake Nebraska running back Ameer Abdullah's desire to make his family proud and finish his college education on schedule. Abdullah said Thursday that the NFL draft advisory committee told him he probably would be selected "very high in the first half" of this year's draft if he were to turn pro.
Of round 1?No chance if that's the interpretation.
I interpreted it as somewhere in the top three rounds.
It's kind of a vague statement, but there about 256 picks in the draft. The first half of the draft would be the first 128 picks. "Very high" in the first half of the draft could be anywhere from the 1st-2nd round. I don't see Abdullah squeaking into the 1st, but Isaiah Pead and Ronnie Hillman went 58th and 67th in the 2012 draft respectively. I would say Abdullah is a lot better than either of those two. 2nd round-early 3rd round seems like a realistic spot where he could go.

He's a guy who, for whatever reason, hasn't generated much excitement in devy drafts over the last couple years despite performing really well in each of the last two seasons. I kinda understand that because his physical dimensions are underwhelming and he's not a flat out burner like Charles or Spiller, but my guess is that he'll outperform many of the RBs ranked ahead of him right now. I think it's pretty optimistic to think that guys like Dalvin Cook, Jeremy Langford, Barry Sanders, and Greg Bryant are going to give you more value.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lots of steals in that draft. Chubb, Dyer, and Abdullah especially.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/huskers-abdullah-says-finishing-degree-priority

The pull of the NFL couldn't overtake Nebraska running back Ameer Abdullah's desire to make his family proud and finish his college education on schedule. Abdullah said Thursday that the NFL draft advisory committee told him he probably would be selected "very high in the first half" of this year's draft if he were to turn pro.
Of round 1?No chance if that's the interpretation.
I interpreted it as somewhere in the top three rounds.
It's kind of a vague statement, but there about 256 picks in the draft. The first half of the draft would be the first 128 picks. "Very high" in the first half of the draft could be anywhere from the 1st-2nd round. I don't see Abdullah squeaking into the 1st, but Isaiah Pead and Ronnie Hillman went 58th and 67th in the 2012 draft respectively. I would say Abdullah is a lot better than either of those two. 2nd round-early 3rd round seems like a realistic spot where he could go.

He's a guy who, for whatever reason, hasn't generated much excitement in devy drafts over the last couple years despite performing really well in each of the last two seasons. I kinda understand that because his physical dimensions are underwhelming and he's not a flat out burner like Charles or Spiller, but my guess is that he'll outperform many of the RBs ranked ahead of him right now. I think it's pretty optimistic to think that guys like Dalvin Cook, Jeremy Langford, Barry Sanders, and Greg Bryant are going to give you more value.
Langford was an overdraft. Bryant is a physical specimen worth waiting for (Umm, Christine Michael). Sanders is very talented from what I've seen. Cook was my pick and I think he's pretty talented. He raced Karlos Williams recently and was barely beat out.

In a draft this deep, it's all about absolute upside, not "earliest possible value/production".

I don't understand how you could say Chubb was a steal, yet question Greg Bryant over Abdullah.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In a draft this deep, it's all about absolute upside, not "earliest possible value/production".
That's my goal in any devy draft. The hard part is actually recognizing when an unproven freshman-sophomore is more talented than a productive upperclassman. There is no exact formula for making those calls. I think Chubb is a top prospect whereas Langford, Sanders, Cook, and Bryant are more middling prospects. Hence my comments.

My thought process kinda goes like this:

1. Proven elite talents (i.e. Gurley)

2. Potential elite talents (i.e. Tyner, Chubb)

3. Proven good talents (i.e. Abdullah, Ajayi)

4. Potential good talents (i.e. Sanders, Cook)

5. Proven mediocre talents (i.e. Langford)

6. Potential mediocre talents (i.e. random mediocre NCAA prospect)

To me when you take a guy like Sanders then you are basically hoping that he's going to become someone like Abdullah, so why not just take Abdullah instead? It comes down to how highly you rate the individual's talent/potential. If you think Sanders, Cook, and Bryant are bucket #2 players then you're not going to see a problem with ranking them ahead of bucket #3 types like Abdullah. However, if you think they're bucket #4 types like I do then it's not going to make a lot of sense for you to take them ahead of guys with equivalent ceilings and a longer track record.

 
EBF said:
Xue said:
In a draft this deep, it's all about absolute upside, not "earliest possible value/production".
That's my goal in any devy draft. The hard part is actually recognizing when an unproven freshman-sophomore is more talented than a productive upperclassman. There is no exact formula for making those calls. I think Chubb is a top prospect whereas Langford, Sanders, Cook, and Bryant are more middling prospects. Hence my comments.

My thought process kinda goes like this:

1. Proven elite talents (i.e. Gurley)

2. Potential elite talents (i.e. Tyner, Chubb)

3. Proven good talents (i.e. Abdullah, Ajayi)

4. Potential good talents (i.e. Sanders, Cook)

5. Proven mediocre talents (i.e. Langford)

6. Potential mediocre talents (i.e. random mediocre NCAA prospect)

To me when you take a guy like Sanders then you are basically hoping that he's going to become someone like Abdullah, so why not just take Abdullah instead? It comes down to how highly you rate the individual's talent/potential. If you think Sanders, Cook, and Bryant are bucket #2 players then you're not going to see a problem with ranking them ahead of bucket #3 types like Abdullah. However, if you think they're bucket #4 types like I do then it's not going to make a lot of sense for you to take them ahead of guys with equivalent ceilings and a longer track record.
I think Sanders is better as a receiver with better elusiveness and just looks more effortless out on the field. He's also slightly bigger (to the naked eye) and could eventually get up to 200-205.

Bryant is far from mediocre. He'll be one of the more impressive physical specimens come Combine time. He's right up there with Christine Michael. And you can potentially get to use him a year earlier than Chubb.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top