Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I actually think that he will be better compared to most people mentioned in this thread. Without him/a running game the Giants are 0-2. I'm giving it a 50% chance that he has a big game, but because the rest of my team is playing really consistent and my opponent has a bad lineup I will go conservative.This thread is very depressing for a David Wilson owner...
for some reason I have that feeling too... even though it's against the Panthers D.
I do, too, but he's not going to be in my lineup, so it's moot.Arwald said:I actually think that he will be better compared to most people mentioned in this thread.Grigs Allmoon said:This thread is very depressing for a David Wilson owner...
Jesus H.....don't put doubt in my mind about benching him! lolpbandy1 said:
So you essentially think that he has less than a 10% chance of being productive. I think it's slightly better than that.
Slightly being the operative word in that sentence. I mean that he is the ultimate boom or bust candidate but frankly the matchups would seem to dictate that the Giants will be throwing the ball a lot yet again. He's always a threat of course to take one 80 yards to the house any time he touches it, hence the inside straight analogy.
