Interseptopus
Footballguy
I have time later today to watch these, so I will respond then. But yeah you will see two different time tables depending on the surgery. Since he is having surgery to fix it, that does speed things up a little because there will be some greater stability to the fracture site that will allow for earlier weight bearing. Like I said in the lockett thread... in my experience about 80% of regular folks have hardware removed at some point because it is bothering them. This is usually more common down in the ankle area as there are more tendons there. This isn't as true with other body parts. That usually doesn't happen until a year later. I'm not sure what this means for Marcus but just thought I'd throw that out there just as an FYI. Doesn't mean it will bother him and maybe his fracture his higher and not a cause for as much concern with this.The team announced Marcus would have surgery in a few days, then took that back, then put it up again.
He is definitely having surgery and a plate inserted to stabilize the bone.
http://www.titansonline.com/news/article-4/Marcus-Mariota’s-recovery-timetable-“4-5-months”/7b77231b-7a90-4da8-9d56-8e88df597487
This (44 seconds) sounds like the Raiders are too rushed with Carr, but what do I know. It's presented as "you're going to see two different timetables but..." so naturally I get that viewpoint from the lead-in but even still....Doc what do you think? Guessing from this info?
http://www.titansonline.com/video/videos/Garafolo-Mariota-Will-Need-4-5-Months-to-Recover/cc9c2d37-e0fd-4a0a-86ae-51691596196f
EDIT: Looks like I have an opening now...
The article is intriguing. Bob Anderson is a great surgeon. I wouldn't expect it to be anything less than an excellent surgery. His mobility won't be impacted but his ability to be mobile might be a little slow to start the season. This is a much better scenario than I painted earlier. I had assumed no surgery needed, however that also means the break was pretty bad.
In regard to Carr's timeline... that's absolutely asinine. 4-6 weeks sure the bone can heal but again, I quote myself from the Dez thread:
I just don't see it happening but maybe his break wasn't that bad... it seemed to be. Granted, the fibula is a non-weight bearing bone for the most part so I guess it's possible, but not real smart for obvious reasons...There are stages of bone healing...
Inflammation stage (1 week)
Healing/Callus (3-4 weeks)
A callus is basically what I refer to as "sloppy" or "unorganized bone" just put down quickly to stop further damage. Think a piece of gum to stop a leak. Patients with a full break usually are toe touch or partial weight bearing. This will stop further damage but can be easily damaged/broken again or worse
Proliferation/Hard Callus (3-4 months)
The callus is replaced by woven bone. This is harder than callus bone and can withstand greater forces. It's not perfect, but this is when people can do a lot of full weight bearing
Remodeling (6-12+ months)
This is where the woven bone is replaced by lamellar bone, which is bascially what un-injured bone is.
All fractures heal differently. A small fracture like this would reasonably take less time. Depends what the actual fracture looks like (spiral vs linear) and how long it is.
Also there's a risk of making the hairline fracture worse and then he would miss even more time.
This is why I wasn't surprised at all when Rodgers missed almost 2 months with a fractured collar bone. Everyone was calling him a slow healer. False.
Last edited by a moderator: