Hmmm...well, I've wondered if I might get more out of an individual book if it weren't being set aside occasionally. Just think I must have some mild ADD or something, though.One at a time here for the most part as well. Sometimes I'll really labor through the first part (or middle) of a book. Rather than read with half-interest...I'll pick up another and then come back to the first with a fresh look. Usually helps to keep my concentration level up on whatever I'm reading.One at a time.Is it normal to be in the midst of so many books simultaneously, or do most people finish one before picking up another? I like to rotate among them based upon what I'm in the mood for a particular day, but I'm wondering if that's what other people do, too.
I'm reading about 5 books right now. Don't worry about it.The most recent was O Jerusalem based on someone's recommendation on this site.Hmmm...well, I've wondered if I might get more out of an individual book if it weren't being set aside occasionally. Just think I must have some mild ADD or something, though.One at a time here for the most part as well. Sometimes I'll really labor through the first part (or middle) of a book. Rather than read with half-interest...I'll pick up another and then come back to the first with a fresh look. Usually helps to keep my concentration level up on whatever I'm reading.One at a time.Is it normal to be in the midst of so many books simultaneously, or do most people finish one before picking up another? I like to rotate among them based upon what I'm in the mood for a particular day, but I'm wondering if that's what other people do, too.
First book sucked. It gets way better.The Gunslinger - Stephen KingI hope it gets better, because the first book was kind of meh
I never read the book...but I really enjoyed the movie. Paxton and Billy Bob both do a really solid acting job.A Simple Plan - Scott Smith
Really good. I'm not sure if I buy that a good person could slide into evil so easily, buy maybe I'm just naive. Great writing though, I may have to check out the film.
That's what I'm banking on. I've heard too many good things about and like King too much to give up on it anyway. It could suck from book 1-7 and I'd probably finish it.First book sucked. It gets way better.The Gunslinger - Stephen KingI hope it gets better, because the first book was kind of meh
I've heard that the two really diverge about halfway through. Plus he spends a lot of the book in the main character's head, so I have to believe that they are pretty different.I never read the book...but I really enjoyed the movie. Paxton and Billy Bob both do a really solid acting job.A Simple Plan - Scott Smith
Really good. I'm not sure if I buy that a good person could slide into evil so easily, buy maybe I'm just naive. Great writing though, I may have to check out the film.
I used to be this way. Recently I was cleaning out my side of the bedroom and had a pile of about 20-30 books that I had been reading or got part way through, etc.... so I've been trying to crack down on the # of them that I read at a time. A lot of my problem was that I'd order something through the library that took a bit to come in. I'd be reading another book or two but feel that I have to read the library one quick so I could get it back on time, and forget what I had read in the other book. So - I've been keeping better track of what's coming in through the library and trying to limit the reading to 1 non-fiction and 1 fiction book at a time.Is it normal to be in the midst of so many books simultaneously, or do most people finish one before picking up another? I like to rotate among them based upon what I'm in the mood for a particular day, but I'm wondering if that's what other people do, too.
this is my current on-the-john book. it has 2 volumes. i finished the first one about the "game on the field" and am now working through the "behind the scenes" volume. an amazing amount of research/effort this guy put into it.Game of inches, Peter Morris- Excellent book about how baseball rules were shaped. I am liking this one quite a bit. Really good history of the game.
have this one lined up on the shelf to read nextSuite Francaise by Irene Nemirovsky
I listened to this on audio a few years ago. Didnt like it at all. The daughter and father interplay was beyond annoying.Thought the end was great. But based on reviews of Lehane's works, I think I expected more overall. 7/10.Next up: The Keep by Paul F. WilsonStarting tonight based on this review.A couple of people in another thread suggested Shutter Island by D.Lehane. Pretty damn good book - just got done reading it a couple days ago. Would make a great movie too.Also looking at mysteries and thrillers too. Thanks.Is this any good?I've been reading primarily non-fiction and I want to start getting into fiction again. I'm really looking for crime stories. For a guy that needs to fill $14 to get Free Super Saver Shipping at Amazon, what can you recommend in this category?
TIA
But it’s really the combination of all the tales of Farley’s wild humor with more little-known stories of his good deeds, helping homeless people and sick children, in part through St. Malachy’s Church in New York -- which also figured in his efforts to battle his own addictions -- that elevate “The Chris Farley Show.” This biography makes the reader feel his humanity and feel for him as he suffers relapses and goes down the wrong paths that end up taking him to his sad fate.
The colleagues in his life who cared for him, quoted at length, with their points of view, give readers the feeling that they are there as these events happen. David Spade, his co-star in “Tommy Boy,” had become less close with Farley for various reasons, exacerbated by a mammoth relapse after Farley had logged about three years sober, and this comes through, as does the fact that Spade still loved him and was concerned for him. Chris Rock offers numerous key insights, notably that Farley’s famed “Chippendales” sketch, while hilarious and classic, contributed to his complexes about only being seen as a fat clown and nothing more.
With “The Chris Farley Show,” readers will really feel the highs and lows of the man’s life, with such a “you are there” feeling to its documenting of the events that the book should go down as primer for sensitive and thoughtful celebrity journalism.
Kinda feeling the same way. About 1/2 way through the first book and have been lukewarm to it so far. Does it start getting better right away with book 2??First book sucked. It gets way better.The Gunslinger - Stephen KingI hope it gets better, because the first book was kind of meh
I actually enjoyed book 1, but I think it's pretty widely accepted (and I concur) that book 2 is the best book in the series.Kinda feeling the same way. About 1/2 way through the first book and have been lukewarm to it so far. Does it start getting better right away with book 2??First book sucked. It gets way better.The Gunslinger - Stephen KingI hope it gets better, because the first book was kind of meh
Don't know how, but I knew zip about the story or series so I was a little when he meets the kid from New York in the middle of the desert. Wondering WTF is going on....I actually enjoyed book 1, but I think it's pretty widely accepted (and I concur) that book 2 is the best book in the series.Kinda feeling the same way. About 1/2 way through the first book and have been lukewarm to it so far. Does it start getting better right away with book 2??First book sucked. It gets way better.The Gunslinger - Stephen KingI hope it gets better, because the first book was kind of meh
I've read the entire series and have started over. (Currently on The Wastelands.) Anyway, I have much more respect for The Gunslinger now after seeing how much foreshadowing there was in it and it was written 20 years before he even knew how he was going to finish the series.Drawing of the Three and Wizard and Glass are the best. The Dark Tower VII was pretty good as well.Don't know how, but I knew zip about the story or series so I was a little when he meets the kid from New York in the middle of the desert. Wondering WTF is going on....I actually enjoyed book 1, but I think it's pretty widely accepted (and I concur) that book 2 is the best book in the series.Kinda feeling the same way. About 1/2 way through the first book and have been lukewarm to it so far. Does it start getting better right away with book 2??First book sucked. It gets way better.The Gunslinger - Stephen KingI hope it gets better, because the first book was kind of meh
AbsolutelyKinda feeling the same way. About 1/2 way through the first book and have been lukewarm to it so far. Does it start getting better right away with book 2??First book sucked. It gets way better.The Gunslinger - Stephen KingI hope it gets better, because the first book was kind of meh
Newer editions of The Gunslinger have portions rewritten to make it fit better with the later books. I believe this was done right around when VII was published.Just finished a re-read of George RR Martin's first 4 A Song Of Ice And Fire books. The 5th book still isn't done & it's now looking like a 2009 publishing date.I've read the entire series and have started over. (Currently on The Wastelands.) Anyway, I have much more respect for The Gunslinger now after seeing how much foreshadowing there was in it and it was written 20 years before he even knew how he was going to finish the series.Drawing of the Three and Wizard and Glass are the best. The Dark Tower VII was pretty good as well.Don't know how, but I knew zip about the story or series so I was a little when he meets the kid from New York in the middle of the desert. Wondering WTF is going on....I actually enjoyed book 1, but I think it's pretty widely accepted (and I concur) that book 2 is the best book in the series.Kinda feeling the same way. About 1/2 way through the first book and have been lukewarm to it so far. Does it start getting better right away with book 2??First book sucked. It gets way better.The Gunslinger - Stephen King
I hope it gets better, because the first book was kind of meh
Read that book several years ago and loved it. Fun stuff.Practical Demonkeeping by Christopher Moore
You've got a sweet few months of reading ahead of you. Those are all well worth it. The Terror, especially, is one of my favorite novels in recent years.Newer editions of The Gunslinger have portions rewritten to make it fit better with the later books. I believe this was done right around when VII was published.Just finished a re-read of George RR Martin's first 4 A Song Of Ice And Fire books. The 5th book still isn't done & it's now looking like a 2009 publishing date.I've read the entire series and have started over. (Currently on The Wastelands.) Anyway, I have much more respect for The Gunslinger now after seeing how much foreshadowing there was in it and it was written 20 years before he even knew how he was going to finish the series.Drawing of the Three and Wizard and Glass are the best. The Dark Tower VII was pretty good as well.Don't know how, but I knew zip about the story or series so I was a little when he meets the kid from New York in the middle of the desert. Wondering WTF is going on....I actually enjoyed book 1, but I think it's pretty widely accepted (and I concur) that book 2 is the best book in the series.Kinda feeling the same way. About 1/2 way through the first book and have been lukewarm to it so far. Does it start getting better right away with book 2??First book sucked. It gets way better.The Gunslinger - Stephen King
I hope it gets better, because the first book was kind of meh
Next up is World War Z by Max Brooks. I had started this about 3 months ago & stopped about 50 pages in - not because I didn't like it but because I was also reading Martin's books & got tunnel vision.
After that, I've got Dan Simmon's The Terror & Joe Hill's (S King's son) Heart Shaped Box on deck. I'm also toying with tackling King's Dark Tower from beginning to end, which I've never done. From The Wastelands on, I've read them as they were published (with a couple of re-reads of III & IV but not the others).
I'll also bite off a chapter or two of McCullough's 1776 when the mood strikes. For some reason I can easily slide back into this one even after a few weeks.
I really like Dan Simmons so I'm looking forward to getting into The Terror. About the only thing I haven't really liked of his is the Hyperion series. I know it gets lauded in the SciFi threads & the writing is good enough, but the story just didn't do it for me.For Simmons fans, check out Crook Factory. It's atypical for him - not horror or scifi. It's a fictionalized (how much, I don't know) story about Ernest Hemingway's involvement as a spy in WWII. Really, really entertaining.facook said:You've got a sweet few months of reading ahead of you. Those are all well worth it. The Terror, especially, is one of my favorite novels in recent years.Uruk-Hai said:Newer editions of The Gunslinger have portions rewritten to make it fit better with the later books. I believe this was done right around when VII was published.Just finished a re-read of George RR Martin's first 4 A Song Of Ice And Fire books. The 5th book still isn't done & it's now looking like a 2009 publishing date.I've read the entire series and have started over. (Currently on The Wastelands.) Anyway, I have much more respect for The Gunslinger now after seeing how much foreshadowing there was in it and it was written 20 years before he even knew how he was going to finish the series.Drawing of the Three and Wizard and Glass are the best. The Dark Tower VII was pretty good as well.Don't know how, but I knew zip about the story or series so I was a little when he meets the kid from New York in the middle of the desert. Wondering WTF is going on....I actually enjoyed book 1, but I think it's pretty widely accepted (and I concur) that book 2 is the best book in the series.Kinda feeling the same way. About 1/2 way through the first book and have been lukewarm to it so far. Does it start getting better right away with book 2??First book sucked. It gets way better.The Gunslinger - Stephen King
I hope it gets better, because the first book was kind of meh
Next up is World War Z by Max Brooks. I had started this about 3 months ago & stopped about 50 pages in - not because I didn't like it but because I was also reading Martin's books & got tunnel vision.
After that, I've got Dan Simmon's The Terror & Joe Hill's (S King's son) Heart Shaped Box on deck. I'm also toying with tackling King's Dark Tower from beginning to end, which I've never done. From The Wastelands on, I've read them as they were published (with a couple of re-reads of III & IV but not the others).
I'll also bite off a chapter or two of McCullough's 1776 when the mood strikes. For some reason I can easily slide back into this one even after a few weeks.
Just finished the Wind Up Bird Chronicle. It was interesting and different but overall disappointing. Im ok with some open endedness but damn.Ooooo, I can't wait to see your update on this one. About a month ago, I finished The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle, which easily slid right into my top 10 all-time favorite books. Better than Kafka on the Shore, which I also loved.I just finished reading "The Road" by Cormac McCarthy, which was utterly fantastic, and prior to that, Phillip Pullman's "His Dark Materials" trilogy, which was great as well . . .
About to tear into Murakami's "Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World."
chicago boy -Just started "A Walk on the Wild Side" by Nelson Algren.Love it so far.
I think I liked The Partner more than all the rest of his books. That's the one where the guy absconds with millions from his corrupt law firm and fakes his own death, right? (Hope that's not a spoiler). Lotsa bad apples get their comeuppance in that one.I was on vacation last week so I read The Partner and The Last Juror by Grisham and Night Watch by Terry Pratchard. I enjoyed all of them. This was the first Discworld book I have read and while Pratchard wasn't as funny as they made him out to be he is good with words and satire, I did find myself chuckling through some of it.
Yes. The Last Juror was good because it was from the point of view of a newspaper guy instead of a lawyer, it was a refreshing change of pace from some of his books. I like the lawyer tales, but it can get boring to read more than one of them in a row.I think I liked The Partner more than all the rest of his books. That's the one where the guy absconds with millions from his corrupt law firm and fakes his own death, right? (Hope that's not a spoiler). Lotsa bad apples get their comeuppance in that one.I was on vacation last week so I read The Partner and The Last Juror by Grisham and Night Watch by Terry Pratchard. I enjoyed all of them. This was the first Discworld book I have read and while Pratchard wasn't as funny as they made him out to be he is good with words and satire, I did find myself chuckling through some of it.
Huh. You are the first person I've ever heard say that. I thought that (and the others in the Foundation series) book was outstanding. Definitely avoid the others in the series as they are pretty much identical in style and pace. Who are some of your favorite sci-fi writers? Asimov, in my opinion, is better at establishing characters and situations in the openings of his books than anybody else. You feel like you know the world after 50 pages...I always thought that was amazing. I'm not coming down on you for not liking him...just curious to see what you do like. I'm the guy that doesn't like Neil Gaiman, so I get plenty of grief on that one.Hawk Fan said:Foundation by Isaac Asimov. Meh. I was disappointed. I don't care for Asimov's writing style; I also recently read I, Robot. I'll probably read the other two in the original trilogy eventually. As far as classic sci-fi goes, I really liked The Stars My Destination by Alfred Bester. Recently read his short story collection Virtual Unrealities which was good but not as good as his novel. I'll be reading The Demolished Man soon (winner of the first Hugo award in 1953).
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close by Jonathan Safran Foer. Enjoyed this.
The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver. I thought this was very good, though the last third dragged a little bit after a major plot point, and Leah's sections got pretty preachy.
There is very little characterization. I didn't feel invested in the book and didn't really care what happened. The dialogue only serves to advance the plot. There is no description. The "science" and ideas seem dated, even by 1950s standards. I do like Neil Gaiman. I haven't read much science fiction, but I plan on reading some Heinlein next.Huh. You are the first person I've ever heard say that. I thought that (and the others in the Foundation series) book was outstanding. Definitely avoid the others in the series as they are pretty much identical in style and pace. Who are some of your favorite sci-fi writers? Asimov, in my opinion, is better at establishing characters and situations in the openings of his books than anybody else. You feel like you know the world after 50 pages...I always thought that was amazing. I'm not coming down on you for not liking him...just curious to see what you do like. I'm the guy that doesn't like Neil Gaiman, so I get plenty of grief on that one.Hawk Fan said:Foundation by Isaac Asimov. Meh. I was disappointed. I don't care for Asimov's writing style; I also recently read I, Robot. I'll probably read the other two in the original trilogy eventually. As far as classic sci-fi goes, I really liked The Stars My Destination by Alfred Bester. Recently read his short story collection Virtual Unrealities which was good but not as good as his novel. I'll be reading The Demolished Man soon (winner of the first Hugo award in 1953).
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close by Jonathan Safran Foer. Enjoyed this.
The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver. I thought this was very good, though the last third dragged a little bit after a major plot point, and Leah's sections got pretty preachy.
Different strokes here. I'll be interested to hear what you think of Heinlein. Go with Farnham's Freehold.There is very little characterization. I didn't feel invested in the book and didn't really care what happened. The dialogue only serves to advance the plot. There is no description. The "science" and ideas seem dated, even by 1950s standards. I do like Neil Gaiman. I haven't read much science fiction, but I plan on reading some Heinlein next.Huh. You are the first person I've ever heard say that. I thought that (and the others in the Foundation series) book was outstanding. Definitely avoid the others in the series as they are pretty much identical in style and pace. Who are some of your favorite sci-fi writers? Asimov, in my opinion, is better at establishing characters and situations in the openings of his books than anybody else. You feel like you know the world after 50 pages...I always thought that was amazing. I'm not coming down on you for not liking him...just curious to see what you do like. I'm the guy that doesn't like Neil Gaiman, so I get plenty of grief on that one.Hawk Fan said:Foundation by Isaac Asimov. Meh. I was disappointed. I don't care for Asimov's writing style; I also recently read I, Robot. I'll probably read the other two in the original trilogy eventually. As far as classic sci-fi goes, I really liked The Stars My Destination by Alfred Bester. Recently read his short story collection Virtual Unrealities which was good but not as good as his novel. I'll be reading The Demolished Man soon (winner of the first Hugo award in 1953).
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close by Jonathan Safran Foer. Enjoyed this.
The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver. I thought this was very good, though the last third dragged a little bit after a major plot point, and Leah's sections got pretty preachy.
Halfway through and enjoying it immensely.Washingtons Crossing
I think based on a recommendation from this thread, regardless, pretty good read so far. Very detailed account of what a group of non-functioning misfits the Continental Army was early on and the man who held it all together.