fatness
Footballguy
I think they might get him for a second round pick. I don't think they'd offer it though.Seriously, what do the Vikings have to give up to get this guy?
I think they might get him for a second round pick. I don't think they'd offer it though.Seriously, what do the Vikings have to give up to get this guy?
Are you implying yours is documented? Please send these things to Shuke so we can confirm. TIA.I'm sure your documented FF success is much better. Congrats.Yep, won $4500 last year too. FFPC $750 entry fee draftmasters...feel free to look it up.Blind squirrels get nuts on occasion. Broken clocks are right twice a day. Fish catch inside straight draws when all-in sometimes. An up year in fantasy football can be had by anyone.Funny you say that. I netted $10K in the FFPC THIS YEAR. It can be verified by several in this board. How about you?Good point. Please feel free to provide some of your other player evaluations for 2014, and we can (avoid those players you endorse, and)Your sample size is horrible.
evaluate them after next season.
2009 FFPC regular season highest scoring team $1000
2009 FFPC 6th place finish overall, yep more cash
Thanks for playing
I was there. Beautiful bird.I won a helicopter playing fantasy football in 2008, came with the pilot and everything.
No way those three chicks were under the total allowed weight limit, we really dodged the proverbial bullet there.I was there. Beautiful bird.I won a helicopter playing fantasy football in 2008, came with the pilot and everything.
Packer fans -- couldn't be avoided.No way those three chicks were under the total allowed weight limit, we really dodged the proverbial bullet there.I was there. Beautiful bird.I won a helicopter playing fantasy football in 2008, came with the pilot and everything.
They can get 56.2% completions, 6.5 yards/attempt, 8 TDs and 10 INTs, 68.6 passer rating, 1-3 record as a starter, from guys already on the squad. Both Cassell and Ponder did better than that this year.Seriously, what do the Vikings have to give up to get this guy?
Peyton Manning completed 56% of his passes, had 26 TD/28 INT's, and a passer rating of 71.2 his rookie year. A lot of QB's start off slow.They can get 56.2% completions, 6.5 yards/attempt, 8 TDs and 10 INTs, 68.6 passer rating, 1-3 record as a starter, from guys already on the squad. Both Cassell and Ponder did better than that this year.Seriously, what do the Vikings have to give up to get this guy?
But Cassell isn't under contract for next year and they are done with Ponder...so it is a matter of if Cousins is better than whatever will be left for them at #8 (or in the 2nd or 3rd round).They can get 56.2% completions, 6.5 yards/attempt, 8 TDs and 10 INTs, 68.6 passer rating, 1-3 record as a starter, from guys already on the squad. Both Cassell and Ponder did better than that this year.Seriously, what do the Vikings have to give up to get this guy?
Cousins is a second-year player; I was giving him the benefit of the doubt by including the one decent game he's played, which was in his rookie year. If you want to look only at what Cousins did in his second year, those numbers go to 52.3%, 4 TD, 7 INT, 5.5 yards/attempt, 58.4 passer rating, 0-3 record. Every season Ponder and Cassel have played has been better than that.Peyton Manning completed 56% of his passes, had 26 TD/28 INT's, and a passer rating of 71.2 his rookie year. A lot of QB's start off slow.They can get 56.2% completions, 6.5 yards/attempt, 8 TDs and 10 INTs, 68.6 passer rating, 1-3 record as a starter, from guys already on the squad. Both Cassell and Ponder did better than that this year.Seriously, what do the Vikings have to give up to get this guy?
Or in free agency. Vick and Josh McCown, have better cred than Cousins, and I'd even look at Sanchez before Cousins if I have to give up anything to get Cousins. And there are probably four or five QBs in the draft who are solidly better prospects than Cousins.But Cassell isn't under contract for next year and they are done with Ponder...so it is a matter of if Cousins is better than whatever will be left for them at #8 (or in the 2nd or 3rd round).They can get 56.2% completions, 6.5 yards/attempt, 8 TDs and 10 INTs, 68.6 passer rating, 1-3 record as a starter, from guys already on the squad. Both Cassell and Ponder did better than that this year.Seriously, what do the Vikings have to give up to get this guy?
Good to hear again from the President of the Kirk Cousins Fan Club.That's one hell of an assessment from his 4 game sample size.
Any chance of winning a Super Bowl in the next 5 years or so.Seriously, what do the Vikings have to give up to get this guy?
Yeah, if Cousins had put together 3 good games at the end of the season we'd be hearing how it proved he deserved to be the starter.Good to hear again from the President of the Kirk Cousins Fan Club.That's one hell of an assessment from his 4 game sample size.
Griffin may have been struggling relative to his rookie season, but he actually had a decent passing year. Certainly far better than Cousins did. 82.2 rating and 7.02 yards/attempt are in the middle of the NFL pack; not as good as his rookie season, but way better than Cousins or any of the others listed here.People said much the same about Nick Foles last season and this summer. I believe there was even chatter of possibly cutting Foles in camp as he "didn't fit the system". Due to need he got a hot and excelled on a GOOD OFFENSE.
All I'm saying is Cousins hasn't had that opportunity yet.
Last year when the Skins offense was GOOD Cousins did well. Not so much this season when the team and especially the offense was BAD.
Cousins has certainly proven he sucks on a BAD offense. Of course the same can be said of most QBs. Even a future HOF QB like Brady has looked bad at times this year when the offense was BAD. I'm not saying Brady is bad as we have a much larger sample size.
This is difficult or some to comprehend. I'm not a fan of Cousins. I'm a pseudo fan of the Skins and started this thread because I could see that Griffin was struggling. He was also struggling on a BAD offense, so I give him a pass for this year and hope he returns next season stronger and gets back to a dominant level.
Clear enough?
Prepare to be flamed. There are a lot of Griffin ball washers on this board who are Skins fans it appears. This is blasphemy!Am I alone in thinking the Skins should dial up the Texans to see if they would part with a couple 2s, this year and next, for Griffin? Skins rid themselves of RG3, recoup some pics while
he still holds market value, and roll with Cousins. If he's good, they have a keeper, if he stinks, draft your franchise guy next year. Being a Texas guy, RG3 would be a great sell for the
Texans.
You're not alone, but there's a reason the short bus is short.Am I alone in thinking the Skins should dial up the Texans to see if they would part with a couple 2s, this year and next, for Griffin? Skins rid themselves of RG3, recoup some pics while he still holds market value, and roll with Cousins. If he's good, they have a keeper, if he stinks, draft your franchise guy next year. Being a Texas guy, RG3 would be a great sell for the Texans.
Newton went through many of the same things last season (also his second year) and things turned out rather well for him and the Panthers. I know it isn't always easy to be patient but when you have someone who clearly has elite talent I think you need to show plenty of patience - and then plenty more - to ensure you've done everything possible to get him to play at that elite level his talent has shown he can reach.If my QB isn't a leader I don't want him and there's been alot of talk in that direction re RG3. If he goes out and stinks it up next year, his value is gone.
Good point with Newton. I'm not a fan of his either and I question whether he has the intangibles to raise his team to the pinnacle but he has advanced.Newton went through many of the same things last season (also his second year) and things turned out rather well for him and the Panthers. I know it isn't always easy to be patient but when you have someone who clearly has elite talent I think you need to show plenty of patience - and then plenty more - to ensure you've done everything possible to get him to play at that elite level his talent has shown he can reach.If my QB isn't a leader I don't want him and there's been alot of talk in that direction re RG3. If he goes out and stinks it up next year, his value is gone.
Not happening.Am I alone in thinking the Skins should dial up the Texans to see if they would part with a couple 2s, this year and next, for Griffin? Skins rid themselves of RG3, recoup some pics while he still holds market value, and roll with Cousins. If he's good, they have a keeper, if he stinks, draft your franchise guy next year. Being a Texas guy, RG3 would be a great sell for the Texans.
The only thing such a trade would accomplish would be to give some message board posters who don't like Griffin a "Ha!. Told you so!" moment. It would do nothing but damage for the Redskins.Am I alone in thinking the Skins should dial up the Texans to see if they would part with a couple 2s, this year and next, for Griffin? Skins rid themselves of RG3, recoup some pics while he still holds market value, and roll with Cousins. If he's good, they have a keeper, if he stinks, draft your franchise guy next year. Being a Texas guy, RG3 would be a great sell for the Texans.
If Griffin is as poor a leader as has been rumored it might be the best thing they could do.fatness said:The only thing such a trade would accomplish would be to give some message board posters who don't like Griffin a "Ha!. Told you so!" moment. It would do nothing but damage for the Redskins.JetMaxx said:Am I alone in thinking the Skins should dial up the Texans to see if they would part with a couple 2s, this year and next, for Griffin? Skins rid themselves of RG3, recoup some pics while he still holds market value, and roll with Cousins. If he's good, they have a keeper, if he stinks, draft your franchise guy next year. Being a Texas guy, RG3 would be a great sell for the Texans.
You're doing yourself a disservice, listening to that kind of moronic rumor-mongering.If Griffin is as poor a leader as has been rumored it might be the best thing they could do.fatness said:The only thing such a trade would accomplish would be to give some message board posters who don't like Griffin a "Ha!. Told you so!" moment. It would do nothing but damage for the Redskins.JetMaxx said:Am I alone in thinking the Skins should dial up the Texans to see if they would part with a couple 2s, this year and next, for Griffin? Skins rid themselves of RG3, recoup some pics while he still holds market value, and roll with Cousins. If he's good, they have a keeper, if he stinks, draft your franchise guy next year. Being a Texas guy, RG3 would be a great sell for the Texans.
Cousins is much closer to Cassell than Manning. I don't think that's arguable. Or maybe in Shark Pool it is.cstu said:Peyton Manning completed 56% of his passes, had 26 TD/28 INT's, and a passer rating of 71.2 his rookie year. A lot of QB's start off slow.CalBear said:They can get 56.2% completions, 6.5 yards/attempt, 8 TDs and 10 INTs, 68.6 passer rating, 1-3 record as a starter, from guys already on the squad. Both Cassell and Ponder did better than that this year.FunkyPlutos said:Seriously, what do the Vikings have to give up to get this guy?
If Griffin is as poor a leader as has been rumored it might be the best thing they could do.fatness said:The only thing such a trade would accomplish would be to give some message board posters who don't like Griffin a "Ha!. Told you so!" moment. It would do nothing but damage for the Redskins.JetMaxx said:Am I alone in thinking the Skins should dial up the Texans to see if they would part with a couple 2s, this year and next, for Griffin? Skins rid themselves of RG3, recoup some pics while he still holds market value, and roll with Cousins. If he's good, they have a keeper, if he stinks, draft your franchise guy next year. Being a Texas guy, RG3 would be a great sell for the Texans.
Seriously? Please find a legitimate source that says RG3 is a poor leader. Every rumor that suggested that was shot down by teammates and people within the organization. Is this stemming from the whole "OL don't help RG3 up" non-story?If Griffin is as poor a leader as has been rumored it might be the best thing they could do.fatness said:The only thing such a trade would accomplish would be to give some message board posters who don't like Griffin a "Ha!. Told you so!" moment. It would do nothing but damage for the Redskins.JetMaxx said:Am I alone in thinking the Skins should dial up the Texans to see if they would part with a couple 2s, this year and next, for Griffin? Skins rid themselves of RG3, recoup some pics while he still holds market value, and roll with Cousins. If he's good, they have a keeper, if he stinks, draft your franchise guy next year. Being a Texas guy, RG3 would be a great sell for the Texans.
Then you should have NO trepidation about sharing your projections prior to next season, right?Yep, won $4500 last year too. FFPC $750 entry fee draftmasters...feel free to look it up.Blind squirrels get nuts on occasion. Broken clocks are right twice a day. Fish catch inside straight draws when all-in sometimes. An up year in fantasy football can be had by anyone.Funny you say that. I netted $10K in the FFPC THIS YEAR. It can be verified by several in this board. How about you?Good point. Please feel free to provide some of your other player evaluations for 2014, and we can (avoid those players you endorse, and)Your sample size is horrible.
evaluate them after next season.
2009 FFPC regular season highest scoring team $1000
2009 FFPC 6th place finish overall, yep more cash
Thanks for playing
Off the top of my head:How many backup QBs have been traded?
How many amounted to anything?
Honest questions.
First off, nothing has been proven. Griffin failed, Cousins failed. Technically, I was proven to be right because the last 3 games of the season Cousins WAS the #1. So, I am 1-0. As for projections, I utilize FBGs and then go from there to adjust projections, make selections, and build my teams. Results are an indicator of preparation. My sample size is large enough to show that it's not just a blind squirrel effect.Then you should have NO trepidation about sharing your projections prior to next season, right?It's very easy, after the fact, to say "I was right." It's much harder to make predictions ahead ofYep, won $4500 last year too. FFPC $750 entry fee draftmasters...feel free to look it up.2009 FFPC regular season highest scoring teamBlind squirrels get nuts on occasion. BrokenFunny you say that. I netted $10K in the FFPC THIS YEAR. It can be verified by several in this board. How about you?Good point. Please feel free to provide some of your other player evaluations for 2014, and we can (avoid those players you endorse, and)Your sample size is horrible.
evaluate them after next season.
clocks are right twice a day. Fish catch inside straight draws when all-in sometimes. An up year in fantasy football can be had by anyone.
$1000
2009 FFPC 6th place finish overall, yep more cash
Thanks for playing
time, and then actually be right.
As of right now, you are 0 for 1 on this board. You predicted that Cousins was the "real #1" in
Washington ahead of time, and after the fact you were proven to be completely wrong.
Don't brag about money you won (or are
pretending to have won), because maybe you did win & maybe you didn't; but no one knows if you used your own predictions, just followed the "experts," got some lucky picks, etc. That's not
the question here, what is, is your ability to analyze players/situations and accurately predict how they will play out.
If anyone was still taking you seriously they won't after that post.Griffin failed, Cousins failed. Technically, I was proven to be right because the last 3 games of the season Cousins WAS the #1. So, I am 1-0.
Yeah but he won $71 at bingo and some fantasy football money in 2006.If anyone was still taking you seriously they won't after that post.Griffin failed, Cousins failed. Technically, I was proven to be right because the last 3 games of the season Cousins WAS the #1. So, I am 1-0.
This is not your Dynasty league where you can just grab a staring QB off the waiver wire at anytime when your QB drops a few duds in a row, or insert your backup until you starter has a better matchup. You don't give up on the kind of player RG3 has shown to be in his second season. Don't be so irrational, relax. Right now just worry about if the next head coach will come in and fully commit to using RG3 skill set, unlike Shananhan.Prepare to be flamed. There are a lot of Griffin ball washers on this board who are Skins fans it appears. This is blasphemy!Am I alone in thinking the Skins should dial up the Texans to see if they would part with a couple 2s, this year and next, for Griffin? Skins rid themselves of RG3, recoup some pics while
he still holds market value, and roll with Cousins. If he's good, they have a keeper, if he stinks, draft your franchise guy next year. Being a Texas guy, RG3 would be a great sell for the
Texans.
I'd put 2 time Pro Bowler Schaub in the successful list.Off the top of my head:How many backup QBs have been traded?
How many amounted to anything?
Honest questions.
Successes
Brett Favre
Matt Hasselbeck
Moderately successful
Matt Shaub
Matt Cassell
Disasters
AJ Feeley
Jim Druckenmiller
The point would be to get rid of the QB controversy and put the team's full faith in Griffin.Ultimately, I think getting rid of Shanahan will prove to be a huge positive for Washington and Griffin so the short-term lunacy of benching Griffin may end up working out in the long run.
However, if there was damage done to Cousins' trade value - and it's difficult to believe there wasn't considering how unimpressive he generally was - that could be a huge negative consequence. Griffin is clearly the future at quarterback and in my opinion clearly the superior talent. So really Cousins' best value to the team comes in the form of potential trade compensation. Given how important the position is there's always a chance some team (and it just takes one) will overpay for Cousins but I think the element of the unknown with Cousins was working in the team's favor. Now that cat's out of the bag unless/until he gets another shot (which could happen since Griffin's style of play would seem to lend itself to injuries, similar to what Vick's gone through in his career).
I don't think Washington would've looked to trade Cousins this coming offseason (that was just more gibberish from a delusional Shanahan) but there's no point to it now. Unless a team really overpaid for him you'd be Selling Low.
I didn't think you'd have the guts to do so. As I said, it's easy to say, after the fact, "I was right about this." Much harder to make predictions ahead of time. It's okay that you aren't confident enough to do so, just don't make up stories about why you won't share your "brilliant" skill at evaluating NFL players/situations.First off, nothing has been proven. Griffin failed, Cousins failed. Technically, I was proven to be right because the last 3 games of the season Cousins WAS the #1. So, I am 1-0.As for projections, I utilize FBGs and then go from there to adjust projections, make selections, and build my teams. Results are an indicator of preparation. My sample size is large enough to show that it's not just a blind squirrel effect.Then you should have NO trepidation about sharing your projections prior to next season, right?It's very easy, after the fact, to say "I was right." It's much harder to make predictions ahead ofYep, won $4500 last year too. FFPC $750 entry fee draftmasters...feel free to look it up.2009 FFPC regular season highest scoring teamBlind squirrels get nuts on occasion. BrokenFunny you say that. I netted $10K in the FFPC THIS YEAR. It can be verified by several in this board.How about you?Good point. Please feel free to provide some of your other player evaluations for 2014, and wecan (avoid those players you endorse, and)Your sample size is horrible.
evaluate them after next season.
clocks are right twice a day. Fish catch inside straight draws when all-in sometimes. An up year in fantasy football can be had by anyone.
$1000
2009 FFPC 6th place finish overall, yep more cash
Thanks for playing
time, and then actually be right.
As of right now, you are 0 for 1 on this board. You predicted that Cousins was the "real #1" in
Washington ahead of time, and after the fact you were proven to be completely wrong.
Don't brag about money you won (or are
pretending to have won), because maybe you did win & maybe you didn't; but no one knows if you used your own predictions, just followed the "experts," got some lucky picks, etc. That's not
the question here, what is, is your ability to analyze players/situations and accurately predict how they will play out.
You are more than welcome to join me in Vegas next year for the FFPC drafts. I'm in all of the Draftmasters. Many of my opponents who play in high stakes are on this board, so I'm not going to stupidly post projections, but since you feel the need to call me out then put your money where your mouth is.
Cousin's game tape should be enough to handle that.The point would be to get rid of the QB controversy and put the team's full faith in Griffin.Ultimately, I think getting rid of Shanahan will prove to be a huge positive for Washington and Griffin so the short-term lunacy of benching Griffin may end up working out in the long run.
However, if there was damage done to Cousins' trade value - and it's difficult to believe there wasn't considering how unimpressive he generally was - that could be a huge negative consequence. Griffin is clearly the future at quarterback and in my opinion clearly the superior talent. So really Cousins' best value to the team comes in the form of potential trade compensation. Given how important the position is there's always a chance some team (and it just takes one) will overpay for Cousins but I think the element of the unknown with Cousins was working in the team's favor. Now that cat's out of the bag unless/until he gets another shot (which could happen since Griffin's style of play would seem to lend itself to injuries, similar to what Vick's gone through in his career).
I don't think Washington would've looked to trade Cousins this coming offseason (that was just more gibberish from a delusional Shanahan) but there's no point to it now. Unless a team really overpaid for him you'd be Selling Low.
It won't matter, a couple of bad games by Griffin and people will be clamoring for Cousins.Cousin's game tape should be enough to handle that.The point would be to get rid of the QB controversy and put the team's full faith in Griffin.Ultimately, I think getting rid of Shanahan will prove to be a huge positive for Washington and Griffin so the short-term lunacy of benching Griffin may end up working out in the long run.
However, if there was damage done to Cousins' trade value - and it's difficult to believe there wasn't considering how unimpressive he generally was - that could be a huge negative consequence. Griffin is clearly the future at quarterback and in my opinion clearly the superior talent. So really Cousins' best value to the team comes in the form of potential trade compensation. Given how important the position is there's always a chance some team (and it just takes one) will overpay for Cousins but I think the element of the unknown with Cousins was working in the team's favor. Now that cat's out of the bag unless/until he gets another shot (which could happen since Griffin's style of play would seem to lend itself to injuries, similar to what Vick's gone through in his career).
I don't think Washington would've looked to trade Cousins this coming offseason (that was just more gibberish from a delusional Shanahan) but there's no point to it now. Unless a team really overpaid for him you'd be Selling Low.
Right, because people are going to take your projections to the bank, brohans.Why would anyone put their projections out in this board for free?
I'm happy to do top 10 lists, etc. and even those would contain misdirection.
I know you probably can't grasp the idea that knowledge is money, but you should try.
No, I'm taking my projections to the bank, pal.Right, because people are going to take your projections to the bank, brohans.Why would anyone put their projections out in
this board for free?
I'm happy to do top 10 lists, etc. and even those would contain misdirection.
I know you probably can't grasp the idea that knowledge is money, but you should try.