They forced the action to Brown when he was there. AB played about 24 of 72 snaps. Gordon played 57. They only had 28 passing attempts. Gordon saw 5 of them. They didn't really need him and overall they just ran the clock down and ran a lot (35 rushing attempts). They easily could have laid it on offensively if they wanted but didn't.Curious if MIA made it a point to take away Josh Gordon ... didn't see much action until very late in the game.
or is he just the odd man out with AB in the lineup now?
It's really criminal how bad the AFC east has been, and continues to be for the Pats.Vegas made the Cowboys a 21.5 point favorite against the Dolphins this week. The Jets countered by saying HOLD MY BEER. With the Jets down two QB's, New England now a 22.5 point favorite against the Jets.
Is that their 4th OL thats out? My goodness.Isaiah Wynn placed on IR . . . will have to miss 8 weeks but can return.
He’ll be back by Thanksgiving.Isaiah Wynn placed on IR . . . will have to miss 8 weeks but can return.
Concerning to GMs with Michel on the team and those that need longer-developing plays for Gordon to get targets. That's me. Dang.This would be the one thing that could de-rail this team. Who would of thought the O-line would be the culprit.
ABs targets came out of Edelman and Dorsett's share. Cannon will be back week 4 if not this week and Ben Watson returns week 5. Scar will keep it together until then.Concerning to GMs with Michel on the team and those that need longer-developing plays for Gordon to get targets. That's me. Dang.
People always say this, but last time I checked Pats had a similar win % vs AFCE as they have vs rest of NFL, around .750. You could argue that the teams are not strong enough to challenge Pats for the division, which would hold water if the Pats were winning the AFCE with 9 or 10 wins, but they consistently are 12, 13 or 14. Show me a division where the second place team consistently has 12-13 wins. Simply does not happen on any kind of consistent basis. So while on the surface it seems to makes life easy for NE, in reality, it honestly does not have much of an impact on their continued success.It's really criminal how bad the AFC east has been, and continues to be for the Pats.
Serious question. How would other divisions look over the last 20 years if each team had to start the year with an average of 1.5 to 2 losses every year if NE had been in a different division. It’s been discussed in multiple threads that NE wins essentially at the same rate in their division, in their conference, or out of conference. What would change would be the division that NE was winning in and how weak that division was.It's really criminal how bad the AFC east has been, and continues to be for the Pats.
Dude, you can spin it however you want, the fact is the AFC east hot garbage. Miami hasnt been relevent since Marino. The Jets have a decent defense once in a blue moon...QB?...and the Bills? Trash! Year in, year out.....These three franchises have been HORRIBLE with player/personnel moves for decades!Serious question. How would other divisions look over the last 20 years if each team had to start the year with an average of 1.5 to 2 losses every year if NE had been in a different division. It’s been discussed in multiple threads that NE wins essentially at the same rate in their division, in their conference, or out of conference. What would change would be the division that NE was winning in and how weak that division was.
6 gimmes this season.....People always say this, but last time I checked Pats had a similar win % vs AFCE as they have vs rest of NFL, around .750. You could argue that the teams are not strong enough to challenge Pats for the division, which would hold water if the Pats were winning the AFCE with 9 or 10 wins, but they consistently are 12, 13 or 14. Show me a division where the second place team consistently has 12-13 wins. Simply does not happen on any kind of consistent basis. So while on the surface it seems to makes life easy for NE, in reality, it honestly does not have much of an impact on their continued success.
AFC East teams are the suckiest bunch of sucks that ever sucked.Man, Pats fans sure are touchy about their division!
Fwiw, I think what the Pats have done is incredible. We will most likely never see another dynasty like this in the NFL.....I just find it comical how bad the rest of that division is year in, year out.....if anything, it gives more credence to what NE has done by showing just how hard it is to get on top, let alone stay there for an extended period of time....
Also, I enjoy watching the Pats do what they do. Most games they are playing chess while the other team is playing checkers. I hand it Brady and Belichik. They cracked the code, and set the trends that other franchises try to follow......their division still stinks though! Haha
To be fair, you could make an argument that those teams have been horribly managed from ownership on down and really have ####ed it up for two decades.AFC East teams are the suckiest bunch of sucks that ever sucked.
Amazing that these teams have had 2 DECADES to figure it out and still can not.
... but seems that every division has at least 2 cup-cakes ... some 3.
He'll get it squared away before the tough stretch. If not, we'll pick up Adam after the Colts cut him.soooo ... anyone want to talk about the kicking game?
Missed FG and 2 missed XP last week.
Gostkowski losing it or is the new holder that much of a problem?
If NE ever plays a REAL team, this could be a problem.
Lets see how the pathetic AFC East does against your powerhouse NFC East teams this year.6 gimmes this season.....
And most seasons we all know those three other trash franchises aren't going to field a competitive team......I'd bet any of the other better franchises in the NFL would KILL to be in the AFC east!
It's one team outside of NEP that currently has any credibility whatsoever. (BUF) The other 2 teams are bottom of the barrel. AFC East is the weakest division in football.Lets see how the pathetic AFC East does against your powerhouse NFC East teams this year.
already BUF tuned up the mighty NYG team. Just doubled their score is all. Now which of these teams is the "gimmie"?
and are you real confident that WAS could beat any AFC team other than tanking MIA? Talk about a "gimmie". There's 2 right there for your Cowboys.
PHI has been underwhelming to the point that I'm expecting BUF to be the favorite in their week 8 matchup. BUF>PHI
Hopefully you stick around to discuss weak divisions when the chips have fallen.
Buffalo is not a gimme, I take that one back, but the Jets and phins are abortionsLets see how the pathetic AFC East does against your powerhouse NFC East teams this year.
already BUF tuned up the mighty NYG team. Just doubled their score is all. Now which of these teams is the "gimmie"?
and are you real confident that WAS could beat any AFC team other than tanking MIA? Talk about a "gimmie". There's 2 right there for your Cowboys.
PHI has been underwhelming to the point that I'm expecting BUF to be the favorite in their week 8 matchup. BUF>PHI
Hopefully you stick around to discuss weak divisions when the chips have fallen.
Of the 8 divisions, which divisions has more than 2 "credible" teams?It's one team outside of NEP that currently has any credibility whatsoever. (BUF) The other 2 teams are bottom of the barrel. AFC East is the weakest division in football.
I see your point, but I'm coming in from a different perspective. I see the patheticness of the 2 teams lacking credibility is unparallelled in the AFC East compared to other divisions.Of the 8 divisions, which divisions has more than 2 "credible" teams?
This one stings.FB James Develin to IR.
Buffalo is not a gimme, I take that one back, but the Jets and phins are abortions
Since you brought it up . . .I see your point, but I'm coming in from a different perspective. I see the patheticness of the 2 teams lacking credibility is unparallelled in the AFC East compared to other divisions.
Interesting numbers, nice dig Anarchy. I would like to see the set of numbers in the last 10 years. I think it will look much different, as I am referring to this more recent time frame.Since you brought it up . . .
Since the league went to 32 teams and 8 divisions, here are the most consecutive non-winning seasons by each team within each division. Basically, the longest stretch for each team with 7 or fewer wins.
NFC East: DAL 1, PHI 2, NYG 3, WAS 3 = 9 (Teams longer than 3 seasons = 0)
NFC South: ATL 2, CAR 3, NOS 3, TBB 5 = 13 (Teams longer than 3 seasons = 1)
AFC West: DEN 2, LAC 2, KCC 3, OAK 7 = 14 (Teams longer than 3 seasons = 1)
AFC North: PIT 1, BAL 1, CIN 3, CLE 11 = 16 (Teams longer than 3 seasons = 1)
AFC East: NEP 0, NYJ 3, MIA 4, BUF 9 = 16 (Teams longer than 3 season = 2)
AFC South: IND 1, TEN 4, HOU 5, JAC 6 = 16 (Teams longer than 3 seasons = 3)
NFC North: GBP 2, MIN 2, CHI 4, DET 9 = 17 (Teams longer than 3 seasons = 2)
NFC West: SEA 4, ARI 5, SFO 6, LAR 10 = 25 (Teams longer than 3 seasons = 4)
I'm not sure the AFC East would fall into the "unparalleled" category in terms of having multiple teams with extended stretches of losing.
I will research that later, but IMO those numbers will be skewed. The AFC East teams start each year with 1.5 to 2.0 losses on average because they have to face NE. Plenty of teams lose to NE . . . they are more fortunate that they don’t have to play them very often.Interesting numbers, nice dig Anarchy. I would like to see the set of numbers in the last 10 years. I think it will look much different, as I am referring to this more recent time frame.
Here are the records for each team over the 2009 - 2018 period. I am off by a game somewhere, but close enough . . .Casting Couch said:Interesting numbers, nice dig Anarchy. I would like to see the set of numbers in the last 10 years. I think it will look much different, as I am referring to this more recent time frame.
Sort of a backhanded way of accounting. NE far and away had the most wins . . . So it would be expected that they beat the teams in their division and those teams had fewer wins because of it.Total wins by bottom 3 teams
AFC E 209
AFCN 219
AFC S 201
AFC W 234
NFC E 226
NFC N 229
NFC S 227
NFC W 220
Teams from the AFC S have the worst record outside of the top division team during this time frame.
I don't recommend smack talk with the state of our o line, absence of a seasoned fullback, and Edelman with sore chest...need James White to channel 28-3.Maybe the complaints about the AFC East hold water. Especially when the QB that has won the most games played in BUF since 2001 is not even a Bills QB . . . it’s Tom Brady.
I'm pretty sure that he had at least one season with more games passing over 300 yards than the Bills have had in total since then as well. Buffalo QBs have been especially terrible.Maybe the complaints about the AFC East hold water. Especially when the QB that has won the most games played in BUF since 2001 is not even a Bills QB . . . it’s Tom Brady.
totally agreeBrady looked so bad and skittish today along with ridiculous, scaredy cat, uncreative play calling= poop. The O sucked today. Defense was pretty good... they probably lose without the blocked punt and TD. Penalties, and a couple lucky penalties against the Bills that negated losses. Credit to Bills D. On to Washington.
I thought they could only take 2 of 3 back from IR between Harry, Wynn and Develin?In other years, NE would have a game like yesterday and have a 2-2 record. People would be pointing to that being the game where Brady fell off the cliff and it would signify the end of the Patriots era as a dominant team in the NFL. The good news is 1) they still won and 2) they always get better and will start hitting their stride in another couple of weeks.
With the injuries on the offensive side of the ball, they probably won't be the team that scored 30 points week in and week out for years. But they should be able to get 21-24 points (more against the bottom feeder teams) . . . maybe even more if the defense and special teams puts up points or gives the offense great field position. If they don't turn the ball over and stay away from dumb penalties, that should be plenty good enough to win (especially against the young QB's they are slated to face).
The defense should be able to carry them most of the time, and NE really should make it through the first half of the season without a loss (WAS, NYG, NYJ, CLE). By then we should know where they stand moving forward. Watson will be back next week, Harry should be back for the last couple of months, if anyone remembers or cares, Cameron Meredith is also waiting in the wings, Wynn will be coming back, Devlin might be back for the playoff push, and who knows if Gronk will show up (he would probably have to be a WR at this points as he has lost a lot of weight).
We can revisit how good this version of the team is after their 6 pack of tougher opponents (CLE, BAL, PHI, DAL, HOU, KC) starting in November.
Yes, you are right. Only can bring back 2 guys. I would rank them differently than you. I think they need OL and receiving help the most. And Develin may be the most injured of the three. The German kid can probably provide a lot of what Develin does. Develin does a lot of little things very well . . . but I think they are a lot of little things. Johnson can probably do well enough blocking that the loss of Develin won't be as noticeable in another 4 or 5 games.I thought they could only take 2 of 3 back from IR between Harry, Wynn and Develin?
I would prioritize Wynn and Develin if so, because this version of the offense won't accomplish jack in the post-season.
I call this northeast USA metropolitan privilege. The affliction is shared across Boston, NYC, and Philly. Fair weather / whiny baby fans and blowhard media tools.Just had to post again on how silly the local sports media is when it comes to covering the team. Big picture, they have been to 9 SB's and won 6 of them in the past two decades and are currently 4-0. That being said, the way the media discusses this team, you would think the sky was falling and the Patriots were the 2019 Dolphins.
Recently, some of the comments I have heard include: that between Brady, Jimmy G, and Brissett, the Pats got stuck with the worst of the three QB's. That the offense as a whole is a hot mess and they collectively have no talent. That the defense is extremely lucky and really isn't that good . . . it's the lack of good teams and good QB's that has made them look way better than they really are. That if Gostkowski were a race horse, he would have been euthanized a long time ago. That the dumbest thing BB ever did was to bring in Antonio Brown and that will be a stain that can never be removed. That Brady is totally unhappy and is 100% gone after this year no matter what. And as always, they might as well just give away their draft picks because they don't get anything out of them as it is.
Basically, they aren't good, they have no talent, the coaches can't coach, they aren't likable, and this year is nothing but smoke and mirrors and they just aren't that good. No talent, no depth, no coaching, poor decision making, lame play calling, horrible drafting, and basically they are an inferior product masquerading as a top team based on prior success.
I considered calling in and asking what record they could they have that is better than 4-0, but I didn't want to waste my time getting flamed for being a blind homer that can't see what a total mess the team is.
I agree with you IF the German fullback can adequately cover Develin's responsibilities. I don't think that's a layup. And I tend to believe that the receiving corps of an eventually healthy Edelman, Dorsett, Gordon and Ben Watson would not be significantly improved by a first year wide receiver....but I don't claim to have the answers.Yes, you are right. Only can bring back 2 guys. I would rank them differently than you. I think they need OL and receiving help the most. And Develin may be the most injured of the three. The German kid can probably provide a lot of what Develin does. Develin does a lot of little things very well . . . but I think they are a lot of little things. Johnson can probably do well enough blocking that the loss of Develin won't be as noticeable in another 4 or 5 games.
Whether Harry can get integrated and in sync with Brady is another issue, but IMO they should be able to get him to run the out routes and square ins that Mitchell ran pretty easily.
The offense would have a lot of potential if they could bring in a high profile receiver, someone like Antonio Brown . . . oh, wait. The problem with NE and wide receivers is it's really hard to learn the playbook as an in season acquisition, so trading for someone else comes with learning curve issues . . . you never can tell you will fit in and when. Some of the people being bandied about as potential trade acquisitions sound interesting (AJ Green, Diggs, Sanders), but that is probably wishful thinking. Not sure who else would be available, as most of the decent receivers are on contending teams, and most of the productive receivers on mediocre teams are all young and have potential. The options are limited . . . unless anyone thinks someone like Larry Fitzgerald could be available (which I doubt he is).I agree with you IF the German fullback can adequately cover Develin's responsibilities. I don't think that's a layup. And I tend to believe that the receiving corps of an eventually healthy Edelman, Dorsett, Gordon and Ben Watson would not be significantly improved by a first year wide receiver....but I don't claim to have the answers.
I'm not worried about NE's WR corps. Dorsett is handling the role AB would have played pretty well.Is that their 4th OL thats out? My goodness.
Canon due back this week maybe?
Not much on the roster for a blocking TE either. There's more than a good chance Brady takes a few lumps from here on out.
This would be the one thing that could de-rail this team. Who would of thought the O-line would be the culprit.