Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Ok, so I lose 100-200k when they hit my storages instead of losing 1k when they snipe my TH.
I think at least part of the answer is that your offense will see a gain in the amount of loot and the number of bases you can hit when you are raiding will offset this. Your statements are true, but ignore the potential gains when you are the one on the other side doing the attacking. Less time between hitting next and seeing much bigger loot base sounds alright to me, but again the casual players will ultimately suffer and be weeded out.
Acer had the same misunderstanding. As an attacker, nothing has changed (as of yet). You still need 50% or the TH for a star.
Post-update...nothing (as of yet) has changed for gaining stars while attacking.
It might also push those that raid 1-2 times a day to raid a bit more. Attacking doesn't completely remove your shield with this new system, and you can browse bases without penalty. In this system, casual players can hop on, browse some bases, and hit one that is "worth it". Currently, they have to break their entire shield to even browse, which they will never do, and gives them incentive to only attack 1-2 times a day.
Yeah, in this situation it will hurt since you will be exposed to an actual raid each time instead of being insta-sniped.
This is going to depend on how they change the league loot bonus structure,and what league you farm in. As is, today, with the current structure you will be treading water and better off just picking up collectors if you raid in gold/silver. In master/champs you could still be +EV. This update today is particularly hard on TH9 who is the most easy to superqueen.
I run the superqueen as well as anyone. While your farm base is a prime superqueen candidate (the only way to make it easier is if you put your AD in the outer compartments), it would be very difficult to take your DE storage with fewer than 120 troop spaces. Frankly I doubt any would try.
Can your DE storage be taken without the attacker destroying at least 30%?
I agree with your premonition this will change. I actually expected it with the introduction of titan/legend leagues. There's a steep slope of bonus increases as you climb to Champs3, then it really flattens out. That structure doesn't make a whole lot of sense anymore.
They also have to deploy 50% of troops. Again, this is probably a small point and not really a concern.
If someone can take your DE storage without taking 30% of the base and without using 50% of their troops, then you deserve to have your DE taken. And I mean all of your DE.
Great posting. If you just log on and empty collectors, your resources will grow.
I haven't lost any DE in the last 7d19h, due to people quickly sniping me everytime I log off. This includes two days where (due to work and life) I failed to empty my collectors. I can afford to lose more than that. I'm interested to see the new rules in action, even if they don't help me.
4 for 5 with this and the fail was still 75% 2*. Gold Jerry, gold!6* war with thisSlightly modified build but the same concept/spells. Smash outside wall with WB, jump into core, rage. Hogs round the outside. Can really hold off on the first heal as all the fire is on the troops in the middle.
12 Wiz
16 hogs
2 witches
4 WB
2 Golem
1 CC Golem
I see about the same type of loss. This update appears to be focused on "fixing" this lopsided problem. I can't imagine thaf a game based on attacking and stealing would originally have been designed so that the most precious resource never gets taken.The Future Champs said:
Do you two have DE drills heavily protected?The Future Champs said:
Agreed.
You seem very angry, and this seems almost personal to you.Clayton Gray said:
Agreed. And I would be interested to see just how much money trophy pushers spend on gems because this seems all about them
