Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Also, the courts do not care if they did or did not answer questions, I believe...could be mistaken. Courts have different rules than independent investigators. They are not compelled int he courts eyes to have to answer questions without a subpoena.
Um, the Deadspin article says Zeke destroyed his old text messages.
This is all about procedures, power, precedent. None of this has anything to do with trying to arrive at a fair and equitable outcome at this point.
Yeah. His old phones. He reset and cleared his old phones. You're supposed to do that so you just don't have something with probably too much personal information on it just floating around.
That would make for good TV
Get the line down then come in with a big bet before you announce your ruling. Smart.
Well, Brady destroyed his old phone to get rid of his personal information, and Salty Haters came out of the woodwork saying that was a smoking gun for his guilt.
Especially when the person who interviewed the witness recommended no discipline. It's just....weird.
Basically Roger gets to do whatever the #### he wants, Elliot. This and the Brady ruling tells me that Elliot is not getting anything from this judge on Friday.
The NFL's lawyers edited the Wells Report before it came out...and refused to say what they changed. Pretty sure the NFL could have deleted some original Wells Report findings that said Brady didn't do it.
yup..and Jerry liked the Brady suspension...now how do you feel Jerry?The NFL's lawyers edited the Wells Report before it came out...and refused to say what they changed. Pretty sure the NFL could have deleted some original Wells Report findings that said Brady didn't do it.
Don't look behind the curtain, just accept the NFL's official findings. That's what the Salty Haters cheered for, so the same should apply to Zeke.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/09/03/judge-didnt-buy-nfls-claims-that-ted-wells-was-independent/
"And [Berman] made clear that he believes the NFL’s handling of Wells’s investigation was unfair to Brady, noting that NFL general counsel Jeff Pash was allowed to edit Wells’s report, while Brady was not allowed to question Pash."
(edit: fixed an obvious typo from original source)
First four were as expected:
Maybe you should head over to the darling of the first week waiver wire thread. You and petekrum can discuss why/why not Kupp should be on everyone's roster.
they #### the bed because value is falling to them. Kinda like when someone drafts McCaffery at 1.12
No joke. "Destroyed" is a very disingenuous way to say that. I do a factory reset on my old phones before I recycle them or give them away. Who wouldn't?
Hardy's infraction occurred before the current rules on domestic violence were in place. I believe there was a period when both the domestic violence and the substance violation rules were overhauled and they said people who's infractions that occurred before the overhaul were not subject to the new rules. So there were some guys whose drug suspensions were reduced (including Josh Gordon possibly?) and the domestic violence guys caught a break as well including Hardy.
no reason to be butt hurt over it. could have just said zeke slipped to round 3...Maybe you should head over to the darling of the first week waiver wire thread. You and petekrum can discuss why/why not Kupp should be on everyone's roster.
There's a very good reason that I rarely venture over here and guys like KingPrawn and petekrum reinforce that decision everytime I read their ####.
