VikingFrog
Footballguy
He's had a couple decent runs. One pulled back by penalty.
Ticky tack holding call scratched that nice gain on the screen. If this guy had less of a RBBC to deal with, he would be a fine FF RB. Limited touches and no work near the goal line limits his point potential.Washington comes in for a carry and immediately trots off holding his groin.
AA comes in and rips off a nice looking 24 yarder, followed by a nice screen catch that was again pulled back by penalty.
Perhaps he can do something in this second half to provide ZZ doesn't need any carries. Now is the time to reach up and grab the opportunity.The ####ty part for AA owners is that even if Washington is hurt they'll just active ZZ next week. He'll get more carries tonight at least.
Speaking of which, I think he'll be a solid start next week vs. ATL. It's not particularly easy to run on ATL but they keep everything in front of them and force teams to dink and dunk if they want to move the ball. I think he'll have 3-4 targets.
Replying to myself, but looks okay on the sideline, as if he wants to go back in.Nice 34 yard run to finish the game... aaaaaand he comes up a bit gimpy after.
His inability to take it to the house via mediocre long speed was his most obvious knock to me coming into the NFL. It's not the deal breaker for me though, the deal breaker is Riddick. Without those receptions to pad his floor you just can't trust him.^^^ Not a nice run. That was his absolute best case scenario and he was too slow to house it. I think that run comvinced me to finally give up on AA. Farewell, sweet prince.
I mean, no offense but why were you on the bandwagon in the first place then? He ran a 4.6, he's not a home run hitter.^^^ Not a nice run. That was his absolute best case scenario and he was too slow to house it. I think that run comvinced me to finally give up on AA. Farewell, sweet prince.
It was the straw that broke the camel. I forgot that on top of everything else going against him, he also doesn't have breakaway speed. Actually, I was probably more in denial about that aspect than anything. I was wrong. He showed it on that run. Peace, Ameer. Good luck to ya brother.I mean, no offense but why were you on the bandwagon in the first place then? He ran a 4.6, he's not a home run hitter.
Half of your top 20 backs would not have been able to take that to the house. His usage is the biggest issue. They pull him in obvious passing situations and short yardage. I personally think he'd be more productive than Riddick in the receiving role, so it sucks that he is taken out of the game.^^^ Not a nice run. That was his absolute best case scenario and he was too slow to house it. I think that run comvinced me to finally give up on AA. Farewell, sweet prince.
Well, they did at least throw him the one screen that went for 19 yards but was called back on a BS holding call on Lang. Also worth keeping in mind that Stafford only threw 21 passes.Good game. The biggest problem from a FF standpoint is that they don't throw him the ball. He could be one of the better receiving backs in the NFL, but they don't use him.
Hope the injury wasn't serious. Looked like he twisted his knee.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/0ap3000000847903/Ameer-Abdullah-powers-downfield-for-34-yard-gain^^^ Not a nice run. That was his absolute best case scenario and he was too slow to house it. I think that run comvinced me to finally give up on AA. Farewell, sweet prince.
Worry about a guy who got 18 carries at over 5 ypc?Do we worry yet?
With grabbing Cohen, Abdullah is downgraded to my Rb4, so I don't have to play him at all the entire season I guess (especially with Ajayi's 1st week bye). But if I have an injury he could see some time...
Just getting concerned right now. It's more of the same from Abdullah; how Detroit has been using him the first 2 weeks gives me no hope going forward- unless some homers see something different. I won't act like I watched either of their 2 games.
Well when you put it that way...shadyridr said:Worry about a guy who got 18 carries at over 5 ypc?
Do what? He has more rushing yards so far than Elliott, Gordon, Crowell, and Montgomery. He's coming off a career high in rushing yards and averaged 5.05ypc and you're worried about him?Dr. Dan said:Do we worry yet?
With grabbing Cohen, Abdullah is downgraded to my Rb4, so I don't have to play him at all the entire season I guess (especially with Ajayi's 1st week bye). But if I have an injury he could see some time...
Just getting concerned right now. It's more of the same from Abdullah; how Detroit has been using him the first 2 weeks gives me no hope going forward- unless some homers see something different. I won't act like I watched either of their 2 games.
Worried about his usage. I guess I didn't phrase that correctly. He got a heavy work load but didn't seem to get opportunities to score on receptions or TDs.Do what? He has more rushing yards so far than Elliott, Gordon, Crowell, and Montgomery. He's coming off a career high in rushing yards and averaged 5.05ypc and you're worried about him?
He had a nice catch and run called back late in the game for a hold. He had 17 carries. I wouldn't be too worried about usage. He's probably not a guy that is going to eclipse 20 carries very often, if it all.Worried about his usage. I guess I didn't phrase that correctly. He got a heavy work load but didn't seem to get opportunities to score on receptions or TDs.
Maybe I am completely missing something here, likely am, but I don't really like to see <10 points from anyone that I start (I didn't start Abdullah but I'd like to see a game over 10 points before I get excited)
I'd be very happy if I am completely missing the boat here and everyone in here is excited about his ROS. Vroom vroom start the wagon sort of thing
I can see it both ways... he played 29 snaps with 17 rushes and 0 receptions. That's like Ingram earlier in his career. It's hard on a RB when the OC is tipping his hand every time he's in the game. I think 10 of his 17 carries came on first down. He's not being put in a position to excel, buuut he's played some tough defenses and he looked pretty good this week when he got a little blocking. He mostly got unlucky in that his one screen got called back on a phantom penalty and he was frequently swarmed by defenders at or behind the line of scrimmage, yet he still broke two carries for over 20 yards.Well when you put it that way...
It just seems like its what some in here kind of predicted... between the 20s but losing out on goal line and receptions. He had a heck of a day, but without a TD or receptions I could get that same production from some WW guys. I can pick up almost any WR on the WW and get 4/45
Fair points. Sometimes I just need to be talked down a ledgeHe had a nice catch and run called back late in the game for a hold. He had 17 carries. I wouldn't be too worried about usage. He's probably not a guy that is going to eclipse 20 carries very often, if it all.
I don't think anyone is in here claiming he's an RB1. He's definitely a nice flex guy and could be a bye week fill-in. That's what I drafted him for. I'm not too worried about him producing. He's coming of a good game for him usage and yardage wise. You can't predict TDs.
I just wouldn't be getting worked up over this game. He looked pretty good and nothing I saw would make me think I need to get rid of him.Fair points. Sometimes I just need to be talked down a ledge
I drafted him as my bye week fill in and maybe flex. So if he can get 10 points a game I'd be happy. If that catch wasn't called back he'd be >10 in PPR.
If he scores a TD he's in the RB2 discussion for the week (not ROS just yet). So I can see how a few broken tackles/good plays and I'd be feeling completely different.
From a dynasty perspective, though, he is not what he is/has been in Detroit. He should be getting utilized in the passing game. Given his skill set, his lack of usage there borders on criminal. But it's just been 2 games. Maybe they'll find a way.AA is what he is. He is not a bell cow. He is not a burner. He is not involved in the passing game much. He is a pretty good running RB though. He seems to have pretty good vision at the LOS and the Detroit Oline has not done him many favors so far.
AA is a good RB3 or flex. As long as he is healthy, he is remaining on my roster.
About the GL carries, the Lions as a team thru 2 games have 5 inside the 10 yard line (according to ESPN team splits)
Abdullah has 2 of them (albeit for -4 yards).
Thanks for these tidbitsThe Lions can only run effectively to the right side at the moment. When LT Taylor Decker comes back in mid-October they'll have a much better offensive line.
Not to be contrary, but he has 1 less attempt than Elliot, 2 less than McCoy... two "bell cows"AA is what he is. He is not a bell cow. He is not a burner. He is not involved in the passing game much. He is a pretty good running RB though. He seems to have pretty good vision at the LOS and the Detroit Oline has not done him many favors so far.
AA is a good RB3 or flex. As long as he is healthy, he is remaining on my roster.
This is a good point. He is currently rated 12th on attempts only (not touches). Above Hunt, Lynch, Montgomery, Crowell, Gordon.Not sure how many RBs are on pace for 272 touches so far but I know that my "#1 RB" Jordan Howard isn't one of them.
FTR I absolutely agree with your concerns inre: passing game & goal line touches but in this game the first thing you need is for your players to get opportunities in general and Abdullah is getting a lot of them right now. His reception upside is probably only 20-25 and his TDs will probably be capped around 6 but 272 opportunities is still really, really nice for your #3 RB (in my 12 team ppr, redraft he was drafted 6.11 as the 25th RB off the board).Not to be contrary, but he has 1 less attempt than Elliot, 2 less than McCoy... two "bell cows"
This is a good point. He is currently rated 12th on attempts only (not touches). Above Hunt, Lynch, Montgomery, Crowell, Gordon.
I always felt like Crowell was a solid RB2/3 due to his pure volume. I didn't realize how much volume Abdullah is getting comparatively
Yes, he may not be heavily involved in the passing game, and goal line carries may be an issue (although he seems to be getting some at least), but the volume is there I guess. Just haven't seen the points quite yet playing against 2 pretty good defenses.
I dunno - IMO it has more to do with health of Washington & Ridddick.Asssuming he stays healthy, I project him at 200-220 rushing attempts. He'll start getting more targets. They're so bland and obvious in their run play calling, but I think Cooter will recognize that and switch it up a bit.
Zenner would be activated and presumedly see the GL carries.Now that said, Washington limped off, and someone in the game topic said AA tweaked his ankle. If Washington misses time, will it be AA at the stripe or a fullback?
True and will limit upside, but the defense is changing the identity of the team. A lot more rushing attempts this year I expect.Zenner would be activated and assumedly see the GL carries.
I much rather see Riddick get more snaps carrying the ball. Seems Riddick has way more power.He is a JAG...nothing special...hes a bit shifty other than that....meh
There's a reason Riddick's career ypc is 3.4, he's not a good at running in between the tackles despite what you saw last night. He'll never get a serious workload.I much rather see Riddick get more snaps carrying the ball. Seems Riddick has way more power.
Let Abdullah get more reps as the COP, I think he can be more productive.
Riddick doesn't at all. He is Darren Sproles.I much rather see Riddick get more snaps carrying the ball. Seems Riddick has way more power.
Let Abdullah get more reps as the COP, I think he can be more productive.