NewlyRetired
Footballguy
=============
[MLS After Dark] Matias Almeyda's translator was just given a red card in the match against Colorado
=============
[MLS After Dark] Matias Almeyda's translator was just given a red card in the match against Colorado
So since actual game play is ~2/3 of clock time, somehow that ratio will magically go away if the clock time shrinks to the 90 min game play time? Impossible to figure that at 60 mins the new game play time wont shrink to 40 mins of actual soccer?2x30.
3x30 would increase the games by 50% (remember all soccer games are roughly 60 minutes of real play).
So since actual game play is ~2/3 of clock time, somehow that ratio will magically go away if the clock time shrinks to the 90 min game play time? Impossible to figure that at 60 mins the new game play time wont shrink to 40 mins of actual soccer?
so this one goes to 11We have 90 minutes now which translates to roughly 60 minutes of play because the refs never stop the clock when the ball stops moving.
The 60 minute games are based on the ref stopping the clock during dead times.
Why not just stop the clock and don't change anything else? What's the benefit to cutting from 90 to 60 instead of just letting everyone know when time wasting is pointless?The 60 minute games are based on the ref stopping the clock during dead times.
If you keep a 90 minute time AND stop the clock, the games will run 50% longer than they do today. That would be a massive change in the game.Why not just stop the clock and don't change anything else? What's the benefit to cutting from 90 to 60 instead of just letting everyone know when time wasting is pointless?
Accuracy. Ball in play time is simple and accurate. Time wasting is hard to police. Stoppage time seems to be all over the place as far as enforcement goes.Why not just stop the clock and don't change anything else? What's the benefit to cutting from 90 to 60 instead of just letting everyone know when time wasting is pointless?
This shouldn't be hard to understand.If you keep a 90 minute time AND stop the clock, the games will run 50% longer than they do today. That would be a massive change in the game.
If you have a 60 minute clock AND stop the clock, the games will run roughly the same length as today but with the added bonus of time wasting being all but removed from the game.
One of FIFA's stated goals in the experiment (being used in Dutch and Belgian under-19 leagues this season, I think) is to shorten the game and maintain the attention of younger fans. If that's true (FIFA, Inoright?), then commercials won't be inserted into play stoppages.It seems like an attempt to add more advertising. I’ve never once watched a soccer match and thought there wasn’t enough time or anything even close to it. Not a problem that needs fixing in my opinion.
Nigel Tufnel : [about the back-stage buffet] Look, this. This miniture bread, it like... I've been working with this now for about half an hour and i can't figure out... let's say I wanted a bite, right. You got this...This shouldn't be hard to understand.If you keep a 90 minute time AND stop the clock, the games will run 50% longer than they do today. That would be a massive change in the game.
If you have a 60 minute clock AND stop the clock, the games will run roughly the same length as today but with the added bonus of time wasting being all but removed from the game.
The problem I have always had with the running clock is the massive inconsistency game to game.I wouldn't be a fan of changing the time to 60 and stopping the clock with ball out of bounds. There is something to the constant running clock that is appealing. It ends up being roughly 60 minutes of game time so it works..
This is great. Incomprehensible to the discussion but still awesome.Nigel Tufnel : [about the back-stage buffet] Look, this. This miniture bread, it like... I've been working with this now for about half an hour and i can't figure out... let's say I wanted a bite, right. You got this...
Ian Faith : You'd like bigger bread?
Nigel Tufnel : Exactly. I don't under stand how...
Ian Faith : [gestures to the meat] You could just fold this... though.
Nigel Tufnel : [folding the bread] Well, no... then it's half the size...
Ian Faith : No, not the bread.
[folding the meat]
Ian Faith : You could fold the meat...
Nigel Tufnel : [still folding the bread] Yeah, but then it breaks up. It breaks apart like this...
Ian Faith : [putting the folded meat onto the miniture bread] No, no, no... you put it on the bread like this; see?
Nigel Tufnel : [folding the miniture sandwich] But if you keep folding it, then it keeps breaking...
Ian Faith : Why would you keep folding it?
Nigel Tufnel : ...and then everything has to be folded... and then you have
[holds up miniture sandwich]
Nigel Tufnel : ... this. And I don't want this. I want large bread, so I can put this...
[puts meat between two pieces of miniature bread]
What about "Fergie Time"?The problem I have always had with the running clock is the massive inconsistency game to game.
Sure, the average game may be 60 minutes in play, but throw some Honduran antics into the game and the refs NEVER and I mean NEVER add anywhere near enough time to compensate. You can have large swings one way or another game to game based on the refs and teams involved.
Sports should be about a consistent format game to game imo.
If the clock had defined stoppages, you would have exact consistency game to game and remove the enormous variability/corruptness of Fergie time vs a ref who just wants to go home,
Eh... it's no different now IMO. No need to Americanize the sport. Just start giving yellows for obvious time wasting.A free kick from 25 yards out with three seconds on the clock would be appealing drama
I understand. But that's where the yellow cards come into play. They just have to be given when there is clear time wasting. It would stop a lot of it when these guys need to come off the field for 5 minutes each time.The problem I have always had with the running clock is the massive inconsistency game to game.
Sure, the average game may be 60 minutes in play, but throw some Honduran antics into the game and the refs NEVER and I mean NEVER add anywhere near enough time to compensate. You can have large swings one way or another game to game based on the refs and teams involved.
Sports should be about a consistent format game to game imo.
If the clock had defined stoppages, you would have exact consistency game to game and remove the enormous variability/corruptness of Fergie time vs a ref who just wants to go home,
Ive thought about that as well...ends up punishing players and teams with legit injuries needing treatment, which I don't like.In addition, I think if you come off with an injury, you shouldn't be able to come right back in if you leave the field. I think that should also require 3-5 minutes until returning.
Nothing changes, other than having to sit out for 5 mins.With this penalty box for yellow cards, would the next card still be red? Or can you get one/two yellows per half? Also would it follow the hockey rule and end early if the opposition scores?
If you have a legit injury, you shouldn't be able to be hopping back on the field immediately. You also have incentive to get them off as quickly as possible to start the timer and not waste time on the field. It's also why I said 3 minutes, potentially.Ive thought about that as well...ends up punishing players and teams with legit injuries needing treatment, which I don't like.
Nothing changes, other than having to sit out for 5 mins.
you take knocks that require quick treatment- it happens quite a bit. having to sit out longer than even a second than necessary is punishment- and in my mind will lead to defenders going in harder to inflict them.If you have a legit injury, you shouldn't be able to be hopping back on the field immediately. You also have incentive to get them off as quickly as possible to start the timer and not waste time on the field. It's also why I said 3 minutes, potentially.
There are bad hires, but this looks REALLY bad, especially when you couple it with a fight with your best player and a poor recordSomehow Eales and Boca keep coming out of this unscathed.
Eh... it's no different now IMO. No need to Americanize the sport. Just start giving yellows for obvious time wasting.
But we have decades of proof that this does not work. Refs have been empowered for ever to do this and it is absolutely useless and time wasting is as bad or worse today than it ever has been.Just start giving yellows for obvious time wasting.
The only ones that get booked for it seem to be keepers.But we have decades of proof that this does not work. Refs have been empowered for ever to do this and it is absolutely useless and time wasting is as bad or worse today than it ever has been.
Added time is a complete and total farce IMO. The refs don't even pretend to keep track of it accurately.
I agree and it is typically only on goal kicks too.The only ones that get booked for it seem to be keepers.
The US game against Canada really showed how silly the system is.Besides, its really only for injuries, goal celebrations, subs and obvious time wasting. Just kicking a ball up 20 rows for a throw doesn't add time.
Bookings happen on three types of occasions:The only ones that get booked for it seem to be keepers.
ETA - and players get booked for time wasting when they boot the ball away following a foul - this might be the most common example, and at least as often as a GK gets booked for delays during a goal-kick.Bookings happen on three types of occasions:
1. GK, during goal-kicks
2. Players during free kicks in the defensive end, many times this might also be a keeper. But, the situation is usually, one player (a defender) lines up a free kick, then gives way to the keeper (or other player) to take the kick.
3. Throw-ins - player takes forever to throw-in, almost always at the end of the game, in an obvious time wasting manner.
Bookings happen on three types of occasions:
1. GK, during goal-kicks
2. Players during free kicks in the defensive end, many times this might also be a keeper. But, the situation is usually, one player (a defender) lines up a free kick, then gives way to the keeper (or other player) to take the kick.
3. Throw-ins - player takes forever to throw-in, almost always at the end of the game, in an obvious time wasting manner.
This and keepers on long kicks are the ones I see most. Don't think I've seen a card given on a throw in in a long time, if ever.ETA - and players get booked for time wasting when they boot the ball away following a foul - this might be the most common example, and at least as often as a GK gets booked for delays during a goal-kick.
I am pretty sure I saw one at the Euros - but it was pretty blatant - first player picks up the ball, then decides to leave it for the 2nd player, who then takes an eternity before getting the card. (But I could be mis-remembering)This and keepers on long kicks are the ones I see most. Don't think I've seen a card given on a throw in in a long time, if ever.
Its possible. I didn't get to watch all the games or every min of each I did watch. Just don't recall seeing this happen.I am pretty sure I saw one at the Euros - but it was pretty blatant - first player picks up the ball, then decides to leave it for the 2nd player, who then takes an eternity before getting the card. (But I could be mis-remembering)
I am assuming this goes all the way back to youth soccer, where you learn to drop the ball, lest the referee think you are taking the throw-in.As a side note, I also never understood why a player drops the ball instead of tossing it to his teammate, even if not wasting time.
Peter Nowak is that you?NewlyRetired said:There are bad hires, but this looks REALLY bad, especially when you couple it with a fight with your best player and a poor record
==========
Doug McIntyre
@ByDougMcIntyre
Not only did ex-Atlanta United coach Gabriel Heinze deny players CBA-mandated days off, he limited the amount of water they could drink during preseason practices, forcing the club’s medical staff to intervene, multiple sources told @FOXSports
yikes! It sounds like Eales and Bocanegra may not have done enough due dilligenceNewlyRetired said:There are bad hires, but this looks REALLY bad, especially when you couple it with a fight with your best player and a poor record
==========
Doug McIntyre
@ByDougMcIntyre
Not only did ex-Atlanta United coach Gabriel Heinze deny players CBA-mandated days off, he limited the amount of water they could drink during preseason practices, forcing the club’s medical staff to intervene, multiple sources told @FOXSports
I agree with all of this. I honestly have given up on fighting to popularize Soccer in America. Only way most American's will get into it is if the US becomes a world power or wins a World Cup or 2 in the next 20 yrs. American's love to bandwagon off winners but will cut you the minute there is trouble. People are more interested in the US Mens Basketball team because of how good they are. Maybe if the US wins a World Cup and some other tourney's people will get more interested, follow certain players more etc.B Maverick said:
I hate all these possible changes, and yes GET OFF MY LAWN!
As I was listening to the discussion on the radio this morning this was my exact thought "No need to Americanize the sport". NBA, NFL, NHL all stop the clock and start with an hour of game time. And each game is 3-4 hours or more. One of the best aspects of watching soccer is 2 hours and done. Clock never stops, and added time. In college they stopped the clock, no added time, had the fans counting down. Absolutely hated it.
I think there are bigger things to fix first: Offside and Handballs. Diving. VAR to an extend (use it how its intended, as an assistant, not as the ref). Game time, action time, kick ins vs throw ins.... Not necessary changes.
Last I saw this was during a Toronto/PhI match where the TFC guy got booked for time wasting on a throw in. That was over 5 yrs ago though. However to be fair the time wasting was so blatant to the point if the Ref didn't call something the Lines Ref was about to call the main ref over to book the dude.B Maverick said:This and keepers on long kicks are the ones I see most. Don't think I've seen a card given on a throw in in a long time, if ever.
Throw in Specialists. That's all I can think of. When Sheanon Williams was playing LB/RB for us with the Union he had a rocket of a throw in arm that was almost like a corner closer to the OPP penalty area you got. He would take the throw ins close to the area on both sides of the pitch constantly especially end of matches. Union use to run plays like they were set pieces off the throw ins. I believe Conor Casey scored like 3 or 4 goals off these plays during his time in Philly.B Maverick said:Its possible. I didn't get to watch all the games or every min of each I did watch. Just don't recall seeing this happen.
Drives me nuts how long throw ins take in general (esp by Shaw and AWB) these days. As a side note, I also never understood why a player drops the ball instead of tossing it to his teammate, even if not wasting time.
As a Union fan and too any Union Supporter this sounds all too familiar to when Nowak got canned before the 2012 Euros and the accusations came out. There was allegations of denying water, spankings to players, running laps during hot days, time not being granted off for practices, hydration break denials etc. On top of that he was also our Sporting Director and there were claims he had a scout or agent that if Nowak transferred said South American player from this guy he got commission from them for getting the player.yikes! It sounds like Eales and Bocanegra may not have done enough due dilligence
==============
[Pablo Carrozza]: "They accuse Heinze of limiting the amount of water Atlanta United players could drink in practice and denying them days off. In Vélez there were soccer players with eating disorders, who went to sleep without dinner so as not to gain a gram. I saw it.