I assume you’ve seen them all before, right?Got the library movies today, so the next double feature will either be Rushmore + Moonrise Kingdom or Lost in Translation or Notorious + Vertigo.
I have not seen Notorious. Honestly not sure about MK either. I remember 0 about it if I did. Vertigo only once all the way through too, I believe.I assume you’ve seen them all before, right?
Notorious is the best HitchcockI have not seen Notorious. Honestly not sure about MK either. I remember 0 about it if I did. Vertigo only once all the way through too, I believe.
I couldn't make it that far.jamny said:The King of Staten Island was pretty good once you get past his dopey friends and onto the family.
I might need to try again. I got about 20mins in and was scared off by the Apatow run time on the movie.It was worth sticking with, imo.
I was close to bailing right about then but powered through.I might need to try again. I got about 20mins in and was scared off by the Apatow run time on the movie.
Weren’t into Grand Budapest Hotel either? That’s his best movie after Rushmore IMOLast night was the Wes Anderson double feature. I feel like I check in on Wes every few years or so to see if my opinion has changed on his non-Rushmore movies. Nope, not as of last night. Direction and the way his movies look are stunning in the later years, but I feel nothing watching them. (last night I watched Moonrise Kingdom).
Oh well, on to Hitchcock.
I tried when it first came out, but I don't think I got all the way through it. Maybe that will be the one I try in a couple years when I revisit a non-Rushmore Wes film again.Weren’t into Grand Budapest Hotel either? That’s his best movie after Rushmore IMO
Love that movie but Wes certainly has a particular aesthetic and sense of humor that's not for everyone.I tried when it first came out, but I don't think I got all the way through it. Maybe that will be the one I try in a couple years when I revisit a non-Rushmore Wes film again.
humor KP. math problem-Love that movie but Wes certainly has a particular aesthetic and sense of humor that's not for everyone.
Hey guy - I laughed my ### off at Paycheck the other night!humor KP. math problem-
I guess part of what I have been chasing is why Rushmore is so much different for me than his other movies. Is the humor that different, does he get more into the quirk spectrum as he goes?Love that movie but Wes certainly has a particular aesthetic and sense of humor that's not for everyone.
....tickticktick...Hey guy - I laughed my ### off at Paycheck the other night!
For me, I think the music sets Rushmore ahead of the rest. Wes Anderson always makes an effective use of music, but he peaked in Rushmore. When I think of Rushmore, the first things that come to my head are the scenes with A Quick One While He’s Away, Ooh La La, Concrete and Clay, etc.I guess part of what I have been chasing is why Rushmore is so much different for me than his other movies. Is the humor that different, does he get more into the quirk spectrum as he goes?
I would agree with all this. Hitchcock was very strange with his casting decisions. Vertigo had the same problem - the age difference.To Catch a Thief - Watched this last night for the first time. It was good not great. Cary Grant is always incredibly charming. But I didn't think the chemistry between him and Grace Kelly was great. Maybe it was the 25 year age difference. I think the story was also good, not great.
Isn't a bit of that a realistic reflection of how Hitch was in real life with his lead actresses?I would agree with all this. Hitchcock was very strange with his casting decisions. Vertigo had the same problem - the age difference.
I am a fan of this one as well, but it's pretty polarizing around these parts mostly based on how the viewer sees McCandless and what he was doing with his life.Into the Wild.
Phenominal. Fantastic. 17 out of 10 stars. I can't recommend this one enough.
If you haven't seen this, you're a bigger dipstick than me. Not since Big Fish have I been engrossed in a story like this.
The story, the performances, the scenery (Oh man! The scenery!), everything was just so so good.
Quite possibly the most spellbounding 2+ hours of my movie watching life.
Can't people just enjoy #### anymore.I am a fan of this one as well, but it's pretty polarizing around these parts mostly based on how the viewer sees McCandless and what he was doing with his life.
Yeah...I never got that as criticism for the movie- which was entertaining and a well told story.Can't people just enjoy #### anymore.I am a fan of this one as well, but it's pretty polarizing around these parts mostly based on how the viewer sees McCandless and what he was doing with his life.
I thin he's saying why get caught up in whether you agree or not with this kids choices and just watch/enjoy the movie.Not sure what you mean.
And really...if the kid's choices are affecting you that much, the movie has succeeded on another level- making you think and consider things beyond your own life, even if in opposition.I thin he's saying why get caught up in whether you agree or not with this kids choices and just watch/enjoy the movie.
Yes! Unfortunately today for most people it seems will just entrench them in their "position". Anyhoo, don't want to ruin this great thread with PSF junk...but yes you captured the intent of my initial post.And really...if the kid's choices are affecting you that much, the movie has succeeded on another level- making you think and consider things beyond your own life, even if in opposition.
I am a fan of this one as well, but it's pretty polarizing around these parts mostly based on how the viewer sees McCandless and what he was doing with his life.
Depends on what you mean by "enjoy". I thought Into The Wild was a pretty good movie. But the protagonist walks the line between hero and anti-hero.Can't people just enjoy #### anymore.
I thin he's saying why get caught up in whether you agree or not with this kids choices and just watch/enjoy the movie.
That's his character. Not sure why that would be different than any other movie where people don't click with the character and their enjoyment of the movie suffers because of it.And really...if the kid's choices are affecting you that much, the movie has succeeded on another level- making you think and consider things beyond your own life, even if in opposition.
What else do we bring to our viewing of movies and such besides our views and real life experiences and biases?Yes! Unfortunately today for most people it seems will just entrench them in their "position". Anyhoo, don't want to ruin this great thread with PSF junk...but yes you captured the intent of my initial post.
Yes, regardless if you agree or disagree with the choices of characters in a movie or the underlying message, if the film is well done and made you think...be happy. Not like we're talking about a movie glorifying nazi's or something.Depends on what you mean by "enjoy". I thought Into The Wild was a pretty good movie. But the protagonist walks the line between hero and anti-hero.
An open mind?What else do we bring to our viewing of movies and such besides our views and real life experiences and biases?
Well maybe "anti-hero" isn't the right term either. He's not Walter White or Tony Soprano, for example.Yes, regardless if you agree or disagree with the choices of characters in a movie or the underlying message, if the film is well done and made you think...be happy. Not like we're talking about a movie glorifying nazi's or something.
In this case its basically the whole premise of the movie, not like some woke message was stuck in the middle of Deadpool...friggin read the plot before you watch and if a kid making different life choices is going to set you off then don't watch.
It's been a while since I watched so maybe I'm misremembering but hard for me to consider him walking the line of "anti-hero". Misguided, different, naive, potentially selfish in ways....maybe all of those but not anti-hero for me.
To a point. We all like/dislike things, and a lot is based on our life experiences and views. I think it would a very rare person who could completely separate that and go in with a total blank and open mind. Again, that's one of the things I like most about talking to people about movies - how they interpret things differently than I do.An open mind?
In any wilderness Man vs Nature type movie...root for the bear.I would get that criticism more on a movie like Into the Wild where you are basically stuck with McCandless for the duration of the movies. It's not like Heat where you have 25 characters running around.
DiCaprio vs Bear in The Revenant...best man vs bear ever. Actually had me rooting for DiCaprio by the end lolIn any wilderness Man vs Nature type movie...root for the bear.
All good points.To a point. We all like/dislike things, and a lot is based on our life experiences and views. I think it would a very rare person who could completely separate that and go in with a total blank and open mind. Again, that's one of the things I like most about talking to people about movies - how they interpret things differently than I do.
Imo you are reading a bit too much into this, especially the bolded.Yes, regardless if you agree or disagree with the choices of characters in a movie or the underlying message, if the film is well done and made you think...be happy. Not like we're talking about a movie glorifying nazi's or something.
In this case its basically the whole premise of the movie, not like some woke message was stuck in the middle of Deadpool...friggin read the plot before you watch and if a kid making different life choices is going to set you off then don't watch.
It's been a while since I watched so maybe I'm misremembering but hard for me to consider him walking the line of "anti-hero". Misguided, different, naive, potentially selfish in ways....maybe all of those but not anti-hero for me.
Preach.y'know, i was just saying to someone the other day that we dont have enough didactic simplism in our culture threads. my lips to God's ears...
Something something keep politics outta here something something words words.Translate