Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

****OFFICIAL 2021 IN- SEASON DYNASTY TRADES****


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Ratbone said:

12 team PPR dynasty

Team A gave- Sterling Shepard and Marvin Jones

Team B gave- 2018 1st, probably 5-9. 

Shepard

11 hours ago, FreeBaGeL said:

12 team non-ppr that starts 2rb, 2wr, 1 flex so tends to be fairly RB heavy.

Gave: Mike Evans, DeMarco Murray

Got: 1.02 (Fournette), Dez Bryant

Evans Murray

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 team PPR QRRWWTFFDK TE 1.5 PPR

Team A gave 2018 1st (middle and from someone not involved)

Team B gave 1.10 OTC

Then Team A announced he is shopping the pick. So I did this:

I gave 2.03 and 2.11 

Team A gave 1.10 and 3.10

I took Hunt at 1.10. He took Zay Jones at 2.03. Njoku was on the board at 1.10 but I have Gronk, JT, Cook and need RB help pretty bad. Kamara and Perine had just come off at 1.08 and 1.09 so I didn't feel Hunt would make it back to 2.03. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 team non-PPR with IDPs - pretty standard scoring, but sack heavy (3 points per sack, with a point for the tackle itself) - start 1 qb, 1 rb, 2 wr, 2 flex, 1 te, 2 dbs, 2 lbs, and 2 dls

A gives Kenneth Dixon and the #32 rookie pick

B gives JJ Watt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, matttyl said:

10 team non-PPR with IDPs - pretty standard scoring, but sack heavy (3 points per sack, with a point for the tackle itself) - start 1 qb, 1 rb, 2 wr, 2 flex, 1 te, 2 dbs, 2 lbs, and 2 dls

A gives Kenneth Dixon and the #32 rookie pick

B gives JJ Watt

Wtf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ghostguy123 said:

Wait, if you get a point for a tackle, and 3 for a sack, how is that "sack heavy"?

Isn't the standard 2 points per sack since you're already getting 1 point for the tackle?  If a guy does the sack-fumble-recovery in our league (as the FF and FR are each worth 2 points) it's an 8 point play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, matttyl said:

Isn't the standard 2 points per sack since you're already getting 1 point for the tackle?  If a guy does the sack-fumble-recovery in our league (as the FF and FR are each worth 2 points) it's an 8 point play. 

Sacks don't register as tackles.  And 3 point for sacks is still a little light for a fully balanced leagues - mine are all 2 or 3 for a sack and we are nowhere near balanced as a result.  There are a lot of theologies out there, but I've seen big play/balanced scoring with sacks at 6-8.  That brings guys like Von Miller into the dominant territory they deserve.  Miller is currently very below average in my leagues - he's an LB3/4 at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hankmoody said:

Sacks don't register as tackles.  And 3 point for sacks is still a little light for a fully balanced leagues - mine are all 2 or 3 for a sack and we are nowhere near balanced as a result.  There are a lot of theologies out there, but I've seen big play/balanced scoring with sacks at 6-8.  That brings guys like Von Miller into the dominant territory they deserve.  Miller is currently very below average in my leagues - he's an LB3/4 at best.

Um, I'm pretty sure that this MFL league registers a sack as a tackle (as well as the obvious sack).  I'm not sure if that's standard or whatever, but that's how it's accounted for.  So if you have a DE that comes in just on third down and registers just two solo sacks - that's 8 points (3 points per each sack, and 1 point for each tackle which was a sack). 

Anyway, there is also a small 1 or 2 point bonus at that 2nd or 3rd sack, have to look aback through the scoring exactly. Regardless, in 2015 Watt scored 150.5 points and the next best DL (Carlos Dunlap) scored 109.5.  The top LB (L David) scored 171.  So the above Watt for Dixon trade above hinges on Watt returning to that form, or not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, matttyl said:

Isn't the standard 2 points per sack since you're already getting 1 point for the tackle?  If a guy does the sack-fumble-recovery in our league (as the FF and FR are each worth 2 points) it's an 8 point play. 

That is not a sack heavy league.  So never mind, I only read "sack heavy" when I originally responded, and the league is not sack heavy.

Still Watt

Edited by ghostguy123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hankmoody said:

Sacks don't register as tackles.  And 3 point for sacks is still a little light for a fully balanced leagues - mine are all 2 or 3 for a sack and we are nowhere near balanced as a result.  There are a lot of theologies out there, but I've seen big play/balanced scoring with sacks at 6-8.  That brings guys like Von Miller into the dominant territory they deserve.  Miller is currently very below average in my leagues - he's an LB3/4 at best.

When a player gets a sack they are also credited with a tackle on the play.  This is 100% fact.

I play in a sack heavy league....sack = 6 pts, tackle = 0.5 pt

Now that's sack heavy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dez said:

When a player gets a sack they are also credited with a tackle on the play.  This is 100% fact.

I play in a sack heavy league....sack = 6 pts, tackle = 0.5 pt

Now that's sack heavy.

Thanks for the clarification.  I wasn't fully aware of the terminology.  I was thinking that 2 points per sack, INT, forced fumble ore recovery was "standard", and that 3 would be "heavy".  Again, my bad.

So with all that - standard league, 10 teams, non-PPR.  Kenneth Dixon pretty much straight up for JJ Watt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FreeBaGeL said:

Docston has startup ADP in the 5th round and Perkins in the 9th.  Value-wise I think there was a clear winner here.  How it will actually work out is anyone's guess of course.

I would think Perkins would have slightly more value than Doctson considering where each stand right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JohnnyU said:

I would think Perkins would have slightly more value than Doctson considering where each stand right now.

WRs typically don't lose their starting positions like RBs do. And with Pryor only on a 1 year deal, seems Doctson has a clear path to starting now and for the foreseeable future IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CabinFever said:

WRs typically don't lose their starting positions like RBs do. And with Pryor only on a 1 year deal, seems Doctson has a clear path to starting now and for the foreseeable future IMO. 

I'll believe it when I see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ILUVBEER99 said:

big win for JuJu/1st side.  JuJu and Adams basically cancel out, so free 2018 1st.

I'm an Adam's owner and would probably take that haul for him, but no way do he and JuJu cancel out.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Protocols of Stringer Bell said:

Ffpc 

 

gave 

Keenan Allen

Fuller

1.1 

2.02

for

Antonio Brown

 

its a bunch to give but I also had 1.2 and some solid wr depth 

Brown for me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This one I believe was pretty even if anything most will take picks side based on Gronk's downfall as most people focus on recent events.  Non PPR TD heavy league (1 pt per 20 yards). Any picks taken 2nd round on can be placed on the taxi squad for up to 3 years.  Risky to take Gronk but hoping for 3-4 more year of a fairly healthy Gronk over the tier 2 rookies that might hit or miss.  Could see this trade going either way odds are in favor of the 8,9,17 hitting 1 to 2 guys and winning the deal but if Gronk is Gronk for 3 more years I will be ok with the deal.

I gave

8

9

17

Edelman

Funchess (Taxi squad)

for

Gronk

Edited by Dez
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gottabesweet changed the title to ****OFFICIAL 2021 IN- SEASON DYNASTY TRADES****

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
  • Create New...