ghostguy123
Footballguy
5,6,,2017 1st.12 Team ppr
Team 1 gave- 1.1 and Dwayne Allen
Team 2 gave 1.5,1.6 and 1st in 17. (probably 4-6 even with Elliot)
5,6,,2017 1st.12 Team ppr
Team 1 gave- 1.1 and Dwayne Allen
Team 2 gave 1.5,1.6 and 1st in 17. (probably 4-6 even with Elliot)
Think even with the 2017 first I lean the 1.01.12 Team ppr
Team 1 gave- 1.1 and Dwayne Allen
Team 2 gave 1.5,1.6 and 1st in 17. (probably 4-6 even with Elliot)
I never said that...You're looking at it wrong big time. If you are expecting more in return because one team is stronger but would accept the same deal for less from another team, then I have to tell you that is a warped mindset.
I think this trade puts me into the top 3 if I can avoid injuries/bad luck.Well, if you end up in the top 4 picks next year I could definitely see that having more long term value. But as it stands AB.
If it ends up being DGB, Coleman, Chubb/Fournette, I could see this being regretted 3 years down the line (especially if Big Ben retires) but for now, give me the best WR in football.
not terrible, I think the coleman owner couldve gotten a little more though12/ppr/2rb-3wr-flx
Freeman owner
gave 2.03
for
coleman/3.07
I like Landry a lot more than any 2 of those pieces, but that is a decent haul12 Team PPR Dynasty
Traded: Jarvis Landry
Received: Breshad Perriman, Matt Jones, 2.8, 2017 first, 2017 second
Landry best player in the deal but getting some nice young dart throws and a couple 2017 picks is a good haul for Landry, who may lose some targets to Parker, theorhetically.I like Landry a lot more than any 2 of those pieces, but that is a decent haul
I think you got a steal. Everyone values players different, but the only piece of those 4 that I'm interested in is Karlos, and he isn't worth a ton.12 team PPR - 20 man rosters in season, have to cut to 15 before our rookie draft
Give: DT, Graham, Dorsett, K.Williams
Get: Gronk
My rationale was I'm pretty loaded at WR (Jeffery, Cooks, Landry, Hilton) and really wanted to upgrade at TE...may have overpaid a bit but made sense with my roster
gronk by a lot unless this is 2013 and those other two guys are future rookie picks, then id take the other side12 team PPR - 20 man rosters in season, have to cut to 15 before our rookie draft
Give: DT, Graham, Dorsett, K.Williams
Get: Gronk
My rationale was I'm pretty loaded at WR (Jeffery, Cooks, Landry, Hilton) and really wanted to upgrade at TE...may have overpaid a bit but made sense with my roster
I think thats probably the cheapest I've seen Gronk go for in a while. Great job.12 team PPR - 20 man rosters in season, have to cut to 15 before our rookie draft
Give: DT, Graham, Dorsett, K.Williams
Get: Gronk
My rationale was I'm pretty loaded at WR (Jeffery, Cooks, Landry, Hilton) and really wanted to upgrade at TE...may have overpaid a bit but made sense with my roster
Ivory and 12 by far.10 team IDP league (start 1 qb, 1 rb, 2 wr, 2 flex, 1 te, 2 dl, 2 lbs, 2 dbs). Trade involving dudes with girl names.
A trades - Chris Ivory, Preston Brown, Stephone Anthony and the #12 pick (also owns Rawls, and has plenty of LB depth)
B trades - Christine Michael, Navarro Bowman (also owns Yeldon)
Bowman lead the NFL in tackles last year - he's no slouch.Ivory and 12 by far.
True, but good IDP's are a dime a dozen.Bowman lead the NFL in tackles last year - he's no slouch.
Tell that to JJ Watt and Kuechly. I own Watt, but I offered a first round rookie pick for Kuechly and was laughed at. I agree that LBs are a fairly easily replaceable position, especially in a 10 teamer - but Bowman is still a stud at his position, and may only get better with the fast paced offense SF is likely to use - meaning their defense will be on the field for more plays.True, but good IDP's are a dime a dozen.
Didn't notice it was a 10-teamer. Nickel a dozen.Tell that to JJ Watt and Kuechly. I own Watt, but I offered a first round rookie pick for Kuechly and was laughed at. I agree that LBs are a fairly easily replaceable position, especially in a 10 teamer - but Bowman is still a stud at his position, and may only get better with the fast paced offense SF is likely to use - meaning their defense will be on the field for more plays.
thats a hard statement to make without knowing how the scoring worksDidn't notice it was a 10-teamer. Nickel a dozen.
If you are Team A, you may want to decrease the value you place on IDP's.
I disagree. 10-team, start 2 LB's.thats a hard statement to make without knowing how the scoring works
Fair pointI disagree. 10-team, start 2 LB's.
Always seems like there are a few top-notch LB's that come out of nowhere every year.
Larceny.12 Team, 0.5 PPR, start 1/2/3/1
I give: Abdullah, Larry Fitzgerald, 1.12, 3.04
I get: Watkins, 2017 1st
Depending what the future first looks like i might do it without watkins.Damn, I'd have done that without the 2017 1st....
He's a Riddick injury away from being a top 5 back.i dont get the Abdullah hype
The guy only topped 50 rushing yards 3 times last year - never hit 80. They also brought in Ridley and still have Zenner.He's a Riddick injury away from being a top 5 back.
like, on his own team?Run It Up said:He's a Riddick injury away from being a top 5 back.
Ive seen the same flashes of talent everyone else has. He was pretty inefficient with the passing targets he had 25-39 183yd, 7.3 avg, 4th worst on the team, 2 of the ones who were worse were zenner and stafford (apparently he caught a ball once?)Run It Up said:He was a rookie, and who said anything about rushing yards? Riddick goes down and then Abdullah becomes a 3 down back.
2017 1stA traded - #9, #12, and #14
B traded - #22, #24, 2017 1st (likely top 5)
17 1st. I like McCoy but just too much value on the other side. Even if the pick is middle 4-8 I like it12 team PPR
Team A gets: McCoy/R.Randle/Gillmore
Team B gets: 2017 1st (projected 1-6), ASJ, 2.09
McCoy for ASJ + 2.9 is fair. That leaves a high 1st for Randle and Gillmore. It better be Sin City-era Rory Gilmore for that price.17 1st. I like McCoy but just too much value on the other side. Even if the pick is middle 4-8 I like it
I think Parker is overrated...however even with 1.5 TE I love the Parker side.Team A gets Devante Parker, WR
Team B gets Jacob Tamme, Vance McDonald TEs, and rookie 3.14 pick.
PPR with standard scoring mostly (TE 1.5, WR 1, RB .75).
I think Parker is overrated as well but he's worth way more than that price (which was basically nothing). Tamme is a 31 year old journeyman TE (that has scored 11 TDs in 8 seasons) and McDonald could have some upside in a Kelly offense but could just as easily take a backseat to Garrett Celek or Blake Bell.I think Parker is overrated...however even with 1.5 TE I love the Parker side.
just landed him in a trade today. Parker for Tamme, Vance McDonald, and 3.14 in a PPR standard scoring league.
still, ewTeam A gets Devante Parker, WR
Team B gets Jacob Tamme, Vance McDonald TEs, and rookie 3.14 pick.
PPR with standard scoring mostly (TE 1.5, WR 1, RB .75).
Nice deal12 team ppr (.75/1/1.25) QRRWWWTF K D 5pt PaTD
Gave: White/Conley
Got: Jeffery
2017 1st, unless in full on, window closing, "must win now or bust" mode.12 team PPR
Team A gets: McCoy/R.Randle/Gillmore
Team B gets: 2017 1st (projected 1-6), ASJ, 2.09
Jeffery.12 team ppr (.75/1/1.25) QRRWWWTF K D 5pt PaTD
Gave: White/Conley
Got: Jeffery
Unless it's a 50-team league, it's hard to imagine there aren't waiver wire TEs that could come close enough to Tamme or McDonald to make them expendable. Looks like getting Parker (a 2015 late 1st) for a 2016 3rd.Team A gets Devante Parker, WR
Team B gets Jacob Tamme, Vance McDonald TEs, and rookie 3.14 pick.
PPR with standard scoring mostly (TE 1.5, WR 1, RB .75).
The 2017 1st round hype is officially out of control. Two late 1's and an early 2 for a couple late 2's and a futur 1? Unless you've got too many 2016 picks/good rostered players than you know what to do with this is bizarro world.A traded - #9, #12, and #14
B traded - #22, #24, 2017 1st (likely top 5)
basically the way it worked out.Unless it's a 50-team league, it's hard to imagine there aren't waiver wire TEs that could come close enough to Tamme or McDonald to make them expendable. Looks like getting Parker (a 2015 late 1st) for a 2016 3rd.
I may take the 2017 1st if I felt like it was the last best offer or if my rookie draft started in 10 minutes, but otherwise no clue why this had to happen now.A traded - #9, #12, and #14
B traded - #22, #24, 2017 1st (likely top 5)