It's a dice roll until draft day but if Philly doesn't draft a QB this could be an absolute home run for Team B...not a big price to pay at all for a potential stud fantasy QB who won't be 23 until August...I would do this for Hurts because I feel if it is a worst case case scenario and Philly drafts a QB I still believe he will end up being a starting QB somewhere else and if you were to take one of the big 5 QBs at 1.9 (which is great value in a SF) there is a good chance they would not start right away, so when you look at it that way it calms the fear down even more (IMO)...ballsy move for both owners, that's for sure.FFPC SF not involved
Team A gave Hurts, 2.05, 4.05
Team B gave 1.09, 2.04, 3.06
If he is the QB then it's too cheap IMO. But an easy quick profit for sure.
Like your side by a decent amount.FFPC $500 Dynasty League
Traded:
RB, Cam Akers
WR, M. Brown
TE, Gerald Everett
Received:
RB, James Robinson
WR, Mike Evans
TE, Evan Engram
Roster clogger or not I was just offered Big Mike for my 3.05. I had the roster spot so I took the deal. Dude is a beast and while he is often plagued with nagging injuries (back, etc) I still think he can be a late career bloomer.I just traded Mike Williams away a few days ago as a part of a bigger deal because I was going to cut him. Other then Josh Gordon, who I once held for almost 7 years on a FFPC team, I would have to classify Mike Williams as the biggest roster drain on a team I've ever owned as I've had him sine he entered the league and don't think I've started him more then once or twice.
Agree with were your mind is on Cooper, I think he' s likely gone after this year and if he's not then Gallup will be. But I also own Gallup on an FFPC team and he's like Mike Williams to me in that it's a roster drain for what I assume is another year so I'd happily exit out for 2.6 and a future second.
Yeah that is pretty good. Late career bloomer is definitely in the range of outcomes, especially with Herbert there now. Future 2nd is an autoslam for me but at 3.05 I'm probably a buyer depending on room/team needs.Roster clogger or not I was just offered Big Mike for my 3.05. I had the roster spot so I took the deal. Dude is a beast and while he is often plagued with nagging injuries (back, etc) I still think he can be a late career bloomer.
Certainly possible, just can't seem to earn much of a target share and that bloom needs to happen fast as he'll be 27 next season. I do think 3.5 is a solid price to take a shot on if you got room. One of my few non-FFPC leagues is a 21 man roster and I'm holding him in that one.Roster clogger or not I was just offered Big Mike for my 3.05. I had the roster spot so I took the deal. Dude is a beast and while he is often plagued with nagging injuries (back, etc) I still think he can be a late career bloomer.
I shopped him around for a third before trading him and market was cold. Perhaps if/when Hunter Henry leaves that will lead to some belief he can pick up some of that target share and prop up his price a little.He is so much of a roster clogger to me that I don't even try to move him because I assume no one wants to buy
I would jump on this personally but depends on if you love Stafford in LA. I would say even a late pick swap of getting a 3rd back for a 5th or something would be good to wiggle something for name value.Just was offered 1.08 for Kupp in 0.5 PPR - thinking of pulling the trigger, but I want to ask for an extra 3rd on top. What's the general feeling on this one?
That is an interesting trade. Big price as I expect Mixon to have a bounce back year but I would say that probably isn't enough for 1.01.FFPC SF not involved:
Team A gives Mixon, Woods, 2022 2nd
Team B gives 1.01, Shenault
FFPC SF not involved:
Team A gives Mixon, Woods, 2022 2nd
Team B gives 1.01, Shenault
Claypool should be good with Juju gone for sure but I think I would take the chance with Reagor and 8 personally. I think 8 still gets you a really good WR or Pitts in standard league and Reagor still has a ton of upside even if it isn't on par with Claypool.12 team ppr QB / 2RB / 3WR / TE / FL
Team A gave up
Reagor, Jalen PHI WR;
Year 2021 Draft Pick 1.08;
Year 2021 Draft Pick 4.07
Team B gave up
Claypool, Chase PIT WR;
Year 2022 Round 4 Draft Pick
For better or worse,depending on how you want to look at it, he's been surprisingly available for most of the last 3 years. He makes those diving catches and seems to get banged up a lot.Just always missing time
I would take Claypool on this one. QB concerns are real but in terms of talent my opinions is he's in the Metcalf kind of neighborhood.12 team ppr QB / 2RB / 3WR / TE / FL
Team A gave up
Reagor, Jalen PHI WR;
Year 2021 Draft Pick 1.08;
Year 2021 Draft Pick 4.07
Team B gave up
Claypool, Chase PIT WR;
Year 2022 Round 4 Draft Pick
I'll be the lone dissenter here, but I'd keep Kupp unless I was in a full rebuild. That offense will be much more dynamic next year with Stafford and Akers, and Kupp is extremely reliable (I think I read he had PFF's second highest grade on third down - first was Davante Adams). Kupp had 92 catches last year, and didn't play week 17. It's not a stretch to see 100 catches, 1100 yards, and 8-10 TD's in that offense. Also, I believe he will age well since he doesn't rely heavily on speed in his game.Just was offered 1.08 for Kupp in 0.5 PPR - thinking of pulling the trigger, but I want to ask for an extra 3rd on top. What's the general feeling on this one?
I'll probably be in the minority again, but I like Akers here. I'm on record as saying that Akers will be a top 5 pick in 2022 redraft leagues. With Evans getting older and his role not super clear, I see Akers as the only superstar in this trade, so I'll take that side.FFPC $500 Dynasty League
Traded:
RB, Cam Akers
WR, M. Brown
TE, Gerald Everett
Received:
RB, James Robinson
WR, Mike Evans
TE, Evan Engram
Reagor at the 1.08 for me.12 team ppr QB / 2RB / 3WR / TE / FL
Team A gave up
Reagor, Jalen PHI WR;
Year 2021 Draft Pick 1.08;
Year 2021 Draft Pick 4.07
Team B gave up
Claypool, Chase PIT WR;
Year 2022 Round 4 Draft Pick
1.01 and Shenault pretty easily.FFPC SF not involved:
Team A gives Mixon, Woods, 2022 2nd
Team B gives 1.01, Shenault
That is an interesting trade. Big price as I expect Mixon to have a bounce back year but I would say that probably isn't enough for 1.01.
my bad I edited it - not SF just regular. I still think it's weird. If you want a WR I'd rather have Chase/Viska if you want RBs I'd rather have my top rookie and Viska. IDK.
12 team SF .5 PPR; not involved
C. Claypool and 1.12
for
A. Jones and 3.07
I suspect the Dolphins to go after Aaron Jones or draft a RB, Having said that, I would take Hamler in this deal, but I’m not that in love with him either.Not involved
.5 ppr
KJ Hamler
For
Myles Gaskin
I must admit I loved Tua last year, but somehow ended up with a lot of shares of Hurts. At this moment I prefer Hurts in that deal, but that could change over time.Superflex:
Team A: Gets Tua and 2021 2.12.
Team B: Gets Jalen Hurts.
I think a year from now this could easily be the Tua side. But I gotta go Hurts. If for no other reason than I can sell him in SF right now today for more than Tua and by a lot. Nobody wants Tua but he may be a great buy low right now.Superflex:
Team A: Gets Tua and 2021 2.12.
Team B: Gets Jalen Hurts.
Give me Gaskin...I think both will be fantasy role players so I'd rather have the RB.Not involved
.5 ppr
KJ Hamler
For
Myles Gaskin
Same, I ended up with a lot of hurts shares as well. I made the trade because I don't have any Tua exposure. My main qb's are Lamar and Kyler. I appreciate your reply.I must admit I loved Tua last year, but somehow ended up with a lot of shares of Hurts. At this moment I prefer Hurts in that deal, but that could change over time.
I’ll take the Waller side. Akers looked really good....for about 2 games late in the year. I’ll take a chance on one of the top 3 rbs in this class. Waller should continue to catch a lot of balls; hock could get an uptick in use and maybe has more years, so maybe closer to even. Hard to discern tier breaks but 1.07 looks like the area, prime spot to move back. Plus 2.09 and moss.This just went down in PPR
Team A gave Hockenson, Akers & 1.09
Team B gave Waller, Z. Moss, 2.09, 1.02 & 1.07
I can't come up with a good reason for the guy to deal Dak and get this back.Not involved, start 1QB:
Dak, N’Keal Harry, Dalton Schultz
for
Goff, Tua, Everett
I wonder which player was his target. Makes no sense in a start 1QB league.I can't come up with a good reason for the guy to deal Dak and get this back.
He does own Mahomes so Dak was his backup, but I was surprised as well.I can't come up with a good reason for the guy to deal Dak and get this back.
I can see wanting to trade a QB if you have two studs, it’s actually smart, but he got two marginal QBs back and a mediocre TE, so it’s not like he helped himself by dealing from strength.He does own Mahomes so Dak was his backup, but I was surprised as well.
Tua has some upside but best case scenario probably not as good or valuable as Dak. Everett could land in the best spot in the world and it wouldn't be that big of a deal would it? Try to imagine I didn't actually ask that. Yeah bizarre.Not involved, start 1QB:
Dak, N’Keal Harry, Dalton Schultz
for
Goff, Tua, Everett
I would actually think that's even less reason to be honest because you don't need the depth of two fringe QB's over one stud backup.He does own Mahomes so Dak was his backup, but I was surprised as well.
I wouldn't make the deal and don't think Tua has shown much of anything as a pro, but saying the best case for Tua isn't worth a 27 year old Dak seems a little too sure that 10 years of Tua can't possibly be worth more than the next 5 of Dak.Tua has some upside but best case scenario probably not as good or valuable as Dak. Everett could land in the best spot in the world and it wouldn't be that big of a deal would it? Try to imagine I didn't actually ask that. Yeah bizarre.
I think it’s pretty unlikely that it happens and part of this game is speculation.I wouldn't make the deal and don't think Tua has shown much of anything as a pro, but saying the best case for Tua isn't worth a 27 year old Dak seems a little too sure that 10 years of Tua can't possibly be worth more than the next 5 of Dak.
There can only be one reason...he thought it was a 2 QB league and pre-trade he only had 1 QB.I can't come up with a good reason for the guy to deal Dak and get this back.
I think I'm actually more in agreement with you than maybe you have inferred. There is no surety on my part regarding Tua. Large range of outcomes. Forced to make a decision I would go with my original take here but no I am not sure about it. I am sure I would ask for more for Dak and not take this deal.I wouldn't make the deal and don't think Tua has shown much of anything as a pro, but saying the best case for Tua isn't worth a 27 year old Dak seems a little too sure that 10 years of Tua can't possibly be worth more than the next 5 of Dak.